STATE TEST DATA SPRING 2012 Report to SSD School Board.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

Bethware Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
North Shelby School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Turning Point Grades Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Burns Middle School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
North Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Shelby Intermediate School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Fallston Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Casar Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Union Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Kings Mountain Middle School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular.
Newark Kids Count 2011 A City Profile of Child Well-Being Advocates for Children of New Jersey 35 Halsey Street Newark, NJ
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
From the Director DTC Training Spring Assessments, Accountability & Information Management.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
1 R-2 Report: Read and write at the end of third grade Review of Progress and Approval of Targets A presentation to the Board by Vince.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY Title I For additional information contact the school at
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated 2011 TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING.
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Bureau of Indian Education
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
Crestwood Elementary School Review of Data School Improvement Process October 26, 2009.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
LYSD and State AYP Comparisons. LYSD Schools Meeting AYP AYP LevelTitle 1 School Emmonak SchoolLevel 5 (1 st year meeting AYP)YES Marshall SchoolLevel.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
School Year. Unbridled Learning Next Generation Learners (100%) Next Generation Support (23%) Next Generation Professionals (10%) Next Generation.
Learning about testing: the SBAs and HSGQE Revised 2/16/2010.
1 Is the Achievement Gap in Indiana Narrowing? September 19,
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
December 2015 STATE OF SCHOOL REVIEW Everett Public Schools Compiled by the Center for Educational Effectiveness.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Alaska’s Education System A “Whistle Stop Tour” for Newcomers to Alaska.
English Language Arts Instructional Materials Presentation to the School Board - May 2016.
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Student Homelessness in NYC
Alaska School Performance Index Annual Measurable Objectives Results
Presentation transcript:

STATE TEST DATA SPRING 2012 Report to SSD School Board

Considerations  Annual Measurable Objectives are the same as last year:  Language Arts AMO: 82.88%  Math AMO: 74.57%  10 th grade HSGQE and SBA results are separated even though the test is the same  Subgroups require 25 students before results are shared AMO: Annual Measurable Objective – the percent of students that must be Proficient to meet AYP

Annual Yearly Progress (AYP)  Baranof/Keet Gooshi Heen Elementary Schools (Level 3) and REACH made AYP  Blatchley Middle School (Level 4)  Language Arts: Alaska Native, Low Income, and Special Education  Math: Alaska Native, Asian, Low Income, and Special Education  Sitka High School (Level 2)  Math: Alaska Native and Low Income  Pacific High School (Level 2)  Language Arts: >25  Math: >25 Level 1: Alert / Levels 2 & 3: School Improvement Status / Level 4: Corrective Actions

Standards Based Assessment (SBA)

SBA SSD Compared to State Reading % Proficient Except for a 2% difference in grade 9, a higher number of SSD students scored Proficient- Advanced in Reading than the number of students from around the state.

SBA SSD Compared to State Writing % Proficient Except for a 1- 2% difference in grades 6 and grade 9, a higher number of Sitka students scored Proficient- Advanced in Writing than the number of students from around the state.

SBA SSD Compared to State Math % Proficient A higher number of Sitka students scored Proficient- Advanced in Math at the elementary and 8 th grade level than the number of students from around the state.

SBA SSD Compared to State Science % Proficient Except for 10 th grade, a higher number of Sitka students scored Proficient- Advanced in Science than the number of students from around the state at all grade levels.

BES/KGH: SBA % Proficient/Advanced

BMS: SBA % Proficient/Advanced

SHS: SBA % Proficient/Advanced

SSD: SBA % Proficient/Advanced

: % Proficient/Advanced In all content areas, the same or a higher number of SSD students scored Proficient – Advanced than the number of SSD students from the previous year.

High School Graduation Qualifying Exam (HSGQE)

HSGQE SSD/Alaska: % Proficient In all areas, an equal or higher number of SSD 10 th grade students scored Proficient than 10 th grade students who were Proficient from around the state.

HSGQE: % Proficient

HSGQE: % Proficient In all areas, a higher %age of 10 th grade students scored Proficient in 2012 than the %age of 10 th grade students who scored Proficient in 2011.

HSGQE: Trend Data ( )

An Examination of Low Income Status and Academic Achievement During the 4-year period from 2009/10 to 2012/13, SSD showed an increase of 86 Low Income students

Low Income 2009/10 to 2012/13

National Center for Children in Poverty  Age 4: Children below poverty line are 18 months below peers, and gaps still present at 10 years old  3rd Grade:  Low-income/under-educated parents = 4,000 words  High-income/well-educated parents = 12,000 words  Not Stereotypical Families:  A significant number of families face economic hardships even if short-lived  Average low income parent is a single, working parent with 1-3 children  Low academic achievement is closely correlated with low income status

Low Income 2012

Low Income Trend (2006 to 2012) In SSD Low Income status is negatively impacting academic progress of our students, and the trend is increasing over time.

STATE TEST DATA SPRING 2012 Report to SSD School Board