David P. Taylor, MS 1,2, Nathan C. Hulse, PhD 1,2, Grant M. Wood 2, Peter J. Haug, MD 1,2, Marc S. Williams, MD 1,2 1 University of Utah, Salt Lake City,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Nursing Diagnosis: Definition
12-1 Chapter 12 Advanced EHR Functionality © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill.
1 Intermountain Healthcare Clinical Genetics Institute Marc S. Williams, M.D. Director Grant M. Wood Senior IT Strategist Introduction to HL7 Clinical.
Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Meaningful Use Stage I Core Objectives
Journey to a new beginning
Meaningful Use Basics.  Demographics  Active Medication List  Active Allergy List  Vitals  Smoking Status  Problem List  Computerized Physician/Provider.
ELTSS Alignment to Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap DRAFT: For Stakeholder Consideration in response to public comment.
Standard 3 Plan and Manage Care NCQA Recognition for Patient-Centered Medical Home 2011 Standards © Qualidigm.
Integrating Genomics into Clinical Practice Jan Dorman, PhD University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing
Maria A. Wamsley, MD Professor of Clinical Medicine UCSF School of Medicine.
Standard 2 Identify and Manage Populations NCQA Recognition for Patient-Centered Medical Home 2011 Standards © Qualidigm.
Lecture 6 Personal Health Record (Chapter 16)
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
Accessing Sources Of Evidence For Practice Introduction To Databases Karen Smith Department of Health Sciences University of York.
Arizona Department of Health Services and Rural Health Office Webinar Series: Issues in Rural Health Planning Community Health Assessment Overview Howard.
Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 9 Tests, Procedures, and Codes.
The Influence of Transportation and Access on the Well-Being of Older Adults William A. Satariano, Ph.D., MPH School of Public Health University of California,
ETIM-1 CSE 5810 CSE5810: Intro to Biomedical Informatics Mobile Computing to Impact Patient Health and Data Exchange and Statistical Analysis Presenter:
Redefining Personalized Medicine Dr. Scott Joy October 16, 2013.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
Genomics Alexandra Hayes. Genomics is the study of all the genes in a person, as well as the interactions of those genes with each other and a person’s.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
David P. Taylor, MS 1,2, Lisa A. Cannon-Albright, PhD 1, Randall W. Burt, MD 1,3, Jason P. Jones, PhD 1,2, Carol Sweeney, PhD 1, Marc S. Williams, MD 1,2,
Darren A. DeWalt, MD, MPH Division of General Internal Medicine Maihan B. Vu, Dr.PH, MPH Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention University.
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Registries: Clinical Perspective J. Marc Overhage, MD, PhD, FACP, FACMI Chief Medical Informatics Officer Siemens Health Services.
Approach and Key Components. The Goal of Cities for Life: To help community groups and primary care providers create an environment that facilitates and.
Margaret MacDougall 1, Liu Zhaobo 2 1. Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
HIT Policy Committee Quality Measures Workgroup October 28, 2010 Fred D Rachman, MD.
UNIT 5 SEMINAR.  According to your text, in an acute care setting, an electronic health record integrates electronic data from multiple clinical systems.
Components of HIV/AIDS Case Surveillance: Case Report Forms and Sources.
Chapter 6 – Data Handling and EPR. Electronic Health Record Systems: Government Initiatives and Public/Private Partnerships EHR is systematic collection.
Combining Structured Data and Connectivity to Serve Consumers Presentation by W. Gregory Feero, M.D., Ph.D. National Human Genome Research Institute March.
Acknowledgements Contact Information Objective An automated annotation tool was developed to assist human annotators in the efficient production of a high.
MedSearch Vaishnav Janardhan COMS E6125 Web-Enhanced Information Management.
System Changes and Interventions: Registry as a Clinical Practice Tool Mike Hindmarsh Improving Chronic Illness Care, a national program of the Robert.
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 6, 2014.
CHAPTER 28 Translation of Evidence into Nursing Practice: Evidence, Clinical practice guidelines and Automated Implementation Tools.
HIT Policy Committee METHODOLOGIC ISSUES Tiger Team Summary Helen Burstin National Quality Forum Jon White Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality October.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Report on Care Coordination Hearing David W. Bates, MD, MSc.
Personal Health Records. Personal health records (PHR): – Availability and utility increasing Important for patients and consumers Combine data and empower.
Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process
One view on integrating Genomics and Informatics into the Undergraduate Nursing Curriculum Prepared by Patti Brennan and Stephanie Gilbertson-White Presented.
PEHR ChartChart Claims Data Breadth and Depth Population Quality Measures.
Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care Recommendation 1: Public Awareness and Patient Education (Updated 2008)
Jan 2002 EDMA The central role of the Medical Laboratory in a World of Managed Health An EDMA presentation of the benefits of in vitro testing as a basis.
Uses of the NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network Jeffrey Brown, PhD for the DRN Team Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical.
Practice Transformation for Physicians and Health Care Teams
DEVELOPING A PERSONALLY CONTROLLED HEALTH RECORD (PCHR) USING MICROSOFT VISUAL C# SESSION 9 SUMMARY.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
Introduction to eHealth eHealth Workshop February 18-19, 2009.
The Holistic Approach to the Design and Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records: A Nursing Experience Frances Beadle, MSc Health Informatics Nurse.
“Personalized medicine and the electronic health record: family history as a starting point” W. Gregory Feero, M.D., Ph.D. National Human Genome Research.
Health Management Information Systems Consumer Health Informatics Lecture a This material Comp6_Unit8a was developed by Duke University, funded by the.
Functional EHR Systems
Research using Registries
Primary Care CMG Buttery MB, BS
Functional EHR Systems
The Capture of Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health in
Component 11 Unit 7: Building Order Sets
Presentation transcript:

David P. Taylor, MS 1,2, Nathan C. Hulse, PhD 1,2, Grant M. Wood 2, Peter J. Haug, MD 1,2, Marc S. Williams, MD 1,2 1 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; 2 Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT Ideal features for a patient-entered family history and risk assessment tool Methods A literature review on FH data collection and risk assessment was performed. A Web search was conducted to find common FH tools and related health risk assessment (HRA) tools. We documented and categorized features to compare them across tools. Internal team meetings were held to discuss ideal features and reach consensus. Conclusion The utility of current FH tools is limited by the lack of integration with EHRs, lack of data structure, and lack of automated decision support to generate specific clinical recommendations based on assessed risks. Through the application and evaluation of these ideal features in our FH initiative we hope to make important contributions to the research in this field. References 1.Yoon PW, Scheuner MT, Peterson-Oehlke KL, Gwinn M, Faucett A, Khoury MJ. Can Family History be Used as a Tool for Public Health and Preventive Medicine? Genetics in Medicine 2002; 4(4): Qureshi N, Wilson B, Santaguida P, et.al. Collection and Use of Cancer Family History in Primary Care. AHRQ Publication No. 08- E001, October Feero WG, Bigley MB, Brinner KM, et.al. New Standards and Enhanced Utility for Family Health History Information in the Electronic Health Record: An Update from the American Health Information Community's Family Health History Multi-Stakeholder Workgroup. JAMIA preprint, Accessed October 24, Introduction A patient’s FH is a risk factor for a variety of diseases including cardiovascular diseases, various cancers, and diabetes, and can be a powerful tool to identify individuals at risk, particularly in the absence of laboratory or genetic tests. 1 Time pressures limit clinicians’ ability to capture accurate and complete histories and the actions they should take based on the data may not be obvious. Patient self-reported FH data entered through a computer-based tool may potentially be incorporated into an EHR and provide more accurate and complete data for clinicians to act on via decision support tools. Despite these potential advantages, at least in primary care settings few FH tools have been developed and evaluated. 2 As part of an initiative to improve FH collection and related clinical decision support at Intermountain Healthcare, we determined that an exploration of the state-of-the- art was important in confirming our goals and guiding the implementation. 1 Capture Data 2 Assess Risk 3 Support Clinician Decision Making Future Questions to Explore How will social networking trends affect the collection of family medical history? How willing are relatives to share medical data electronically? How will genetic and family history data interact? Could family members’ EHR records be networked in order to calculate familial risk, but in a way that is sensitive to privacy? Family History Core Data Set Selected recommended elements from the American Health Information Community (AHIC) Personalized Health Care Workgroup (PHC) 3 : Relative name (first and last) Numeric identifiers for patient and relatives Age (Full DOB if possible, year at minimum) Age at death Cause of death Ethnicity/Race (self-defined) Biological sex Biological parents identified Consanguinity of parents of proband Disorders (in standard vocabulary to address diagnosis, age of onset, and multiple disorders) Sensitive fields (to indicate restricted access) Text box for annotations Ability to define data sharing status ● Web-based and requires less than 15 minutes to complete ● Preferably, linked to an EHR ● Captures data on at least 1 st and 2 nd degree relatives ● Able to import standards-based, machine readable family history (i.e., already completed previously) ● Based on standardized core data set (see lower left) but also captures context-specific data ● Able to save partial work and store online ● Visual tool to build family tree and health history, not just to display it ● Easy to search or select disorders. Definitions of disorders provided. ● Privacy and security are key considerations ● Collect relevant lab and behavioral data (if not available from EHR) ● Able to modify risk factors to see affects on risk in real time ● Comprehensively assess risk based on family history and behavioral data ● Download family history and assessment in human-readable and standards based machine-readable formats ● Utilize evidence-based models to assess risk ● Provide evidence references and lay-friendly background on how risk is calculated ● Use data from EHR (e.g., labs, vitals) if available in risk assessment ● Provide risk assessment immediately after data entry ● Print friendly view ● Able to import family history data and risk assessment to EHR. However, exclude unnecessary data (e.g., relative names) that may have privacy implications ● Automated notification to clinician of new or updated data ● Evidence-based and actionable recommendations for screening and next steps for care of patient (order sets if possible) ● Evidence references through Infobuttons Contact Information David Taylor ● Addresses disorders that are well-defined, where FH is an established risk factor, and where effective treatments exist. ● Ability to select more than one disorder per relative