CP1081584-1. Incidence of Cholangiocarcinoma Cumulative incidence of cholangiocarcinoma (%) Years since PSC diagnosis CP1042831-1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breast Cancer Patient Issues in Family Practice: An Interactive Session.
Advertisements

IVD Validation and Regulation in Rx/Dx Combinations
Lecture 3 Validity of screening and diagnostic tests
CT COLONOGRAPHY. CRC TRENDS  Incidence decreased by 7%  Mortality decreased by 20%  Five year survival rates increased by 12%
How do we delay disease progress once it has started?
Great Debates & Updates in GI Malignancies
Liver Transplantation for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Mary Douglas, RN, MSN,CCTC Clinical Transplant Coordinator University of Wisconsin- Madison.
Expression profiles for prognosis and prediction Laura J. Van ‘t Veer The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
Metastatic involvement (M) M0 - No metastases M1 - Metastases present.
Introduction of Cancer Molecular Epidemiology Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD University of California Los Angeles.
Detection of Mutations in EGFR in Circulating Lung-Cancer Cells Colin Reisterer and Nick Swenson S. Maheswaran et al. The New England Journal of Medicine.
Ayman Abdo MD, AmBIM, FRCPC
© Copyright 2003 Cardinal Health, Inc. or one of its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. PET in Breast Cancer Early detection of disease Precise Staging.
Eleni Galani Medical Oncologist
Update on 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose/Positron Emission Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography Imaging of Squamous Head and Neck.
Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) to Identify Genetic Changes in Fine Needle Biopsy of Lung Lesions Prepared by Jin Jen NCI.
Cholestatic liver diseases:
Case Report Patient PP Submitted by:Matthew Clower, MSIV Faculty:Sandra Oldham, MD Date:29 August 2007 Radiological Category:Principal Modality (1): Principal.
Diagnosing and Managing Cancers of the Liver and Bile Ducts Jeffrey S. Weinstein, MD Medical Director of Liver Transplantation Methodist Dallas Medical.
Role of Biomarkers in Management of Prostate Cancer Dr. Angela Amayo Specialist Pathologist 13 th April 2012.
PANCREATIC CANCER.
Interpreting Your Liver Test Results Sumeet Asrani MD MSc Hepatologist Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas April 2015.
PET in Colorectal Cancer. Indications for FDG PET Rising marker, (-) CT/MRI Nonspecific findings on CT/MRI, recurrence or post treatment changes? Known.
PSC and ERCP Paul R. Tarnasky, M.D. Methodist Digestive Institute Methodist Dallas Medical Center.
11th Biennial Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society 11th Biennial Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society Semih Gorgulu,
Changes in Breast Cancer Reports After Second Opinion Dr. Vicente Marco Department of Pathology Hospital Quiron Barcelona. Spain.
Introduction: It is the classic hepatobiliary manifestation of IBS. It is generally chronic progressive. Frequently present with asymptomatic, anicteric.
New Oslo PSC biobank.  Broad consent – covers all clinical and research biobanking  Integrated storage of clinical data and biological material  DNA,
Cytologic and DNA- Cytometric Early Diagnosis of Oral Cancer Torsten W. Remmerbach, Horst Weidenbach, Natalja Pomjanski, Kristiane Knops, Stefanie Mathes,
 Volunteer bias  Lead time bias  Length bias  Stage migration bias  Pseudodisease.
Grading And Staging Grading is based on the microscopic features of the cells which compose a tumor and is specific for the tumor type. Staging is based.
1 Differential Diagnosis of Neoplastic Pancreatic Cysts: The Role of EUS with Guided FNA E.M.Santo,Y.Ron,O.Barkay,Y.Kopelman,M.Leshno,S.Marmor Dep. of.
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene family aberrations in cholangiocarcinoma Katsuyuki Miyabe, MD, PhD Lewis R. Roberts, MB ChB, PhD.
Cancer Accelerated Biology. Learning Objectives The different methods of diagnosing cancer. The difference between a malignant tumor and a benign tumor.
Preoperative staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by dual-modality PET/CT. DR SIKANDAR YASHODA HOSPITALS HYDERABAD.
Annals of Oncology 23: 298–304, 2012 종양혈액내과 R4 김태영 / prof. 김시영.
EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction : results of a prospective, single-blind, comparative study.
간담도 암에서의 PET 의 활용 핵의학과 홍일기. 18 F-FDG PET: Warburg effect.
심 재 준심 재 준 Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:
Malignant Pleural Effusion
“Interpreting Your Test Results”
KV Narayanan Menon, MD, FRCP, FAASLD
RADICAL WHIPPLE`S PANCREATODUODENECTOMY FOR CHRONIC PANCREATITIS
FISH of urothelial cells
Fig. 1. EGFR content as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemical staining. FISH was performed with the EGFR ( red.
Sensitivity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Sampling Modalities with Electromagnetic Navigational Bronchoscopy & Effect of Radial EBUS on Yield Deepankar.
Role of ERCP in patients with PSC
Cholangiocarcinoma Tamar Taddei, MD.
Patient Case 1 Patient Case 1: PET/CT Scan.
Chapter 14 Hepatic Tumors, Malignant 1
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Orthotopic liver transplant, recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis
Volume 145, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Biliary Stricture and Negative Cytology: What Next?
Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor
The Development of a Multitarget, Multicolor Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Assay for the Detection of Urothelial Carcinoma in Urine  Irina A. Sokolova,
Circulating Tumor DNA Identifies EGFR Coamplification as a Mechanism of Resistance to Crizotinib in a Patient with Advanced MET-Amplified Lung Adenocarcinoma 
Liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis
Tissue Yield and Diagnostic Efficacy of Fluoroscopic and Cholangioscopic Techniques to Assess Indeterminate Biliary Strictures  Douglas J. Hartman, Adam.
Volume 136, Issue 7, Pages (June 2009)
BRAF amplification causes clinical acquired resistance to combined RAF/EGFR inhibition. BRAF amplification causes clinical acquired resistance to combined.
Cholangiocarcinoma Gastroenterology
Georgios I. Papachristou, Thomas C. Smyrk, Todd H. Baron 
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Molecular heterogeneity can drive mixed response and treatment failure in EGC. A, PET images from Patient #4 obtained before treatment and upon disease.
A prospective comparison of digital image analysis and routine cytology for the identification of malignancy in biliary tract strictures  Todd H Baron,
Decision-Making Analysis for Surveillance
ERCP for the Diagnosis and Management of PSC
Waxing and Waning of MET Amplification in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC in Response to the Presence and Absence of Erlotinib Selection Pressure  Joel P. Womack,
Circulating Tumor DNA Identifies EGFR Coamplification as a Mechanism of Resistance to Crizotinib in a Patient with Advanced MET-Amplified Lung Adenocarcinoma 
Presentation transcript:

CP

Incidence of Cholangiocarcinoma Cumulative incidence of cholangiocarcinoma (%) Years since PSC diagnosis CP

Relationship Between the Natural History of a Disease and Effective Screening CP Biologic onset Early clinical diagnosis Usual clinical diagnosis Ineffective therapy Effective therapy

CP

ROC for CA 19-9 in Identifying Cholangiocarcinoma in PSC Sensitivity 1-specificity CA 19-9>100 Sensitivity75% Specificity80% CP Chalasani et al: Hepatology 31:7-11,

Performance for Routine Cytology Interpretation Harewood et al Am J Gastro, 2004

CP Advances in Diagnostic Modalities

Digital Image Analysis Improves the Diagnostic Yield of Brush Cytology Feulgen dye to stain DNA Employs computer-assisted technology to assess DNA content of cells Quantitates ploidy at the single cell level Aneuploidy = malignancy Feulgen dye to stain DNA Employs computer-assisted technology to assess DNA content of cells Quantitates ploidy at the single cell level Aneuploidy = malignancy

Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Fluorescent hybridization oligonucleotides chromosome 3 chromosome 17 chromosome 7 locus 9p21 Fluorescent hybridization oligonucleotides chromosome 3 chromosome 17 chromosome 7 locus 9p21

Prospective Study of DIA vs Brush Cytology CP Consecutive patients with bile duct strictures (n=97) Classification of benign vs malignant Surgical specimens Follow-up Consecutive patients with bile duct strictures (n=97) Classification of benign vs malignant Surgical specimens Follow-up

CytologyDIAFISH Percent N=130, 69 malignant and 61 benign Sensitivity and Specific of Cytology, DIA, and FISH for Malignant Biliary Strictures for Malignant Biliary Strictures

FISH Polysomy of 2 or more chromosomes = cholangiocarcinoma Trisomy of chromosome 7 can be observed without cholangiocarcinoma - 50% no cancer - ? Early marker of neoplasia Polysomy of 2 or more chromosomes = cholangiocarcinoma Trisomy of chromosome 7 can be observed without cholangiocarcinoma - 50% no cancer - ? Early marker of neoplasia

CEP7/EGFR Probe CEP7=Green EGFR=Red PROBES

Hypothesis CP Trisomy 7 EGFR amplification Growth advance Cancer EGFR inhibition

PSC Screening? ERCP with cytology for FISH (1-2 years) Trisomy 7 ? Chemoprevention EGFR Inhibitor

Position Emission Tomography (PET) ? Cholangiocarcinoma

Utility of PET scanning in cholangiocarcinoma (n=21) Primary tumor sensitivity 92% specificity 93% Metastases sensitivity 15% Primary tumor sensitivity 92% specificity 93% Metastases sensitivity 15% Kluge, et al, Hepatololgy, 2001

Initial Diagnosis of Symptomatic PSC CP Brushings/biopsies DIA FISH Brushings/biopsies DIA FISH PET scan Serum CA 19-9 PSC ? ?

Evaluation of Indeterminate Stricture CP Pathology (DIA, FISH) Postive Negative CA 19-9 >100 U/mL Treat as malignant >100 U/mL Treat as malignant <100 U/mL MRI + feredex Suspicious Negative PET

Cholangiocarcinoma Incidence Risk factors Diagnosis Staging Treatment Incidence Risk factors Diagnosis Staging Treatment

Staging Cholangiocarcinoma Periductal Extension Staging Cholangiocarcinoma Periductal Extension CP Submucosal tumor

Staging of Cholangiocarcinoma CP MR studies Cholangiogram Feredex Angiogram EUS FNA of lymph nodes MR studies Cholangiogram Feredex Angiogram EUS FNA of lymph nodes

Feredex MR CP Feredex Fe based Kupffer cells  signal on MR Allows visualizaton of bile duct tumors Feredex Fe based Kupffer cells  signal on MR Allows visualizaton of bile duct tumors

Endoscope CP EUS and Staging Cholangiocarcinoma Lymph node metastasis

Lymph Node

Utility of EUS in the Staging of Cholangiocarcinoma CP patients Operative candidates Negative CT scans for nodal metastases EUS with FNA Positive in 17% 30 patients Operative candidates Negative CT scans for nodal metastases EUS with FNA Positive in 17%

Cholangiocarcinoma Incidence Risk factors Diagnosis Staging Treatment Incidence Risk factors Diagnosis Staging Treatment

Surgical Resction for Cholangiocarcinoma

Survival Following Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma CP Survival rate (%) Time (yr) Rea et al: Archives of Surgery 139:54, 2004

Liver Transplantation for Cholangiocarcinoma

Liver Transplantation for Hepatobiliary Malignancy in PSC CP Survival probability Years post-transplantation No HB-malignancy HCC GBC CCA n=192 n=9 n=4 n=17 Brandsaeter et al: J Hept 40:815, 2004

CP Criteria for LTx Unresectable, perihilar Mass if present <3 cm If PSC, any ductal tumor <3 cm

Diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma Cytology - routine cytology, positive DIA, or positive FISH Malignant appearing stricture with CA-19 > 100 U/L in the absence of cholangitis Cytology - routine cytology, positive DIA, or positive FISH Malignant appearing stricture with CA-19 > 100 U/L in the absence of cholangitis

CP Treatment Protocol External beam radiation therapy Brachytherapy Capecitabine Abdominal exploration for staging Liver transplantation External beam radiation therapy Brachytherapy Capecitabine Abdominal exploration for staging Liver transplantation

CP CP RESULTS patients 4 deaths 4 disease progression 5 awaiting transplantation 57 staging operation 14 positive 38 liver transplantation Irradiation + 5-FU 7 deaths 6 waiting for lap 31 Alive

Patient Demographics at Enrollment into Protocol CharacteristicTransplanted (n=38) (+) staging lap. (n=14) Age45 Male: Female28:108:6 PSC29 (76%)11 (78%) IBD10 (26%)7 (50%) Cirrhosis12 (31%)6 (43%) CA 19-9  (34%)6 (43%) CA 19-9 >1003 (8%)4 (14%)

PATIENT SURVIVAL AFTER TRANSPLANTATION

CP Patient Survival Survival (%) Survival (%) Years OLT No OLT

CP Cause of Death Recurrent CCA4 Sudden death1 Complications following LDLT2 HAT, retransplant, bile leak, sepsis, MOF Bile leak, sepsis Recurrent CCA4 Sudden death1 Complications following LDLT2 HAT, retransplant, bile leak, sepsis, MOF Bile leak, sepsis

Rationale for Screening PSC Patients for Cholangiocarcinoma CP Biologic onset Early Dx: ERCP + RC/FISH/DIA Usual clinical diagnosis Ineffective therapy ? EGFR inhibition ? EGFR inhibition Liver Tx ? EGFR inhibition ? EGFR inhibition Liver Tx

CP

North Dakota Beer Cooler