EngageNY.org Traditional vs. CCSS Approaches to Canonical Texts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
All images © Mat Wright Role of English in the Development of World Class Universities Mark Baumfield Senior Adviser Education.
Advertisements

Research Lessons from Module 4: Secondary
Argument Writing Introduction
Principals Session: Introduction to NTI Goals and Session Framework for Principals EngageNY.org.
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Scaffolding to Rigor in High School English Language Arts
June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
EngageNY.org Orientation to the NY Curriculum Modules.
Orientation to the NY Curriculum Modules. 2 Live NTI We will be live tweeting throughout the week! Follow us:
EngageNY.org Approaching Research in the NY Curriculum Modules.
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
EngageNY.org Network Teams Institute May 15-16, 2013 Math Assessment Session.
EngageNY.org Principals’ Session: Addressing School Realities.
Supporting Module Implementation: Leading Change
EngageNY.org What Can Kids Do? Raising Expectations for Research Session 1, May 2014 NTI.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices March 27, April 23, April 30, May 7 Session One: Modules 1 & 2 Session Two:
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 1.Complexity: Regular practice with complex text and its academic language. 2.Evidence:
EngageNY.org Introduction to the Curriculum Materials Digging Into the Modules.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
Laying the Foundation: Using CCLS Aligned Materials.
EngageNY.org Identifying CCSS-Aligned Instruction Recognizing Effective Instructional Practices.
EngageNY.org Traditional vs. CCSS Approaches to Canonical Texts.
EngageNY.org Structures and Systems Homework, Annotation, and Accountable Independent Reading.
Understanding the Core Proficiencies Units Implementing the CCSS with Fidelity EngageNY.org.
ELA Common Core State Standards Job Alike #8 Assessment.
Approaching Writing in the NY Curriculum Modules EngageNY.org.
Classroom Discussions: Math Discourse in Action
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Bridge to Practice Reflection As a review from the last PLC session, discuss your.
EngageNY.org Principals’ Session: Addressing Rigor in Writing Instruction.
Aligning Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessments
EngageNY.org Principals’ Session: Identifying CCSS Aligned Instruction in Writing.
PCG Education Helping Florida Schools and Districts Successfully Transition to the Florida Standards Palm Beach Charter School Administrators.
EngageNY.org Principals’ Session: Planning for Improved ELA Learning.
SPRING 2012 UPDATE Common Core Standards. The headlines “Common Core Raises PD Opportunities, Questions,” Teacher PD Sourcebook, Spring 2012 “Common Core.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
© TNTP 2014 March Principal Training. / 2 Do Now Reflect on your progress from the last session: How successful were you in supporting a teacher to identify.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Standards, Instructional Moves and Student Engagement.
Instructional Leadership and the Iowa Core ELA Standards Great Prairie AEA Burlington: April 9, 2013 Ottumwa: April 16, 2013.
EngageNY.org Providing Feedback and Support. Purpose of this Session Participants will be able to  Identify the various settings for teachers and leaders.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
May 14, May 21, or June 4 Lisa Arneson, Literacy Curriculum Specialist Julee Dredske, Curriculum Specialist/Title III 1.
Prepared by Joseph D. Cantara- Counsultant 1 Curriculum Mapping: A Road Map for The Common Core Standards: Session #2 The work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs: Presented.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
EngageNY.org Principals’ Session Approaching Argument Writing: Module 9.4.
Laying the Foundation: Using the NY Curriculum Modules as a Foundation for CCSS-aligned Instruction.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 3.
Denver Public Schools Understanding the Revised Framework.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
Leaders Critique Curriculum ELA Lessons and Units.
CAPS: COACHING TEACHERS Facilitator: Dr. Lynne Paradis BELIZE LITERACY PROGRAM June 2011.
New to NTI: Understanding the EBC Unit Implementing the CCSS with Fidelity EngageNY.org.
Prenatal to 3 rd Grade Alignment & School Readiness PSESD EL Center Directors February 27, 2014.
Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) – A Teacher Tool for Implementing the CCSS AGENDA October 4 th and 5 th 2012 Outcomes: Self- reflections on how the.
» Please grab the packet and read the article, “The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom.” » Take 4 Sticky Notes and label.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Leadership Presentation Title
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
The Year of Core Instruction
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Shifting the Paradigm: A Standards-Based approach to Fiction
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Reading Closely For Textual Details
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
111E: Shifting the Paradigm: A Standards-Based Approach to Fiction (K-5) July 2015.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Presentation transcript:

EngageNY.org Traditional vs. CCSS Approaches to Canonical Texts

EngageNY.org Identifying CCSS-Aligned Instruction Recognizing Effective Instructional Practices

Purpose of this Session Participants will be able to:  Distinguish between traditional approaches to canonical texts and a CCSS treatment of those texts  Use NY ELA curriculum materials to approach canonical texts differently EngageNY.org3

Purpose of this Session Participants will be able to  Identify instructional decisions that are consistent with effective implementation of the NY ELA Modules.  Support the use of Evidence Guides as a tool to identify CCSS-aligned practices in the ELA classroom.  Recognize closely aligned instructional practices within ELA 9.1 lessons.  Detect “red flags” in teacher and student practices that do not align with the Common Core. EngageNY.org4

Discussion: Read the quote below. Do you agree or disagree? Discuss at your table. “Learning new ways of teaching and leading will be critical. However, unlearning old habits will pose the greatest challenge to school leaders.” Dr. Mel Riddile, NASSP EngageNY.org 5

6 Surfacing Approaches to Canonical Texts In pairs, surface traditional approaches to teaching canonical texts:  What are some of the ways you have taught or seen canonical texts taught traditionally? In your table groups, discuss the following questions:  What are the opportunities and potential pitfalls of teaching canonical texts?  How can teachers’ preconceived schema impede students’ ability to experience texts?

Developing Expectations for Instructional Practice EngageNY.org7

Importance of Shared Vision for Classroom Lessons Common language and understanding of the instructional shifts inherent in the CCSS is critical:  Creating a common language to ensure clear communication  Establishing a clear and well defined, shared vision of the expectations for CCSS-aligned instruction  Understanding the instructional shifts inherent in the CCSS EngageNY.org8

Key Components of CCSS- Aligned Lesson – Teacher Text at Center of Lesson Time spent engaged with text Questions & tasks text- dependent Evidence and precision expected EngageNY.org9

Key Components of CCSS- Aligned Lesson – Student EngageNY.org10 Persist in efforts when engaged with complex texts Construct meaning collaboratively Support answers with textual evidence Transfer learning to new experiences - deeper understanding

How the NY Curriculum Modules Approach Canonical Texts Read Module 9.1 Unit 3 Overview, focusing on the following:  Introduction  Assessed Standards (indicated in bold)  Unit Assessments (mid-unit and end of unit)  Lesson Summaries In your table groups, discuss the following:  What do you notice about NY’s approach to teaching Romeo and Juliet?  How does this approach differ from traditional approaches to teaching canonical texts? EngageNY.org11

Exploring Romeo and Juliet In pairs, review Lesson 7 of Romeo and Juliet. Using the Evidence Guide, highlight CCSS- aligned practices found within the lesson. Identify CCSS-aligned instructional practices that can be observed during a walkthrough, which will ensure effective implementation of the lesson. EngageNY.org12

Red Flags: Signs of Non-Alignment EngageNY.org13 Romeo and Juliet has been taught in high school for decades in a traditional, non-CCSS aligned format. Changing long standing instructional practices are inherently difficult as instructional decisions may be based on practices of habit rather than instructional intent.

Talk About It! Discuss in table groups: What types of instructional practices could be present in Lesson 7 that would be red flags indicating the lesson is not well aligned to the module? (Old instructional habits) EngageNY.org14

From the Student Lens Revisit Lesson 7. Using the Evidence Guide, highlight Core Area 3 focusing on student practices that should be observed during the lesson. What student actions should be observed during the lesson to ensure all students are actively engaged in an aligned lesson? What “red flags” would be present in the classroom if the lesson was not aligned? EngageNY.org15

Talk About It! After diving into the module to assess CCSS- aligned practices, reflect on the following:  How did digging into the lesson affirm your understanding of the strong connection between the ELA Module 9.1 and the Evidence Guide indicators?  Why would this activity be important as you assess “traditional” ELA lessons?  How can you message to staff the importance of effectively implementing the unit? EngageNY.org16

Implications for School Leaders Key Components for School Wide Implementation:  Common Understanding of Expectations  Alignment of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessments  Strong Leadership  Resources and Structures Supporting Implementation EngageNY.org17

Discussion and Reflection What opportunities exist for the use of the ELA Evidence Guide in assessing level of implementation of Module 9.1? What are the major challenges and opportunities? What additional supports will you or your staff need in order to feel successful with this work? EngageNY.org18

Other things to consider… Variety of modes to deliver content… Common Core Standard 7 EngageNY.org19

Comparing Two Mediums EngageNY.org20

Q & A EngageNY.org21