MACOORA + MARCOOS = MARACOOS 5 IOOS Subsystems. NOAA press release announces MARACOOS HFR Network Operational in USCG SAROPS U.S. Department of Commerce.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 18, Breakthroughs in Healthcare Workforce Development Transforming Public/Private Partnerships.
Advertisements

Pathways: An Alternate Route to Graduation December 1, 2010.
WECC/TEPPC Response to DOE Funding Opportunity Status Update June 29, 2009 Bradley Nickell Renewable Integration and Planning Director.
/4/2010 Box and Whisker Plots Objective: Learn how to read and draw box and whisker plots Starter: Order these numbers.
1 Any views expressed related to procedural or explanatory material are those of the author and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Copyright © 2010 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Washington 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation February 2011.
Number Theory Click to begin. Click here for Final Jeopardy.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
National HF Radar Technical Steering Team Meeting: July 19-20, 2011 Steering Team members Project Manager: Jack Harlan, NOAA IOOS Federal Partners: Bill.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S.A.F. 1 Commodity Councils 101 NAME (S) SAF/AQCDATE.
A-16 Portfolio Management Implementation Plan Update
Accuracy of Capital Project Cost Estimates Proposed Final Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee September 23, 2009 Mark Fleming, JLARC Staff.
FAFSA on the Web Preview Presentation December 2013.
Commonwealth Connector Minimum Pharmacy Standards October 11, 2007.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool 1. Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool Session structure Introduction About the tool Using the tool Supporting materials.
Budget Advisory Committee, September 16 th, 2011 FY11/12 SUNY ONEONTA STATE PURPOSES BUDGET UPDATE.
Urban Transportation Council Green Guide for Roads Task Force TAC 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition Vancouver.
U.S. IOOS ® Briefing for RDML Glang Suzanne Skelley, CAPT Scott Kuester, & Jen Rhoades US IOOS Program Office 1.
Existing Mid-Atlantic Sub-regional Observing Systems LEO.
Phased Deployment and Operation of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Coastal Ocean Observing System (MARCOOS) Project Duration: 3 years; currently starting year.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay Larry Atkinson Teresa Garner Jose Blanco.
-101 MACOORA Annual Meeting October 22-23, 2008 Dartmouth, Massachusetts Presenters: Scott Glenn & Josh Kohut.
Success Stories – Making a Difference Optimizing HF Radar for SAR using USCG Surface Drifters Art Allen U.S. Coast Guard Josh Kohut, Scott Glenn Rutgers.
Success Stories – Making a Difference Optimizing HF Radar for SAR using USCG Surface Drifters Art Allen U.S. Coast Guard Josh Kohut, Scott Glenn Rutgers.
National Science Foundation Ocean Observing Initiative Cyber Infrastructure Implementing Organization Observing System Simulation Experiment NSF OOI CI.
Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras: ~1000 km Coastline Results from the Mid Atlantic High Frequency Radar Network Hugh Roarty, Ethan Handel, Erick Rivera, Josh.
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Demonstration Project Ports of Los Angeles/Long Beach Julie Thomas Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing.
Welcome MACOORA Annual Meeting October 22-23, 2008 Fall River, Massachusetts Carolyn Thoroughgood.
GCOOS HF Radar Gap Analysis Version 1.0, 27 June 2008 Key Authors –Stephan Howden, USM –Nick Shay, UM –Ann Jochens, TAMU Consulted with –GCOOS-RA Board.
Remote Currents: HF Radar QA/QC and Standards Jack Harlan National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services QARTOD
The Gulf of Maine Ocean Observing System. Technical Program Real time monitoring and forecasts of: Weather - surface ocean winds, air temperature, visibility.
NOAA Navigation Services CO-OPS Update Richard Edwing National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services Hydrographic Services.
Cape Cod Cape Hatteras NJ MA CT VA DE NY NC RI MD PA M ID - A TLANTIC R EGIONAL A SSOCIATION C OASTAL O CEAN O BSERVING S YSTEM 1000 km Cape to Cape RAISING.
National High Frequency Radar Network Jack Harlan, Ph. D. NOAA IOOS Program Office Project Manager: HF Radar DHS Training 21 Apr 2010 Washington, DC.
Ligurian Sea Mid-Atlantic Bight Results from the Mid Atlantic High Frequency Radar Network Radar Network Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn, Josh Kohut, Erick Rivera,
Super-Regional Modeling Testbed to Improve Forecasts of Environmental Processes for the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Coasts Super-Regional Modeling.
U.S. IOOS ® HF Radar Network 10 Years of Experience Measuring Ocean Surface Currents Jack Harlan, Ph.D. U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS ®
Surface Current Mapping with High Frequency RADAR.
MACOORA The Mid-Atlantic Coastal Ocean Observing Regional Association Annual Membership Meeting and Luncheon Address October 28, 2010 Carolyn.
IOOS National HF Radar Update Jack Harlan IOOS National HF Radar Project Manager GCOOS Annual Meeting September 2012 Corpus Christi.
Josie Quintrell, NFRA Executive Director October, 2010 MACOORA Board Meeting.
Creating a national plan for the regional contribution to National ICOOS.
Northeastern Regional Association of Coastal Ocean Observing Systems MARACOOS.
AWIPS-2 HF Radar Sea-Surface Current Product By Ross Van Til Contributions by: Nicole Kurkowski, OS&T Dr. Pablo Santos, WFO Miami Dr. Jack Harlan, NOAA.
Mr. Robert Forney Dr. Hugh Roarty Dr. Scott Glenn Measuring Waves with a Compact HF Radar MTS/IEEE OCEANS15 October 2015 Washington DC.
Observations to Operations: Why validation is important? Julie Thomas Scripps Institution of Oceanography Hydrographic Review Panel Los Angeles, CA April.
Figure 2. Near real-time comparisons of 6 minute NOAA ADCP data (blue) and hourly CODAR data (red) at (YS) York Spit (CH) Cape Henry and (TS) Thimble Shoals.
CODAR Surface Current Maps Improve Coast Guard Search And Rescue Nearest Coastal Site CODAR Currents SLDMB Drifter SAROPS NowSAROPS w/ HFR Surface Currents.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay INTRODUCTION High frequency RADAR antennas are used to observe the surface circulation patterns in.
Real-Time Beyond the Horizon Vessel Detection
Results from the Mid Atlantic High Frequency Radar Network
National High Frequency Radar Network
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay
Mid-Atlantic Blue Ocean Economy 2030
MARACOOS High Frequency Radar Network Operations
Hugh Roarty, Michael Smith, Ethan Handel and Scott Glenn
Analysis of the Wind Resource off New Jersey for Offshore Wind Energy Development Hugh Roarty, Joe Riscica, Laura Palamara, Louis Bowers, Greg Seroka,
October 27, 2011 New Brunswick, NJ
A Multi-static HF Radar Network for the
Observing the Ocean from the Rutgers University “COOL Room”
Coastal Ocean Dynamics Radar (CODAR) Mapping of
Presentation transcript:

MACOORA + MARCOOS = MARACOOS 5 IOOS Subsystems

NOAA press release announces MARACOOS HFR Network Operational in USCG SAROPS U.S. Department of Commerce Website: May 4, 2009

National HF Radar Technical Steering Team Meeting: July 19-20, 2011 Steering Team members Project Manager: Jack Harlan, NOAA IOOS Federal Partners: Bill Birkemeier, USACE Pat Burke, NOAA CO-OPS Bill Burnett, NOAA-NDBC Ming Ji, NOAA NWS OPC Rich Patchen, NOAA CSDL Elected by RAs: Larry Atkinson, Old Dominion Pierre Flament, U Hawaii Scott Glenn, Rutgers Jeff Paduan, Naval Postgrad Nick Shay, U Miami Eric Terrill, Scripps Technical Experts: Don Barrick, COS Mike Kosro, Oregon State

National HF Radar Technical Steering Team Meeting: July 19-20, 2011 Annual Meeting – NCAR, Boulder, Colorado – 1.5 Days Goals: 1)Revisit Tiger Team Topics from the 2010 Meeting in Washington, DC a) Freshwater HF Radar – Jeff Paduan (Lead) b) Waves & HF Radar – Don Barrick (Lead) c) Modeling & Data Assimilation – Rich Pachen (Lead) - Reconstituted d) Budget Line for HF Radar – Scott Glenn (Lead) – “Rendered Moot” 2) Discuss the Buildout of the National HF Radar Network based on the $5M Budget Proposed in the President’s FY2012 Budget Request

A) Freshwater HF Radar Results: Theory for attenuation is “extremely” good. More wave conditions examined in Final report will include the new results. Expect better but still range-limited success at higher frequencies. B) Waves and HF Radar Results: Wave Data Status: Significant Wave Height (Hs) is robust on existing systems. Wave Period & Direction is at an intermediate level of maturity. First 5 Spectral Coefficients have not matured sufficiently. More research on wave data spectral & mapping validation. Development of quality control, file formats and metadata. C) Modeling & Data Assimilation Results: Forecast model assimilation of HF Radar currents - necessary capability for a mature network. Work required to compile community status & success stories for HF Radar data assimilation. National HF Radar Technical Steering Team Meeting: July 19-20, 2011

President’S FY2012 Budget Request, OMB Passback Language: "Passback provides and (sic) additional $5M to improve monitoring of near shore currents using technologies such as HF Radar. The utility of HF Radar was most recently highlighted during the deepwater spill with real-time network data provided by OR&R, to provide trajectory maps and to identify oil that might make its way into the loop current. Funds should be prioritized on the operation of existing radar systems located in regions of offshore oil production (and) in the vicinity of major ports and harbors.” IOOS: A Plan to Meet the Nation’s Needs for Surface Current Mapping, September 2009: Page 21, Table 5. Full 5-Year Buildout Estimated annual cost for new HF Radars and to maintain existing HF Radars - $20 M / year. (Initially: 50% Acquisition, 50% Operations; After 5 years: 25% Acquisition, 75% Operations.)

National HF Radar Technical Steering Team Meeting: July 19-20, 2011 A performance metric for the national HF radar network has been put forward in the Congressional Justification document that requires an 80% uptime and 80% spatial coverage (“80/80 metric”) for each HF radar. Guidance from the U.S. Coast Guard on the data requirements for operations:

National HF Radar Technical Steering Team Meeting: July 19-20, 2011 A performance metric for the national HF radar network has been put forward in the Congressional Justification document that requires an 80% uptime and 80% spatial coverage (“80/80 metric”) for each HF radar. Guidance from the U.S. Coast Guard on the data requirements for operations:

National HF Radar Technical Steering Team Meeting: July 19-20, 2011 Steering Team Deliberation (majority of day 1): Question: How do we prioritize a $5 M initial investment when there is $20 M in community need? Team’s answer: Prioritize operation of what is already deployed to achieve the 80/80 goal where we can, demonstrate success, and further grow the investment. Steering Team Cost Estimates for Operating the 2010 Network: 1) The Steering Team estimates that the required funds for annual operations and maintenance (O&M), recurring costs and spare parts of the existing 123 radars is approximately $6.6M. 2) In addition to O&M, a number of tasks (see table below) are required annually at the national level to fully operationalize the network. The costs of these tasks total approximately $1M. 3) Combining 1) O&M support for all 123 radars with 2) the additional necessary tasks for operationalizing the national radar network yields a total annual support of approximately $7.6M.

National HF Radar Technical Steering Team Meeting: July 19-20, 2011 Priority 1 Radars for a $5 M Investment: Search & Rescue: All Long range CODARs and 8 MHz WERAs = = 45 U Miami WERAs = 4 Subtotal = 49 Oil Spill Response: All Long range CODARs and 8 MHz WERAs = = 45 SF Bay 42-MHz CODARs = 4 U Hawaii radars = 4 SF Bay Approach 25-MHz CODARs = 2 Subtotal = 55 Major Ports and Shipping Lanes: NY/NJ Harbor 25-MHz CODARs = 3 Delaware Bay 25-MHz CODARs = 3 Chesapeake Bay 25-MHz CODARS = 4 Tampa Bay WERAs = 2 San Diego 25-MHz CODARs = 4 Subtotal = 16 Sum (excluding duplication) = = 75 Radars for Priority 1 (# CODARs = 62; #WERAs = 13) Regions can operate non-Priority 1 HF Radars out of existing RA funds if they choose.

Prioritized Ports with HF Radars in 2010: New York Harbor Delaware Bay Chesapeake Bay Tampa Bay San Diego National HF Radar Technical Steering Team Meeting: July 19-20, 2011

Annual O&M: 75 Radars *(2 Techs / 7 Radars) * $130 K = $2,786 K 123 Radars *(2 Techs / 7 Radars) * $130 K = $4,569 K Annual Recurring Costs: 75 Radars * ($10 K / Radar) = $750 K 123 Radars * ($10 K / Radar) = $1,230 K Annual Spare Parts: 75 Radars * (1 Spare / 15 Radars) * 100 K / Spare = $500 K 123 Radars * (1 Spare / 15 Radars) * 100 K / Spare = $820 K Still Missing: Regional Coordinators for Field Operations Data Assimilation in Dynamical Models Training

MARACOOS HF Radar Network Mid-Atlantic Regional 5 MHz, 14 CODARs Chesapeake Bay 25 MHz, 4 CODARs Delaware Bay 25 MHz, 3 CODARs New York Harbor 25 MHz, 3 CODARs Western Long Island 25 MHz, 2 Radars Eastern Long Island 25 MHz, 3 Radars New Jersey Coast 13 MHz, 7 Radars