AP Lang & Comp Unit 1: Rhetorical Analysis Week 4: HF, Narrative Rhetorical Analysis Week 4.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Reason and Argument Induction (Part of Ch. 9 and part of Ch. 10)

Advertisements

Framing an Experimental Hypothesis WP5 Professor Alan K. Outram University of Exeter 8 th October 2012.

Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Classical and Toulmin, Models Junior AP English September 23, 2008.

AP Lang & Comp Unit 1: Rhetorical Analysis Week 4: HF, Narrative Rhetorical Analysis Week 5.

AP Language RHETORICAL ANALYSIS Test Strategy Olson and Bailey.

AP Lang & Comp Unit 1: Rhetorical Analysis Week 2: TSL, HF, Narrative Mode Rhetorical Analysis Week 3.

Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.

1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.

Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.

DEDUCTIVE REASONING We reason deductively when we draw a conclusion from a set of given facts using the laws of logic.

DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS Fundamentals of Logic Unit – 1 Chapter – 4 Fundamentals of Logic Unit – 1 Chapter – 4.

Argument & Reason. Argument Never contend with one that is foolish, proud, positive, testy, or with a superior, or a clown, in a matter of argument. Thomas.

Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.

Other Info on Making Arguments

BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers

This is Introductory Logic PHI 120 Get a syllabus online, if you don't already have one Presentation: "Good Arguments"

Reasoning Automated Deduction. Reasonable Arguments Argument: An attempt to demonstrate the truth of a conclusion from the truth of a set of premises.

For Friday, read chapter 2, sections 1-2 (pp ). As nongraded homework, do the problems on p. 19. Graded homework #1 is due at the beginning of class.

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.

Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.

1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.

Christianity, Belief & Science. Strengths  The scientific method is rational, and objective.  It is a logical process which can be repeated by others.

DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

Basic Argumentation.

An In-Depth Look at the Rhetorical Analysis Essay Question

Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 1, Unit 1D, Slide 1 Thinking Critically 1.

Persuasion Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning.

Time 2 hr No choice 1st six week course will be for the paper (including teasers) The 1st six week outlines attached in form of slides.

Reason: as a Way of Knowing Richard van de Lagemaat, Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma (Cambridge: CUP, 2005)

Thinking Mathematically

Logic in Everyday Life.

Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.

Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Inductive Observing the data, recognizing a pattern and making generalizations Do you see a pattern Can you describe.

AGENDA – ALGEBRA 1A SEPT. 3, 2012 (TUESDAY)  Warm-Up  Lesson Logical Reasoning and Counterexamples  Objectives – Identify the hypothesis and conclusion.

READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:

Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer

Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.

The construction of a formal argument

NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. REASONING.

Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”

Understanding the Persuasive Techniques in Developing Arguments How a speech can soothe and inspire a grieving population.

Deductive and Inductive Reasoning

SPRING 2015 UNIT 2 ARGUMENT REVIEW. VOCABULARY Argument/Argumentation: The process of reasoning systematically in support of an idea, action or theory.

The problem of induction

What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.

Section 3.6 Reasoning and Patterns. Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning starts with a general rule, which we know to be true. Then from that rule,

Text Table of Contents #5: Evaluating the Argument.

Introduction to Argument Chapter 2 (Pgs ) AP Language Demi Greiner | Arlyn Rodriguez Period 4.

Part One: Assessing the Inference, Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.

Text Table of Contents #4: What are the Reasons?.

UOP CRT 205 Week 7 Assignment Argument Evaluation Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

CLASSICAL ORATION INDUCTION DEDUCTION TOULMIN MODEL

What makes a Good Argument?

Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections

Yup, another powerpoint about this…

Shaping Argument: 4 Ways

Deductive & Inductive Forms of Reasoning

Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements

Inductive and Deductive Logic

Argumentation Strategies

A Closer Look at Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning

Logical Fallacies.

The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.

Tenets to Argumentation

Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.

Evaluating Deductive Arguments

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

Basic Errors in Logic Featured in “Love is a Fallacy” By Max Shulman

Presentation transcript:

AP Lang & Comp Unit 1: Rhetorical Analysis Week 4: HF, Narrative Rhetorical Analysis Week 4

9/6-9/13 Rhetorical Analysis ObjectiveAssignmentsHW Mon Comp LabNarrative due Friday TuesComp LabNarrative due Friday WedPeer ReviewWU: Vocab Score Essays Read HF; Narrative due Friday ThursAnalyze a narrative WU: Vocab Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” Read HF; Narrative due Friday FriAnalyze a narrative WU: Vocab Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” Read HF; Narrative due Friday Rhetorical Analysis Week 4

Rhetorical Terms consonancethe correspondence of consonants, especially those at the end of a word, in a passage of prose or verse; the use of the repetition of consonants or consonant patterns as a rhyming device. Fancy Words adroithaving or showing skill, cleverness, or resourcefulness in handling situations Rhetorical Analysis Week 4 Khaled Abdullah—Reuters Sept. 2, A boy stretches as he exercises at a fitness center in Sanaa, Yemen. "As in guys she gently sways at ease." “The Silken Tent” by Robert Frost.

Rhetorical Terms Inductionreasoning in which the premises seek to supply strong evidence for the truth of the conclusion. The truth of an inductive argument is supposed to be probable, based upon the evidence given Rhetorical Analysis Week 4 Sept. 2, Smoke from the fires below Pilot Peak intermingles with clouds from an arriving weather front as firefighters begin to get the Rim Fire under control near Old Yosemite Road, Division S, as seen from Greeley Hill, Calif. deductionthe process of reasoning from one or more general statements (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion; links premises with conclusions. If all premises are true, the terms are clear, and the rules of deductive logic are followed, then the conclusion reached is necessarily true.

Rhetorical Analysis Week 4 Inductive reasoning is probabilistic; given the premises, the conclusion is probable. Example: 100% of biological life forms that we know of depend on liquid water to exist. Therefore, if we discover a new biological life form it will probably depend on liquid water to exist. Inductive vs. deductive reasoning Unlike deductive arguments, inductive reasoning allows for the possibility that the conclusion is false, even if all of the premises are true. Instead of being valid or invalid, inductive arguments are either strong or weak, which describes how probable it is that the conclusion is true. deduction: reasoning from the general to the particular (or from cause to effect) Induction, or generalization: reasoning from detailed facts to general principles

Rhetorical Terms dictionWord choice: it’s never enough to say an author uses “diction.” One must qualify what type of words authors use. Fancy Words thwartoppose or baffle Rhetorical Analysis Week 4 Sept. 4, An Indian Kathakali artist is reflected in a mirror as he dons make up prior to a performance in Chennai, India.