CONSENSUS BASED DECISION MAKING CBDM CANA/ACNA. THIS MAY BE TITLED MORE APPROPRIATELY… DISCUSSION BASED CONSENSUS BUILDING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Techniques For Leading Group Discussions
Advertisements

NCRSC Leadership Workshop June 14, 2008
An Introduction to Working Together
Do all the good you can, by all the means you can, in all the ways you can, at all the times you can, to all the people you can, as long as ever you can.
BC Regional Service Committee Discussion Based Decision Making (DBDM)
Public Relation.  While NAWS has no specific position on Facebook. NA as a whole has a clearly defined outline for the use of Internet technologies.
Consensus Based Decision Making WSLD What is CBDM?  CBDM stands for Consensus-Based-Decision- Making  Consensus may be defined as an acceptable.
Consensus Decision Making In the Sacramento Fellowship of Narcotics Anonymous.
Consensus Decision Making
Consensus Based Decision Making
KNOWLEDGE BASED DECISION MAKING FOR AN INFORMED GROUP CONSCIENCE.
Public Relations and Hospitals & Institutions Drug replacement Therapy Workshop.
“Casting the Net” Building Consensus 2009 National Leadership Conference April 24, 2009 Lacosta Resort Carlsbad, California.
Decision Making Process It is essential that teams have a clearly defined process for making decisions before and during the course of their work. It should.
What is Teamwork & Team Building Team work : Concept of people working together as a team. Team Player : A team player is someone who is able to get.
1 Dumping Robert’s Rules, Let’s Focus on Participatory Decision Making August 3, 2006 Alliance for Nonprofit Management Monica Herrera
6/5/2007SE Survival Exercise Recap1 Team Software Project (TSP) June 05, 2007 Planning, Quality, Risks.
The Manager as Leader 3.1 The Importance of Leadership
 The source for guidance on the roles, qualities, and practice of leadership in NA comes from our and practice of leadership in NA comes from our Steps,
Teamwork 101.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT Coach as Facilitator The purpose of this module is to present key concepts of facilitation and provide an opportunity for participants.
Leadership & Team Building
Pulaski Technical College Committee Training August 11, 2014.
ھم رشتگی CO-OPERATIVE LEARNING.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Techniques For Leading Group Discussions.
+ How to Advise Membership Problems Office of Student Activities & Involvement.
Conservation District Supervisor Accreditation
Assertiveness Training
How Teams Work. Task and Maintenance Needs  Task Activities – Any activity a team member does that contributes to the group’s performance purpose. 
Why Teams?. Teams Outperform individuals acting alone or in groups Outperform individuals acting alone or in groups Often necessary to lead deep and lasting.
Consensus Based Decision-Making and Robert’s Rules: Have I Lost my Voice? SIXTH FLORIDA SERVICE SYMPOSIUM MARCH 12 – 15, 2015.
Some Tools For Team Building an Introduction 2010 Faith and Light International Formation Project Team.
Asperger’s Working In A Team by Neil Morgenstern.
Some Tools For Team Building Faith and Light International Formation 2010.
Consensus Based Decision Making 2013 Florida Service Symposium.
Being An Effective GSR Florida Region GSR Assembly 2012.
 People with goals succeed because they know where they are going. ~ Earl Nightingale.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Consensus decision making: the basics MA in Activism and Social Change SCHOOL OF GEOGRAPHY.
4 Communicating and Working in Teams “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” ― Henry Ford, American.
Chapter 9* Managing Meetings. Chapter 10/Managing Meetings Hilgert & Leonard © Explain why meetings, committees, and being able to lead meetings.
Problem Solving, Decision Making, Negotiation and Compromise
1 The 7 Elements of a High Performance Healthcare Team Cohesiveness Healthy Climate Team Members’ Contribution.
Team Exercise. 5/29/2007SE Survival Exercise2 SURVIVAL!
Consensus Validation A Tool for Teams GALA Leadership Symposium October 11, 2013 Presenter: Mindy Taylor.
This presentation only summarizes CAT material. Please read the complete CAT for comprehensive information and reports:
Consensus Decision Making Third World Group 2010.
4 Communicating and Working in Teams “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” ― Henry Ford, American.
Using Knowledge-Based Decision-Making (KBDM).  Informed group conscience  Group decisions  Spiritual principles  KBDM process.
Effective GSR/RCM /Facilitator GSR Assembly 2016.
Guiding Principles. A Working Definition of Consensus Derives from the Latin con meaning “with” or “together with” and sentir meaning to “think” or “feel”.
Presented by The Solutions Group Decision Making Tools.
Leadership Styles "All of the great leaders have had one characteristic in common; it was the willingness to confront unequivocally the major anxiety of.
Consensus Based Decision Making Proposed by Guide to Florida Regional Service Workgroup (GFRS)
SIXTH FLORIDA SERVICE SYMPOSIUM Consensus Based Decision-Making
Consensus Based Decision Making
Consensus Based Decision Making
MSIG Workshop The Role of the GSR
Facilitation 101.
Putting Our New Traditions Workbook to Work
Applying Our Principles
Putting Our New Traditions Workbook to Work – Tradition 1 Unity
Florida Service Symposium 2009
Putting Our New Traditions Workbook to Work
Putting Our New Traditions Workbook to Work
Rubric for Group Activity or Group Project
CONSENSUS BASED DECISION MAKING CBDM CANA/ACNA.
Member Leadership!.
Techniques For Leading Group Discussions
The Board’s Goals for the 2019 WSC
Presented by: Northern California Region of Narcotics Anonymous
Presentation transcript:

CONSENSUS BASED DECISION MAKING CBDM CANA/ACNA

THIS MAY BE TITLED MORE APPROPRIATELY… DISCUSSION BASED CONSENSUS BUILDING

TO MOST OF US… THIS SEEMED CONFUSING AT FIRST AND WE ASKED… WHY CHANGE THE WAY WE DO BUSINESS? MANY OF US THOUGHT…. WHAT WE WERE DOING… GOT THE JOB DONE…! SOME ALSO THOUGHT… that this was going to be too time consuming!

WE WANTED TO CHANGE BECAUSE…. In some cases… just over half the room was on board with a decision……what about the other 49 percent?? In some cases…. The majority of the service body had no input into the decisions that were being made…and when they did there was a limit of members to speak for or against, instead of inputting into the idea! In some cases…. there was little discussion, leaving some of us confused about the decisions that were being made but some of us went along with it anyways…… These ideas didn’t seem to follow our 7th concept….

A Different Way of Making Decisions (that more clearly follow our concepts) All members of a service body bear substantial responsibility for that body’s decisions and should be allowed to fully participate in its decision-making processes. (7th Concept) “NA service is a team effort. Our Service representatives are responsible to the NA fellowship as a whole rather than any special constituency; so are all other trusted servants on the team. The full participation of each member is of great value as we seek to express the collective conscience of the whole”. (Twelve Concepts of NA Service, p 16)

How can a whole room of addicts agree on an issue? Most of us, who are familiar with Robert’s Rules of Order saw this as a problem… at first… CBDM is a different way of thinking about coming to a resolve. We either take a.... Discussion Topic or idea We take an idea and work together to mold it into a proposal Or Specific Proposal We take a proposal and work together to discuss if this will work best for the group, can be reworked into what the group wants

CDM Requires Practicing Spiritual Principles such as…  Patience  Open-mindedness  Trust  Faith  Good will  Honesty  Respect  Willingness

CBDM …. ….Is a cooperative process for making decisions in which everyone or nearly everyone consents to the decisions of the group ….Is a problem-solving method for people who wish to work together to find the best solution for the group Basically means…. ….The decision is in this room — our job is to find it …...together

Discussion Proposal Test for Consensus/Straw poll NOYES Modify of Proposal Assent, Assent w/Reservations, or Stand Aside Concerns RaisedConsensus Achieved ActionBlock How CBDM Works:

Assent with Reservations – “I think this may be a mistake but I can live with it” (going along with this so we can move forward but not fully on board – not stopping what I see what the group wants to do) Stand Aside – “ I personally can’t do this, but I won’t stop others from doing it.” (basically taking myself out of the equation – do not agree but will allow the group to move forward) Block – “I cannot support this or allow the group to support this. It is against our principles.” Blocking is a rare and extreme form of dissent taken only if you honestly believe that one of the Traditions or Concepts is directly violated by a proposal or that some very fundamental moral position would be violated. A participant who blocks must be able to articulate which Tradition, Concept or Spiritual principle fundamental to NA is violated by the proposal.

THERE ARE DIFFERENT MODELS SUCH AS THE FOLLOWING MODEL ORIGINALLY FROM THE EUROPEAN DELEGATES ZONE In this model 85 percent is considered consensus…. ….there are times when a proposal can be a choice….members opinions….and more opportunity to disagree….so 85 percent would show solid support in these instances

Short discussion Budget implications Facilitator can gauge the room -More information -Dissenting views heard -Small group or time out -If very small amount of dissents they may be asked if they could support this…

What would be ideal!  Write your topic on the topic discussion board………  Have the group prioritize the topics…………  Put a time frame on the topic if necessary ………..  Allow members to share…before others share twice….if someone is not on board….hear from them!! All new information is valuable……....  The group makes a decision and we take action……  Or if more information or research is needed we could… Form a workgroup to complete the project and have the workgroup complete an outline so everyone is on the same page and knows what their specific tasks are……(usually called a project charge sheet)  They would take the information shared during the discussion to complete their tasks. This workgroup would meet for a specific amount of time and come back to the table with their findings or the project completed.

These models can be changed to fit the needs of your service body….it is just an example….. SOME THINGS TO REMEMBER ARE  Blocking a proposal is a last resort and only done in rare and extreme cases  We need to change the way we think….to work together… “WE”  Can I put aside my personal opinion to allow the rest of the group to move forward?  CBDM does not have to slow down the process….  Am I able to pass on making a point, when someone else has already made it?  Straw Polls are just to see where the body is at with a proposal  Some service bodies allow all members at their meeting to participate in reaching consensus. This would be determined by your area/region.

It is up to us, the participants, to try to achieve consensus even though it is not the only method of decision-making. We have the tools in the form of guidelines, NA resources, committees and a higher power to help us reach a satisfactory conclusion. NOTE - Concept Six states: “Just as we seek the strongest possible spiritual unity in Narcotics Anonymous, so in our decision making we seek unanimity, not merely a majority vote.”

Example Discussion Topic Board 1 Creating unity in our area 2 Caring an NA message of recovery in our meetings 3 Social Networking posts about NA 4 Giving more literature to the local treatment center 5 Funding more members to the regional meeting 6 Lack of newcomers in the meetings 7 Encouraging members to be of Service 8 Lets buy pizza after the meeting with the 7 th tradition?

Working Together – CBDM Lets prioritize! We will take # 1  We can work together to find a solution…  Facilitator will keep it on track  Secretary to take notes After we have consensus… Let us know… Was the experience one of working together? Describe? Did you feel it was helpful to gain the ideas of the group? Describe your experience?

Exercise 2 – Small Groups

Working Together – CBDM Lets prioritize! Pick a topic from discussion topics! 5 Small Groups  Have a facilitator  Secretary  Speaker to share results  brainstorm ideas  Facilitator will keep it on track  You are the service body and can make the decision of action as a group  What is your action?  Was the experience one of working together? Describe?  Did you feel it was helpful to gain the ideas of the group?  Describe your experience