Presenter: Brett A. Sokolow, Esq

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ROLE OF THE AORC IN CAPACITY BUILDING FOR THE INTEGRITY INSTITUTIONS ADV ISHARA BODASING 14 JUNE 2012.
Advertisements

1 Department of State Program Evaluation Policy Overview Spring 2013.
1) When an institution receives notice of sexual harassment, the institution has an obligation to (check all that apply):  End the harassment  Abide.
Atixa webinar – the civil rights investigation and grievance model
TITLE IX IN THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE SETTIG
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year (4-year institutions) Salisbury University Project Description of Review Process of First College.
Sexual Harassment Seminar Mechanisms in Lingnan University to deal with sexual harassment Presented by Li Kam-kee, Director of Administration.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
TASK FORCE ON SEXUAL VIOLENCE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF SEATTLE Domonique Crosby, Taylor Dukes, Alexa Forster, and Kjirsten Kennedy 1.
Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Student Integrity and Misconduct Training for Administrative Staff supporting the Misconduct Process.
Students in Private School Placed by Their Parents Developed by Contra Costa SELPA
Developing a Gender Equity Action Plan Judith M. Sweet Former Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services and Senior Woman Administrator.
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
CAMPUS TITLE IX INVESTIGATION TRAINING presented by Saundra K
Anti-Discrimination & Harassment Policy
Ombudsman UMKC SOM GME. Ombudsman Objective: The position of Ombudsman for Graduate Medical Education (GME) was developed to promote a positive climate.
Beyond Compliance: Title IX at UW- Madison Tonya Schmidt Assistant Dean of Students, Director of Student Title IX & Clery Compliance University of Wisconsin-Madison.
DR. DOREEN M. TOBIN EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY TITLE IX COORDINATOR MS. PATRICIA A. KASHNER EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY DEPUTY TITLE IX COORDINATOR TITLE.
Sexual Harassment Complaints: Cultural & Procedural Differences in Response Please use your smart phone, iPAD or lap top to participate in polling Smart.
Reporting Requirements POLICY DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT, AND SEXUAL MISCONDUCT FACULTY SENATE CONSULTATION, JANUARY 26, 2015.
Equal Opportunity and Compliance Renisha Gibbs, SPHR Assistant Vice President for Human Resources/ Finance and Administration Chief of Staff August 17,
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Presentation Outcomes Ensure you are aware of the resources available to you in the Dean of Students office Help you understand your role as Student Org.
Effective September 1, 2011 Staff Training Edgewater School District September 2014.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Copyright © Education Compliance Group, Inc. All rights reserved. By Peggy A. Burns, Esq. and Mark Hinson, SPHR Internal Investigations & Decision-Making:
Title IX related CRR Changes for Students Faculty Senate Meeting September 18, 2014 President's Report1.
NEW FACULTY ORIENTATION AUGUST 18, 2015 The First Line of Response: Student Disclosure of Sexual Misconduct.
1 Federal Sector Discrimination Complaints Process for Individuals Incident/Alleged Discrimination (1) Employee Contacts EO Counselor (Rights & Responsibilities)
Title IX GRS New Teaching Fellow Orientation August 28, 2015 GRS Deputy Title IX Coordinator Laura Wipf Assistant Director of Graduate Affairs
1 Procedural Requirements for School Districts and Community Colleges Florida Department of Education Office of Equity and Access Adeola Fayemi, Director.
Grievance Process. Definition: A grievance is a written complaint by an employee alleging that they have been adversely affected in their role as an employee.
DRAFT Proposed Sexual Harassment Policy Office of General Counsel Southern Illinois University September 2008.
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO.
MODULE 3 Composition & Roles. TAT TEAM APPROACH UPON COMPLETION OF THIS MODULE, PARTICIPANTS SHOULD UNDERSTAND: 3 – 2  Composition of the Threat Assessment.
Implement annual campus climate survey to: Gain further insight into student’s perceptions of campus safety Collect common data points Measure long-term.
President’s Report Faculty Senate Meeting November 20, 2014 President's Report1.
1 Intake 2 Initial Report 3 Title IX Interview 4 Title IX Investigation 5 Findings of Fact 6 Final Report 7 Appeal.
Derbyshire County Council PUBLIC HANDLING GRIEVANCES - BRIEFING FOR MANAGERS.
Sexual Misconduct Information Presented by Office of Equity & Inclusion Sue Groff, Ed. D. September 8, 2015.
A Parent’s Guide to Resolving School Concerns and Complaints Linda Gill Marvin Jones Executive Directors Office of School Administration.
Job Corps Equal Opportunity Officers Orientation Presenter: Kevin Malone U.S. Department of Labor Civil Rights Center.
An Overview of Strategic Human Resource Management.
Title IX Essentials Academic Leadership Retreat July 27, 2015 Bob Mabry, Title IX Coordinator & Tawny Alonzo, Title IX Investigator.
Designing an Intentional Campus Plan for Title IX Compliance, Education & Outreach Brett L. Bruner, M.S. Director of Transition & Student Conduct Former.
Title IX The Human Resource Challenge for Higher Education.
BROADBANDING. OVERVIEW GOALS/OBJECTIVES Decentralize compensation management & administration Reduce the need for reclassification reviews and improve.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission Complaints Process CLN4U.
Employee concerning other employees or employment conditions
Title IX & Relevant Legislation overview
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO
Responsible Employee Training
Protecting the Educational Environment
Sexual Harassment Seminar
Welcome to UNT! Inya Baiye Director of Equal Opportunity,
Title IX Essentials Graduate Assistants Orientation August 18, 2015
SCSEP Grievance Policies & Procedures
HR TOOLS Webinar Wednesdays Anna Elento-Sneed April 4, 2018
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Complainant files complaint in person or through online reporting system to one of the entities defined by an arrow Bemidji State University & Northwest.
Office of Affirmative Action and Violence Prevention & Response annual & Mid-Year Reports and legislative & Regulatory Updates Presented by: Sybil B.
Title IX Compliance.
Connection Codes Implementation
The Equity Office April Castañeda
The Ever-Growing and New Frontier of Discrimination Claims
Title IX Proposed Regulations
Ombudsman UMKC SOM GME.
Presentation transcript:

Presenter: Brett A. Sokolow, Esq Presenter: Brett A. Sokolow, Esq. ATIXA INAUGURAL NATIONAL CONFERENCE– The Global Human Dignity Resolution Model www.atixa.org June 24th, 2012

OVERVIEW OF TODAY’S TOPICS HISTORY THE CIVIL RIGHTS INVESTIGATION MODEL ROLE OF INVESTIGATORS WHO ARE THEY? WHAT DO THEY DO? HOW ARE THE INVESTIGATION FINDINGS/REPORT USED? HOW DOES THIS MODEL CHANGE THE INSTITUTION’S ROLE? INTEGRATING INVESTIGATION INTO EXISTING RESOLUTION MODELS

OVERVIEW OF TODAY’S TOPICS WHAT IS THE ROLE OF INVESTIGATORS IN ANY HEARING? WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF THIS MODEL? PROMPTNESS ASSURANCE OF EQUITY MORE EVIDENCE PATTERN RECOGNITION LESS OBFUSCATION INFORMAL RESOLUTION

Who Investigates? In this model, a pool of 6-24 people are chosen from administrative and staff ranks for their analytical and inquisitive character. All pool members serve 2-3 year or longer terms. All pool members are trained as advocates, investigators, hearing officers and appeals officers, and will serve varying roles in each grievance. Permits strategic selection and balance.

What’s Global About this Model? All employees, students, faculty and union employees are subject to (largely) the same policy and process. Policy is written broadly to encompass IX, VII and relevant state laws. One process is administered centrally under the Title IX Coordinator or EEO administrator. Policy and process govern all discrimination complaints, not just sex/gender discrimination.

Should There Be More Than One Investigator? No specific requirement, but: Investigation must be prompt, thorough and impartial Investigatior must collect the maximum amount of relevant information available to make a determination A pool of investigators may help to ensure that your investigation meets these requirements. © 2012 ATIXA all rights reserved

Team Investigations Other benefits: Who investigates may be strategic to each specific case Ability to brainstorm investigation steps and lines of questioning with co-investigators, co-facilitate interviews Flexibility if there is any conflict with investigators and parties © 2012 ATIXA all rights reserved

Investigation Team Process Overview The investigation team, in consultation with their supervisors, and/or the Title IX Coordinator strategizes the entire investigation, including methodology, order, timeline, goals, obstacles, etc. Interview all witnesses Gather and assesses evidence Write a report Make a finding or recommendation (will vary by school) May recommend sanction © 2012 ATIXA all rights reserved

Role of Investigator in Decision Process Variations in role of decision process: Investigator presents findings to accused individual Investigator recommends to supervisor or hearing panel Investigator only presents investigation report without findings The investigator may recommend a finding The investigator may be the key witness at the hearing The investigation report is admitted as evidence Other witnesses can be called, or the investigation may summarize their testimony The investigator can attest to credibility, call attention to discrepancies, and arrange for expert sources of information, as needed © 2012 ATIXA all rights reserved

Some Variations Administrator accepts or rejects finding, makes determination subject to appeal Or, hearing is held, subject to appeal Or, investigator presents findings: Accused individual accepts Recommended finding implemented Not appealable May recommend sanctions or sanctions by administrator If rejected, hearing on sanctions Appeal © 2012 ATIXA all rights reserved

Continued….. Investigator presents findings: Accused individual rejects Hearing Appeal Accused individual accepts in part, rejects in part Hearing only on disputed findings © 2012 ATIXA all rights reserved

PRESENTER Brett A. Sokolow, Esq. serves as Executive Director of the membership associations NaBITA and ATIXA. He also serves as managing partner of NCHERM, a law and consulting firm that provides risk management services to higher education. Please contact Brett with any questions at Brett@atixa.org Join ATIXA at www.atixa.org