Louisiana’s Co-Teaching Resource Guide Part 3- Results/Effectiveness Kristina Braud, Literacy Goal Office Melanie Lemoine, Louisiana State Improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Module 1: IEP Overview – A Plan for Guiding Instruction and Service Provision.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Response to Intervention Presented by: Agnes B. Domingo EDSP 6345, HBU, Spring 2014.
Desired Results Developmental Profile - school readiness© A Project of the California department of education, child development division.
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Team Teaching Section 7: Monitoring Teacher. The Monitoring Teacher model One teacher assumes the responsibility for instructing the entire class. The.
Trends in Teacher Evaluation Systems in Public Education CEC’S POSITION ON SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Team Teaching Section 2: Traditional Team Teaching.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Multi-Tier System of Support (MTSS) Objective: By the end of this session, I will demonstrate my understanding of the MTSS system by describing.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Office of School Support
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
How to Implement Co-Teaching in the Elementary Classrooms.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
 Self-advocacy. How do students come to understand their own learning needs? How do they learn to explain them to others?
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson
What Is Evidence? PRESENTED BY SCHAUNA FINDLAY, PH.D.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Tools for Instruction and Assessment for the Maryland College- and Career-Ready Standards Time to Revisit Tools that will Inform Instruction.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Overview of Differentiated Instruction District Articulation Archuleta School District 50 JT Friday, September 25,
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series A Framework for Formative Assessment November 15, 2011 Dr. Dorothea Shannon Dr. Greg Wheeler.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
Welcome to TEAMS Mid-Year Training. Workshop Goals 1.Identify and share successes with TEAMS implementation 2.Identify and problem solve concerns with.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Standards Based Essential Skills Curriculum Johnson County Special Services: Center Grove, Clark Pleasant, Edinburgh, Flat Rock- Hawcreek, Franklin, Greenwood,
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Laura Blake Candidate Teaching Summit Presentation “The shell must break before the bird can fly” ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson Website .
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
 “I have to teach the same information skills each year because students do not learn them.”  “I don’t have time to give tests so I do not assess student.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
SIT Professional Development- Defining the Consultation Model Permission to reprint granted with appropriate acknowledgement ©2009 DPS.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Long Beach Unified School Distcit
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Ready for Anything SUPPORTING NEW TEACHERS for SUCCESS by Lynn Howard.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
“Sharing What Works With Colleagues”
An Introduction to NETS*T
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Classroom Walk-Through
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Learning Prompt- How do you think tonight’s readings connect to the next steps in our assessment process?
What have we learned, where do we need to go?
Cooperating Teacher Training
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

Louisiana’s Co-Teaching Resource Guide Part 3- Results/Effectiveness Kristina Braud, Literacy Goal Office Melanie Lemoine, Louisiana State Improvement Grant Andrea Thompson, Literacy Goal Office

Guide’s Location: accessguide.doe.louisiana.gov/site%20documents/FINALcoteaching_guide.pdf

Co-Teaching Resource Guide Part 3--Results 3

Why Measure Co-Teaching Efforts Student learning and academic growth are expected outcomes of effective co-teaching Teachers’ instructional skills can improve Academic data indicates effectiveness Related data improvement indicates effectiveness Student progress improves longitudinally 4

Why Measure Co-Teaching Efforts Informal instrument for co-teachers and their supervisors drive conversations Documents the effectiveness of co-teaching classrooms Helps focus on areas that need improvement, and pinpoints the component(s) affecting success Directs professional development

What to Measure Administrative Support Team Building Planning Implementation of co-teaching approaches Student Outcomes

How to Gather Evidence on Co-Teaching Effectiveness Rating Scale Rubric Reflective Guide Administrator Walk-through Co-teaching Observation Checklist –Quality Indicators –General and Approach-specific

Co-Teaching Observation Checklist Quality Indicators Snapshot of behaviors that drive conversations to adjust planning and implementation Uses simultaneously for both co- teachers

Support, Measure, Adjust Ensure that teachers who are co-teaching receive professional development so they maximize the contribution of both partners. Use curriculum based and other measures that can document the amount of educational progress students (those with and without disabilities) make in co-taught classes. 11

Students Making Academic Progress Traditional Class Setting Inclusion Class Setting With DisabilitiesMath 35.9% Reading 41.9% Math 43.3% Reading 45.9% Without DisabilitiesMath 39.0% Reading 47.1% Math 58.8% Reading 50.7% Inclusion Works

Essential Elements to the Change Process Adapted from Knosler, in Pearl, n.d. Common Vision IncentivesKnowledge and Skills ResourcesAction Plan Result NoYes Confusion YesNoYes Resistance Yes NoYes Anxiety Yes NoYesFrustration Yes NoTreadmill Yes Change

Other Resources in the Guide Co-Teaching Connection Access Center Sample Lesson Plans Data Profile (individual data summary)

Other Resources in the Guide 50 Ways to Keep Your Co-Teacher The IRIS Center Council for Exceptional Children –(CEC Standards for Professional Practice) IDEA – Individuals with Disabilities Act INTASC – Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium

Final Notes Take baby steps rather than mass inclusion without proper support Find pockets of promise and build Utilize resources and links in the guide Contact the Literacy Goal Office or LaSIG