Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1140r0 Submission 11n 40 MHz and BT coexistence test results Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interference of Bluetooth and IEEE , MSWIM01 July 21, 01 1 Interference of Bluetooth and IEEE : Simulation Modeling and Performance Evaluation.
Advertisements

Bluetooth / IEEE Coexistence Reliability of IEEE WLANs in Presence of Bluetooth Radios Jim Zyren
Doc.: IEEE /309r0 Submission 2/8/2014 Michael Livshitz, MetalinkSlide 1 Issues With Off-channel TDLS Date: Authors:
Improved CCA for 80 and 160 MHz BSSs
Doc.: IEEE /037r1 Submission March 2001 Khaled Turki et. al,Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Simulation Results for p-DCF, v-DCF and Legacy DCF Khaled.
Doc.: IEEE /567r0 Submission May 2003 Youngsoo Kim, Samsung/SNU and S. Choi, SNU Slide 1 Throughput Enhancement via Frame Aggregation – A Sequel.
Doc.: IEEE /567r1 Submission July 2003 Youngsoo Kim, Samsung/SNU and S. Choi, SNU Slide 1 Throughput Enhancement via Frame Aggregation – A Sequel.
Doc.: IEEE /0818r2 Submission July 2008 Jing Zhu, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Managed Contention Access – A technique to improve Video Streaming.
An approach to the problem of optimizing channel parameters March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /152 Submission.
Integrated Programmable Communications, Inc. November, 2001 doc.: IEEE /484r0 Submission Slide 1 InProComm, Inc. Project: IEEE P Working.
Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission November 2010 Allert van Zelst, QualcommSlide 1 VHT-SIG-B in NDPs Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /082r0 Submission January 2001 Anuj Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /082r1 Submission January 2001 Anuj Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 An Intelligent Frequency Hopping Scheme for Improved Bluetooth.
Doc.: IEEE /00143r0 Submission 3/01 Nada Golmie, NISTSlide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Interference Aware.
doc.: IEEE /252r0 Submission May 2001 Bandspeed, IPC, TI Dallas, TI IsraelSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /026r1 Submission March 2001 Jie Liang, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Jie Liang Texas Instruments Incorporated TI Blvd. Dallas, Texas.
Doc.: IEEE /265r0 Submission June 2001 Robert F. Heile, Consultant Steve Shellhammer, Symbol Technologies Slide 1 IEEE P Working Group for.
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE COEX 02/019r0 Submission May 2002 Art Astrin, Apple Computer Inc. Impact of Bluetooth on b and vice-versa.
Doc.: IEEE Submission January 2001 Shoemake and Lowry, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 IEEE B COEXISTENCE TESTING DATA Matthew B. Shoemake, Ph.D.
IEEE DRAFT RECOMMENDED PRACTICE Clause 14: Collaborative Coexistence Mechanism – IEEE and Steve Shellhammer (Symbol Technologies)
Integrated Programmable Communications, Inc. May 14, 2001 doc.: IEEE /246r0 Submission Slide 1 Integrated Programmable Communications, Inc. and.
Doc.: IEEE /1515r0 Submission November 2011 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide ah Wi-Fi Offloading Considerations Date:
Technical discussion on Re-channelization Proposal for DSRC band coexistence Date:
256-QAM TX EVM and RX Sensitivity
Doc.: IEEE /080r1 Submission January 2001 Jie Liang, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Jie Liang Texas Instruments Incorporated TI Blvd. Dallas,
Doc.: IEEE /026r0 Submission January 2001 Jie Liang, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /543r0 Submission April 2006 Richard van Nee, Airgo NetworksSlide 1 Transmitter CCA Issues in 2.4 GHz April /543r0 Richard van.
Doc.: IEEE /1255r0 Submission TX Mask for Noncontiguous 160 MHz Date: Youhan Kim et al.Slide 1 Authors: November 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /1367r0 Submission Nov 2013 Mingguang Xu, et. Al.Slide 1 Tx EVM for MCS-10 in ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0668r7 SubmissionMatt Fischer, Broadcom TX Mask Shoulders vis-à-vis ACI Date: Authors: May 2011 Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0613r0 Submission May 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom US Channelization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1516r0 Submission November 2011 Huai-Rong Shao, et.al. Samsung ElectronicsSlide ah Channelization Proposal for US Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0868r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 UL & DL DSC and TPC MAC simulations Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0443r0 March 2014 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 What Is P2P Traffic in HEW Simulation Scenarios? Date: Authors:
January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement.
Doc.: IEEE /0785r0 Submission July 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0315r1 Submission Mar 2008 Hart (Cisco Systems) Slide 1 Coexistence Mechanisms at 5 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0645r0 Submission May, 2010 Shuzo Kato, NICT/TUSlide 1 [Intra cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise cubicle environments.
Doc.: IEEE /0839r0 Submission Slide 1S. Abraham, Qualcomm Inc. July 2010 DL MU-MIMO performance with QoS traffic and OBSS.
Doc.:IEEE /321r0 Submission May 2002 Y. Liu, et al Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation Yonghe Liu, Jin-meng Ho, Matthew B. Shoemake, Jie Liang.
Doc.: IEEE /443r0 Submission October 2001 Anuj Batra, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2009 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 40MHz BT Over the Air Demonstration Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE MHz-11n-impact-on-bluetooth Submission July 2008 Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 IEEE n 40 MHz Impact on BT Performance.
Doc.: IEEE /1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Measurements of Coexistence between n 40MHz and Bluetooth SCO.
Doc.: IEEE /446r0 Submission July 2002 Y.Inoue, NTTSlide 1 Discussions on the access control mechanisms for WLAN NG Yasuhiko Inoue, Satoru Hori,
Impact of LTE in Unlicensed Spectrum on Wi-Fi
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/772r0 July 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Non-HT Duplicate PPDU FILS Advertisement Frame Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0309r1 Submission March 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 1MHz Waveform in Wider BW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Uplink Channel Access Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0148r0 Nokia Internal Use Only January 2012 Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia Slide 1 Date: Authors: Uplink Throughput.
Doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission Proposed Changes to Simulation Scenario Date: 2015/01/12 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Authors: January.
Doc.: IEEE /0107 Jan 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) HEW Evaluation Metrics Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /0984r0 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 1 Bluetooth test cases with n 40 MHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 1999 Jim Zyren, Intersil Reliability of IEEE WLANs in Presence of Bluetooth Radios Jim Zyren
Doc.: IEEE /0893r0 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Measurements of Coexistence between n 40MHz and Bluetooth Date:
BLUETOOTH TECHNOLOGY Coexistence Of Bluetooth And Wi-Fi
Submission doc.: IEEE /0372r2 Slide 1 System Level Simulations on Increased Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Jinjing Jiang(Marvell) March.
Doc.: IEEE /66r0 Submission March 2000 Nada Golmie, NISTSlide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks WPAN Coexistence.
Doc.: IEEE /0127r0 Submission January 2009 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 1 Bluetooth AFH and IEEE Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1073r0 September 2013 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Access Control Enhancement Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0992r1 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola Inc.Slide 1 20/40 MHz 11n Interference on Bluetooth Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /243r0 Submission May 2001 Slide 1Steve Shellhammer, Symbol Technologies IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /482r0 Submission October 2001 Steve Shellhammer, Symbol Technologies Slide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /0535r0 Submission May 2008 Thomas Kenney, Minyoung Park, Eldad Perahia, Intel Corp. Slide 1 PHY and MAC Throughput Analysis with 80.
Doc.: IEEE /0992r0 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola Inc.Slide 1 20/40 MHz 11n Interference on Bluetooth Date: Authors:
Bluetooth and WLAN coexistence in dense deployment scenarios
September, 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Adaptive Frequency Hopping - An Simple.
Error Rate Results of OFDM from Bluetooth Interference
July 2008 doc.: IEEE /1021r0 November 2008
July 2008 doc.: IEEE /1021r0 November 2008
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 Submission 11n 40 MHz and BT coexistence test results Authors:

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 2 Objective Measure performance impact on n and Bluetooth (BT) when n operates in 20 MHz and 40 MHz Measurements made in accordance to test scenarios specified in [1] and [2] Test Scenarios –BT Profiles: SCO, ACL and A2DP –802.11n: 20 MHz/40 MHz

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 3 Test Setup Anechoic shielded room used Separation of WLAN devices is 3m due to test facility constraints 11g performance not measured due to time constraints Laptop is the primary n transmitter n Setup –Throughput test using IxChariot –Aggregation ON and video priority used to maximize medium utilization

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 4 BT Adaptive Frequency Hopping (AFH) Definitions AFH off –All 79 MHz channels are used and none of the channels are blocked AFH on: Two types of AFH used –Manual AFH –Manually remove or blacklist channels that get affected by and some margin at the edges. –For e.g. when using 40 MHz with 2, 6 channel, block all lower channels (except for first four) and enable all higher channels (top twenty seven) –Regular AFH Present results with both regular and manual AFH

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 5 Tests Outline Quantitative Test Setups –#1: SCO: Measure Mean Opinion Score (MOS) –#2: ACL: Measure BT throughput Qualitative Test Setups –#4: SCO –#5.1: A2DP: Distance between BT and n = 0.5 meters –#5.2: A2DP: Distance between BT and n = 0.5 meters –#5.3: A2DP: Distance between BT and n = 1.5 meters

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 6 Test Setup #1: BT SCO performance Refers to use-case 1 of [1] & [2]. Adjustments –22 Mbps data rate not measured due to time constraints Setup –Refer slide 3. –Bluetooth Setup SCO link: MOS measured using PESQ P.862 method AFH on: Manual AFH was used –The tester was standing between bluetooth devices

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 7 Test Setup #1: BT SCO performance No n throughput throttling Baseline (AFH off) n 20MHz (AFH off) n 40MHz (AFH off) Baseline (AFH on) n 20MHz (AFH on) n 40MHz (AFH on) BT MOS Average n Mbps Throughput 20 MHz: MHz: MHz: MHz: n throughput: 1 Mbps Baseline (AFH off) n 20MHz (AFH off) n 40MHz (AFH off) Baseline (AFH on) n 20MHz (AFH on) n 40MHz (AFH on) BT MOS Average n Mbps Throughput

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 8 Setup –Refer slide 3. –Bluetooth Setup ACL link: packets of length 160 bytes of type DH5 Maximum achievable throughput in this configuration is about 315 kbps BT performance: Measure throughput AFH on: Manual AFH was used Test Setup #2: ACL performance

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 9 Test Setup #2: ACL performance No n throughput throttling Baseline (AFH Off) n 20MHz (AFH off) n 40MHz (AFH off) Baseline (AFH on) n 20MHz (AFH on) n 40MHz (AFH on) BT Average (kbps) Average (Mbps) 20 MHz: MHz: MHz: MHz: n throughput 1 Mbps Baseline (AFH Off) n 20MHz (AFH off) n 40MHz (AFH off) Baseline (AFH on) n 20MHz (AFH on) n 40MHz (AFH on) BT Average (kbps) Average (Mbps) 1/111 11

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 10 Discussion: Quantitative Test Results n High medium utilization (No throughput throttling) –Without AFH, performance of BT degrades in the presence of n for both 20 and 40MHz MOS is not acceptable for both 20 MHz and 40 MHz n throughput also gets severely affected (down 30 %) –Manual AFH greatly improves the performance of BT in the presence of n for both 20 and 40MHz MOS is comparable for 20 MHz and 40 MHz n throughput has slight degradation n Low medium utilization (1 Mbps) –802.11n and BT performance are not degraded considerably (<10%)

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 11 Qualitative Tests Perception tests for audio quality of BT SCO and A2DP in presence of n 20 MHz and 40 MHz The data presented here is for reference only and it is not intended to be interpreted as comparing different implementations and their performance. Results are presented for limited number of scenarios Note –“blips”: minor interruption in audio of duration <2 second –“dropouts”: major interruption in audio of duration >= 2seconds

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 12 Test Setup #4: BT SCO – Qualitative Tests Equipment –Plantronics Voyager 855 headset and Marvell BT Setup similar to use-case 1 of [1] & [2]. Adjustments 22 Mbps data rate not measured due to time constraints AFH –Regular AFH

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 13 Test Setup #4: BT SCO – Qualitative Test Results AFH Disabled –802.11n: No throughput throttling 20 MHz: Audio is distorted but remains intelligible (on the threshold of being acceptable/unacceptable) 40 MHz: Audio is heavily distorted and marginally intelligible (unacceptable) –Running 1 Mbps (Both 20 MHz and 40 MHz) Audio quality is very good but do hear occasional dropouts (not often) AFH Enabled –Regular AFH –802.11n: No throughput throttling Audio quality was very good for both 20 MHz and 40 MHz With 40 MHz hear slightly higher number of dropouts –802.11n: 1 Mbps throughput. For both 20 MHz and 40 MHz: No audible effect

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 14 Test Setup #5.1: BT A2DP Equipment –Marvell BT Devices Setup similar to use-case 3 of [1] & [2]. Refer slide 4. AFH –Manual AFH

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 15 Test Setup #5.1: BT A2DP – No n throughput throttling – Qualitative Test Results AFH Mode Throughput (Mbps)BT Performance OFFBaseline20 MHz: 98.6 (802.11n only) 40 MHz: (802.11n only) Good audio quality, Rare blips (BT Only) OFF20 MHz87.3Lower number of blips- ~10% - Audio quality is good OFF40 MHz119Several blips and some dropouts - ~25% - Audio quality is not good ONBaseline20 MHz: 98.6 (802.11n only) 40 MHz: (802.11n only) Good audio quality, Rare blips (BT Only) ON20 MHz96.5Good audio quality, Rare blips ON40 MHz176.7Good audio quality, Very few blips

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 16 Test Setup #5.1: BT A2DP – Varying Throughput – Qualitative Test Results AFH Mode Throughput (Mbps)BT Performance OFFBaseline20 MHz: 98.6 (802.11n only) 40 MHz: (802.11n only) Good audio quality, Rare blips (BT only) OFF20 MHz< 60 Mbps*Good audio quality, Very few blips OFF40 MHz< 90 Mbps*Good audio quality, Very few blips * Empirical search: Throughput was varied in steps of 5 Mbps

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 17 Test Setup #5.2: BT A2DP – Qualitative Tests Equipment –Plantronics Pulsar 590A headset and stereo adapter Setup similar to use-case 3 of [1] & [2]. Adjustments: 22 Mbps data rate not measured due to time constraints AFH –Regular AFH

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 18 Test Setup #5.2 : BT A2DP – Qualitative Test Results AFH Disabled –802.11n: No throughput throttling. For both 20 MHz and 40 MHz Lots of dropouts. Audio quality was not acceptable –1 Mbps (Both 20 MHz and 40 MHz) Audio quality is very good but hear dropouts occasionally AFH Enabled –802.11n: No throughput throttling 20 MHz: Periods of music and periods of dropouts. 40 MHz: Lots of dropouts. Audio quality was not acceptable –Regular AFH algorithm i.e. no manual blacklisting

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 19 Test Setup #5.3: BT A2DP Equipment –Plantronics Pulsar 590A headset and stereo adapter Setup similar to use-case 3 of [1] & [2]. Adjustments: Increased distance between tx and BT tx to 1.5m 22 Mbps data rate not measured due to time constraints AFH –Regular AFH algorithm i.e. no manual blacklisting

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 20 Test Setup #5.3: BT A2DP – Qualitative Test Results AFH Disabled –802.11n: No throughput throttling 20 MHz: Audio quality is good but do hear blips 40 MHz: Audio quality is good but because of higher dropouts it is not acceptable AFH Enabled –802.11n: No throughput throttling 20 MHz: Audio quality is very good 40 MHz: Audio quality is good to very good with some blips

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 21 Discussion: Qualitative Test Results SCO –No tests were done with manual AFH –With regular AFH enabled, the audio went from unacceptable to near perfect A2DP –With regular AFH With distance between BT Tx and Tx equal to 0.5 m, audio quality for both 20 MHz and 40 MHz was unacceptable With distance increased to 1.5 m, audio quality improved significantly for both 20 MHz and 40 MHz Note: The headset remained 0.5 m away from n Tx. This still emulates a user working on a laptop while listening to music and amounts to moving the BT tx (stereo) away by 1m –With manual AFH Audio quality is good in both 20 MHz and 40 MHz

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 22 References [1] “11n 40MHz BT test cases”, Eldad Perahia (Intel) et al –Available at 000n-11n-40mhz-bt-test-cases.ppthttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/ n-11n-40mhz-bt-test-cases.ppt [2] “Bluetooth test cases for n 40 MHz”, John R. Barr (Motorola) et al –Available at 000n-bluetooth-test-cases-for n-40-mhz.ppthttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/ n-bluetooth-test-cases-for n-40-mhz.ppt

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 Submission Backup Slides Setup, detailed test results etc.

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 24 Test Setup #1: SCO performance Baseline (AFH off) 11n 20MHz (AFH off) 11n 40MHz (AFH off) Baseline (AFH on) 11n 20MHz (AFH on) 11n 40MHz (AFH on) BT MOS Average n Mbps Throughput 98.4/ /

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 25 Test Setup #1: SCO performance with 1Mbps 11n Throughput Baseline (AFH off) 11n 20MHz (AFH off) 11n 40MHz (AFH off) Baseline (AFH on) 11n 20MHz (AFH on) 11n 40MHz (AFH on) BT MOS Average n Mbps Throughput 1/111 11

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 26 Test Setup #2: ACL performance Baseline (AFH Off) n 20MHz (AFH off) n 40MHz (AFH off) Baseline (AFH on) n 20MHz (AFH on) n 40MHz (AFH on) BT Average (Kbps) Average (Mbps) 97.06/ /

doc.: IEEE /1140r0 SubmissionHarish Ramamurthy, Marvell Semiconductor Inc.Slide 27 Test Setup #2: ACL performance – n 1 Mbps throughput Baseline (AFH Off) n 20MHz (AFH off) n 40MHz (AFH off) Baseline (AFH on) n 20MHz (AFH on) n 40MHz (AFH on) BT Average (Kbps) Average (Mbps) 1/111 11