PQRI Workshop Discussion D Discuss Strategies to Increase the Number of Excipients Labeled USP-NF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policy Aspects of the Transition to IPv6 Geoff Huston Chief Scientist, APNIC.
Advertisements

Mary Jane Harris, PT, MS Director, Accreditation Department, APTA.
Strategies for success? Managing Chemical Risks in Small Enterprises: Review of European Practice – a CEFIC project Ann-Beth Antonsson Swedish Environmental.
PLIVA, a Member of the Teva Group Tihomir Oreskovic
Sorenson Medical, West Jordan, Utah USA Medical Device Development Robert Hitchcock, Ph.D. Director of Engineering & Technology Development Sorenson Medical,
When is Excipient Reduced Testing Appropriate?
Quality Assurance Policy RHSC, SSWG Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 21 June 2011 Morten Sorensen, UNFPA PSB.
Regulatory Auditing. Audit Areas Management Responsibility Auditing (internal and external) Design Control Document Control Purchasing Control Identification.
Discuss the Strategies to Increase the Number of Excipients Labeled USP-NF October 10-11, 2006 DISCUSSION TOPIC D Closing Presentation Moderator:Barbara.
Application of the web based technologies in tourism ( The praxis of Bulgarian tour operators and travel agencies ) Author: Tania Gorcheva, Associated.
A Realistic Approach to Creating an Effective Process Control System Consulting Services, LLC.
ICH Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria (RAAPAC) Overview and Update Robert H. King, Sr. Office of Pharmaceutical.
Atypical Actives PDA-FDA Conference March 9-10, 2011 David R. Schoneker
FDA Economically Motivated Adulteration Conference 119.
Regulatory Challenges in the Cell Preparation Facility Adrian Gee Center for Cell & Gene Therapy Regulatory Challenges in the Cell Preparation Facility.
GMP Document and Record Retention
Workshop 2 Supply reasons Solutions for medicines shortages.
Developing a Harmonized Pesticide Classification System Work undertaken by the Federal/ Provincial/ Territorial Committee on Pest Management and Pesticides.
Integrating CMC Review & Inspection Industry Recommendations Joe Anisko April 24, 2003.
Rapid Microbiology Methods A Regulatory Viewpoint Bryan S. Riley, Ph.D. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Office.
1 MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (ERT 455) HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEM Munira Mohamed Nazari School.
Validation Part 2: Cleaning validation
Slide 1 of 19D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept Training Workshop for Evaluators from National Medicines Regulatory Authorities in East African Community.
Risk analysis – FMEA Workshops. FMEA 1 Simple risk assessment process!!  Identifying risk  Simple method for grading risk  Determines appropriate risk.
7th February PQG Supplier Auditor Certification and Training scheme Introduction to the scheme & implications of the changes David Mogg PQG Chairman.
Industry Trends and Tools for Generic Product Selection KATE KUHRT SHANGHAI JUNE 19-21, 2007.
Third Party Audit Advantageous or Risky?. PQRI Survey Results >90% Audit New Suppliers >90% Audit New Suppliers ~85% Certify Vendors ~85% Certify Vendors.
Regulatory Overview.
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
D. Christopher Watts, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA Science Seminar Series for the Office of Commissioner April 9, 2004 Process Analytical.
Excipient QbD Concepts to Enhance the Development of Robust Drug Products Priscilla S. Zawislak Global Regulatory Affairs Manager - Ashland Inc. Chair.
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
Fourth Annual Medical Research Summit Concurrent Session 4.05 – Managing CROs and SMOs from a Compliance Perspective Michael SwiatochaAprill 23, 2004.
EXCiPACT TM EXCiPACT TM International Pharmaceutical Excipients Certification Minimize risks – maximize benefits.
Shelf Life Extension Program (SLEP)
CONFIDENTIAL ©2014 PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE PRACTICE OF REGULATORY INTELLIGENCE: CASE STUDIES OMICS 5 th International Pharmaceutical.
FDA Regulation of Drug Quality: New Challenges Janet Woodcock, M.D. Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration April.
Blend Uniformity - PQRI Research
PwC 21 CFR Part 11 – A Risk Management Perspective Patrick D. Roche 07 March 2003, Washington D.C.
The Proposed Changes to NDC System Legacy NDC Numbers and Compliance December 11, 2006 Dr. Thomas F. Willer Director Global Regulatory Affairs.
PQRI Opening Session 1 PQRI Survey of Pharmaceutical Excipient Testing and Control Strategies Used by Excipient Manufacturers, Excipient Distributors and.
2013 IPEC Certificate of Analysis Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients
Total Excipient Control (TEC) Tools for Managing Excipient Quality A Pathway to Increased Patient Safety David R. Schoneker Vice Chair – Maker and Distributor.
1 Regulatory Aspects of Pharmaceutical Excipients PQRI Workshop Nick Buhay Acting Director Division of Manufacturing and Product Quality Office of Compliance.
SIDI™ ppt V Standardized Information on Dietary Ingredients (SIDI™) A joint trade association initiative to standardize ingredient information.
Challenges of a First Commercial Product Launch Steve Pondell January 8, 2008.
Quality by Design & Question-Based Review: Observations by the Generic Pharmaceutical Industry Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science October 5,
Proposed Gluten Regulations in Argentina Excipient Realities and Global Requirements.
Dr Patricia Rafidison IPEC Federation Dow Corning Corporation ExcipientFest Asia November 28th Beijing.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
Molecule-to-Market-Place Quality
Purdue University – Industrial and Physical Pharmacy - Morris Discussion Questions of Polymorphism in ANDAs Ken Morris Industrial and Physical Pharmacy.
Some Future Developments Brian Carlin, Ph.D FMC Chris Moreton, Ph.D FinnBrit Consulting IPEC-Americas FDA Seminar, October 21,
Design Documentation Clint Kehres, Brian Krouse, Jenn Shafner.
Implications of FDASIA Legislation in the U.S. for Excipients – Increased Supply Chain Controls Priscilla S. Zawislak Global Regulatory Affairs Manager.
Progress in FDA’s Drug Product Quality Initiative Janet Woodcock, M.D. November 13, 2003.
How characterization of excipient physical and chemical properties helps build quality into drug products How characterization of excipient physical and.
Drug Quality Regulations for the 21 st Century PhRMA Perspective Manufacturing Subcommittee Meeting – May 21, 2003 Gerry Migliaccio Pfizer Inc.
Use of Risk-based Approach for Regulating CMC Changes to Approved Applications FDA Public Meeting February 7, 2007.
Topic #2: Quality by Design and Pharmaceutical Equivalence Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Regulatory Labeling and Marketing. Which ones are involved in label design and control? Manufacturing Manufacturing Quality Assurance Quality Assurance.
Heavy Metals: Regulatory Aspects DIA-SIG RA-CMC working group 15Mar12 Anders Neil Principal Consultant PAREXEL Consulting.
Developing Combined Control Systems IPEC’s first attempt at pulling together the various guidelines into an integrated structure was the development of.
MGT 322 Week 2 Global Strategy Check this A+ tutorial guideline at here are a.
Water Testing Labs in Chennai
“Your sustainable compliance and remediation partners”
BSB Biomanufacturing CHAPTER 11 GMP – Pharmaceutical Water
CTD Content Management
Government Regulations
A FRIENDLY REMINDER ON OTC DRUGS. DRUG REGULATIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES.
Presentation transcript:

PQRI Workshop Discussion D Discuss Strategies to Increase the Number of Excipients Labeled USP-NF

PQRI Workshop Discussion D Current Situation Increasing danger that excipient manufacturers will stop producing excipients that meet USP-NF standards Increasing danger that excipient manufacturers will stop producing excipients that meet USP-NF standards May result in deletion of USP-NF monograph for such excipients May result in deletion of USP-NF monograph for such excipients

PQRI Workshop Discussion D Current Situation Problematic for drug product manufacturers Problematic for drug product manufacturers Additional regulatory burden for excipient information in regulatory filings Additional regulatory burden for excipient information in regulatory filings methods and acceptance criteriamethods and acceptance criteria methods validationmethods validation justification of specificationsjustification of specifications

PQRI Workshop Discussion D Current Situation Contrary to FDA’s cGMP Initiative to: Contrary to FDA’s cGMP Initiative to: strategically reduce industry’s regulatory and paperwork concerns, andstrategically reduce industry’s regulatory and paperwork concerns, and change the regulatory focus to concentrate on those aspects of manufacturing that pose the greatest risk to product qualitychange the regulatory focus to concentrate on those aspects of manufacturing that pose the greatest risk to product quality such as unique attributes of an excipient needed for manufacturing such as unique attributes of an excipient needed for manufacturing

PQRI Workshop Discussion D Survey Results Most (>80%) excipient manufacturers, distributors and drug product manufacturers make their products for global distribution Most (>80%) excipient manufacturers, distributors and drug product manufacturers make their products for global distribution Most (>80%) test excipients according to USP-NF Most (>80%) test excipients according to USP-NF Almost all (97%) drug product manufacturers test excipients per USP-NF Almost all (97%) drug product manufacturers test excipients per USP-NF

PQRI Workshop Discussion D Survey Results Most (89%) excipient manufacturers label their excipients as compendial grade Most (89%) excipient manufacturers label their excipients as compendial grade survey may not be reflective of all excipient manufacturerssurvey may not be reflective of all excipient manufacturers Most (80%) distributors label their excipients as compendial grade Most (80%) distributors label their excipients as compendial grade

PQRI Workshop Discussion D Survey Results Difficulty finding a manufacturer of at least 1 USP-NF grade excipient? Difficulty finding a manufacturer of at least 1 USP-NF grade excipient? 40% of drug product manufacturers40% of drug product manufacturers 25% of distributors25% of distributors

PQRI Workshop Discussion D Survey Results When no USP-NF grade excipient is available, drug product manufacturers: When no USP-NF grade excipient is available, drug product manufacturers: 80%use best grade available80%use best grade available 80%test excipient per USP-NF monograph80%test excipient per USP-NF monograph 90%conduct audit of excipient manufacturer90%conduct audit of excipient manufacturer 78%do not reformulate product78%do not reformulate product 90%do not contact FDA for direction90%do not contact FDA for direction

PQRI Workshop Discussion D Survey Results Reasons for not labeling excipients as USP-NF Reasons for not labeling excipients as USP-NF 35%low demand for USP-NF grade35%low demand for USP-NF grade 30%GMP requirements too restrictive30%GMP requirements too restrictive 30%internal time/resources for audits30%internal time/resources for audits 30%potential to be inspected by FDA30%potential to be inspected by FDA 5% can’t meet monograph5% can’t meet monograph

PQRI Workshop Discussion D For Discussion What are the barriers to labeling an excipient as USP-NF grade? How can the barriers be reduced? What are the barriers to labeling an excipient as USP-NF grade? How can the barriers be reduced? What excipients are no longer available as USP-NF grade? What excipients are no longer available as USP-NF grade?

PQRI Workshop Discussion D For Discussion What are the implications when an excipient user moves from a compendial grade excipient to noncompendial grade (i.e., not designated through labeling suffix, namely USP-NF, Ph. Eur. or JP)? What are the implications when an excipient user moves from a compendial grade excipient to noncompendial grade (i.e., not designated through labeling suffix, namely USP-NF, Ph. Eur. or JP)? What is industry’s burden in supplying analytical method validation data to regulatory agency for excipients no longer labeled USP-NF? What is industry’s burden in supplying analytical method validation data to regulatory agency for excipients no longer labeled USP-NF?

PQRI Workshop Discussion D For Discussion What test methods are used when an excipient user must replace a compendial grade excipient with noncompendial grade? What test methods are used when an excipient user must replace a compendial grade excipient with noncompendial grade? What are the ongoing initiatives at the USP to address these problems? What are the ongoing initiatives at the USP to address these problems?