Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 1 Authors: Transmission Mechanism in MU-MIMO Date: 2010-11-10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /272a Submission June 2001 S. Choi, Philips Research Slide 1 Problems with IEEE (e) NAV Operation and ONAV Proposal Javier del.
Advertisements

Haiguang Wang, Jaya Shankar, Zhongding Lei
Doc.: IEEE /0410r2 Submission March 2011 Slide 1 Data Transmission Protection on the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0534r1 Submission Duration in L-SIG Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: May 2010.
Protocol for SU and MU Sounding Feedback
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0802r0 Consideration on UL MU transmission Date: Slide 1Jinyoung Chun et. al, LG Electronics July 2014 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0627r00 Submission Yuichi Morioka, Sony Corporation Date: Why we need Length Field in VHT SIG May 2010 Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1355r2 11ah Submission Date: Authors: Nov 2012 James Wang, MediaTek Slide 1.
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Doc.: IEEE /0074r0 Submission NDP Type PS-Poll Frame Follow-Up Date: Authors: Slide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Huawei.
Doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /630r1a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research November 2001 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.: IEEE /0342r0 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Power Efficient PS Poll Date: Authors: Date: March, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0608r2 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Low-Power PS-Poll Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Slide 1 Prioritized PS-Polls Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1325r0 Submission Nov PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: David Xun Yang, Huawei, et. al.Slide 1.
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /0324r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel March 2010 DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0037r0 Submission Jan. 17, 2011 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 BW Indication in Non-HT Frames Date: Authors:
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Discussion on OFDMA in HEW
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0060r1 Submission January 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Capability Support for ah Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0288r0 TXOP Sharing Operation for Relay Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom Authors: March 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov
Submission doc.: IEEE /1265r1 November 2015 Slide 1 RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Submission Jul 2012 doc.: IEEE 11-12/0842r0 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Short Beamforming Report Poll Frame Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0843r1 July 2015 Submission(ZTE) UL MU Random Access Analysis Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Yonggang.
Doc.: IEEE /1122r0 Submission Identifiers in HE PPDUs for power saving Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1348 Multiple NAVs for Spatial Reuse Date: Slide 1IITP Authors: Nov 2015 NameAffiliationAddressPhone Evgeny.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0615r0 May 2012 Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Considerations for early NAV indication Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection for MU Transmission Date: Authors: July 2015.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Submission doc.: IEEE /1116r1 September 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Trigger Frame Channel Access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
MCS, NSS, BW and PPDU selection for 11ax
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
ACK Protection Schemes for the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink
120MHz channelization solution
EDCA and BlockAck Extensions for Reliable Multicast/Broadcast Services
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
BlockAck Enhancement for Multicast Transmissions
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
ACK Protection Schemes for the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink
UL MU Random Access Analysis
RTS&CTS Exchange in wideband transmission
[Multi-RTS Proposal] Date: Authors: September 2010
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO link access
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
A unified transmission procedure for multi-AP coordination
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 1 Authors: Transmission Mechanism in MU-MIMO Date:

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 2 Abstract A detailed transmission mechanism for MU-MIMO are proposed in this contribution, including protective mechanism with CTS-to-Self and scheduled multiple RTS/CTS frame changes, MU-MIMO data transmission, scheduled ACK and exception handling.

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 3 Background Current data transmission mechanism was designed for SU-MIMO only –Tx STA sends RTS addressing one Rx STA with one RA field. –Rx STA addressed by the RA field responds with CTS. –Not all recipients’ neighbors can be protected. Challenges to MU-MIMO data transmission: –Define multiple recipients RTS/CTS protective mechanism. –Define MU-MIMO data selection method. –Define multiple recipients ACK scheduling. –Define retransmission rules. –Be compatible with legacy devices.

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 4 MU-MIMO Transmission Mechanism A short PPDU, e.g. CTS-to-Self is used to start MU-MIMO transmission and reserve the MAX transmission duration, including all RTS/CTSs, MU-MIMO data frames, scheduled ACKs and all xIFSs. Multiple RTS/CTS frame exchanges are used to reserve bandwidth for multiple recipients The RTS/CTSs for primary STAs will be arranged first. If no CTS is correctly received from any primary STA, the current MU-MIMO transmission is failed. If the remaining time within the TXOP duration is sufficient to complete an MU-MIMO transmission, AP may initiate a new transmission or retry the previous MU-MIMO transmission. AP may terminate the TXOP with a CF-END. Otherwise, if a CTS is not correctly received, AP should issue the next RTS, until RTS/CTS exchanges for all rest scheduled recipients are issued.

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 5 MU-MIMO Transmission Mechanism (cont.) MU-MIMO data streams are carried in a MU-MIMO data frame based on above reservation. Only data with successfully received CTS will be carried in the MU- MIMO data frame; Planned data without a successfully received CTS will be removed from the MU-MIMO data frame. Scheduled ACKs are used for each recipient to acknowledge the receiving of data carried in MU-MIMO data frame. A CF-END may be used to terminate a MU-MIMO transmission if the transmission is terminated before the duration reserved by CTS-to- Self.

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 6 MU-MIMO Transmission Mechanism Analysis A CTS-to-Self is used to reserve a long duration allowing MU-MIMO transmission through “duration” field AP checks scheduled recipient one by one by RTS/CTS exchanges The RTS(s) for primary STA(s) should be arranged firstly.

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 7 MU-MIMO Transmission Mechanism Analysis (cont.) If AP does not detect a valid CTS frame within one SIFS period plus a delta time (TBD) following the RTS transmission, AP shall initiate the next RTS/CTS frame exchange, or start MU-MIMO data frame transmission. The data for a scheduled recipient with unsuccessful RTS/CTS frame exchange will be removed from the transmitted MU-MIMO data frame.

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 8 The ACK(s) is (are) scheduled based on the stream information indicated in the Nsts field of MU-MIMO data frame. MU-MIMO Transmission Mechanism Analysis (cont.)

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 9 If one ACK is missed, the other STA(s) will send ACK at the scheduled time shown as below. MU-MIMO Transmission Mechanism Analysis (cont.)

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 10 MU-MIMO Transmission Mechanism Analysis (cont.) Only when any primary STA failed to receive MU-MIMO data, the AP will initiate retransmission. The retransmission could be: retransmitted MU-MIMO data frame which includes at least the data for a primary STA failed in previous MU-MIMO transmission, and the data for other STA(s) failed in previous MU- MIMO transmission, or retransmitted SU-MIMO data frame which includes the data for a primary STA failed in previous MU-MIMO transmission, or retransmitted MU-MIMO data frame which includes at least the data for a primary STA failed in previous MU-MIMO transmission, and the data for other STA(s) failed in previous MU- MIMO transmission, and new data for other STA(s) succeeded in previous MU-MIMO transmission

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Summary The proposed MU-MIMO transmission mechanism provides following advantages: –Avoiding hidden node problems in BSS and OBSS –Compatibility with legacy devices –Reuse of legacy RTS/CTS frame exchanges –Avoiding unexpected confliction during the gap when a CTS is missed –Efficient MU-MIMO transmission Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 11

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 12 References [1] Yun.Joo.Kim, et. al., “considerations-on-mu-mimo- protection-in-11ac” IEEE /335r01. [2] Allan Zhu, et. al, “txop-sharing-for-dl-mu-mimo-support” IEEE /1123r00 [3] Tian Kaibo, et. al, “Multiple CTSs in MU-MIMO transmission” IEEE /1067r00

doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Thank you! Sun Bo, ZTE Corp