State and Federal IPP Regulations Grace Scott Pretreatment Coordinator Water Bureau Disclaimer: The information provided.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPA Update David Phillips Industrial Pretreatment Program Coordinator
Advertisements

Designing More Contractor- Friendly Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans April 6, 2005 Joan M. Meitl.
MS4 Permit and Storm Water Management Program Overview
LOCAL IPP REGULATIONS SEWER USE ORDINANCES Sandra Diorka Director of Public Services Delhi Charter Township.
Got Capacity? A Case for Special Allocation Limits
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Info Item: Waste Discharge Rules Presented to the Environment Committee September 14,
EPA Field Activities Relating to Nanoscale Materials Bradley R. Grams, Environmental Scientist Chemicals Management Branch Land and Chemicals Division,
The Pretreatment Program September 14, 2012 Bethlehem, PA.
WDEQ Sanitary Sewer Overflow Reporting Kevin M. Wells Natural Resource Program Manager WDEQ/WQD Herschler Building, 4 West 122 West 25 th Street Cheyenne,
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Rocky Beem 2011 Smithfield Environmental Conference.
2006 AP Government Free Response Question #3 Mark Power.
Industrial Wastewater ENVH 440/545 Fall Outline Regulations governing industrial wastewater discharges King County industrial wastewater limits.
Improving Water Quality: Controlling Point and Nonpoint Sources Chapter 15 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
Clean Water Act Permitting and Operational Discharges from Vessels An Overview February 2007.
Jerald O. Thaler, P.E. Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc. Elaine J. Venema, PE. Fleis & VandenBrink Engineering, Inc.
PRETREATMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES (Draft) 24 th EPA REGION 6 ANNUAL PRETREATMENT WORKSHOP OKLAHOMA CITY 8/14/08 Allen Gilliam ADEQ State Pretreatment Coordinator.
1 What is a Multijurisdictional Agreement? By Scott Mallery, P.E. Pretreatment Engineer September 2007 State of Washington Department of Ecology Water.
The Clean Water Act Objective: To restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters PHOTO OF 2007 OUTFALL AT.
ADEQ Regulatory Process
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of the Hempfield Township’s New Storm Water Management Program.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview: The Lower Providence Township Storm Water Management Program.
Spring Training 2008 IPP INSPECTION. PURPOSE OF INSPECTION The main purpose of an industrial waste pretreatment program is to protect the environment,
IRAC Dry Cleaning Workgroup’s Goals. Answer the Questions What technologies to recommend? How to improve waste management? How to get old, leaky machines.
Laws that Affect the Hospitality Industry Hiring and Employment Laws Worker Safety Laws Environmental Protection Laws Food Safety Laws Laws involving.
Introduction to Business, Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilitySlide 1 of 44 What Is Ethics? Ethics is the set of moral principles by which people.
Scott Hicks & Jessica Anderson.  Sponsored by United Nations  Coordinates international health activities  Helps government improve health services.
Chapter 11 Offenses Against Public Health and the Environment.
Command and Control Regulation in Action Regulating Industrial Water Pollution in the US.
CENTRALIZED WASTE TREATMENT 40 CFR 437 Lessons Learned.
Summary Department of Health (DOH), Clean Water Branch (CWB) Background. Introduction to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits.
© Copyright SafetyInstruction.com 2006 FIRE - SLIDE 1 OF 59 WELCOME OSHA 29 CFR INDUSTRIAL FIRE SAFETY CORPORATE SAFETY TRAINING.
Clean Water Act (CWA) (1977, 1981, 1987). Description and Affects This Act was put into place in order to regulate the amount of pollutants that were.
Metal Finishing Pretreatment in Connecticut SNEATP Tech Talk Presentation Mariana Miller February 10, 2015.
Wastewater And Toxics Don’t Mix Preventing Toxic Discharges To Municipal Treatment Plants Judy Kennedy, WA State Dept. of Ecology Jessica Shaw, City of.
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 1938, 1954, 1958 (FFDCA) Katie Buhai Period 3.
The Safe Drinking Water Act By: Lexie Lewis Period: 2 Mr.Rall.
Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Pretreatment 101 Training Course Sponsored by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, States of Region 6 And the Region VI Pretreatment Association.
MDEQ Updates and Requirements Grace L. Scott Pretreatment Coordinator Field Operations Division, Water Bureau Phone:
Overview of Pretreatment Program Regulations 40 CFR Part 403 Pretreatment 101 Short Course 8/3/09 Addison, Texas David Hardgrave ODEQ State Pretreatment.
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM HISTORY Presented by Rodney Compo- City of West Palm Beach Written by Holly McGrath- City of West Palm Beach, FL and Jennifer Dodd-TN.
Introduction to the Clean Water Act And Water Quality Regulation Tracy Hester Environmental Law Fall 2015 September 15, 2015.
Tyler S Teacher Malone Introduction to Business Chapter 4 Vocabulary This is prepared for the Business student by a student in your business.
ISAT 422: Environmental Management Water Regulations n "Clean Water Act (CWA)" = Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 n Amended by Clean Water Act of 1977.
Introduction to NPDES Permits Introduction to NPDES Permits NPDES = National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. Permit system required by Section.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Regulatory Agencies. Students Will: Be able to identify and describe regulatory agencies in order to analyze the effects they have on the safety of the.
PREVENTING AGRICULTURE POLLUTION. Essential Question: What measures can be taken to prevent agriculture pollution? Objectives: 1. Identify sources of.
University of Texas at AustinMichigan Technological University 1 Chapter 3: Environmental Laws and Regulations David Shonnard and David Allen Department.
26 DAVIS-BACON & OTHER LAWS Federal Labor Standards 101.
Jessica Williams. History/ Basic Information The CWA was formerly known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, which was made in 1948 and was the.
Clean Air Act The law that defines EPA's responsibilities for protecting and improving the nation's air quality and the stratospheric ozone layer. Draft.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Oil Spill Response Plans A History Lesson PHMSA Review and Approval.
Legislative Overview  This quick module outlines in more detail the background of the legal requirements.
1 Water Quality Standards - CWA and Porter-Cologne An Overview.
Municipal Code Title 16 Update: Liquid and Industrial Waste Disposal Board of Water Commissioners November 10, 2014 Item 5.
Fred Noble, P.E. State NPDES Administrator Florida Department of Transportation NPDES MS4 Permit Overview 2016 Maintenance Conference.
RELEASE REPORTING OBLIGATIONS AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL Mississippi Manufacturers Association October 15, 2015.
CWA.
NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS AND GOALS
DOE Approach to Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) in Safety Standards Office of Worker Safety and Health Policy (AU-11)
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
The Clean Water Act 1977, 1981, First drafted: 1948 (called Federal Water Pollution Control Act) -Amendment Year: National Act.
Introduction to the Environmental Protection Agency
How to get Tribal Permitting Authority
Collection System Protection Through an Effective Pretreatment Program
Wastewater Permitting Updates
Presentation transcript:

State and Federal IPP Regulations Grace Scott Pretreatment Coordinator Water Bureau Disclaimer: The information provided in the following slides is an overview only. The actual rules and regulations should be consulted for complete requirements.

Wanted: Industrial Pretreatment Coordinator ChemistBiologistEngineerTechnicianLawyer Data Clerk Public Relations Specialist RegulatorTeacherInspector

Part 23 Michigan Rules vs Federal 40 CFR Part 403 In 1983, Michigan received delegation from USEPA to manage and enforce the Industrial Pretreatment Program. 40 CFR Part 403 General Pretreatment Regulations R of the Michigan Administrative Code Code=Single&Admin_Num= &Dpt=EQ&Rng High=

INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM R (403.2) prevent discharge of metals, solvents & other pollutants prevent POTW interference/pass- through prevent worker health and safety problems enhance biosolids character

Interference You know it’s going to be a bad day when:

(IPP) Prohibited Discharges R (403.5) Fire or Explosion (Flashpoint <140ºF) Corrosive (pH<5) Block Flow Interference or Pass through Heat (<104ºF at WWTP) Oil Toxic Gases Trucked Wastewater (unless at designated points)

(IPP) Local Limits R (4) Local limits are site specific and environmentally protective of the local conditions Evaluate Ten Pollutants (Minimum) –Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Silver, Zinc and Cyanide – Other Pollutants of Concern Influent, Effluent & Biosolids Sanitary (Background) Other locations as appropriate

When is an IPP required? R (403.8) If > 5MGD design and non-domestic users with potential to cause pass through or interference or categorical industrial user a Federal IPP If <5MGD design and non-domestic users with potential to cause pass through or interference or categorical industrial user a Michigan IPP, unless Federal IPP If a state permit (groundwater) with non-domestic users with potential to cause interference or permit violations or categorical industrial user a Michigan IPP Programs must be developed within one year of written notification

Legal Authority R (403.8) The authority may be contained in: –a statute –ordinance –series of contracts –or interjurisdictional agreements Require compliance with pretreatment standards and requirements Control through permit the contribution to the POTW by each Significant Industrial User (SIU) Require installation of technology to meet standards and requirements, and self monitoring and reporting

Legal Authority (cont.) Carry out all inspection, surveillance and monitoring procedures necessary to determine compliance independent of information supplied by nondomestic users Enforce and seek injunctive relief and penalties Immediately halt (after informal notice) a discharge that may endanger persons, the environment, or threatens to interfere with the operation of the POTW Comply with confidentiality requirements All local units of government that collect wastewater from nondomestic sources, shall be responsible for the development and implementation of an IPP consistent with the POTW’s program

Legal Authority (cont.) Permits Requirements Statement of Duration (not more than 5 yrs.) Statement of nontransferability without prior notification to the POTW and provision of a copy to the new owner or operator Effluent limits based upon applicable general pretreatment standards, categorical pretreatment standards, local limits, and state and local law. Self monitoring, sampling, reporting, notification and recordkeeping requirements Pollutants to be monitored, sampling location, frequency, and type Criminal and Civil Penalties and any applicable compliance schedule Future streamlining addition: Slug Control Plan Requirement and Notification of Changes which impact spill/slug potential

Procedures R (403.8) Identify and locate all possible nondomestic users that might be subject to the POTW’s IPP Identify the character and volume of pollutants contributed to the POTW Notify nondomestic users identified of applicable pretreatment standards, 204(b) and 405 of the CWA, and subtitles C&D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (except MIPPs don’t have to notify users of RCRA) Within 30 days of the approval of a list of Significant Industrial Users, notify each SIU of its status and all requirements as a result of its status

Procedures (cont.) Receive and analyze self-monitoring reports Randomly sample and analyze the effluent from nondomestic users. Inspect and sample all SIUs at least once per year. Evaluate whether SIU needs a slug control plan every two years (not required for MIPPs) Investigate instances of non-compliance.

Procedures (cont.) Sample taking and analysis and the collection of other information shall be performed with sufficient care to produce evidence admissible in enforcement proceedings or in judicial actions Annually public notice nondomestic users in significant noncompliance (6 month rolling quarter) Develop an Enforcement Response Plan Prepare and maintain a list of SIUs

Submittal and Approval Process R and R (403.9 & ) Submissions for Approval –Original Program –Modifications

Modifications R (403.18) Substantial Modifications Non-Substantial Modifications

Reporting R (403.12) Industrial User – Periodic Compliance Reports Sampling and Analysis in accordance with 40 CFR 136 POTW Annual Reporting Certification statements and signatory requirements

Categorical Standards and Dilution Prohibition R (403.6) New or Existing Source Dilution Prohibition Combined Wastestream Formula

Alternative Categorical Standards R (403.6, 403.7, , ) Removal Credits – When POTW agrees to treat a categorical pollutant for the CIU Fundamentally Different Factors – When a user applies to be included or exempt from categorical regulations. Claim must be applied for within 180 days of regulation. Net/Gross – When an allowance is granted for pollutants in intake water Equivalent Mass Combined Wastestream Formula

Confidentiality R (403.14) Trade Secrets may be claimed as confidential, if so marked at the time of submission. Discharge information shall be available to the public without restriction.

Upset R (403.16) An upset is an affirmative defense for a categorical pretreatment standard if: –user can establish an upset occurred and can identify the cause; –the facility was operated in a prudent and workmanlike manner and in compliance with applicable O&M procedures; and, –required information is submitted within 24 hours.

Bypass R (403.17) A routine bypass for essential maintenance that will not cause violations does not require advance notice If potential for violation - –If planned, notice must be given 10 days in advance. –If unplanned, a user must notify within 24 hours of becoming aware, followed by a wriitten report.

Categorical Regulations R (40 CFR ) 40 CFR Subpart N – Parts (adoption by reference) Some pretreatment standards only refer to 40 CFR 403 or do not have limits or requirements. These IUs are not considered categorical industrial users (e.g. Plastics Forming) Pretreatments Standards for Existing Sources (PSES) Pretreatment Standards for New Sources (PSNS) No discharge requirement Some are production based, others are concentration based

Streamlining Requirements Flow proportional sampling or documentation that time proportional is representative Slug Control Plan and notification of change in Permit Notification of violation and resampling requirement when POTW monitors Documentation and recordkeeping of BMPs Submission of ALL monitoring data in periodic compliance reports

Questions?