October 19, 2010 State Growth Model Trends AYP Results 2010 School Committee Presentation Brockton Public Schools

How did we do?

2010 School Committee Presentation Accomplishments Concerns Changes AYP Results Gap Analysis Grade Level Analysis Subgroup Performance CPI Performance Primer Gap Analysis State Growth Model Brockton Public Schools

Status Accomplishments Concerns Changes AYP Brockton Public Schools

Brockton AYP 2010 Results Adequate Yearly Progress History NCLB Status ELA Aggregate Yes No Yes No Corrective Action - Subgroups All Subgroups - - No MATH Aggregate Yes No Yes No Corrective Action - Subgroups All Subgroups - - No Brockton Public Schools

MCAS ELA Performance Targets State BPS

Brockton Public Schools MCAS Math Performance Targets State BPS

21 Ways to Miss AYP North Middle School Math 7 Targets3 Categories Brockton Public Schools A + (B or C) + D = AYP

AYP Accomplishments Angelo, Ashfield, BHS, Davis, North, Plouffe, South,& West Earned High Performance Ratings in ELA Angelo, Davis, North, & Plouffe made AYP in the Aggregate for ELA Ashfield, North & Plouffe made AYP in the Aggregate for Math Brockton Public Schools

AYP Challenges District Missed AYP at Every Grade Band. No School Made AYP in Both Aggregate and Subgroups. Brockton Public Schools

Changes National Standards Common Core National Assessments Common Core Assessments Potential Changes in NCLB New Tiers and Levels Brockton Public Schools

Aggregated & Disaggregated Trends & 2010 Results CPI Performance Brockton Public Schools

ELA CPI: Three Different Levels Three Different Stories Brockton Public Schools Aggregate Grade Band Grade Level

ELA CPI Aggregate BPS vs. State Brockton Public Schools BPS State

ELA CPI by Grade Band Brockton Public Schools 5 Gain 7.3 Gain -1.2 Decline

ELA CPI Gain/Loss by Grade Level Brockton Public Schools Elementary Losses Secondary Grade Gains Small Gain 5.8 Gain 6.7 Gain

2010 ELA Gains Brockton Public Schools

Grade 3 ELA Reversal? 2010 Outgains State Brockton Public Schools 5.6 Gain 3.2 Gain 2.4 Gain -2.4 Loss BPS State

Grade 8 ELA 1 Year Regression: 5 Year Positive Trend Brockton Public Schools 8.8 Gain

2010 ELA CPA Aggregate Brockton Public Schools 9.8 Gap.3 Gap

ELA Subgroup Gain BPS vs State Brockton Public Schools

2010 ELA Subgroup BPS vs State Brockton Public Schools 75.1

BPS vs State SWD ELA Gain: Why We Drill Down Brockton Public Schools Elementary Down Secondary Higher

Brockton Public Schools Math CPI Aggregate BPS vs. State State BPS

Math CPI by Grade Band Brockton Public Schools 9.4 Gain 9.8 Gain 4 Gain

Gain/Loss by Grade Level Brockton Public Schools Gains Decline Smaller Gains Larger Gains

2010 Math Gains Brockton Public Schools Area of Concern

Grade 3 Math 1 Year Improvement: Overall Trend is Down Brockton Public Schools Loss 1 Year 1.7 Gain

2010 Math CPI Aggregate Brockton Public Schools 13 Gap 1.9 Gap

Math Subgroup Gain BPS vs State Brockton Public Schools LEP

2010 Math Subgroup BPS vs State Brockton Public Schools

BPS vs State SWD Grade Level Gain Brockton Public Schools Elementary Concerns Secondary Gains Overall Gain

Trends Accomplishments Grade 7 & 8 Large Gains in ELA & Decreased Achievement Gap with State Grades 7, 8, & 10 Improved Strongly In Math & Decreased Achievement Gap with State Grade 10 Improved in ELA Grades 4, 5, 6 Improved in Math Concerns Grade 4 ELA trending down. State trending up. Grades 3-6 have not improved in ELA Grade 3 Math Down while state has gained State Outgained BPS in 5 Different Grades in Math Brockton Public Schools

Primer Gap Analysis Growth

State Growth Model: Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Academic Peer Group Each student is compared to students with a similar score history Percentiles State Growth Percentile is always th percentile means better than 70 % Brockton Public Schools

Growth to grade 7: Three students Mary Paul Peter SGP Grade Grade Grade English language arts Academic Peer Groups

Interpreting Student Growth Percentiles Peter’s SGP was 35. His score was higher than 35% of his academic peers (and lower than 65%). 35 Percent of students Lower growthHigher growthTypical growth Brockton Public Schools Is that amount of growth typical?

Seeking the Northeast Quadrant Low Growth, High PerformanceHigh Growth, High Performance Low Growth, Low PerformanceHigh Growth, Low Performance Growth (SGP) Brockton Public Schools

ELA Scatterplot Brockton Public Schools PerformancePerformance Growth

Math Scatterplot Brockton Public Schools PerformancePerformance Growth

ELA SGP Brockton Public Schools

Math SGP Brockton Public Schools

SGP Trend Summary Accomplishments Every Grade has average or better SGP in ELA BPS Grade 10 had highest SGP among Comparable Districts in ELA 2010 Grade 4 gained 10 points in Math Grade 7 gained 10 points in Math Concerns Lowest growth in Elementary Grades in ELA Grades 5 & 6 are low and declining in Math Brockton Public Schools

Conclusions Missed Aggregate AYP in ELA & Math NCLB Change is Likely AYP Middle & High School Gaining in ELA and Math Elementary Declining in ELA: Gaining in Math 2010 Secondary Decline & Elementary Gain in ELA 2010 Middle School Gain in Math CPI ELA growth is moderate to high Math growth is moderate to low Growth Brockton Public Schools

Brockton Public Schools Data Presentation 2010 October 19, 2010 Dr. Ethan R. Cancell School Committee MayorLinda M. Balzotti Chair Ward One Thomas J. Minichiello, Jr. Vice-Chair Ward Two Richard E. Bath Ward Three Janice A. Beyer Ward FourPatricia A. Joyce Ward FiveWilliam Carpenter Ward SixJames M. Daley Ward SevenTimothy J. Sullivan SuperintendentMatthew H. Malone, Ph.D. Secretary

END AYP Trends SGP 2010 School Committee Presentation Brockton Public Schools