PORT ACCESS ROUTE STUDY PARS. AUTHORITY - RESPONSIBILITY Ports and Waterways Safety Act (PWSA) P.L. 95-474; 33 U.S.C. 1223 Coast Guard is responsible.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) Consistency Review Process House Resources Committee Hearing 1.

Advertisements

Paul Townsend SW WAVE HUB Routeing Measure Options.

ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements.

Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.

First Coast Guard District Office of Aids to Navigation WAMS Review Presentation.

Affirmative AtoN Claims Presented by: Ninth District Legal Office.

Update on the Bering Strait Port Access Route Study CDR James Houck 17 th Coast Guard District 23 May 2012.

Status Update on Future Water Quality Strategies for the Refuge Kenneth G. Ammon, P.E., Deputy Executive Director, Everglades Restoration and Capital Projects.

Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.

Gateway National Recreation Area Jamaica Bay Transportation Studies at Floyd Bennett Field, Jacob Riis Park, Riis Landing, and the Former Pennsylvania.

US Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Northwestern Division 1 System Flood Control Review: Regional Agency Review Briefing Lonnie Mettler Northwestern.

Cook Inlet Harbor Safety Committee Informational Meeting Enhancing the Marine Transportation System (MTS) in Cook Inlet.

Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.

U. S. Coast Guard Role and Process for LNG Mr. Alan Moore LT Dan McLean

Atlantic Coast Port Access Route Study (ACPARS) Slide developed and provided by NOAA NOAA’S HSRP MAY 8, 2013.

Mid-Atlantic Navigation Services Stakeholder Presentation NOAA Hydrographic Services Review Panel Half Moone Cruise & Celebration Center Norfolk, VA 26.

Overview Which IMO measure should you choose? Use of four real world examples Factors to consider in choosing an IMO measure Summary of potential difficulties.

HARPATS 2002 Description of the Coast Guard Auxiliary Harbor Patrol Program at MSO Buffalo, NY Michael Kittell DSO-MS, 9ER US Coast Guard Auxiliary N-TRAIN.

1 SCORT 2010 September 21, 2010 David Valenstein Federal Railroad Administration State Rail Planning.

Preparing an Essential-Use Nomination for CFC MDIs: The U.S. Experience Consultative Meeting on Essential Use Nominations Bangkok, Thailand 6 July 2008.

Alaska Regional Response Team Places of Refuge By John Bauer Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.

FERC and the Development of an Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Robert J. Cupina, Deputy Director Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

North American Emission Control Area

HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,

Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.

Washington Marine & Rail Oil Transportation Study Preliminary Results Linda Pilkey-Jarvis Spill Prevention, Preparedness and Response Program.

United States Coast Guard Port Security Assessment Program Evaluability Assessment LaKeshia Allen Alexandra Sommers May 2, 2005.

ICA Transport Sector Platform ICA Member’s Meeting Paris, 17 May, 2011 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)

1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.

Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing

United States Coast Guard Marine Transportation Systems Management George Detweiler U.S. Coast Guard Washington, DC NOAA’s Hydrographic Services Review.

State of Connecticut Nutmeg Network Statement of Direction 9/10/

CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.

MMS Alternative Energy Program November 28, 2007.

Harbor Safety Committee of the San Francisco Bay Region Established by state law to prevent oil spills in San Francisco Bay by planning “for the safe navigation.

U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.

Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.

1. Marine Transportation Security Regulations Work Plan Webinar presentation January 2014 Transport Canada Donald Roussel

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.

The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 By: Kevin Lee (Period 1) Name: Oil Pollution Act (OPA) Draft Year: 1990 Amendment Year: Never Amended International / National.

Flowchart of Campus Master Planning Process

Intelligence Reform & Terrorism Act – The Act – Intelligence Reform & Terrorism Act – The Act – -The Process- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Tug Escort Work Group Commented on and worked with a state senator’s staff on proposed state legislation that would require tug escorts for chemical tankers,

Millbrook Dam Environmental Assessment Study Dan Marinigh CAO/Secretary-Treasurer Otonabee Region Conservation Authority October 20, 2015 Otonabee Conservation.

CALENDAR ITEM 101 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) S A N F R A N C I S C O B A Y A N D D E L T A S A N D M I N I N G P R O J E C T STATE CLEARINGHOUSE.

Overview of the IEEE Process. Overview of Process l Project Approval l Develop Draft Standards l Ballot Draft l IEEE-SA Standards Board Approval l Publish.

1 THE NORTH CAROLINA REQUEST FOR INTEREST (RFI)/ CALL FOR INFORMATION (CFI) AREA George Detweiler U.S. Coast Guard NC State Task Force Meeting October.

Authority: Who Does What?. Los Angeles – Long Beach Area Contingency Plan Marine Firefighting and Salvage Plan.

A FIRST LOOK: Information and Issues A FIRST LOOK: Information and Issues Recreational Boating Accident Reporting Manual (COMDTINST M ) Federal Register.

CEQA and the Delta Plan Presentation to Delta Stewardship Council February 24, 2011.

North Atlantic Right Whale Recovery Program Gregory Silber Office of Protected Resources National Marine Fisheries Service 5 April 2005.

Project Briefing for BROOKS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STUDY and SANTA ROSA SOUND ALTERNATE CROSSING STUDY April 2015 SPEAKER: BOB.

CEAA 2012 EA PROCESS OPTIONS OCTOBER 15, 2012

Competent authority and cooperation between involved administrations in Belgium 5 June 2015 – MSEG MSP - Lisbon.

Federal Rulemaking Primer January 29, 2016 First Published: April 24, 2013 Producer: Alexander Perry Director: Afzal Bari.

Goals and ObjectivesFeb. 20, 2014 TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: FACILITATING TEXAS’ ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBAL COMPETIVENESS Regional Freight Advisory Council.

AEMCPresentation to GWCFPAGE 1 AEMC and Rule changes Presentation to AEMO Gas Wholesale Consultative Forum Kamlesh Khelawan Director This presentation.

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.

Captain Patrick Gerrity United States Coast Guard Sector Portland

U.S. Coast Guard Regulatory Development

PORT ACCESS ROUTE STUDIES AN UPDATE

Finding the Law: Primary & Secondary Sources in Print

Office of Navigation Systems

COASTAL STATE RESPONSIBILITY (IMO) – HYDROGRAPHY

EMA Board Nominations.

North American Emission Control Area

Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project

Meeting National Hydrographic Obligations

U.S. 20 at State Road 2 New Interchange

Presentation transcript:

PORT ACCESS ROUTE STUDY PARS

AUTHORITY - RESPONSIBILITY Ports and Waterways Safety Act (PWSA) P.L ; 33 U.S.C Coast Guard is responsible for: Designation of fairways and traffic separation schemes to provide safe access routes for vessels proceeding to and from ports.

REQUIREMENTS Required before establishing new or adjusting existing fairways or traffic separation schemes (TSS) Must coordinate with interested stakeholders to reconcile need for safe access routes with other reasonable waterway uses.

STUDY OBJECTIVES To Determine: Present traffic density Potential traffic density If existing traffic routing measures are adequate If existing traffic routing measures require modifications Type of modifications

STUDY OBJECTIVES (Con’t) Define and justify the needs for new routing measures Determine the type of new routing measure Determine if the usage of the vessel routing measures must be mandatory for specific classes of vessels.

PARS PROCESS Determine if PARS is required based on: Request from private party New Information Review of previous PARS Identify the study area

PARS PROCESS (Con’t) Prepare a draft Notice of PARS, including: Reasons for the PARS Invite public comment Specific questions to be answered Any contemplated vessel routing measures and any associated legal effect of those measures Publication of Notice of PARS in Federal Register

PARS PROCESS (Con’t) Conducting the study Collect and analyze data on traffic trends, fishing activity, rec boat traffic, Military activities, environmental factors, economic impact, etc. Notification and Consultation with all Federal, State, and local government agencies within the study area Conduct public meetings (if deemed necessary or requested by an interested party)

PARS PROCESS (Con’t) Final PARS Report Published by District Commander, forwards copy to Commandant (CG-5431) Notice of Study Results Commandant (CG-5413) works with District Commander to create notice which will be published in the Federal Register

POSSIBLE RECOMMENDATIONS Modification of existing vessel traffic routing system Extending or shifting current routes Creating new routes Validate existing measures No change

San Francisco PARS

PURPOSE Identify if there is a need to extend traffic lanes to the limit of the San Francisco VTS coverage area May result in extending existing traffic lanes

Current Issues Popular area for fishing vessels Marine sanctuaries

PROJECTED TIMELINE 10 DEC 09 – Published Notice of PARS study in the Federal Register. 10 DEC May 10 – Comments, Public Meetings, Agency Consultations, Analyze Data 01 May 10 – D11 release Final PARS Report 01 Aug 10 – Notice of Study Results

QUESTIONS?