Doc.: IEEE 802.15-05-0575r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /513r0 Submission November 2001 Anuj Batra, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /151r0 Submission 12 March 2001 James P. K. Gilb, MobilianSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /147r0 Submission March 2001 Stanley K. Ling, Intel Corporation Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /0034r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 1 Detect and Avoid for MB-OFDM Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE xxx a Submission May 2005 Zafer Sahinoglu, Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission January 2001 Shoemake, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /341r0 Submission 12Sept2003 John R. Barr (Motorola) Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
June 2005 doc:IEEE b Slide 1 Submission Liang Li, Vinno Inc. Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /120r0 Submission March 2004 Bert Gyselinckx, IMECSlide 1 Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /0200r0 Submission Jan 2008 Rick Roberts, IntelSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE Submission November 2013 Dotlic, Li, Hernandez, Miura (NICT), Verso, McLaughlin (Decawave) Project: IEEE P Working.
IEEE /r0 Submission July, 2005 Slide 1 Hiroyo Ogawa, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE g Submission May X Wang, YX Fu, J Shen Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE SubmissionSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed.
Doc.: IEEE /443r0 Submission October 2001 Anuj Batra, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE XXX g Submission May FX. Fu, J.ShenSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE −11−0506−01−004j TG4j Submission Nov 2011 Liang Li (Vinno)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE r1 Submission Novemebr 2005 C. Razzell, H. Waite (Philips)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE −11−0506−00−004j TG4j Submission May 2011 Liang Li (Vinno)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission February 2004 McCorkle, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE a Submission November, 2003 CRL-UWB ConsortiumSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
Name - WirelessHD doc.: IEEE g July 2010
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
Jul 12, /12/10 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Coexistence Brainstorming Date.
Submission Title: [Comment resolution for i-31]
Submission Title: [Multi-band OFDM Proposal References]
July 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [FCC-UWB-certifications-below-1-GHz] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Toumaz response to TG6 Call for Applications]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [802.11n Liaison Report May 2009]
Submission Title: [Harmonizing-TG3a-PHY-Proposals-for-CSM]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Common rate resolution]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Text Proposal for FCC NPRM Response Date.
September g Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Recognition of Hiroshi.
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 May, 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Ultra-Wideband.
Submission Title: [Proposal to split the TG3a into two]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: European UWB Regulations Date Submitted: 14 May 2003
Submission Title: [Mid-week Update for WG Meeting]
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
<month year> doc.: IEEE <04-106> March 2004
Submission Title: [Frame and packet structure in ]
<month year>20 Jan 2006
Doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 Jan 2013 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏ Submission Title: [Windowing.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
September 2009doc.: IEEE wng0
平成31年4月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 July 2008 doc.: IEEE c
Submission Title: [TG3a Closing Report November 2005]
Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution for FSK/GFSK Prior Comments]
Submission Title: [TG3a Compromise Proposal]
September 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested TG3c PAR Changes] Date Submitted:
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
January 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Band plan and PRF considerations] Date.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> September 2015
Submission Title: [Common rate resolution]
Submission Title: [Common rate resolution]
Submission Title: [Mid-week Update for WG Meeting]
Jul 12, /12/10 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Dependable Interest Group Closing.
Submission Title: TG9ma Agenda for September Meeting
doc.: IEEE <doc#3>
Jan 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TeraHertz Closing Report Date Submitted: January.
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DAA for Multi-band OFDM UWB] Date Submitted: [ 22 Sept 2005] Source: [Jim Lansford] Company [Alereon] Address [7600C N. Capital of Texas Hwy., Suite 200, Austin, TX 78731] Voice:[ ], FAX: [ ], Re: [To be considered in context of TG3a regulatory] Abstract: [Detect and Avoid (DAA) is under discussion by both Japanese and European regulatory agencies as a non-collaborative coexistence technique. DAA requires the receiver to detect the presence of interference and suppress energy in that portion of the band. MB-OFDM is particularly well suited to implement DAA, because the FFT can be used as a channelized radiometer, and the IFFT can be used to sculpt the transmit spectrum.] Purpose:[To inform] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 2 Background UWB was developed as an “underlay” –FCC bought into the concept –Most of the rest of the world has been skeptical –It’s a coexistence problem What are the issues? –Detecting the presence of an “incumbent” signal (FWA) –Dropping emissions in the shared band so that interference on the “incumbent” is minimized This is a form of cognitive radio –Similar to “waterfilling” TBD: Detection level/confidence and suppression level

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 3 How does MB-OFDM implement DAA? Detect: Channelized radiometer –128 channel FFT inherent in the design –Integrate spectra to achieve desired P d Avoid: Bandstop filter (frequency domain) –128 point IFFT –Additional signal processing techniques can increase notch depth, subject to RF linearity ADC DAC FFT/ IFFT Filter/ Decimate Interp. /Filter AGC Detect Despread Demap Deinterleave Depuncture Viterbi Spreading Mapping Interleave Puncture Convo- lutional Coder MAC/PHY Interface ChanEst CFO Equalize ADC DAC FFT/ IFFT Filter/ Decimate Interp. /Filter AGC Detect Despread Demap Deinterleave Depuncture Viterbi Spreading Mapping Interleave Puncture Convo- lutional Coder MAC/PHY Interface ChanEst CFO Equalize Mixer & Filter Mixer & Filter 90°

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 4 Detect (1) Channelized radiometers have been used for decades –Narrowband detection in a wideband channel –Used in Radar and communication intercept receivers –Theory well developed If FFT bins contain noise alone, distribution is Rayleigh If narrowband signal + noise, distribution is Rician FFT (●) 2 ∫ <><> P(N) P(S+N)

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 5 Detect (2) Averaging spectra reduces the variance of the distribution For ensemble average of N spectra, variance within a bin decreases by 1/N, standard deviation by 1/sqrt(N) Thus, detection probability can be made arbitrarily close to 1 but integration time can become large There is a considerable body of research for fluctuating signals (such as pulsed beacons)

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 6 Detect (3) For MB-OFDM system, FFT resolution is 528/128=4.125MHz kTB for a single tone is = -108dBm Assume 6.6dB NF in RF => N 0 = -101dBm FWA characteristics –5 or 10MHz BW –4W uplink, Downlink power <-90dBm at UWB system For FWA downlink, detection probability at -90dBm should be more than adequate – unless DL is in a fade –Possible for devices in piconet to collaborate –Uplink can always be easily detected –Uplink confirms local activity after downlink detected

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 7 Detect (4) Detection test setup –This is a demo –Fading channel tests will be done later UWB transmitter UWB Receiver FWA signal Generator Rhode & Schwartz Spectrum Analyzer +

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 8 Detect (5) Spectrum analyzer Noise floor MB-OFDM signal (zoomed: 200MHz)

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 9 Detect (6) “FWA” -90dBm “FWA” Signal + OFDM Signal (10ms averaging, -81dBm)

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 10 Avoid (1) Spectral “notches” have been discussed widely in a in reference to MB-OFDM Generally, can be considered frequency domain bandstop filters (FIR) –Like any FIR filter, intentional ISI can be introduced to control notch depth and width –EVM of RF chain must be consistent with desired depth Typically, these notches can be 15-20dB in depth More advanced techniques are under evaluation to achieve deeper notches

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 11 Avoid (2) MB-OFDM signal with 20MHz notch (5 tones) MB-OFDM signal plus “FWA” inside 20MHz notch 20MHz

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 12 Summary These measurements were made on an actual MB- OFDM system BER/PER increase from removal of five tones is insignificant –Erasure performance has been well documented Detection algorithm works, but needs further study –Fluctuating FWA signal –Strategies for downlink+uplink detection Collaborative coexistence (in a laptop, for example) would work even better Spectral sculpting really works…

doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 13 References M.Skolnik, Introduction to Radar Systems, McGraw Hill, 1980 Johanna Vartiainen, “Concentrated Signal Extraction using Consecutive Mean Excision Algorithms,” Proceedings of the 2005 Finnish Signal Processing Symposium - FINSIG'05, August, 2005, Kuopio, Finland, pp S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Detection Theory., Prentice Hall, 1998.