ET: Einstein Telescope

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Hild, Andreas Freise University of Birmingham Roland Schilling, Jerome Degallaix AEI Hannover January 2008, Virgo week, Pisa Advanced Virgo: Wedges.
Advertisements

Stefan Hild for the GEO600 team October 2007 LSC-Virgo meeting Hannover Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling.
Stefan Hild ASR Group meting, November 2008 Squeezing the best astrophysics out of Advanced Virgo Squeezing the best astrophysics out of Advanced Virgo.
Michele Punturo on behalf of the ET team GA # A short introduction to the project.
Michele Punturo European Gravitational Observatory and INFN-Perugia On behalf of the GW ILIAS-next community Gravitational Wave Network.
ET: The Einstein telescope design study
 ET is a “design study” supported by the European Commission under the Framework Programme 7 (FP7)  It is a ~3 years project supported by EC with about.
ET- WP2, Thermal noise issues Fulvio Ricci Assergi (L’Aquila) Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, February, 9th 2008.
Michele Punturo ET scientific Coordinator INFN Perugia and EGO On behalf of the ET design study team 1ET-Michele Punturo.
Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO On behalf of the Einstein Telescope Design Study Team 1GWDAW-Rome 2010.
FP7 Design study proposal Michele Punturo Harald Lueck.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
LIGO-G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
VIRGO: WHERE WE COME FROM WHERE WE ARE GOING GIOVANNI LOSURDO - INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Project Leader for the Virgo Collaboration (and the LIGO Scientific.
Harald Lück, AEI Hannover 1 GWADW- May, 10-15, 2009 EU contract #
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site Identification Jo van den Brand
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site identification and infrastructure Jo van den Brand Tübingen, October.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site identification and infrastructure Jo van den Brand Tübingen, October.
Towards a Design Study Proposal for a 3rd Generation Interferometric Gravitational- wave Detector Harald Lück London, October 26th 2006.
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
Summary and Plans for the WG3 activity H.Lück, M.Punturo.
WG6 Gravitational Waves Michele Punturo INFN Perugia On behalf of the WG6.
E.T. Design Study Harald Lück. 3 main noise sources Thermal Noise Seismic Shot Noise.
E.T. Design Study & European roadmaps Michele Punturo/Harald Lück.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
Status of Virgo A. Viceré INFN-Firenze – Università di Urbino.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
Lisbon, 8 January Research and Development for Gravitational Wave Detectors Raffaele Flaminio CNRS/LMA Lyon.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
R&D on thermal noise in Europe: the STREGA Project Geppo Cagnoli University of Glasgow AMALDI 6 – Okinawa - Japan June
A proposal for additional Low Frequency Gravitational Wave Interferometric Detectors at LIGO Riccardo DeSalvo California Institute of Technology Globular.
WG3 Report Michele Punturo Harald Lück. WG3 composition Co-Chairmen M.Punturo INFN Perugia, Italy H.Lück MPI für Gravitationsphysik, AEI, Hannover, Germany.
Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p1 Michele Punturo on behalf of the ET team GA # A short introduction to the project.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 The Future - How to make a next generation LIGO David Shoemaker, MIT AAAS Annual Meeting 17 February 2003.
International Gravitational Wave Network 11/9/2008 Building an Stefan Ballmer, for the LIGO / VIRGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO G
STREGA & ET - 4th ILIAS-GW general meeting 1 STREGA legacy for ET Michele Punturo INFN Perugia.
Status of Virgo GWDAW12 Status of Virgo GWDAW Dec Leone B. Bosi INFN and University of Perugia (Italy) On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
Advanced Towards Advanced Virgo Giovanni Losurdo – INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Coordinator on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
LIGO G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO 11st ELiTES meeting.
The quest for gravitational waves. 2 The Universe has been studied essentially through EM radiation. GWs have a different origin. The Scientific Motivation.
Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO 1 3rd ET annual workshop - Budapest 23-24/11/2010.
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
Harald Lück AEI Hannover. Thank you Science Team! You did a great job!
ELiTES 4 th General Meeting Michele Punturo EGO and INFN.
Michele Punturo EGO & INFN Perugia 1 2nd ET meeting, Erice Oct'09.
THE NEXT GENERATIONS OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS (*) Giovanni Losurdo INFN Firenze – Virgo collaboration (*) GROUND BASED, INTERFEROMETRIC.
Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO 1MGR13- ET.
Lessons to be learned from the ET design study Michele Punturo INFN Perugia ET-0005A-16 Dawn Meeting
Fulvio Ricci Cascina, November, 24th 2008
The Quest for Gravitational Waves: a global strategy
Advanced Detector Status Report and Future Scenarios
GW Policy: The Future: G3 Detectors
EGO The Infrastructure for Gravitational Wave Research in Europe
THE NEXT GENERATION OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS
Commission II meeting – 7 March 2009
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Signal recycling R&D at LAL: Influence in Virgo
Advanced VIRGO Experiment
Quantum noise reduction techniques for the Einstein telescope
ELiTES The European-Japanese collaboration in Gravitational Wave research Dr. Michele Punturo Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) European Gravitational.
ILIAS WP3 activities report and ET organization
Jim Hough for the GEO collaboration
GEO HF Limits/Goals/Options…
WG3 Activities M.Punturo & H.Lueck WG3 - 4th ILIAS GW meeting.
The views of Virgo collaboration groups on upgraded/advanced Virgo
Presentation transcript:

ET: Einstein Telescope Michele Punturo INFN Perugia On behalf of the ET design study team ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

Evolution of the current GW detectors Current Gravitational Wave interferometric detectors have a well defined evolution line in the next 5-7 years LIGO just completed its S5 scientific run Virgo completed in October 07 its first long scientific run in parallel with LIGO Both the detectors are in upgrade/commissioning mode to implement their 1.5 generation upgrade step (Virgo+, enhanced LIGO) GEO is covering (“astrowatch” mode) the down time of LIGO and Virgo in collaboration with the resonant bar detectors … see G.Losurdo Talk ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

1st generation GW detectors sensitivities 10 -24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 -18 1 100 1000 4 h (Hz-1/2) Virgo LIGO Resonant antennas Hz GEO Core Collapse @ 10 Mpc BH-BH Merger Oscillations @ 100 Mpc Pulsars hmax – 1 yr integration BH-BH Inspiral, z = 0.4 BH-BH Inspiral, 100 Mpc QNM from BH Collisions, 1000 - 100 Msun, z=1 NS, e =10 -6 , 10 kpc 100 - 10 Msun, 150 Mpc NS-NS Inspiral, 300 Mpc NS-NS Merger 1st generation detectors Credit: P.Rapagnani ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 ESO – May 2, 2006 G.Losurdo – INFN Firenze 3

“1.5 generation” sensitivities Monolithic FS suspensions Laser amplifier Higher finesse, lower mirror TN ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 Advanced detectors Enhanced detectors are a step toward the realization of the 2nd generation detectors (“advanced”) Also GEO will participate to the network of enhanced detectors with an upgraded version, “specialized” in the high frequency regime thanks (mainly) to the signal recycling technology GEO HF They are based on “small” changes of the current detectors with available technologies that anticipate the next step Advanced detectors will be online in the >2013 timeslot They will be based on known technologies currently under preliminary engineering phase High power laser (~200W) and compliant optics Lower thermal noise mirrors (substrates and coatings) Lower thermal noise suspensions (FS monolithic suspensions) Better seismic isolation Active filtering in LIGO Focused improvements of the Virgo Super-Attenuator Signal recycling ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

Detection progresses NS-NS (1.4MS): 13  15/50  120/170 Mpc NS-NS Credit: Richard Powell, Beverly Berger. From LIGO presentation G050121 Detection progresses NS-NS (1.4MS): 13  15/50  120/170 Mpc NS-NS

3rd generation detectors Second generation detectors: Will permit the detection of Gravitational Waves (GW) Will open the era of the GW astronomy Will be the “core business” of the next decade in experimental GW research But can we look beyond? Precision GW astronomy needs high SNR to determine the parameters of the astrophysical process Interesting phenomena involves massive bodies that requires low frequency sensitivity in GW detectors We need to think to 3rd generation GW detectors ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 Objectives of a 3 rd generation GW detectors From detection and initial GW astronomy to precision GW astronomy Fundamental Physics: Test general relativity in the strongly non-linear regime Initial and advanced detectors won’t have the sensitivity required to test strong field GR (too low SNR) Most tests are currently quoted in the context of LISA, but in a different frequency range We need to have good enough SNR for rare BBH mergers which will enable strong-field test of GR Black hole physics: What is the end state of a gravitational collapse? Astrophysics: Take a census of binary neutron stars in the high red-shift Universe Adv VIRGO/LIGO might confirm BNS mergers, possibly provide links to g-ray bursts 3rd generation GW detectors could do much more: see different classes of sources (NS-NS, NS-BH) and contribute to resolve the enigma in the variety of g-ray bursts ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

How to arrive to an European 3rd generation GW Observatory? Long preparatory path, already started: ILIAS played a determinant role: ILIAS-GW-WP3 realized the correct environment where to discuss, at European level, the evolution of the current detectors and where to merge the efforts addressed to the proposition of a 3rd generation GW observatory It supported the meetings, the workshops and the preliminary studies All the ET proposal writing meetings have been supported by WP3 WP3 has been also the core of the new WG6 (GW) in the ASPERA road-mapping activity ILIAS-JRA3 (STREGA) partially supported R&D activities in thermal noise issues for 3rd generation GW detectors European Science Foundation supported an exploratory workshop (Perugia, Sept 2005) that has been a milestone in the definition of the strategy for the proposal of a new Observatory FP7 Design Study has been the perfect environment where to synthesize our ideas in a proposal and compete with other excellent proposals ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 ET: Einstein Telescope An European 3rd Generation Gravitational Wave Observatory Conceptual design study proposed at the May 2007 FP7 call Capacities Research Infrastructures Collaborative projects ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

Participant organization name ET: Participants Participant no. Participant organization name Country 1 European Gravitational Observatory Italy-France 2 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Italy 3 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V., acting through Max- Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik Germany 4 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique France 5 University of Birmingham United Kingdom 6 University of Glasgow 7 NIKHEF The Netherlands 8 Cardiff University ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ET: Status of the project The proposal passed the first selection and now we are in an advanced negotiation phase We agreed a budget reduction to 3M€ for 38Months of activity Main costs: man power and travels Description of Work document accepted by the European Officer We are submitting the signed documents to prepare the Grant Agreement Consortium Agreement under final definition ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

Project organization Project organization driven by the “Physics”: Project Coordinator Scientific Coordinator Secretary WP1 coordinator: Infrastructures Task responsible WP2 coordinator: suspensions Task reponsible WP3 coordinator: Topology WP4 coordinator: Astrophysics WP5: Management Executive board Governing Council Science Team Institutions Scientific community ET Project Information fluxes Project organization driven by the “Physics”: 4 working groups are devoted to the major technical and scientific issues Let see the main technical aspects: ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 3 main noise sources 1st generation 2nd generation 3rd generation 1 10 100 1000 10000 -25 -24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 Seismic Shot Noise Thermal Noise ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 Thermal Noise Long interferometer arms Cryogenic optics Large beams, large optics Non-gaussian beams Improved coatings 3 main noise sources 1st generation 2nd generation 3rd generation 1 10 100 1000 10000 -25 -24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 Thermal Noise Long interferometer arms Cryogenic optics Large beams, large optics Non-gaussian beams Improved coatings 2nd generation 10km ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 Cryogenic Optics Test masses and suspensions thermal noise reduces at low temperature: <X2> ~ T Thermoelastic noise of the mirror substrates and coatings decrease: <X2> ~ α T2 Thermal expansion rate a decreases at low temperature; Mechanical Q of some materials increases at low temperature Thermal lensing: Thermal conductivity increases and consequently reduces thermal gradients on the coating; Refraction index variation with temperature is very small at low temperature; (Sapphire @ 20K β = 9 × 10−8, Fused Silica @ 300K β ~ 10−6) ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS “supported” or related activities Silicon substrates R&D activities in many European Labs: Glasgow, INFN Florence & Perugia, Jena University, … Coatings studies R&D activities in many European Labs: Glasgow, INFN Perugia, LMA-Lyon, MPG Hannover, … Cryogenic Super attenuator R&D activities in INFN Rome & Pisa ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 3 main noise sources Thermal Noise Long interferometer arms Cryogenic optics Large beams, large optics Non-gaussian beams Improved coatings Thermal Noise Long interferometer arms Cryogenic optics Large beams, large optics Non-gaussian beams Improved coatings 1st generation 2nd generation 3rd generation 1 10 100 1000 10000 -25 -24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 10km 10km, 20K ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 3 main noise sources Thermal Noise Long interferometer arms Cryogenic optics Large beams, large optics Non-gaussian beams Improved coatings Thermal Noise Long interferometer arms Cryogenic optics Large beams, large optics Non-gaussian beams Improved coatings 1st generation 2nd generation 3rd generation 1 10 100 1000 10000 -25 -24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 10km, 20K 10km, 20K, 10cm ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 Non Gaussian Beams Thermal noise in a GW interferometric detector could be further reduced by using “flatter” beams: ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 3 main noise sources Thermal Noise Long interferometer arms Cryogenic optics Large beams, large optics Non-gaussian beams Improved coatings Thermal Noise Long interferometer arms Cryogenic optics Large beams, large optics Non-gaussian beams Improved coatings 1st generation 2nd generation 3rd generation 1 10 100 1000 10000 -25 -24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 10km, 20K, 10cm 10km, 20K, 10cm, non gauss ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 3 main noise sources Shot Noise High laser power Squeezing Long interferometer arms Shot Noise High laser power (maybe 1550nm for silicon; less thermal lensing @ 25K) Shot Noise High laser power 1st generation 2nd generation 3rd generation 1 10 100 1000 10000 -25 -24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 800kW 3MW Shot Noise ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 3 main noise sources Shot Noise High laser power Squeezing Shot Noise High laser power Shot Noise High laser power Squeezing Long interferometer arms Shot Noise High laser power Squeezing Long interferometer arms Multiple colocated interferometers 1st generation 2nd generation 3rd generation 1 10 100 1000 10000 -25 -24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 800kW 3MW 3MW, 6dB 3MW, 6dB, 10km 3MW, 6dB, 10km, 3ifos ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

Co-located interferometers “Old” idea still under debate Possible implementation: 3 detectors in a triangle configuration Rüdiger, ‘85 Antenna Patterns: Angular response of a standard ITF Angular response of the triangle configuration Credit: Cella, Vicerè ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 3 main noise sources 1st generation 2nd generation 3rd generation 1 10 100 1000 10000 -25 -24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 Underground operation Homogeneous ‚soil‘ Seismic ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

Underground operations LISM: 20 m Fabry-Perot interferometer, R&D for LCGT, moved from Mitaka (ground based) to Kamioka (underground) Seismic noise strongly reduced 102 overall gain 103 at 4 Hz Credit: K.Kuroda ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

Seismic Isolation Shortcut Newtonian Noise! ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 Figure: M.Lorenzini

Newtonian Noise credit: G.Cella Compression waves Surface waves Surface waves give the main contribution to newtonian noise (Compression waves not included) Reduction factor NN reduction of 104 @5 Hz with a 20 m radius cave Surface waves die exponentially with depth Cave radius [m] 102 less seismic noise x 104 geometrical reduction 106 overall reduction (far from surface) ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 Credit: G.Cella

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 3 main noise sources 1st generation 2nd generation 3rd generation 1 10 100 1000 10000 -25 -24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 1st generation 2nd generation 3rd generation Newtonian noise Underground Ground surface ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 Conclusions The target of the four Working Groups in the ET project is to try to transform these (and many other) ideas in a coherent conceptual design It is an huge job for a restricted set of persons ET is an emerging facility for the whole Europe and we don’t want to limit the contribution to the founding team/institutions The proposal writers created in the project structure a special body that permits the exchange with a larger Scientific Community The Science Team has been considered extremely important by the project referee and already promoted the interest of European and extra-European Scientists If you are interested, please, contact us Executive board Governing Council Science Team Institutions Scientific community ET Project ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008 Comments ILIAS-N5 played a fundamental role in building-up the framework where ET project is born ILIAS-JRA3 partially supported the technological development needed to “think” to ET ET is a conceptual design, with any R&D support: It needs a further support from the ILIAS (-next) community ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008

Conclusions: Planning You are here ´06 ´07 ´08 ´09 ´10 ´11 ´12 ´13 ´14 ´15 ´16 ´17 ´18 ´19 ´20 ´21 ´22 Virgo GEO LIGO LISA E.T. Virgo+ Advanced Virgo GEO HF Hanford LIGO+ Advanced LIGO Livingston Launch Transfer data DS PCP Construction Commissioning data ILIAS General meeting, Jaca Feb 2008