National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Kazimierz Bilanow Managing Director, Perspektywy Education Foundation, Poland How quality.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.

Advertisements

1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.

By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.

| 1 Developments in the Norwegian Model for Quality Assurance in Higher Education and the Role of NOKUT Developments in the Norwegian Model for.

Changes in Quality Assurance: the Case of Germany ECA Seminar Changing Systems Den Haag, 9 December 2009 Academic Director Prof. Dr. Rainer Kuenzel Wilhelm-Busch-Straße.

BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF- 18 MAY BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF 18 MAY 2009 BACKGROUND - ERASMUS SORBONNE DECLARATION 1998 (FRANCE, GERMANY, ITALY, UK)

1 Bologna Shaping the Agenda Bologna today and tomorrow Lesley Wilson Secretary-General, European University Association.

1 The Labour Market Integration of Immigrants in Germany Key results of the OECD-Report Thomas Liebig Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs.

Integrating the Three Pillars of Sustainable Development:

Scaling up the global initiative on the implementation of the SNA and supporting statistics Meeting on Scaling up the coordination and resources for the.

Youth Unified Sports®: Young people with and without intellectual disability in school-based sports teams Martha Jo Braycich Director, Organizational Development,

Bernd Wächter Director, ACA Fostering student mobility. Bruxelles 29 May 2008 Student mobility. What is the realistic picture in the EHEA today?

Current initiatives in rankings: how do you see them from the perspective of your agency? Tia Loukkola 28 September 2009.

International guidelines: Similarities and Criticisms

Korkeakoulujen arviointineuvosto Rådet för utvärdering av högskolorna The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC) Internal quality assurance.

ECA - Code for the selection of experts Rolf Heusser, Chairman of ECA Oslo, 14 February 2008.

European Developments in Quality Assurance – an Overview Achim Hopbach ENQA Vice President.

REALIZING BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINAS EUROPEAN POTENTIAL: FROM POST-CONFLICT TO PRE-ACCESSION FROM DAYTON TO BRUSSELS - PROGRESS ON EU INTEGRATION - Mr. Adnan.

Planning and use of funding instruments

The European Qualifications Framework (EQF)

NexSAT NexSAT Steering Group Meeting - 8 June 2004 © 2004 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) 1 Welcome to the 4th meeting.

MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.

Outcomes of a recent study: National Qualifications Framework – a possibility for having level 5 in Higher Education (Polish Rectors Foundation and Pearson.

HERODOT International Conference: Torun, Poland 2-5 September Tuning and European Higher Education Geography Kevin Crawford & Karl Donert Liverpool.

1 The new unified French evaluation agency for research and higher education: a direct consequence of the international rankings Pr. Alain Menand, Director.

HE in FE: The Higher Education Academy and its Subject Centres Ian Lindsay Academic Advisor HE in FE.

Population Change: 2005 versus 2004 More than 2% 1% to 2% 0% to 1% Less than 0% US: 0.94%

Bart Ooijen Sport Unit European Commission Torun 12 December 2011 Sport and EQF A Perspective from the European Commission.

Graduate Surveys in Germany as a Tool to Measure and Improve the Relevance of Higher Education Contribution to the International Seminar The Relevance.

Engaging Learners at Multiple Levels: Innovations to support the development of professional practice in e-learning Adrian Kirkwood, Robin Goodfellow &

1 Educate to Innovate Intel ® Education Initiative in China March 2010.

Strategic Leadership: Key principles of effective leadership & strategy Bob de Wit Professor of Strategic Leadership, Open Universiteit Director, Strategy.

Madrid Territorial Review February 6-9, 2007 UAM Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Factores de Crecimiento urbano Higher Education & Competitivity Antonio.

Education and global cities, St. Petersburg, March 2014 Quality of rankings in the spotlight Education and global cities, St. Petersburg, March 2014 Waldemar.

Structural Development and Quality Assurance of Higher Education

TQA CONCEPTS & CORE VALUES

Higher education reforms in Armenia: experiences, obstacles and perspectives using the Bologna process Quality Assurance in Higher Education and Bologna.

© S Haughton more than 3?

A Human Resource Management Approach

Findings from a survey of HGIEs in eight countries and policy implications Mutual Learning Seminar Session II: Policies to support high-growth innovative.

The use of the CEFR at national level in the member states of the Council of Europe Waldek Martyniuk José Noijons Language Policy Forum 2007.

BS-ERA.NET project- state of the art Dr. Şerban PANAITESCU Project Coordinator International Learning Network (ILN) meeting on the implementation of International.

Addition 1’s to 20.

Krzysztof Krajewski Jagiellonian University Department of Criminology Krakow - Poland Gaps in the knowledge base – evidence in the criminal justice system.

Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts

Korkeakoulujen arviointineuvosto — Rådet för utvärdering av högskolorna — The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC) eLearning and Virtual.

Website: Bologna Secretariat Transparency Tools in The European Higher Education Area Viorel Proteasa 2010.

Information for potential research suppliers July 2014 Working with the UK Commission for Employment and Skills.

1 Bologna Process Seminar Friday 12 May The Mobility Challenge Sorbonne Declaration, May 1998 “At both undergraduate and graduate level, students.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc Topic 9 (Chapter 15) Inequality in Earnings.

1. Karadeniz Technical University Continuing Education Center has been established to organize Karadeniz Technical University’s continuing education programs,

A A member of the U.N. Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction An international scientific organization dedicated to the reduction of disaster risk.

National rankings as an integral part of the global university landscape Waldemar Siwiński Vice-President, IREG Observatory President, Perspektywy Education.

Ranking - New Developments in Europe Gero Federkeil CHE – Centre for Higher Education Development The 3rd International Symposium on University Rankings.

Ranking universities: The CHE Approach Gero Federkeil CHE – Centre for Higher Education Development International Colloquium “Ranking and Research Assessment.

Career Structure and Challenges for Young Faculty at Chinese Research Universities Qi Wang Center for World-Class Universities Graduate School of Education.

Rating and Ranking: Pros and Cons Dr. Mohsen Elmahdy Said Professor, Mechanical Design and Production Department Faculty of Engineering – Cairo University.

The CHE ranking The multi-dimensional way of Ranking Isabel Roessler CHE – Centre for Higher Education Development International Conference “Academic Cooperation.

Searching for Globally Feasible Indicators from Domestic Rankings Ya Lan Xie and Ying Cheng Graduate School of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University,

Gero Federkeil Expert Seminar „Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Lifelong Learning“, Berlin, February 2011 Rankings and Quality Assurance.

Role of University Rankings in Kazakhstan Prof. Sholpan Kalanova BRATISLAVA 2011.

Natalya Kryvulina, Andrey Kashyn June, 2009 Astana, Kazakhstan.

Academic Ranking of World Universities

Higher Education Reform Toward Autonomous University : Lesson Learned from Indonesia Satryo Soemantri Brodjonegoro Director General of Higher Education.

SciVal to support building a research strategy

Matching Skills for the Amsterdam region’s Development

Indicators&Criteria in External Quality Assessment

Presentation transcript:

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Kazimierz Bilanow Managing Director, Perspektywy Education Foundation, Poland How quality and competitiveness of the European universities are reflected in global academic rankings?

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May Introduction Global university ranking is a relatively new phenomenon: rankings of the first generation (1.0), compared to advanced national rankings (US News & World Report and Perspektywy in Poland), global rankings demonstrate limitations, more data becomes available, steps towards global rankings of the second generation (2.0).

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May Ranking construction: defining whom the ranking is made for, defining a group of higher education institutions to be included in the ranking, selecting adequate criteria to define and characterize a group of HEIs, attributing percentage weight to selected criteria, securing acceptance for the ranking among the main groups of stakeholders. Calculations based on the multi-criteria analysis (MCA).

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May National v. global ranking National ranking large group of detailed criteria available, groups of HEIs easy to define. Global rankings selection of HEIs and relevant criteria more difficult, higher education systems differ greatly from one country to another.

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May National v. global ranking National rankings: rich data available, large spectrum of criteria (32 – Perspektywy), provide more precise picture of HEI, HEIs know faster if steps taken contributed to improvement of their position in ranking. Global rankings: lack of compatible and up-to-date worldwide statistics on higher education, feed-back is slow and provides less information.

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May National rankings: US News & World Report prepared by Bob Morse since Perspektywy University Ranking since “Self educating” rankings that closely follow changes in Higher Education. Use spectrum of criteria reflecting different missions of universities and various aspects of their activities. National rankings are published in over 40 countries.

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings 7 32 criteria in 5 groups: Studying environment Prestige Internationalisation Scientific strength Innovation Case study – evolution of a ranking

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May Global rankings: Shanghai ranking (ARWU) – published by Professor Nian Cai Liu of the Shanghai Jiao Tong University (since 2003), QS-THE ranking ( ), Leiden ranking, Webometrics. limitations in the number of criteria, lack of flexibility allowing for evolution, still young phenomenon yet to grow and evolve.

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings House of ranking… Scientific strength Working environment Studying environment Internatio- nalisation Peerreview Prestige + employers Innovation

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings ARWU ranking Scientific Strength (partly) Studying environment PeerReview(partly)

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May Leiden University ranking (bibliometrics)... Studying environment

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings THE-QS ranking… Studying environment Internatio- nalisation Peerreview Prestige + employers

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Webometrics ranking… Innovation

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May Global rankings 2.0 New generation global rankings: wider range of criteria, allow for complex analysis, some under construction: (U-Multirank European global ranking), new global ranking THE underway: number of criteria increased to 13 or even 16, introduction of international ranking panel.

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May Future… For universities and ministries of education, national rankings provide a more thorough and in-depth information than global rankings do. Global rankings have their place too, especially if they: are properly constructed, provide clear information about themselves.

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May Rankings’ evaluation Measures directed to the improvement of the quality of rankings. Berlin Principles adopted in 2006; international group of rankers and ranking experts (IREG) led by Jan Sadlak IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence established in 2009.

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May Rankings’ evaluation

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Warsaw, 18-19, May Rankings’ evaluation Community of rankers: understand social responsibility, read arising expectations, take action to improve quality national and global rankings.

National university rankings and the evolution of global rankings Only the combination of all criteria give a full picture… Thank you for your attention Kazimierz Bilanow Ph.D. Managing Director, Perspektywy Education Foundation, Poland