Results so far…. And things that still need to be done 4rd project meeting, 17th of March 2011, the Netherlands

1. Intake phase 3. Validation phase 4. Report phase 5. Accreditation phase Evaluation - intakeform - intake interview positive advice: cost overview, APL agreement 2. Recognition phase - portfolio -Portfolio assessment -Observation / Interview - format APL report - APL certificate

1. Intake phase 2. Recognition phase 3. Validation phase 4. Report phase 5. Accreditation phase Evaluation pilot - intakeform - quickscan positive advice: cost overview, APL agreement - portfolio - portfolio assessment - observation - format Dutch APL report - APL certificate Evaluation: Homework: - interview (√) -checklists tutors - translate portfolio model -translate checklist - 5 tutors fill in checklist - 10 younster fill portfolio -Sending outcomes - interview* - checking assment on quality criteria - assess 10 youngster -Sending outcomes - interview* - translate report - fill in report per youngster - sending outcomes - interview* - questionnaire - describe your way of accreditate by filling in questionnaire -Sending outcomes Pilot - Logbook -Translate logbook - Tutors fill in logbook per youngster - sending outcomes * These interviews will be combined in 1 interview - intake 10 youngsters

2. Recognition phase - portfolio- interview (√) -checklists tutors - Translate portfolio model (√) - Translate checklist (√) - 5 tutors fill in checklist (√) - 10 younster fill portfolio - Sending translated portfolio (√) - Sending 5 checklists (√) - Sending 10 filled portfolio (PT, ?) Phase Instrument Evaluation Homework Result: Revised APL Portfolio model (in four languages) that can be used by youngsters in Juvenile prison. Result: Revised APL Portfolio model (in four languages) that can be used by youngsters in Juvenile prison.

Phase Instrument Evaluation Homework 3. Validation phase - portfolio assessment - observation - interview* - checking assment on quality criteria - checking assment on quality criteria (PT,NL,?,) - assess 10 youngster - sending filled in checklist on quality criteria (PT,NL,, ) Results: -The assessments in the APL procedure fulfill to most of the criteria of a competence based assessment - The validation phase can be applied in the pilot of each partner Results: -The assessments in the APL procedure fulfill to most of the criteria of a competence based assessment - The validation phase can be applied in the pilot of each partner

Phase Instrument Evaluation Homework 4. Report phase - format APL report - interview* - translate report (√) - discuss report with 3 tutors - adapt report - fill in report per youngster - sending adapt version of report (√) - sending 10 filled in reports Results: - Revised APL report format (in 4 languages) -The report phase can be applied in the pilot of each partner Results: - Revised APL report format (in 4 languages) -The report phase can be applied in the pilot of each partner

Phase Instrument Evaluation Homework 5. Accreditation phase - APL certificate - interview* - questionnaire - describe your way of accreditate by filling in questionnaire -sending filled in questionnaire Result:  we will do this part tomorrow after lunch

Phase Instrument Evaluation Homework Evaluation pilotPilot - Logbook - Translate logbook (√) - Tutors fill in logbook per youngster - Write summary main findings logbooks in English - Sending translated logbook (√) - Sending 10 filled in logbooks - Sending summary main finding in English - tutors fill in logbooks for every youngster - answer questions for summary logbook resultsquestions - sending summary of logbooks to Simone - sending 10 filled in logbooks to Simone

Results Pilot (so far) Italy CSCS Portugal ISQ Netherlands De Sprengen Intake√8√8√ 10 intakeforms √7* Recognition phase √8√8√ 10 portfolio’s√5√5 Validation phase Regional system Please send prove√5 Report phase Please send prove√5√5 Accreditation phase Please send prove√5

Results logbooks Results logbooks: Amount of logbooks analysed Results Portugal0 Italy0 Netherlands 3 Tutors found the APL procedure valuable The portfolio model needs more examples and images Tutors spend +/- 1,5 hour supporting the youngster by filling the portfolio

Practicality of the APL project All partners agree that tutors can work with this APL procedure in prison. Some partners say that they need extra training or support. All partners agree that youngsters can work with this APL procedure if they are supported well. All partners agree that the APL procedure is logically designed. Although some activities needed to be adapted. It is hard to say if the APL procedure reached the intended goal. Not all the results are there yet.

Final results The final format of the APL procedure can only be delivered if I receive all the input.

Questions