1 Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission Performance Measures Work Group Efficiency/Cost Measures 03/14/2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making Payment Reforms Work for Patients and Families Lee Partridge Senior Health Policy Advisor National Partnership for Women and Families January 28,
Advertisements

April 13, Matching Revenue Flows with the Populations Needs: The Experience in Maryland John M. Colmers VP, Health Care Transformation and Strategic.
Chartbook 2005 Trends in the Overall Health Care Market Chapter 4: Trends in Hospital Financing.
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 4.0: Trends in Hospital Financing Chart 4.1: Percentage of Hospitals with Negative Total Margins, 1981 – 2006 Chart 4.2: Aggregate.
Chapter 4: Trends in Hospital Financing. Trends in Hospital Financing Chartbook 2003 According to the AHA Annual Survey, approximately 29 percent of hospitals.
Exhibit 1. National Health Expenditures per Capita, 1980–2007
BEGIN. HealthShare Contracts with Providers & Purchasers Integrated Service Providers Management Marketing Provides quality care Makes business.
MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
AAMC Contacts: Jennifer Faerberg Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Hospital Compare Release April, 2012.
Instructor’s Name Semester, 200_
AHA Task Force on Variation in Health Care Spending Report to the Institute of Medicine Committee on Geographic Variation In Health Care Spending and Promotion.
13. Healthcare Sector Costs Payments and revenue received by physicians and healthcare entities represent the cost of business for the government, insurance.
CareFirst’s White Paper on Annual Updates: The Annual Allowance Calculation A Proposed Process for Meeting the Dual Waiver Tests of the Demonstration CareFirst.
New All-Payer Model for Maryland Population-Based and Patient-Centered Payment and Care Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission December 2014.
1 Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission New All-Payer Model for Maryland Population-Based and Patient-Centered Payment Systems.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” 30 Years of Medicaid Innovation Our first care is your health.
Medicare GME PRIMER OGME Development Initiative. Direct Graduate Medical Education (DGME) Payment Payment for Medicare’s share of the costs of training.
MedPAC Hospice Payment Adequacy Meeting Summary at a Glance: The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) met 12/11/09 and commissioners heard a staff.
1 Wisconsin Partnership Program Steven J. Landkamer Program Manager Wisconsin Dept. of Health & Family Services July 14, 2004.
Pioneer ACO Overview to NYSDOH ACO Workgroup March 6, 2014.
Tracey Moorhead President and CEO May 15, 2015 No Disclosures ©AAHCM.
Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly PACE Financing Chris van Reenen, NPA MN PACE Summit July 2004.
Cost-Effectiveness Problem l You have a $1.5 billion budget to spend on any combination of these programs:
Maryland’s APCD Linda Bartnyska Acting Director, Center for Analysis & Information Services NAHDO APCD Meeting October 25, 2012 January 23,
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
6/15/ Hospital Rate Setting Methods for State Fiscal Year 2011 June 15, 2010 Department of Health Services Division of Health Care Access and Accountability.
Independent Long Term Care: Creating Consumer Choice and Cost Savings.
Includes Supplements 12 through 13
 MedPac Report  Rebasing  Cost Report Update 1.
How Much Does Medicare Pay Hospitals for Adverse Events? Building the Business Case for Investing in Patient Safety Improvement Chunliu Zhan, MD, PhD,
1 Estimating non-VA Health Care Costs Todd H. Wagner.
Rural Input for Health Care Payment Learning and Action Network March 25, 2015.
The Heritage Foundation May 19, 2011 “How Should Washington Control Medicare Spending?” James C. Capretta Visiting Fellow
0 Overhead and the Truth about Efficiency Metrics.
Delmar Learning Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company Nursing Leadership & Management Patricia Kelly-Heidenthal
Meritus Health Family Medicine Residency Program September 10, 2015 Presentation to IGME Workgroup.
Ozcan: Chapter 9 Productivity ISE 468 Spring 2013 Dr. Joan Burtner.
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
Better, Smarter, Healthier: Delivery System Reform U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1.
1 Delivery System Reform: Developing Accountable Care Organizations John Bertko, F.S.A. Visiting Scholar Brookings Institution July 30, 2009 State Coverage.
Improving Patient-Centered Care in Maryland—Hospital Global Budgets
Actuarial Research Corporation1 Inside the Black Box: Adjustments and Considerations for Public Policy Proposals AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting:
ENHANCING VALUE IN MEDICARE Brian Biles, MD, MPH The George Washington University January 14, 2007.
A Performance Monitoring Resource for Critical Access Hospitals, States, and Communities CAH Financial Indicators Report for Our Hospital CAH Financial.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: PUSH FROM INPATIENT TO OUTPATIENT CARE
Vantage Care Positioning System®: Make Your Case with Medicare Spending Data November 2014 avalere.com.
Autumn Staff briefings As a NHS patient, care is provided free at the time you need it, whether this is from a hospital or community nurse or.
CAHMPAS Financial Indicators for Our Hospital
Trends in Hospital Financing
Healing our Health System Models of Care
Measuring Efficiency HSCRC Performance Measurement Workgroup
MARYLAND HEALTH SERVICES COST REVIEW COMMISSION
Hospitals Student lecture
Indian Health Care Improvement Fund Workgroup Update
Chart 1.3: Per Capita National Health Expenditures, 1980 – 2014(1)
The Current Status of the Nursing Home Industry
Chart 1.10: Total Prescription Drug Spending, 1980 – 2014(1)
ISE 468 ETM 568 Spring 2017 Dr. Joan Burtner
Chart 1.1: Total National Health Expenditures, 1980 – 2014(1)
Delivering Self Service BI in the Changing Healthcare Industry
MARYLAND HEALTH SERVICES COST REVIEW COMMISSION
Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission
Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission
Measuring Efficiency HSCRC Performance Measurement Workgroup
DRGs + Four Factors in Hospital Improvement
CAHMPAS Financial Indicators for Our Hospital
Healthcare Overview.
CAHMPAS Financial Indicators for Our Hospital
Presentation transcript:

1 Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission Performance Measures Work Group Efficiency/Cost Measures 03/14/2014

2 Conceptual Framework Value Quality Patient Experience Cost (Efficiency)

3 Possible uses of Efficiency measures  Provide comparative information for decision making  by businesses about health plan purchasing  by consumers about health plan/provider choice  by health plans about provider contracting  by managers about resource allocation  Monitoring and planning  Pay-for-performance  Public reporting

4 Review of Selected Cost Measures  Per Case: Reasonableness of Charges (ROC)  Episode: Medicare Spending per Beneficiary (MSPB)  Population: Total Cost of Care PMPM measures

5 Reasonableness of Charges (ROC) HSCRC per case measure

6 HSCRC History of Efficiency Measures Converted into ROC in (1999) ROC converted into Blended ROC in (2010) Screens First Efficiency Measure (1982) The Commission has a long proven history of including some form of efficiency measure in its arsenal of tools used to set Maryland hospital rates. Once introduced these efficiency measures undergo many changes adapting to the industry environment.

7 ROC General Information  Published each fall by HSCRC  Hospitals are Stratified into Peer Groups. Current Peer Groups:  Threshold for “Reasonableness” of charges  Hospitals over 3.0% above their peer group average are identified by HSCRC as failing the ROC  Hospital options after failing  Reduce CPC to Peer Group Average over 2 years  File full Rate Review Application (ICC) Non- Urban TeachingSuburban/Rural Non Teaching UrbanAMC Virtual

8  To compare hospitals with their peer group standards, approved CPCs or CCTs adjusted for the following:  Mark-up – C ommission approved markups over costs that reflect uncompensated care built into each hospital’s rate structure.  Direct Strips – (Direct Medical Education, Nurse Education, and Trauma) remove partial costs of resident salaries, nurse education costs and incremental costs of trauma services of hospitals with trauma centers  Labor Market – Adjustment for differing labor costs in various markets  Case Mix – Adjustment accounts for differences in average patient acuity across hospitals  Indirect Medical Education- Adjustment for inefficiencies and unmeasured patient acuity associated with teaching programs.  Disproportionate Share – Adjustment for differences in hospital costs for treating relatively high number of poor and elderly patients  Capital – Costs for a hospital are partially recognized ROC Adjustment Factors

9 Medicare Spending per Beneficiary (MSPB)

10 What is MSPB?  MPSB is a ratio and calculated based upon a hospital’s average spending compared to the national median  1 = Spending is approximately the same as the national median  >1 = Spending is MORE than the national median  <1 = Spending is LESS than the national median  MPSB Episode includes all Part A and B claims between 3 days prior to index hospital admission to 30 days post hospital discharge  Episode based on “from date” or admission dates for inpatient claim

11 Coverage of Episode Index Admission 30 Days After Hospital Discharge 3 Days Prior Home Health Hospice Outpatient Inpatient Skilled Nursing Facility Durable Medical Carrier Time DimensionCost Dimension

12  Age  Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs)  Disability and End-Stage-Renal Disease (ESRD) Enrollment Status  Long-Term Care  Interactions between HCCs and/or enrollment status variables  MS-DRG of Index Admission  Reset (Winsorize) expected cost for extremely low-cost episodes Risk-Adjustment Variables

13 Total Cost of Care PMPM

14 What is Total Cost of Care?  The total cost of care is a measure of the total cost of treating a population in a given time period expressed as a risk adjusted per member per month (PMPM).  PMPM with appropriate and comprehensive risk adjustment methods allows for fair comparisons between providers, insurers, and regions over time.  1 = Cost is approximately the same as the peer group or benchmark Standard  >1 = Cost is MORE than the peer group or benchmark Standard  <1 = Cost is LESS than the peer group or benchmark Standard

15 Coverage of Care Annual Quarterly Others Inpatient, Outpatient, Professional, Pharmacy, Ancillary Services, Home Health, Hospice, Skilled Nursing Facility, Durable Medical Carrier Time DimensionCost Dimension

16  Measurement of Total Cost of Care  Private Claims from Maryland Health Care Commission  Medicaid Claims  Medicare Claims  Risk Adjustment  Historical data on diagnosis  Risk Adjustment Methodology  Attribution  Regional, county level calculations  Hospital level Considerations