Fall Creek School District Joe Sanfelippo, Superintendent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.
Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO). Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Training for Teachers and Specialists
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
APS Teacher Evaluation
Sandra Pizaro Planning templates Who has used the writing moderation kit – how? How do you provide feedback to your school? What teacher/s or content area.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework October 2011.
What is Pay & Performance?
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Teachers and LEAP in Back to School August 2014.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
South Pacific Board for Educational Assessment M & E Teacher Performance Improving teaching effectiveness Capacity Building Workshop on ‘Monitoring and.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Module Two. 
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
Professional Learning
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Peninsula School District
New Teacher Induction Academy Data Collection November 30, 2011
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Introducing the New College Scheme Seevic Performance Appraisal.
1 Marking For Improvement Presented by: Mrs G Duffy, VP & Mrs B Bridges, Curriculum Leader Self Evaluation.
1 Marking for Improvement Presented by: Mrs G Duffy, Vice Principal Self Evaluation.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Resources for School and District Planning August 15, 2014.
Understanding the Process T EACHER L EARNING P ORTFOLIO.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
District Meeting #3 Year One East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
Developing Personal and Academic Excellence in the Catholic Tradition Developing Leaders Through the AdvancED Accreditation Process Rapid City Catholic.
For Center Grove Community School Corporation Data Component for Indiana Teacher Evaluation System.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Using the framework to ground decisions in the quality of teacher practice.
District Meeting # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Collaborative Action Research Option: Staff Development.
Australian Council for Educational Research School Improvement Christian Schools National Policy Forum Canberra, 26 May 2014.
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Supporting the Development of Student Learning Objectives Teamwork in Motion.
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Dissemination Training
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Deliberate Practice PGP
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Evaluating Principals Making a Fuzzy Process More Clear
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Essential Elements: Schools-to-Watch Program
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
Developing your Teaching Practice through Goal Setting
Presentation transcript:

Fall Creek School District Joe Sanfelippo, Superintendent

Presentation Slides

Don’t walk away with this feeling…

Or feeling like you missed the boat…

Meeting with Elementary Staff Captured from

Handbook Conversations

In the beginning… Captured from Captured from Captured from Captured from

Integrated Growth

Captured from

Captured from

Captured from Captured from

Building it as we go… Captured from ww.leadershipfreak.wordpress.com

Captured from from

What is your A to B? Captured from

How did we do it? Captured from

From the crew…

Guiding Questions What does effective teaching look like? How do we quantify effective teaching? How do we reward high quality teachers? How do we accurately measure effective teaching?

Student Achievement Process Growth

Process Develop a Goal Reflective Baseline Action Plan Assessment

Growth Captured from Captured from Captured from

Student Achievement

DATE ACTIVITY August 22 Whole Group Introduction  Introduction with all staff members to the process of professional development in the district. Timelines, expectations, and documentation forms to be handed out at this time August 22-September 21 Peer Suggestion Meetings  The Professional Development/Evaluation Group will be available during the following times to meet with individual teachers to review their goal and make suggestions based on the criteria Reviewer Dates Angie Adams Dave Ross Val Herman Toby Jacobson Jessica White Matt Prissel September 21, 2012 ALL GOALS SUBMITTED TO SUPERINTENDENT October 2 Review Team Meeting  At this time the Professional Development/Evaluation Group will convene to review the goals presented. Identification of missing components to the goals will be noted. The Superintendent will notify staff members of missing components and allow time for restructure. October 12 FINAL SMART GOAL SUBMISSION TO SUPERINTENDENT February 1 Mid year Checkpoint (Professional Development Group Available) February 4-15 Goal Checkpoint with Administrator May 3 FINAL REVIEW SUBMISSION TO SUPERINTENDENT May 17 Final Decision of Merit Pay to staff

Multiple Layers to the Roll Out… Flipped Meeting Teacher Ownership Work Time Survey Feedback Little Hoop Jumping All Staff Meeting Resource Page Multiple Check ins Meeting with Team

Captured from

How is the process working? What evidence components have you secured What is the impact on colleagues, students, parents, and self Do you need to make any adjustments? Mid Year

Survey Data-Positive Survey Question (48 of 56 returned) Agree/Strongly Agree % Working through my professional growth plan has, in some ways, made me a more effective teacher 94% Working through my professional growth plan improved some aspect of my students' learning over the past year 94% In the coming years, I will continue using the strategies that I developed while working through my plan 98% My plan produced results that have benefitted (or could benefit) the FC School District beyond my own classroom. 92%

Survey Data-Need Improvement Survey Questions (48 of 56 returned)Agree/Strongly Agree While working through my plan, I had access to sufficient support from the administrators 61% When the professional growth model was first introduced to staff, the process and expectations were made very clear 62% The feedback I received from my administrator during the mid-year review was helpful in assessing my progress and charting further steps 63% The professional growth model encourages meaningful collaboration among the teaching staff 60%

Presentation Slides