Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements.
Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
SAFETEA-LU’S EFFICIENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS FOR PROJECT DECISIONMAKING Final Guidance 11/15/06.
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Improvements to Project Development and Program Management of New Starts Projects FY 2008 Proposed Effective April 30, 2006.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
40 CFR REGULATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS OF NEPA Legislative vs. Discretionary Timelines - Agency Requirements for Implementing.
1 Writing Landscape Unit Objectives 2 Planning for Old Growth Retention Data Preparation Delineate OGMAs Develop WTR Targets Write LU Objectives Establish.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Topic 6 Environmental Impact Assessments. EIA – Introduction The start Effectiveness?
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Negotiating the NEPA Maze: It Really Is Rocket Science Start.
Draft RMP/EIS. Objectives Write a draft land use plan and EIS. Issue a draft land use plan and EIS for public review.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
CHAPTER 2 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS AND PROCESSING.
What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Rob Adams Vice President, Landrum & Brown NEPA Essentials — Tools: E, B, Desk Reference,
I Larry Heil, FHWA October 15, 2003 Environmental Streamlining.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
What If I Have to Go Beyond an IEE?. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 Environmental Assessments (EAs) & Programmatic Environmental Assessments (PEAs)
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
1 C E T A S Triage Presentation, Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Writing the IEE. EA Training Course 2 Writing the IEE IEE Preparation  Suggested steps in preparing an IEE are:  assembling relevant information resources.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
April 2006 Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process April 25, 2006
Mitigation and Impact management
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
BUILDING STRONG ® TELLING THE PLANNING STORY Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Technical Proposals Written in order to expedite job-related processes: Significant operational improvements New business Additional jobs Safer working.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
1 Responding to Comments Janet Cox TMDL/Planning Communications Region 2.
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
How Tribes Can Influence State Title V Permits Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
LBNE Environmental Assessment NEPA Informational Meeting May 23, 2013 Rod Walton, LBNE NEPA Manager.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
PURPOSE & NEED Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, Associate Professor.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
CE 360Dr SaMeH1 Environmental Eng. 1 (CE 360) Associate Professor of Environmental Eng. Civil Engineering Department Engineering College Majma’ah University.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.
What If I Have to Go Beyond an IEE?. EA Training Course 2 Environmental Assessments (EAs) & Programmatic Environmental Assessments (PEAs) How Do I Prepare.
Willow Meadows Civic Club Meeting September 13, 2011
ACA Conference - September 2017
MPO School Transportation Working Group
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
22 CFR 216 A Brief Walk Through
Unit 6 NEPA.
Consultation (C) After approval of the EIS, FONSI, or CE designation, the applicant shall consult with the Administration prior to requesting any major.
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Class 1 - Environmental Impact Statement Significant Impacts  Class 2 - Categorical Exclusion No Significant Impacts  Class 3 - Environmental Assessment ??????? Classes of Action Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

Context  Effects upon environment, geographic area, setting, socioeconomic profile  What’s there? Intensity  Magnitude, severity  How bad is it? Significant - Context and Intensity Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Scoping  Notice of Intent (NOI)  Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)  Circulation Period  Public Hearing  Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)  Record of Decision (ROD) EIS Major Steps Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Section 6002 Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decision-making  New Procedures for EISs  Optional for EAs and CEs SAFETEA-LU Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Federal Lead Agency – USDOT (FHWA)  Joint Lead Agency – Project Sponsor Lead Agencies Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Everything we normally do, plus….  Identify & Involve Participating Agencies  Develop Coordination Plans  Provide Opportunities for Involvement  Manage the process and resolve issues  Ensure the environmental review process moves forward in a timely manner Role of Lead Agencies Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Any federal or non-federal agency that may have an interest in the project  Must be invited by lead agency Participating Agency Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

If a federal agency chooses to decline, the response letter must state they: 1. Have no jurisdiction or authority with respect to the project 2. Have no expertise relevant to the project 3. Do not intend to submit comments If the response does not state their position in these terms, treat them as a participating agency Declining an Invitation Federal Agencies Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 A state, tribal, or local agency must respond affirmatively in order to be designated as a participating agency  If they fail to respond or decline the invitation, regardless of the reasons, they should not be considered a participating agency Declining an Invitation Non-Federal Agencies Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Purpose & Need  Range of Alternatives  Evaluation of Alternatives Opportunities for Involvement Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Cover Sheet  Summary  Table of Contents  Purpose and Need  Alternatives  Affected Environment  Environmental Consequences  List of Preparers  EIS Distribution  Comments and Coordination  Index  Appendices EIS Format Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Timing – prepare an environmental document or prepare an EIS?  Content Proposed action Alternatives Scoping process Notice of Intent Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Description of Proposed Action  Other Federal Actions in the Area  Reasonable Alternatives Considered  Major Environmental Impacts  Areas of Controversy/Unresolved Issues  Other Federal Actions as a Result 404 permit, 106 agreement, etc. Summary Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Summarize Data  Tables and Graphics  Pictures  Compare Information  Minimize Text  Technical Information in Appendices Make it Reader-Friendly Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Importance What if we don’t do anything?  Range of Alternatives Establishes the yardstick  Basic Elements Mobility, safety, system linkage, economic development etc.  Use in Decision-Making Screening, justification, and impacts Purpose and Need Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Describe how preliminary alternatives were developed and basis for their elimination  Describe how reasonable alternatives were selected Compare level of detail Include discussion of “no build” Discuss TSM alternative where applicable  Graphics  Presentation Techniques Alternatives Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Existing Setting Social Economic Environmental  Environmentally Sensitive Features  Engineering Features Topography, Facilities, etc.  Photographs and Graphics  Planning process with maps Affected Environment Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

1.Relocations 2.Noise, Air, Water 3.Land Use 4.Economic 5.Social 6.Section 4(f) Properties 7.Historic Sites 8.Wetlands/Floodplains 9.Farmlands 10. Other ????? Environmental Consequences Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 FHWA, state, consultant or other agency persons who made substantial contribution to the preparation Qualifications, including education background and/or experience. Areas of EIS responsibility  FHWA officials responsible for review If not included above List of Preparers Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Early coordination process including scoping and Participating Agencies  Meetings with groups and/or individuals Results, not just times, dates, and numbers)  Key issues and pertinent information received from public and government agencies  Every comment deserves a response Comments and Coordination Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Traditional - “New” document  Condensed - Summary of changes  Abbreviated - Re-circulate DEIS Final EIS Options Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Reference & summarize DEIS information  Discuss changes  Identify Preferred Alternative & basis  Alternatives not selected & basis  Mitigation & enhancements  Unresolved issues  Comment & coordination  Final 4(f) Condensed FEIS Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Minor changes only  DEIS attachments contain: Extra sheets New section with items as shown in condensed version Abbreviated FEIS Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 File with EPA  Cooperating & Participating Agencies  DEIS Commenters  Requestors  Publish Availability in Local Newspapers  Make Available Locally Library, City Hall, District Office, etc. FEIS Distribution Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Decision, including 4(f) Determination  Alternatives Considered & Preferred  Mitigation  Monitoring/Enforcement  Responses to Comments on FEIS  May be submitted concurrent with FEIS Record of Decision (ROD) Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 A document prepared for an action where the significance of the environmental impacts is not clearly established EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Early Coordination  Environmental Assessment (EA)  Circulation Period  Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) EA Major Steps Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Concise Public Document  Briefly provide evidence and analysis  Include brief discussion of…  No long descriptions or detailed data…  CEQ suggested page limits - take a guess EA Content Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Cover Sheet  Purpose & Need  Alternatives Considered  Impacts/Mitigation  Comments & Coordination  Section 4(f)  Appendices EA Suggested Format Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Briefly presents why an action does not have a significant impact  Must include or reference the EA Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation

 Does not need circulated  Notice of Availability: Clearinghouse  30 Day Comment Period EA and FONSI Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation