RtI Case Studies RSS RtI Foundations Training August 2010 Amy Roberts & Erin Banks School Psychologists.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerating Achievement in Boston Public Schools: Academic Achievement Framework.
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Progress Monitoring And RtI System
RTI and LD: Case Studies Rhode Island RTI Initiative Module 5 Edition 2, Feb
Tier III Meeting Outline. Roles of Team Members Coordinator –Set up meetings, contact parents, inform members of team about agenda, inform teachers about.
Data Collection Benchmark (CBM Family) Progress Monitoring Interventions Tiers Training/Materials Problem Solving Model Allocation of Resources.
Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer Aimsweb support
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *systematically assessing.
RTI 101 Mia Hyde Tennessee Department of Education Coordinator of Reading Content & Resources.
Progress Monitoring in Reading: Why, What, and How
1 The Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading Overview.
What do all these numbers mean? Columbia Elementary Data Night - Winter.
Wisconsin’s Literacy Screener A training for the administration and scoring of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screener.
Problem Solving Model Tier I and Tier II
Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI)
Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville Project.
Interventions Carol Burton, Ann Goff, Sherry Franklin.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development October 9, 2009.
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing Using CBMs to write RtI goals Using CBMs to write RtI goals.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Aimsweb overview Group-Administered Measures: Training Format
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
AIMSweb and Goal- Setting December 8, 2010 PRTI. Basic goal setting Measurable goals include: Conditions Timeline, materials, difficulty level In 9 weeks.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Utilizing AIMSweb to Inform Instruction June 25, 2012.
Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI)
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
RtII: Data Analysis Teaming. Goals of Today’s Session  Compare and contrast types of collaborative teams Building-wide teams Grade-level teams Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Moving to Tier IV Most students will never make it to Tier IV. It’s ok for a student to stay on any tier that he is successful on. At WPS we do a Formative.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
LIGHTS, CAMERA …. ACADEMIC DATA at the Elementary Level Cammie Neal and Jennifer Schau Forsyth County Schools.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Intervention Team / Tier III Overview Harding University High School
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Agenda Introduction of Team Changes Presentation of Tiers Questions.
1 Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) Problem-Solving Model Tier II North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *using a researched-based.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
More Time to Learn… Experimental Instructional Response Models for Primary Literacy Serving Students at Risk, Grades 1 & 2 Mary Hogan Elementary School,
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
RTI 2 Please write down three things you want to know before this session is done today.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) LEARNING DISABILITIES (LD) By: Julia Bjerke, Monica Fontana Crystal Schlosser, & Jessica Ringwelski.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Colt Early Childhood Education Center October 8, 2012
RTI- Response to Intervention
RSU #38 Response to Intervention
What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a benchmark and progress monitoring system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.
Welcome to Eagleview RTI Reading & Math.
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Response to Intervention = RTI
Student Support Team (SST) Training
Ensuring Success for Every Reader
Presentation transcript:

RtI Case Studies RSS RtI Foundations Training August 2010 Amy Roberts & Erin Banks School Psychologists

RtI Team Break into school-specific groups Assign responsibilities to each member:  Student’s Regular Education Teacher  RtI Chairperson  Administrator  EC Teacher  Regular Education Teacher

“Kyle” Case Study September 1-4th, 2010 = Fall Benchmarks 1st grade:  R-CBM - Oral Reading Fluency (words per minute)  M-CBM - Math Computation (digits in 2 minutes)

Fall Benchmark Data Analyze Fall Benchmark Data from Mrs. Leonard’s classroom Discuss Data Reflection Questions within your teams for both Fall R-CBM and M- CBM data Share data discovery with group

Tier I Paperwork Student Name: Kyle Michael Walker Teacher: Leona Leonard DOB: Attendance: K= 176/180 Attendance: 1st = 17/17 DRA Level = 4 Children’s Progress: Phonics/Writing = 1, Reading = 1, Phon. Awareness = 1/ Operations = 1, Measurement = 2 Parents: Chris and Jenna Walker

Additional Information Mrs. Leonard is concerned with phonemic awareness, word identification, sight word vocabulary, reading comprehension, reading fluency, and basic math facts. It was noted that Kyle is immature for his age. He puts forth much effort, but is unable to do a lot of his work. At the beginning of 1 st grade, he could not recognize all of the letters of the alphabet. He does not know his numbers after 10. Mrs. Walker was noted to be concerned with his reading. Kyle has difficulty with decoding words and is not a fluent reader. He has difficulty remembering how to compute basic math addition and subtraction facts.

Vision/Hearing Screening Mrs. Leonard placed the vision/hearing screening in the nurse’s mailbox. Kyle was screened on 10/9/2010 Results:  Vision: Pass 20/20 (far) 20/20 (near)  Hearing: Pass 20 Hz

Tier I Page 2 Mrs. Leonard meets with Mr. and Mrs. Walker on 9/14/2010 to discuss Kyle’s performance on the Fall benchmarks. State concerns that parents may have in first box. Define problem. Devise Hypothesis Plan Development/Implementation Parent Intervention

Tier I Pre/Post Data Baseline (pre-test)  Document all areas of concern (I.e. reading, math, etc.) Benchmark  RSS norms if available  AIMSweb aggregate if RSS not available

Tier I Meeting (Page 3) Post-test:  Oral Reading Fluency - Kyle read 4 words per minute on 10/10/2010  Math CBM - Kyle solved 0 digits correctly on 10/10/2010  He can recognize the numbers 11 and 14 consistently Did he meet his goal? Document Decision, Date, and Rationale

Tier II Page 1 Define Problem (again). More specific? Document Baseline, Strength, Concerns in each area Behavior Concerns? (Refer to classroom observation completed by school counselor)

Tier II Page 2 Goal: Set goal for each area of concern Document intervention strategy Who? When? Where?

Speech/Language Screening Kyle was screened by SLP on November 15, 2010 He passed language, but failed articulation for 3 sounds SLP sent home parent worksheets and gave teacher intervention to work on 10 minutes/1X week (Document on paperwork)

Tier II Progress Monitoring Oral Reading Fluency 10/30/2010 = 9 wpm 11/15/2010 = 6 wpm 12/2/2010 = 6 wpm 12/17/2010 = 11 wpm Math Computation 10/30/2010 = 3 digits 11/15/2010 = 3 digits 12/2/2010 = 5 digits 12/17/2010 = 4 digits

Winter Break.....

Winter Benchmarks January 2011 = Winter Benchmarks Analyze Mrs. Leonard’s Winter R-CBM and M-CBM data Discuss Classroom Data Reflection questions Share with group

What needs to happen with Kyle???

Tier III Meeting 1 Date: January 15th, 2011 Review social history Complete Page 1 of Tier III  RIOT!!! Do you need any additional information? Do you have current baseline?

Early Literacy Skills Letter Naming Fluency = 53 letters/min. Letter Sound Fluency = 31 sounds/min. Phoneme Seg. Fluency = 30 phonemes/min. Nonsense Word Fluency = 28 sounds/min. What norms do we use? Fall, Winter, or Spring? What percentile is Kyle in each area? Document on Assessment Results column of Page 1.

Early Numeracy Skills Oral Counting = 82 Number Identification = 44 Quantity Discrimination = 20 Missing Number = 7 Where will you intervene with Kyle?

Tier III Goal-Setting Page Choose which areas you want to target Set short-term goal Set long-term goal Determine goal-setting method (Share with group!)

Tier III Page 3 Determine intervention, arrangements, and person responsible for EACH area of concern Measurement Strategy Set date to review in 4 weeks = February 18, 2011

Progress Monitoring Data Data Check Meeting # 1  Review Graphs and complete Page 5 Decision Making  Reading?  Math? Data Check Meeting # 2  Review Graphs and complete Page 5 Decision Making  Reading?  Math?

Change Intervention If the data suggest changing intervention or increasing intensity, what will you do next? Document on page 3 of paperwork under the number 2.

Data Check Meeting # 3 Analyze overall data  Discrepant from peers?  Rate of Improvement (ROI)  Is it 2 times below what it should be to meet goal?  What percentile is he functioning?  When should we switch from Winter to Spring norms?  Reset graph?

Tier IV If needed, complete Tier IV and give to designated EC teacher