Disinfectant & Disinfection Byproducts Control and Optimization Case Study of the University of Alaska Fairbanks Water System By Johnny Mendez, P.E., Drinking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Andy K. Valickis, P.Eng. Jim Shubat May 7, 2013
Advertisements

Systems Working Together to Comply with New LT2/Stage 2 M/DBPRs KY & TN Wholesale.
Excel Tutorial 3 Working with Formulas and Functions
Disinfection – Chapter 26
January 23, Quincy Wu Interconnecting VoIP on Taiwan Academic Network (TANet)
Micha LisaninSofia, Bulgaria, July Republic of Serbia Ministry of Labour and Social Policy Costing Methodology of Social Welfare in Child Protection.
Scaling distributed search for diagnostics and prognostics applications Prof. Jim Austin Computer Science, University of York UK CEO Cybula Ltd.
Measurement of the Hard photodisintegration of a proton-pair in the 3 He nucleus. Running now in JLab, hall A E03-101:GamPP n p p Ishay Pomerantz, Tel-Aviv.
Overview of the EPRI Groundwater Assessment Program
Basics on COD measurement
Reconstruction Charm and Bottom with the ALICE EMCAL
Italian white certificates scheme
Ultraviolet (UV) Disinfection in Water Treatment
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
YES New Mexico Enterprise Eligibility System
Madrid 7 -9 March FARO EU Kick-off Meeting Introduction to the project by Marta Pérez-Soba.
M. F. Chiang, Z. Ghassemlooy, Wai Pang Ng,
Broadband Adoption: Patterns, Behaviors, and Implications Presented to the New Jersey Connected Broadband Summit John B. Horrigan Associate Director for.
Oregon Leadership Network Fall Leadership Institute Lloyd Center Doubletree Portland, Oregon November 28, 2007.
Regulatory Review Presented by: Joe Munson. Outline  New Employee/Office  Lead and Copper Reminder  Stage 2 Disinfection Byproduct Rule.
Defining Affordability for Massachusetts Christine Barber Community Catalyst Connector Board Meeting April 2007 How can research inform the individual.
SO2 Precursor Gas Monitoring Training Overview
Michelle Wind, Drinking Water Program Supervisor,
Terry Keep September 18, 2013 ADVANCES IN UV TECHNOLOGY FOR 4-LOG VIRUS DISINFECTION OF GROUNDWATER.
Reducing THM via Aeration: A Case Study November 21, 2013 by Gary Williams, P.E. Jones & Henry Engineers Southeast AWWA District Meeting 1.
Disinfection by-products Precursors + oxidant → DBPs DBPs can be reduced by: the precursors (organic materials present in the sourcewater) the reactants.
Slide 1 Delta Water Quality: Implications for Utility Compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act Edward G. Means III Sr. Vice President McGuire Environmental.
Secondary Disinfection with Chloramines Charlotte Smith Charlotte Smith & Associates, Inc. Groveland Community Services District Community Education Meeting.
DISINFECTION BY PRODUCTS IN ALASKAN WATER SYSTEMS by Lee Johnson, P.E. ADEC Drinking Water Program Northern Program
Overview of Distribution System Optimization (DSO) Training Presentation 1 DSO Training April 2015.
Environmental Health XIV. Standards and Monitoring Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental.
Combined Ozonation-Nanofiltration for Drinking Water Treatment B. S
Drinking Water Technical Assistance Water Treatment Plant and Distribution System KY Water and Wastewater Operators Association 57 th Annual Conference.
Stage 2 DBP Plan Workshop May 2013 Janice Thomas, CDPH Sonoma District, Drinking Water Field Operations Branch.
Photolysis and secondary formation of disinfection by-products by UV treatment of swimming pool water Spiliotopoulou Aikaterini Master thesis 30 ECTS Supervisors:
Effective Use Of Peracetic Acid to Reduce Effluent Disinfection Byproduct in Water Resource Recovery Facilities Isaiah Shapiro, EIT Dimitri Katehis PhD,
1 Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule – LT2 Mark McIntire Drinking Water Program SDWWA Water Seminar February 7, 2006 Please ask questions.
Distribution System Control Strategies.  Tank Management/Operations  Flushing  Rerouting Water  Others  optimizing existing booster chlorination.
Formation and Dissipation of Trihalomethanes during Aquifer Storage and Recovery Operations Jason Pulley City of Salem Public Works.
Natural and Engineering Factors that Affect Disinfection Byproduct Concentrations in the Home Boning Liu and David Reckhow Department of Civil and Environmental.
Operational Evaluation Level Stage 2 D/DBP Rule Compliance Michael W. Deal Compliance Assurance Section Central Office Division of Drinking And Ground.
Assessing Plant DBP Performance Using the DBP-CPE Warren J. Swanson, P.E RMSAWWA/RMWEA Annual Conference Grand Junction, Colorado Schmueser gordon.
Age of Potable Water Impacts on DBP’s and Disinfection Residuals.
Buckhorn Disinfection Byproducts / Backwash Disposal Project Board of Directors Meeting June 14, 2012.
The Stage 2 Disinfection By-Products Rule DoD/EPA State Conference Compliance Track DoD/EPA State Conference Compliance Track Atlanta, GA Atlanta, GA June.
Chemical Measurements in Drinking Water: Their Use in Monitoring Disinfection and its Consequences Kusum Perera, Ph.D.
1. Disinfection By-Products: A Historical Perspective Effect of Early Analytical Methodology for Analyzing Trihalomethanes (THMs) –Concentrating processes?
Assessing Distribution System Performance: Sampling and Monitoring.
Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule Bruce Macler USEPA Region H Br Cl Bromodichloromethane.
STAGE 2 DISINFECTION BY- PRODUCTS (DBP’S) A GUIDE TO COMPLIANCE 1.
State of Alaska Implementation of MBDP Rules Carrie Bohan Environmental Program Specialist ADEC DW Program.
Denver Water’s Preparation for the Stage 2 Disinfectant By-Product Rule Bruce Hale (DW) Steve Lohman (DW) Arnold Strasser (DW) Edward Koval (B&V)
WATER TECHNOLOGIES FOR RURAL TEXAS OFFICE OF RURAL COMMUNITY AFFAIRS Cryptosporidium: Technologies for Disinfection, Particulate Removal & By-Product Management.
Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (Stage 1&2 DBPRs) Wyoming Potable Water Age, Lagoon Aeration and Utility Line Replacement Seminar Hosted.
Nitrification Action Plans
Disinfection Byproducts and Associated Challenges Resulting from Advanced Treatment Jeff Prevatt Presented by AZ Water Association New Directions in Wastewater.
Water Treatment: Disinfection Processes Current Technology vs. Alternatives.
Water Quality Facts John Shirey City Manager William Busath, P.E. Director of Utilities Pravani Vandeyar Water Quality Superintendent.
Maebh A. Grace, Mark G. Healy, Eoghan Clifford
Area Wide Optimization
Advanced Technologies for Attaining and Maintaining DBP Compliance
Disinfectant & Disinfection Byproducts Control and Optimization
Bujar H. Durmishi1*, Arianit A. Reka, Murtezan Ismaili, Agim Shabani
Water Quality Monitoring -Sampling Design-
Treatment – Chlorine Disinfection
Pilot testing services and a case study to reduce organics Devendra Borikar, Laura Zettler, Jeff Avedesian, Lindsay Ariss, Luc Léonard, Denis Dolbec,
National Optimization Goals
Lebanon Water Works National Optimization Goals Case Study - Meeting the Goals at the Lebanon Water Works Company Daren Thompson, MBA, MPM.
Trihalomethanes Removal Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Disinfectant & Disinfection Byproducts Control and Optimization Case Study of the University of Alaska Fairbanks Water System By Johnny Mendez, P.E., Drinking Water Program Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Prepared in Cooperation with Ben Stacy, WTP Supervisor, University of Alaska Fairbanks. Note: The D/DBP optimization and control concepts being presented here have been adapted from a ADEC training workshop in Fairbanks, AK Feb 26-Mar 1, The workshop was developed by Mr. Larry DeMers, PE of Process Applications Inc.

November 12, Disinfectant vs. DBP balance Optimized disinfection at WTP and Distribution System improves barrier against microbial pathogens Optimized disinfection at WTP and Distribution System improves barrier against microbial pathogensBUT…. (Cl or O3)+ Organics  DBPs (TTHM, HAA5, Bromate) (Cl or O3)+ Organics  DBPs (TTHM, HAA5, Bromate) The challenge is to balance these competing goals The challenge is to balance these competing goals

November 12, DBP Health effects Suspected Carcinogens Suspected Carcinogens Suspected to affect reproduction Suspected to affect reproduction Large population exposure to DBPs Large population exposure to DBPs Other potential DBPs health effects have not been fully researched Other potential DBPs health effects have not been fully researched

November 12, Optimization goals for Disinfection & DBP Control Methodology developed from CPE concepts used at media filtration WTPs. Methodology developed from CPE concepts used at media filtration WTPs. –Optimization goals –Use of special studies (scientific method) Process Applications Inc. and EPA effort. Process Applications Inc. and EPA effort. Basis for Optimization Goals: Basis for Optimization Goals: –Public health protection –Safety factor for achieving compliance –Provide means to measure improvements

November 12, D/DBP Optimization Goals TOC Performance Goals: TOC Performance Goals: –(% TOC removed/% removal required)=1.1 (10% safety factor) –Finished water TOC concentration= goal WTP specific Disinfection Goals: Disinfection Goals: –Maintain sufficient inactivation CT (safety factor is system specific) –Maintain minimum distribution system residual: Free Chlorine ≥ 0.2 mg/l Free Chlorine ≥ 0.2 mg/l Total Chlorine = system specific (suggest >0.5 mg/L) Total Chlorine = system specific (suggest >0.5 mg/L) DPB Goals: DPB Goals: –Individual site LRAA: TTHM≤ 80 ppb; HAA5 ≤ 60 ppb –Long Term System Goal (based on 11 quarter average of Max LRAAs): TTHM≤ 60 ppb; HAA5 ≤ 40 ppb

November 12, D/DBP Optimization Tools Historical Cl2 and CT Spreadsheet Historical Cl2 and CT Spreadsheet –WTP Cl dose, Cl residual, and CT assessment Historical Chlorine Residual Performance Spreadsheet Historical Chlorine Residual Performance Spreadsheet –assess historical Cl residual trends for WTP effluent and distribution system Historical TOC performance Spreadsheet Historical TOC performance Spreadsheet –assess WTP TOC removal performance Historical DBP Performance Historical DBP Performance –Assessment of historical DBP performance vs. new optimization goals

November 12, Develop a WQ Baseline and Monitoring Plan Before changes in the water system are implemented a water quality baseline is needed to: Before changes in the water system are implemented a water quality baseline is needed to: –Understand historical system performance in light of optimization goals –Help fine tune/set optimization goals –Have a basis of comparison for measuring improvements in DPB control –Anticipate and prepare for potential secondary impacts A monitoring plan will help in the systematic and efficient collection of data for the baseline. A monitoring plan will help in the systematic and efficient collection of data for the baseline.

November 12, Developing a Baseline Select which relevant WQ parameters to monitor (i.e. TOC, Alkalinity, CT, TTHM). Select which relevant WQ parameters to monitor (i.e. TOC, Alkalinity, CT, TTHM). Some parameters may already be available, but frequency may need to be modified. Some parameters may already be available, but frequency may need to be modified. Consider use of surrogate parameters for ease of data collection & cost savings (e.g. TOC and DBP surrogates) Consider use of surrogate parameters for ease of data collection & cost savings (e.g. TOC and DBP surrogates)

November 12, Surrogates for DBP related data Developing a DBP control strategy may require increased TOC and DBP data. This can increase cost and complexity of data collection Developing a DBP control strategy may require increased TOC and DBP data. This can increase cost and complexity of data collection Tools exist to enhance TOC and DBP data quantity by using alternative field methods that are faster and less costly Tools exist to enhance TOC and DBP data quantity by using alternative field methods that are faster and less costly

November 12, Field TOC Methods UV absorbance at 254 nm: UV absorbance at 254 nm: –Uses spectrophotometer –Samples need to be filtered –Requires development of relationship b/w UV 254 and TOC –Best for water samples before Cl addition Field TOC method (HACH ® ): Field TOC method (HACH ® ): –Uses reagents and spectrophotometer –Issues with accuracy & precision Portable TOC analyzer (GE): Portable TOC analyzer (GE): –costly equipment (~ $15K) –Easy to use and calibrate

November 12, TOC and UV 254 Relationship TOC (mg/L) UV Absorbance at 254 nm (1/cm) R 2 =0.89 Y=34X+0.98

November 12, Field DBP Methods Cl residual Decay Cl residual Decay –Simple, can be done by all WTP operators –Cl residual is used as surrogate for DBP formation –Relationship may change through the year due to WQ and temp. changes

November 12, Field DBP Methods (cont.) THM Plus™ ( HACH ® ) THM Plus™ ( HACH ® ) –Uses spectrophotometer and 4 reagents –Measures 4 THM species plus other trihalogenated DBPs: Chloroform Chloroform Bromodichloromethane Bromodichloromethane Dibromochloromethane Dibromochloromethane Bromoform Bromoform Trichloroacetic acid, plus other HAAs, & Chloral Hydrate. Trichloroacetic acid, plus other HAAs, & Chloral Hydrate. –Results can be obtained in 1-2 hrs. –Paired sampling needed to develop relationship b/w field and analytical values. –Cost ~$5 to $10 per sample once equipment purchased –Spectrophotometer cost ~$3000 (DR2800) to $6000 (DR5000)

November 12, THM-Plus Method Results Measured at 515 nm Results reported as ppb chloroform Range ppb Sensitivity ~10 ppb Precision= 66 ppb (95% confidence range= 53 ppb-79 ppb) HACH® Method The method can be run on any Hach DR 5000, DR 2800, DR 4000, DR 3000, DR 2400, DR 2010, or DR 2000 Spectrophotometer

November 12, Creating a Monitoring Plan Develop objective for the monitoring Develop objective for the monitoring Answer sampling specifics (what, where, how, who, frequency) Answer sampling specifics (what, where, how, who, frequency) Suggested min. monitoring: Suggested min. monitoring: –TOC & DBPs (including surrogates)-> monthly –Disinfectant residuals at WTP->Daily –Disinfectant Residuals in Distribution->Weekly

November 12, What Next: what to do With All this Data? Create Graphs to see trends Create Graphs to see trends Make list of issues/sites to focus on Make list of issues/sites to focus on Develop relationships with surrogate parameters to help in process control Develop relationships with surrogate parameters to help in process control Develop DBP control strategies for testing Develop DBP control strategies for testing

November 12, Developing a DBP Control Strategy Operations-based change that will lower DBPs Operations-based change that will lower DBPs Use “Special Studies” approach Use “Special Studies” approach –Hypothesis, Methods/Resources, Experimental Design, Results/Conclusions, implementation Take small steps Take small steps Pay attention to secondary impacts Pay attention to secondary impacts Develop implementation strategy Develop implementation strategy –Use data to sell idea to management –Think of scale (Seasonal/Year-round?, WTP/Distribution?)

November 12, DBP Control Strategies-- Examples: Lowering TOC Lowering TOC Optimize Chlorine Use (pre-chlorination, intermediate, & post chlorination) Optimize Chlorine Use (pre-chlorination, intermediate, & post chlorination) Optimize Process pH Optimize Process pH –Higher pH (>8.5) higher TTHM formation Potential –Lower pH (<6.5) higher HAA formation potential Reduce water age Reduce water age

University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) Case Study

November 12, UAF Public Water System Aerial View

November 12, UAF Water System Facts Population: 3600 Non-Transient, 1400 Resident Population: 3600 Non-Transient, 1400 Resident 2600 acre campus (230 acres developed) 2600 acre campus (230 acres developed) Design Capacity= 1 MGD; Typically runs < 0.5 MGD (350 gpm) Design Capacity= 1 MGD; Typically runs < 0.5 MGD (350 gpm) Source: Ground water wells (3 wells) Source: Ground water wells (3 wells) –High Iron  15 mg/l –High Mn  1.5 mg/l –High TOC  ~13 mg/l Treatment: Treatment: –Objective: Fe & Mn & Organics removal (Benzene) –Pre-Oxidation (Permanganate) –High Rate Aeration, –Coagulation: Nalco 7768 Anionic Polymer & 8185 PAC polymer, –Flocculation: 2-Stages, 20 min to 2 hrs detention time -- Arsenic  45ppb -- pH  7 to 8 -- Alkalinity  ~ mg/L

November 12, UAF Water System Facts (cont.) Treatment (cont.): Treatment (cont.): –Sedimentation: 30 0 Tube Settlers, (settled water turbidity ~ NTU) –multi-media filtration: Anthracite, Sand, Gravel (turbidity ~ NTU) –GAC (10 filters, run 5 at time) –Corrosion inhibitor (zinc sulfate), –Storage (1.5 MGal), –Chlorination (MIOX Sal-80): Target entry point Cl residual ~1.5 ppm. Distribution: Distribution: –~ 6-miles of pipe –Parallel fire protection and domestic water mains –Mainly 8” and 10” diameter DI Pipes –Water pipes in utilidor shared by steam lines –~100 service connections –Highest Water Temp ~72 o F

November 12, UAF

November 12, Bunnell IARC Ag-Farm Museum Eielson Physical Plant WTP Nat. Science Wood Center Duckering Commons Library O’ Neill Arctic Health Gruening Brooks Power Plant Student Housing Elvey Notes: Not to Scale, Simplified Diagram; not all service connections or branches shown Water mains are mostly 8-in. diameter. Some sections are 10-in.

November 12, UAF DBP Study Strategy Cl data Cl data TOC data TOC data Develop Cl Map in Distribution Develop Cl Map in Distribution Collect CL residual Collect CL residual Collect THM Plus data Collect THM Plus data Collect TTHM data and HAA5 Collect TTHM data and HAA5

November 12, Historical data TOC TOC CL CL DBP DBP

November 12, Latest Developments THM-Plus data THM-Plus data

November 12, What Next? Select Stage 2 sites Select Stage 2 sites IDSE IDSE Treatment changes: Treatment changes: Coagulation enhancement Coagulation enhancement Carbon Filter Special Study? Carbon Filter Special Study? Membrane system? Membrane system?

November 12, Sources ADEC D/DBP Training February 26, Larry DeMers, Process Applications Inc., Ft. Collins, CO. ADEC D/DBP Training February 26, Larry DeMers, Process Applications Inc., Ft. Collins, CO. UAF Water Distribution Condition Survey. PDC, Inc. Consulting Engineers; Project CWS, Final Report. November UAF Water Distribution Condition Survey. PDC, Inc. Consulting Engineers; Project CWS, Final Report. November ADEC SDWIS Database ADEC SDWIS Database

November 12, Questions?