Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE PROJECT AND THEIR POSSIBLE INCLUSION IN EUROPEAN STANDARD -Major findings -Major findings suitable for inclusion in European Standard.

Advertisements

SAFER Project - FINAL MEETING Elin Skurtveit & Amir M. Kaynia - NGI

Basic structural theory. Statics Things dont continue to move if forces are resisted – Static Equilibrium What resists the force? Equal and opposite Reaction.

Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of.

Shallow Foundations Bearing Capacity

9. Axial Capacity of Pile Groups

Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University.

11 Energy Methods.

JP Singh and Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., P.E. Gary Norris, Ph.D., P.E. March 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM S-SHAFT FOR LATERALLY LOADED.

CandeCAD – DEMO Step 4.1: Import Results – Import all Results.

Liangcai He Committee in Charge: Professor Ahmed Elgamal, Chair

SUB-STRUCTURE foundations.

Calculation of Heave of Deep Pier Foundations By John D. Nelson, Ph.D., P.E., Hon. M. SEAGS, F. ASCE, Kuo-Chieh (Geoff) Chao, Ph.D., P.E., M. SEAGS, M.

Lecture 9 - Flexure June 20, 2003 CVEN 444.

1 Application and Analysis of Helical Piers in Frozen Ground He Liu, Ph.D., P.E. Daniel Schubert, P.E. Hannele Zubeck, Ph.D., P.E. Sean Baginski.

Mechanics of Materials – MAE 243 (Section 002) Spring 2008 Dr. Konstantinos A. Sierros.

ADSC/CALTRANS CIDH Pile Workshop Spring Overview of Structural Design and Detailing of Large Diameter Drilled Shafts (Caltrans Practice) Amir M.

Negative Skin Friction

Designing Piles for Drag Force

Session 25 – 26 DRILLED SHAFT And CAISSON FOUNDATION

Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with

OUTLINE SPATIAL VARIABILITY FRAGILITY CURVES MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS CONCLUSIONS EFFECTS DESIGN RECOMMEND BEARING CAPACITY OF HETEROGENEOUS SOILS APPENDIXOUTLINE.

“LIQUEFACTION” Prepared By: Husni M. Awwad Talal Z. Zammar

Experimental & Analytical Studies of Drilled Shaft Bridge Columns Sandrine P. Lermitte, PhD Student Jonathan P. Stewart, Assistant Professor John W. Wallace,

Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of.

Micropiles Save Drilled Shafts

2014 National RAC and TRB State Representatives Meeting

Pile Testing and Evaluation for the Sand Creek Byway, Sandpoint, Idaho Presented by Dean E. Harris, P.E., CH2M HILL.

Liquefaction: Behavior Evidence, Prediction, and Prevention.

Foundation Fundamentals GSD 6204 Building Technology Harvard Graduate School of Design.

Beams Beams: Comparison with trusses, plates t

Presentation by Shreedhar S.  Shear force is the force applied along or parallel to surface or cross section, instead of being applied perpendicular.

FOUNDATION The foundation of a structure is the lowest part of the sub-structure interfering with the soil and the structure. It consists of some structural.

BEARING CAPACITY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS of Shallow Foundation

Bearing Capacity Theory

Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation

Session 17 – 18 PILE FOUNDATIONS

What is compaction? A simple ground improvement technique, where the soil is densified through external compactive effort. + water = Compactive effort.

Soil-Pile Interaction in FB-MultiPier

Liquefaction Analysis For a Single Piled Foundation By Dr. Lu Chihwei Moh and Associates, Inc. Date: 11/3/2003.

Analysis of Laterally Loaded Drilled Shafts and Piles Using LPILE

C ONTACT STRESS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING. Introduction 1 Skyscrapers Bridges Dams How are these constructions supported? Why are all these large constructions.

CIE Soil Mechanics and Foundations II èSoil Properties and Site Investigation èShallow Foundation Design èDeep Foundation Design èRetaining Structures.

LIQUEFACTION FAILURE OF FOUNDATION - STRUCTURE COLLAPSE.

Session 15 – 16 SHEET PILE STRUCTURES

ENT 153 TUTORIAL 1.

Class A Centrifuge Prediction of future SG1 of Full Scale Test with Pile Foundation by Marcelo Gonzalez Tarek Abdoun Ricardo Dobry Rensselaer Polytechnic.

An-Najah National University Faculty Of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Al-Najjar Building Footing Design Systems Alternative Prepared by : Mohammed.

OMAE 2009 Honolulu, HI - May 31 to June

PRACTICE AND RESEARCH ON MICROPILE GROUPS AND NETWORKS Prof. François SCHLOSSER ENPC - CERMES 2 nd LIZZI lecture Tokyo IWM August 2004.

Session 19 – 20 PILE FOUNDATIONS

DEEP FOUNDATIONS Course Work Topics

Mechanics of Materials Shear Stress and Shear Flow In Beams))

SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)

PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.

SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)

GLE/CEE 330: Soil Mechanics Introduction to Foundation Engineering

Chapter 15 Soil-Bearing Capacity for Shallow Foundations

Pile Foundation Reason for Piles Types of Piles

Chapter 13 Lateral Earth Pressure – Curved Failure Surface

Soil Mechanics-II STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS DUE TO SURFACE LOADS

BRIDGES MOST IMPORTANT GEOTECHNICAL EFFECT- LIQUEFACTION

DEEP FOUNDATIONS PILES.

Helical Pile Lateral Capacity

Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington

Stresses, Strains and Deflections of Steel Beams in Pure Bending

Find: Bearing Capacity, qult [lb/ft2]

SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS

Table 8. The different focus of teaching contents

Presentation transcript:

Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of Nevada, Reno APRIL 3/4, 2006 Computer Program DFSAP Deep Foundation System Analysis Program Based on Strain Wedge Method

AXIALLY LOADED PILES/SHAFTS IN LAYERED SOILS (SAND/CLAY)

Deformations in soil layers around an axially loaded shafts QoQo QTQT Sheared soil layers Loading Direction  q X X Vert. Shear Stress distribution Shaft Cross Section oo nn Shaft roro rnrn r n + m Displacement, z z max Distance  n + m znzn Z n + m Shear Stress,  Vertical Shear Stress Shaft Cross Section Shaft Vertical Displacement, Z Shear Stress, T T-Z curve

Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3

A Comparison Between Measured and Computed Axial Pile Load at Different Depths (After Vesic, 1970)

Fig Comparison Between Measured and Predicted Load Transfer (  ) – Pile Movement (z) Curve for the California Test

Predicted Pile-Head Load-Settlement Curves for Seven Loading Tests at Different Time Periods for the California Test in Comparison with the Predicted Results Axial Load Distribution along the Pile

Layer 3 Liquefiable soil  = 32 0 Clay Effect of Developing Liquefaction on Axial Capacity of a Pile from FHWA/RD/86/102 Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 4

No Liquefactiona max = 0.25g, M = 6.5a max = 0.40g, M = 6.5 Effect of Soil Liquefaction on the T-z Curve

K s = 14.4 x 10 7 lb/ft K s = 14.2 x 10 6 lb/ft Pile Axial Stiffness Using DFSAP vs. FHWA/RD/86/102

Piles/Shafts in Sloping Ground Lateral Load Different Failure Planes Sloping Ground

Piles/Shafts in Sloping Ground

10 Degree Sloping Ground0 Degree Sloping Ground

Effect of Ground Slope on Pile/Shaft Lateral Response (Downhill Loading)

Effect of Ground Slope on Pile/Shaft Lateral Response (Uphill Loading)

Effect of Ground Slope on Pile/Shaft Lateral Response