THE CASE FOR PR Most points are from Vernon Bogdanor “What is Proportional Representation?”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Voting Systems Explained
Advertisements

Copyright Strodes College Laws students are free to make use of this Pdf Print files for study purposes (they should print them off and take them to class).
With reference to at least 2 specific PR systems, what are the arguments for and against PR systems.
Electoral systems used in the UK
Electoral Systems First Past the Post Additional Member System.
“The Additional Member System provides greater choice and is more responsive to the will of the electorate than First-Past-The- Post.” Discuss 15 marks.
UK electoral systems Fotolia.
The case for and against PR FPTP or PR?. Possible criteria for a new system Ease of voting Does each vote have an equal weight? High level of proportionality.
Elections Explained… An election is when a country decides who will be in charge. Scotland is a democracy – this means that everyone has the right to have.
Electoral Systems - Proportional Representation
STAGE ONE: Begins in the Scottish Parliament STAGE TWO: Moved to the committee STAGE THREE: Back in parliament.
To what extent does the Single Transferable Vote (STV) encourage greater participation and representation than First Past The Post (FPTP)? 15 marks.
Alternative Electoral Systems Read and précis notes will be checked before this Lecture is delivered … 1.
Where is FPTP used? First Past The Post is used in British general elections. Britain is split into 646 constituencies, and an MP is elected from each.
Elections, Electoral Reform, and 2010 The Purpose of Elections  They allow the ‘will of the people’ to be expressed  They provide for voter choice.
Section A: Political Issues in the UK Study Theme 1D: Electoral Systems, Voting and Political Attitudes. A selection of essays 5_AMS Essays.
Elections – revision To review the different systems used in the UK.
Elections and Voting Systems
Topics for Today Civil Society and Institutional Design: Electoral Systems 1.Finish group discussion activity. 2.Characteristics and consequences of three.
Electoral Systems.
Elections and Electoral Systems
VOTING SYSTEMS IN THE UK and 2010 Election Results Comparison Election Results- Conservatives 306 seats (share of the vote, 36.1%) Labour.
Single Transferable Vote. Multi Member Constituencies Only Voting is Preferential meaning voters indicate preference by numbers, In order of their favourite.
Democracy- Lesson 2 Different types of voting systems.
What are its main advantages and disadvantages?
The role of elections in a democracy Do elections guarantee democracy? Unit 1.
The Single Transferable Vote electoral system provides for better representation than First Past the Post. Discuss.
Political Parties AS Politics. Political Parties and the need for them What are political parties? What are political parties? Why are parties important.
Did it deliver a fair result?. What are the Euro Elections? Elections to the European Parliament were held in the 27 member states of the European Union.
Electoral Reform in Britain The Jenkins Commission.
 Reformed number of seats from 785 to 736 MEPs  Britain returns 72 seats  Reformed system in 1998, implemented.
Other Voting Systems Although FPTP and AMS are used in British Parliamentary elections, there are other voting systems you should be aware of 1.Alternative.
First past the post. What is First past the post? FPTP is the voting system used for the election of MPs to 'seats' in the UK Parliament. It is a system.
Voting Systems – Scotland – Additional Member System (AMS)
Scottish Parliament elections use a mixed member system, comprising a first-past-the-post component and a proportional representation component. AUTHORED.
Answers to UK Parliamentary Elections worksheet. Question  What’s an election?
Proportional Representation (Additional Member System) Arguments For & Against.
First Past the Post How representative is it?. What is FPTP  It is a, simple, voting system used in the UK general elections  The voter puts an X next.
SA1: Living in a Democracy Electoral Systems. Proportional Representation Aims: Define Proportional Representation (PR) Examine different types of PR.
Proportional Representation
Electoral Systems and Reform How democratic is our democracy?
Elections and Electoral Systems Election Systems First Past the Post Additional Member Supplementary Vote Closed List System Single Transferable Vote.
Electoral Systems Answering an essay question. Types of questions Questions will focus on FPTP and systems of PR (AMS and/or STV) You will be asked to.
Institutional Design: Electoral Systems Plan for Today 1. Understand the characteristics and democratic consequences of three basic types of electoral.
Voting in Scotland LI: To find out about different voting systems and their advantages and disadvantages.
Is First-Past-The-Post Fair?. You can be elected with less than 50% of the votes NamePartyVotes%+/- Eric JoyceLabour23, John McNallyScottish.
Voting systems in elections
CFE Democracy The Single Transferable Vote
Arguments FOR and AGAINST AMS
The Additional Members System
Scotland’s Voting System
The Single Transferable Vote
Westminster System to elect members of Parliament where all votes are equal Result 2015 UK Election. Conservative Party 239 seats Democratic.
The Additional Member System
First Past the Post the true title of the system is ‘plurality within single-member constituencies’, and the term ‘first past the post’ really refers.
CFE Democracy First Past the Post
Key Features of FPTP.
Voting systems in elections
Additional Member System
Lesson 4: The Single Transferable Vote (STV)
Voting Systems in the UK –
Proportional Representation
Additional Member System
Voting Systems in the UK –

Over the next several periods we will…
Elections and Electoral Systems
Lesson Starter Explain, in two sentences or less, the difference between PLURALITY electoral systems and PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION electoral systems.
Voting Systems in the UK –
Over the next several periods we will…
Presentation transcript:

THE CASE FOR PR Most points are from Vernon Bogdanor “What is Proportional Representation?”

Describe the arguments for and against electing the house of commons by proportional representation.Describe the arguments for and against electing the house of commons by proportional representation. Arguments for FPTP (including those against PR)Arguments for FPTP (including those against PR) Arguments for PR (including those against FPTP)Arguments for PR (including those against FPTP)

Part 1 Myths about PR Rebuttal points

1. Some fear the central party but - the central party (that holds the balance) will become a pivot They would become a RESPONSIBLE pivot and would be held to account by the electorate. It would also be checked by its larger coalition partner. Power is SHARED and there would have to be CONSENSUS

2. Some say PR is complicated – but it isn’t Are British people more stupid that our European neighbours who use PR e.g. Germany? PR is already used in Britain – STV for councils in Scotland, Party List in EU elections.

In 1994 Black South Africans voted for the first time. 80% of them could not read or write. However they managed to vote using Party List. Party List is one of 4 PR systems currently in use in the U.K.

3. PR encourages extremism? – It does not. Hitler came to power because of other issues e.g. Versailles, economic collapse etc. NOT because of the voting system.

4. PR encourages the proliferation of parties? It does not. PR has led to a reduction of the number of parties in Ireland and Germany.

5. PR means frequent elections – It does not. Germany and Ireland average the same number of elections as the UK. In Scotland Labour and Liberal Democrats formed coalition governments in 1999 and Each ran its full term.

6. PR means coalitions and this means that voters don’t actually choose ‘The Government’ Under FPTP voters are often choosing which party will govern – Labour or Conservatives. Opinion polls however inform the voters and they can make decisions based on that.

7. PR destroys the link between M.P. and constituency? Some systems (such as Germany) have retained single member constituencies. Multi member constituencies such as Scottish Councils (STV) means the public are better served as they can speak to a representative who shares their view.

Arguments against FPTP Source – Ian Wright of the Electoral Reform Society

Only one MP is elected per constituency DUMFRIESSHIRE, CLYDESDALE AND TWEEDDALE - GENERAL ELECTION 2010DUMFRIESSHIRE, CLYDESDALE AND TWEEDDALE - GENERAL ELECTION 2010 David Mundell (Con) 17,457David Mundell (Con) 17,457 Claudia Beamish (Lab) 13,263Claudia Beamish (Lab) 13,263 Catriona Bhatia (Lib Dem) 9,080Catriona Bhatia (Lib Dem) 9,080 Aileen Orr (SNP) 4,945Aileen Orr (SNP) 4,945 Steven McKeane (UKIP) 637Steven McKeane (UKIP) 637 Alis Ballance (Green) 510Alis Ballance (Green) 510 Voters who didn’t vote for the winning M.P. may feel that they are not represented. David Mundell only need one more vote than Claudia Beamish to win and so over 4,000 of his votes didn’t matter. Those who voted for neither Labour or Conservatives wasted their vote.

Wasted Votes In 1997 there were 14.7 ineffective votes. (That is 48% of those who voted). Examples include Labour voters in Surrey ( a Cons area) and Conservative voters in Durham ( a strong Labour area).

There is a lack of choice to voters. Candidates are selected by a small number of party members. The voter can only vote for the candidate put forward by their party. STV would change that.

Voters are unequally represented In 2010 the Lib Dem vote rose by 23% (1 million votes) but they lost 5 seats! In 1997 Labour got an M.P. elected with – on average – 32,000 votes. For the Lib Dems the average was 113,000. A crowd of 113,000

FPTP leads to people casting negative votes. People often vote for someone they don’t like to stop someone they hate election figures

FPTP distorts results In 2005 Labour won 35% of the vote but gained 413 out of 646