International News US increasing its visible support Operating under financial constraints but slowing down other parts of the MUCOOL programme to provide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report from MICE project teams Proposed MICE organogram: revised Revised request for resources for financial year 2003/04 Review of iMICE schedules – status.
Advertisements

1 paul drumm; Jan’05; MICE RF Needs MICE RF Power Paul Drumm ISIS Facility Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & MICE.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
PID activities 1. Summary of work/activities since last CM in Berkeley 2. PID parallel session in Frascati 3. Topics specific to each subdetector CKOV1.
Target Status Report Lara Howlett University of Sheffield.
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
KEK Test Beam Phase II Plan Makoto Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE FT Daresbury 2005/8/30.
Particle ID in the MICE Beamline MICE Collaboration Meeting 30 March Paul Soler, Kenny Walaron University of Glasgow and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
CHIPP Sept 2005Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 What is MICE  Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment  What is Ionisation Cooling ? Cooling = Reduction of Beam.
Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: or ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.
March 2003 Paul Drumm MICE Collaboration Meeting, CERN 1 Beam Line & Installation Plans Paul Drumm CLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Project Report Paul Drumm CM15, FNAL June MICE Schedule Overview First beam September/October 2007 –Shutdown from January 2007 –Eight months for.
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
27/6/05 Frascati1 M. Bonesini INFN Milano A possible design for MICE TOF stations.
6 th April 2005 Malcolm Ellis, Imperial College London 1 Sci Fi Status & KEK Test.
DPNC Sept 2007Jean-Sébastien Graulich MICE The international Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment o o Introduction o o Beam Line o o Cooling Channel o o.
CMPB Alain Blondel 14 April STATUS OF MICE.
MuCool RF Status MICE Collaboration Meeting June 7-10, 2006, Fermilab A. Moretti June 9, 2006.
MB1 T.O.F. II Precise timing Electron ID Eliminate muons that decay Tracking devices T.O.F. 0 & I Pion /muon ID precise timing 201 MHz RF cavities Liquid.
1 M. Bonesini - CM 25 RAL 5/11/09 PID status report M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
Tracker Summary Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 28 th, 2005.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
MICE CMPB Alain Blondel 19 April spokesperson remarks CMPB MICE NEWS.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
Goals and Status of MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment J.S. Graulich.
Status of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Yagmur Torun Illinois Institute of Technology April 1, 2013.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
27/6/05 Frascati1 M. Bonesini INFN Milano MICE TOF stations updates.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
Steve Geer OsC RAL 21 June, Muon Accelerator Program MUON COLLIDER & NEUTRINO FACTORY R&D in the U.S.  
MICE : the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) for the MICE Collaboration Osaka - Overview and Status -
ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, 7 July 2012 Paul Soler on behalf of the MICE Collaboration The MICE Beam Line Instrumentation (Trackers and PID) for precise Emittance.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
Sci-Fi Tracker: Progress Report Malcolm Ellis, MICE Video Conference Wednesday 6 th October 2004.
UKNF OsC RAL – 31 st January 2011 UKNF - Status, high lights, plans J. Pozimski.
Fiber Tracker Update Edward McKigney Imperial College July 3 rd, 2002.
Takashi Matsushita Imperial College T. Matsushita 1 MICE Status Excerpt from talks at MuTAC review:
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
MICE FAC Alain Blondel 21 september   MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment BRIEF STATUS OF MICE.
MCTF 8/17/06 A. Bross MTA Activities and Plans MCTF August 17, 2006 A. Bross.
MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.
MICE Status & Plans MICE-UK paul drumm 15 th September 2004.
1M. Ellis - NFMCC - 31st January 2007 MICE Tracker.
John Womersley Welcome Director of Particle Physics, CCLRC International Scoping Study Meeting, RAL April 2006.
MICE RF Workshop Alain Blondel MICE = critical R&D for neutrino factory and muon collider 1 neutrino factory: accelerate muons and store to produce.
MICE: The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment MOPLT106 Abstract The provision of intense stored muon beams would allow the properties of neutrinos.
March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.
Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.
MICE CMPB Alain Blondel 1 Highlights on MICE.
MICE FAC open session Alain Blondel 1   MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment.
Muon Collider R&D Plans & New Initiative 1.Introduction 2.Muon Collider Schematic 3.Conceptual Breakthrough 4.Ongoing R&D 5.Muon Collider Task Force 6.Muon.
29 September 2006M.Sakuda NuFact06 Asian Regional Outlook (Japan) -by Y.Kuno (Osaka) (1) SuperBeam (T2K) (2) J-PARC current upgrade plan (3) T2HK or T2KK.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
- MICE - The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève o Introduction: Aims And Concept o Design o Infrastructure: Hall,
1 Alan Bross AEC March 31, 2008 MuCool RF Program Muon Cooling R&D Alan Bross.
M. Bonesini – CM 291 PID detectors summary M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
Andrew Moss ASTeC TIARA Mid term meeting 12 th 14 th June 2012 CIEMAT ICTF Progress on the MICE RF System.
MICE CM20 Alain Blondel 10 February The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment MICE CM20 Spokesmouse remarks.
ch/~bdl/lepc/lepc.ppt 1 MICE Status and Plans Rikard Sandström Université de Geneve International Scoping Study CERN,
CHIPP Oct 2007Jean-Sébastien Graulich Status of MICE Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève o o Introduction o o Beam Line o o Technical Design o o PID.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
Completion of the MICE-US construction project
MICE The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment
Luminosity Monitor Status
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
Presentation transcript:

International News US increasing its visible support Operating under financial constraints but slowing down other parts of the MUCOOL programme to provide resources to iMICE.

Solenoid & Refrigerating Solenoid Expected mid October - time scale slipped by two months but no panic ( yet ) Refrigeration A problem with the discontinuation of the system which had been the basis of the original plans. The replacement system is more expensive – however the process of drawing down contingency funds has been exercised. Expecting to order replacement this week.

RF Power System from Berkley Arrived at Daresbury and the renovation is building momentum.

RF Cavity The RF cavity under construction at Berkeley has been electro-polished and is being prepared for power at the Fermilab MTA

TRD SEPT04 Layout TOF0 TOF1 Ckov1 Iron Shield TOF2 Ckov 2Cal ISIS Bea m Diffuser Proton Absorber Iron Shield Tracker Target Particle identification PID

Chkov1 CKOV1 University of Mississippi Summary Frascati meeting Ray tracing optimization of Mirror and PMT in progress Test Beam this autumn Final design by January 06

Aerogel box Front mirror Particle entrance window Particle exit window Reflecting pyramid Back mirror Optical windows, Winston cones, PM’s + various small elements (clamping pieces for windows) 8 Ckov2 : University of Louvain

Simulation of ckov2 3 detectors hit ! Some ring imaging clearly visible on the screen display. 28 No scattering

Aim of TOF stations : Milan TOF0 experiment trigger TOF0/TOF1 PID on incoming muons TOF1/TOF2 PID on particle traversing the cooling channel Requirements: oSingle detector resolution  ~60 ps oHigh rate capability oSustain nearby B fringe fields

The environment The beamline design puts harder and harder requests on TOF stations Higher and higher particle rates ( now MHz for TOF0, it was ~1 MHz at beginning) Request for thinner and thinner scintillators (to reduce multiple scattering) TOF stations in the fringe field of magnets: quadrupoles for TOF0 (B ~ gauss), solenoids for TOF1/TOF2 (B~.2 T)

TOF0 support structure

TOF Detector Layout TOF X/Y planes with PMTs at both ends: TOF0 is placed after Q6. TOF1 is placed after Q9. TOF2 downstream –Transverse sizes: TOF0,1,2 are all 48  48 cm. –Segmentation: All stations are 2 planes arranged orthogonal to each other. TOF0 has 12 slabs in each plane. NO OVERLAP (to cope with higher rates) TOF1,2 have 8 slabs per plane. NO OVERLAP TOF0 environment: –Low field: g; High rate: 2.5 MHz. TOF1,2 environment: –High field: 1-2 Kg; Medium rate 0.5 MHz

Comparison of laser with cosmics calibration data  The two calibration methods provide similar accuracy on the equalization constants   The shifts of equalization constants (  ) measured with the two methods are well correlated (within 100ps) 70ps laser cosmics Shifts of calibration constants from 2001 to 2002 data taking M Bonesini – IEEE 2002

TOF : Conclusions design for TOF stations well understood only some points to be defined connected with choice of size of TOF1/TOF2 PMTs (1.5” vs 2”) and divider for TOF0 PMTs (booster vs active divider) define electronics chain (TDC for high incoming rate): probable choice CAEN V1290 define the high-demanding calibration system (mainly laser based) test a prototype asap at LNF BTF, together with EMCAL

Test Beams UK : Focus on two test beams KEK : late September – testing the tracker ISIS : Early January – testing the production target

Tracker Prototype Fourth station completed and new tracker assembled with 4 stations at Imperial. New waveguides manufactured in Japan. Optical connector at Station end much easier to use! Tracker was made light-tight at Imperial and shipped to Fermilab for cosmic-ray testing. Now in Japan being setup for test-beam.

ACC and TOF Performance

VLPC with MICE Cryostat We have two D0 VLPC cassettes (1024 channels each). MICE cryostat, using Sumitomo cryocoolers has been operating at Fermilab since May. Now operating well at KEK. LED calibration data taken at Fermilab as well as 3606 cosmic ray triggers.

FNAL Cosmic Ray Setup

High Gain Cassette - More Light Made with G4MICE

Test Beams : Isis Background Isis beam – 50 Hz rep rate. Injection every 20ms. Acceleration 10ms. Fast extraction. MICE target dips into the beam during the last ~2ms by upto 35 millimetres Must be out by the next injection 10ms later.

Target questions Satisfy ISIS that we can create a system which 1.Will not compromise the vacuum 2.Whose reliability does not compromise ISIS operation 3.Removes a maximum amount of ISIS beam Determine whether what muon flux we can produce within these constraints. Aims of the tests 1.Run a prototype target 2.Characterise the beam

Hall Switches (Control) Position Sensor (Monitor)

Target questions A target has been created and put through bench tests It works with some provisos continuous oscillation one shot operation needed for synchronisation with ISIS not made of vacuum safe materials

Target answers : i Plans Necessary improvements Creation of a version in vacuum safe materials Improvement of the electronics to allow one shot operation Desirable improvements Upgrade the electronics to increase the power and hence the acceleration. At present the acceleration is not sufficient to get the target in and out in the required time.

Target answers : ii Desirable improvements Upgrade the electronics to increase the power and hence the acceleration. At present the acceleration is not sufficient to get the target in and out in the required time. January running 50/128 Hz – means that the target does not have to be out in 10ms Start of insertion can be moved back in time to allow sufficient target insertion.

Timetable: Design review end September Test mechanical assembly late October. Vacuum & reliability tests November. Decision on readiness end November. Install in ISIS from early January ISIS closes 20 th January. Test run from 23 rd January (~100 pulses? Over a few days). Remove by 31 st January.

Particle flux measurements : Glasgow Prepare for system test end 2005 inside ISIS at 10 m, 20 m. –Set-up test station at Glasgow with UNIDAQ and read-out electronics: in progress, some technical problems with DAQ (talking to Makoto) –Test all PMTs and validate performance –Purchase Bicron BC-404 scintillator + light-guides. –Full system fully tested by November 2005 –Purchase polyethylene absorbers –Install equipment in ISIS during December-January (ISIS shutdown) –Set-up triggering electronics and gated scalers for target monitoring In parallel, perform more accurate simulations: in progress –Calculate particle momenta coming out of target –Run test-beam set-up at 10 m and 20 m using different absorbers –Determine rate per scintillator slab for different configurations –Write proposal to ISIS: target November 2005

Conclusions Work is building momentum. Progress is happening in all the components Problems are arising and ( thus far ) being solved

Advert CCLRC/PPARC seeks to position UK strategically w.r.t.: –International Linear Collider –Neutrino Factory –Other accelerator-based scientific facilities Key component – high-gradient cavities: –Develop manufacturing capability –Neutrino Factory application: Proton driver: –Front-end: ~234 MHz, RFQ, buncher cavities, chopper –Could be SC linac; SPL (352 MHz), FNAL (1.3 GHz), … –Synergy with ILC Phase rotation, buncher and cooling channel –Require large aperture  low frequency –Transport: solenoidal channel  cavities operate in strong B field Use warm cavities at low (200 MHz – 300 MHz) frequencies

Collaboration: So far: –US: LBNL (some advice/contact from/with JLab) –UK: IC Phys/Mech.Eng., advice and contact from CCLRC, RAL and DL Proposal: –Cavity: US: LBNL, FNAL (MuCool, MTA), JLab? UK: IC, CCLRC, HPRF Faraday (E2V, Shakespeare) Cockroft –Note: Industrial CASE application ICL/HPRF Faraday submitted –Coupling coil: GVA Timescale: –Submit October/November Proposal Design, manufacture and commission 201MHz cavity

Design from Imperial Mech. Eng. Contact Ken Long