1 Project Nexus Analysis of impacts and next steps Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus UNC Workgroup 03 April 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMIG Electricity Market Investment Group Presentation to the Ontario Energy Board February 17, 2004.
Advertisements

Review of NTS entry charge setting arrangements - IA 1 July 2010.
Third Energy Package for Change of Supplier 2009/73/EC.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
PNUNC AMR3 Topic Workgroup 12 th May, Transporter response to actions.  AMR004: Transporters (CW) to provide supporting justification as to why,
1 Project Nexus Modelling costs and benefits Andrew Wallace, Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus IA Subgroup 25 July 2012.
Project Nexus Next Steps Xoserve/Large GT View – 6 December 2011.
12/10/20141 Project Nexus Workgroup Settlement Issues 15 th May 2012.
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic) Allocations Overview 4 th December 2012.
PN UNC Workgroup 20/9/11 Requirements Definition to Delivery.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic) Meeting 3, 18 th July 2011.
Funding UKLink Process changes (User Pays). 2 Purpose of Presentation  Review of User Pays  Principles  Application to date  National Grid NTS observations.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
1 Project Nexus Requirements Definition Phase Steve Nunnington.
Senior Stakeholder Forum Wednesday 19 th June 2013.
Mod 0445 – Amendment to the Arrangements for Daily Metered Supply Point Capacity Ofgem Direction to Provide Further Evidence National Grid Distribution.
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup Meeting 19 – Meter Reading.
Entry Capacity Release Methodology Statement Transmission Workstream, 4 th May 2006.
1 CODE MODIFICATION PROPOSAL No 0243 Amendments to the process for initialisation of Enduring NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity at the Moffat NTS Exit Point Presentation.
SO Incentives from April 2010 John Perkins. 2 Gas System Operator (SO) Incentives National Grid operates the high pressure Gas Transmission System in.
Draft Review Proposal 175 Encouraging Participation in the elective DM Regime Phil Broom 25 October 2007.
Communicating a Smarter Future Keynote at Network th annual distribution network strategy conference 16 February 2012 Sandy Sheard Deputy Director.
MOD506 – Gas Performance Assurance Framework and Governance Arrangements.
Lessons Learned Process – A Strawman.  Lessons Learned  “To pass on any lessons that can be usefully applied to other projects”  “The data in the report.
Discretionary Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 1st May 2008.
Performance Assurance 21 st May Value Chain. Value Chain Xoserve would like to propose an approach to further aid the development of the Performance Assurance.
Delivering Connections and Capacity RIIO-T1 and associated commercial changes - Summary June 7th 2012.
1) Establish & Identify Scheme 5) Evolve Scheme 4) Review & Modify Scheme Deliverables 3) Operate the Framework 2) Manage Performance Assurance Scheme.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
Proposer: Hayley Burden Panel Date: 17th April : Mod Title: Imbalance Charge amendments required to align the UNC with the Network Code on Gas.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
Meter Read Validation 11 th August Background The meter read validation principles were developed under ‘The Settlement’ BRD and formed part of.
Code Governance Review Major Policy reform Proposals Gas Customer Forum 26 January 2009.
Presented by : Steven J Edwards, Head of Income and Pricing, Wales & West Utilities GDN Allowed and collected revenue awareness presentation for Shippers.
Modification proposal 0073 ‘Revision to the Notice Period regarding the implementation of changes to Transportation charges’ Transmission Workstream, 2.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Environmental Standing Group. 2 Background  Ofgem issued an open letter on 15 th April 2008 to consider issues associated with carbon assessment for.
1 Project Nexus Approach to modelling costs and benefits Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus UNC Workgroup 15 May 2012.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
PN UNC Workgroup Settlement topic 4 th October 2011.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.
PN UNC Workgroup Read Validation 4 th October 2011.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Beverley Viney - National Grid NTS.
Project Nexus : Funding Arrangements Joel Martin - 30 April 2009.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 24 th October Objectives of the Workgroups To determine detailed business requirements Consider/review comments made.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 10 th January Objectives of the Workgroups To determine business principles for future Invoicing processes –Consider/review.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 19 November 2010.
CONFIDENTIAL - Modification Proposal 0395 © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
Supply Point Register 7th December 2011
Supply Point Register 21st November 2011
Modifications iGT 039 and GT 0440 re iGT Agency Services background
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 4th October 2011.
Modification th July 2008.
Gas Performance Assurance
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Chris Warner UNC Modification Panel 21 December 2017
Proposer: Penny Garner Panel Date: 19 April 2018
Lessons Learned Process – A Strawman
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
Proposer: Debbie Brace Panel Date: 20th March 2014
Gas Customer Forum Project Nexus xoserve update (as of 19th July 2010) 26th July 2010 Final.
Gemini Code Contingency Review
Project Nexus Workgroup
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Enabling Large Scale Utilisation of Class 3
Presentation transcript:

1 Project Nexus Analysis of impacts and next steps Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus UNC Workgroup 03 April 2012

2 Agenda High-level principles for conducting an impact assessment (IA) Costs and benefits Next steps

3 Main areas to cover in IA High-level principles Topics 1) Distributional impacts on market participants For example, changes that improve the allocation of wholesale energy and distribution charges, less opportunity for gaming AQs 1) Distributional impacts on market participants For example, changes that improve the allocation of wholesale energy and distribution charges, less opportunity for gaming AQs 2) Impact on prices For example, the costs of implementing new systems (for transporters and suppliers) or the benefits from improved efficiency, lower AQ review costs, balancing charges, system management 2) Impact on prices For example, the costs of implementing new systems (for transporters and suppliers) or the benefits from improved efficiency, lower AQ review costs, balancing charges, system management 3) Other impacts For example, on sustainable development 3) Other impacts For example, on sustainable development

4 Steps for conducting the IA Identify appropriate baseline counterfactual(s) Identify costs and benefits against each of the main areas in the IA Collect data on the costs and benefits for each of the possible counterfactuals and scenarios Undertake analysis in line with best practice High-level principles Design the analysis to assess impacts Undertake analysis in line with best practice

5 Dealing with uncertainty High-level principles Data availability Conduct of market participants Rules in flux Potential sources Quantify costs using scenarios Prioritise assessment of benefits –Which benefits can be quantified? –Where are the biggest wins? Be clear about approach to qualitative impacts –What is the effect? –Is this sensitive to the scenarios? Approach

6 Standard of evidence required High-level principles Standard Industry to use best judgement when providing data Document sources and findings when conducting research to inform analysis Use best practices in conducting analysis and modelling work Provide an audit trail for figures in final report

7 Assessment of PN – potential costs PN Impacts – Costs and benefits We need to understand total costs to the industry under a range of scenarios StakeholderPotential impacts£m initial £m per year Suppliers System upgrades to accommodate processing and storage of larger volumes of DM data Any specific impacts on Distribution and Transmission charges? Staff training to manage larger number of DM customers Any metering costs? Other impacts? ?? Distribution companies System upgrades to accommodate processing and storage of larger volumes of DM data ?? Metering agent costs? System upgrades to accommodate larger volumes of DM data? Other impacts? ?? Xoserve System upgrades to accommodate larger volumes of DM data Implementation of proposed solution ??

8 Assessment of PN – potential benefits We need to better explain benefits and their materiality PN Impacts – Costs and benefits StakeholderPotential benefitAssumptions required£m per year Suppliers Accurate allocation of energy costs Accurate allocation of network costs Balancing costs Identify and reduce unallocated units Load shifting? Efficiencies and cost savings Reduce settlement timescales and costs? Variation of actual consumption from load factors Potential for DSR? Avoided costs Other? ? Distribution companies and Xoserve Identify and reduce unallocated units Efficiencies and cost savings Reduce settlement timescales and costs? Avoided costs ? Other? ?

9 Assessing the impacts: An example Efficiency gains More accurate allocation of energy & network costs Lower balancing costs Etc. Incremental benefits Baseline Path/period of implementation Uptake of settlements products Options System upgrades GDN/NTS costs Metering costs? Etc. Costs Individual modifications/BRD Pack of BRDs implemented Some BRDs implemented Others Scenarios PN Impacts – Costs and benefits

10 Indicative timetable Next steps

11 Roles and responsibilities Joint Office to facilitate the development of robust analysis –Through project management –Through analytical support PN workgroup is recalled to undertake analysis: –Ofgem to outline best practice at first meeting in April –JO provides first draft of a project plan at first meeting in April –JO pulls together strawmans in advance of PN Workgroup meetings to inform discussion –Industry, through PN workgroup, undertakes analysis and submits report to UNC Panel (in summer) Next steps

12