DYFI VALLEY PILOT VISITOR SURVEY 2002 Presentation to Dyfi Eco Valley Partnership November 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Life Satisfaction in Past, Present, and Future
Advertisements

AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Core Research Final FREDERICKSBURG CVB RESEARCH FINAL REPORT Four-phase Tracking Study comparing and Results March, 2008.
EuroCondens SGB E.
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
Whiteboardmaths.com © 2004 All rights reserved
Parlemeter – Autumn janvier Methodology.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
CALENDAR.
1 Screening & Eligibility Jeopardy Title V/PHC.
Welcome Youth Conference – Monday 19 th March 2007.
Lewis and Clark Enthusiasts in Montana Results from the 1999 Missouri-Madison Recreation Visitor Use Survey.
Unit Test Practice Number Sense Part I START.
Washington News Council July 2001 ELWAY RESEARCH, Inc. 12 The Daily Local News: Most Watched Television; Fewer than Half Read Newspaper or Listened to.
Eat. Play. Live... Better Montclair Baseline Evaluation & Needs Assessment Preliminary Community Survey Findings Partnership Meeting February 8, 2012.
GE Smart Grid Survey June, /2/2014 Table of Contents Background & Methodology Key Findings Detailed Findings Demographic Trends Demographic Profile.
Tablet ownership and behaviour 1 Results from YouGov survey conducted 28 th – 31 st December 2012.
The basics for simulations
ASSESSING THE VALUE OF BUS SERVICES FOR LEISURE Dr Jo Guiver Nick Davies Institute of Transport and Tourism.
Number Sense Unit Test Practice Q1: What is the absolute value of -10? a) b) a) b)
Minneapolis – St. Paul Visitor Count and Profile
Plenty of Fish U.S. Dating Survey Final Report August, 2010.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
WA State Seniors Oral Health Status. Methodology A total of 4,400 surveys were completed by phone with Washington State residents age 55 and older. Geographic.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
EUPM -Public Opinion Poll in Bosnia and Herzegovina- April, PRISM RESEARCH Obala Kulina Bana 15/ Sarajevo Bosna i Hercegovina Phone:
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Crisis Shelter Program GOALS To stabilize youth and families in crisis To develop stable living conditions for youth To engage families in the resolution.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
BTEC Progression The facts Vocational Presentation Lorne McNeill.
The Canadian Flag as a Symbol of National Pride: A question of Shared Values Jack Jedwab Association for Canadian Studies November 28 th, 2012.
AHS IV Trivia Game McCreary Centre Society
IPM THEORY CHALLENGE QUIZ NUMBER 3 Unit 3 Outcome 2.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
DURHAM DAY-TRIP REPORT Prepared For: Durham Convention & Visitor’s Bureau Prepared By: D.K. Shifflet & Associates Ltd. April 2003.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
25 seconds left…...
Edinburgh People Survey 2012 Craigentinny/ Duddingston Results Summary Report January 2013.
27 th June 2006Irene Potter – Learning Partnership Conference.
PORTRUSH VISITOR SURVEY B ACKGROUND Coleraine Borough Council is currently implementing the ‘Portrush Regeneration Strategy Western Peninsula’ (PRS)
Subtraction: Adding UP
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Unit Test Practice Expressions & Equations Part 1 Unit Part 1 Unit.
Conversion Unit Q1: Write the fraction as a percent. 16/20 a) c) b)d) 64% 8% 80% 20%
Unit Test Practice Expressions & Equations Part II.
Unit Test Practice Statistics Unit Q1: Find the mean. 6, 9, 2, 4, 3, 6, 5  a) c)  b)d)
Week 1.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Chapter 10 Testing the Difference between Means and Variances.
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Essential Cell Biology
Lab 15 :BCD Counters and Frequency Division:
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
PSSA Preparation.
Slide 1 Expectations of DNOs & Willingness to Pay for Improvements in Service May 2008.
Patient Survey 2013/14 Appointment & GP Access. 2 part survey carried out between December 13 & January 14 Much Wenlock & Cressage Patients Voice’ agreed.
National Consumer Agency Market Research Findings: Online Discount Sites July 2012 Research Conducted by.
Patient Survey Results 2013 Nicki Mott. Patient Survey 2013 Patient Survey conducted by IPOS Mori by posting questionnaires to random patients in the.
Cambridge Avenue Medical Centre GP Patient Survey 2013.
Powered by Online Weekly Circular Ad Survey 10/29/14 Monday, November 24, 2014.
Dysport - MB - November 2007 Innehåll
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
HEADLINES FROM THE GREATER MANCHESTER LEISURE VISITOR SURVEY 2014.
Presentation transcript:

DYFI VALLEY PILOT VISITOR SURVEY 2002 Presentation to Dyfi Eco Valley Partnership November 2002

STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION INTRODUCTION RESEARCH FINDINGS - Profile of Visitors - Profile of Visits - Reasons for Visit and Previous Visits - Facilities Used - Information Sources - Enjoyment of Visit - Perceptions of Dyfi Valley - Likelihood of Revisiting - The Environmental Visitor Centre SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES In 2002, pilot research commissioned to obtain information about visitors to the Dyfi Valley Purpose of survey: to give a picture of the profile, behaviour, characteristics & perceptions of visitors to the Dyfi Valley and to evaluate support for the proposed environmental Visitor Centre

METHODOLOGY Quantitative study involving two surveys: Street Survey A face-to-face street survey with a random sample of 300 visitors Two sampling points – Aberdyfi (200 interviews) & Machynlleth (100 interviews) Respondents aged 16 years and over Residents & those working in the area excluded

METHODOLOGY continued Visitors interviewed over cross-section of days of week Interviews 10 minutes duration Fieldwork conducted 18 October – 4 November 2002

METHODOLOGY continued Self-completion survey with interviewer accompaniment 3,000 self-completion questionnaires distributed to 11 outlets Poor response (7%) most likely due to time of year (maybe staff encouragement as well?) Fieldwork took place 18 October - 6 November Future recommendation would be just a face-to-face survey, if budget allows

METHODOLOGY continued Breakdown of response by outlet: - Centre for Alternative Technology (35 out of %) - Corris Craft Centre (37 out of 400 – 9%) - Celtica (24 out of 200 – 12%) - Talyllyn Railway (2 out of 200 – 1%) - Timberkits (26 out of 200 – 13%) - Bro Dyfi Leisure Centre (4 out of 200 – 2%) - Tabernacl and Museum of Modern Art (28 out of 200 – 14%) - Beiciau Madium Quads (14 out of 200 – 7%) - Trefeddian Hotel (45 out of 200 – 23%) - 0% response at Co-op & Aberdyfi Tourist Information Centre

RESEARCH FINDINGS

PROFILE OF VISITORS

Profile of Sample % BASE: all respondents (300)

SOCIAL OCCUPATION CLASSIFICATION (outlet survey) % BASE: outlet (219)

HOME LOCATION % BASE: all respondents (street : 300, outlet : 219)

HOME LOCATION OF VISITORS FROM ENGLAND % BASE: respondents from England (street :198, outlet: 147)

BASE: respondents from Wales (street: 64, outlet: 59) HOME LOCATION OF VISITORS FROM WALES %

PROFILE OF VISITS

Q3) MAIN PURPOSE OF VISIT % BASE: respondents from England (street :300, outlet: 219) Not surprisingly, those from further a field more likely to be staying away from home. Day trippers more local and from lower socio-economic grades.

BASE: those respondents not on a daytrip (Street: 262, Outlet: 192) Q4) WHETHER VISITORS STAYING IN OR AROUND THE DYFI VALLEY %

Q5) WHERE VISITORS STAYING % BASE: those respondents staying in or around the Dyfi Valley (street: 229, outlet: 143)

Q6) TYPE OF ACCOMMODATION USED % BASE: those respondents staying in or around the Dyfi Valley (Street: 229, Outlet: 143) Lower social grades most likely to stay in caravans higher grades in holiday flat/cottages

Q7) LENGTH OF STAY (NIGHTS) % Average number of nights = 5 BASE: those respondents staying in or around the Dyfi Valley (Street: 229, Outlet: 143)

Q8) LENGTH OF TIME IN DYFI VALLEY– DAY VISITORS % BASE: those respondents on a day trip or not staying in the Dyfi Valley (Street: 71, Outlet: 69) Younger visitors (16-34 yrs) likely to stay longer

Q9) MAIN METHOD OF TRANSPORT % Younger visitors (16 –24 yrs) more likely to use public transport BASE: all respondents (Street: 300, Outlet: 219)

Q10) PARTY COMPOSITION % BASE: all respondents (Street: 300, Outlet: 219)

Q12) NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN PERSONAL GROUP % BASE: All respondents (Street: 300, Outlet: 219)

Q13) NUMBER OF CHILDREN AGED 15 OR UNDER IN PERSONAL GROUP % BASE: All respondents (Street: 300, Outlet: 219)

REASONS FOR VISIT AND PREVIOUS VISITS

BASE: all respondents (Street: 300, Outlet: 219) Q2 REASONS FOR VISIT %

Q1) FREQUENCY OF VISITING % BASE: all respondents (street: 300, self-completion:219) 1 st time visitors most likely to be young (16-24 yrs)

FACILITIES USED

Q14) FACILITIES USED/LIKELY TO USE (street survey only) % BASE: all respondents (300)

INFORMATION SOURCES

Q22) INFORMATION SOURCE PRIOR TO VISITING % BASE: all respondents (street: 300, self-completion:219)

Q23) PREFERRED SOURCE OF INFORMATION % BASE: all respondents (street: 300, self-completion:219)

ENJOYMENT OF VISIT

Q14 & 15) ENJOYMENT OF VISIT % BASE: all respondents (street: 300, self-completion:219)

STREETOUTLET Beautiful scenery/views (25%) It’s relaxing/peaceful (23%) Weather (23%) People (5%) Seeing family/friends (4%) Beach (4%) Like Wales (4%) Very enjoyable (4%) Memories/been before (4%) Beautiful scenery (45%) Peaceful/relaxing (13%) Weather (10%) Interesting place (9%) Great attraction (7%) Great for shops/facilities (5%) Hotel we’re in (5%) Great for walking (4%) Enjoyable area (4%) Q15&16) MAIN REASON FOR ENJOYMENT % BASE: respondents who enjoyed visit (street:290, outlet:214)

STREETOUTLET Countryside (31%) Beaches (20%) People and atmosphere (18%) Weather (5%) Attractions (4%) Shops (4%) Don’t know (5%) Scenery (26%) Peacefulness (7%) Walks (5%) Labyrinth (5%) Great attraction (4%) CAT (4%) Hotel we’re at (4%) Don’t know/non-response (15%) Q16&17) MOST ENJOYABLE ASPECTS OF VISIT % BASE: all respondents (street:300, outlet:219)

STREETOUTLET Weather (38%) Nothing (50%) Don’t know (4%) Weather (45%) Having to go home (2%) Getting here (2%) Attraction closed early (2%) Nothing/non-response (38%) Q17&18) LEAST ENJOYABLE ASPECTS OF VISIT % BASE: all respondents (street:300, outlet:219)

PERCEPTIONS OF THE DYFI VALLEY

Q20 &21) ATTITUDES & PERCEPTIONS % BASE: all respondents (519) Higher disagreement for street & younger visitors Higher agreement amongst younger visitors Higher agreement for street

Attractions to be open longer (4%) Indoor activities when raining (3%) Public Transport (3%) Nothing/non-response (70%) Q21) SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (outlet survey) % BASE: all respondents (219)

LIKELIHOOD OF REVISITING

BASE: all respondents (street:300, outlet:219) Q18&19) LIKELIHOOD OF REVISITING % Likelihood is highest for those residing in Wales and visitors aged 35+

Q19 &20) LIKELY RETURN VISIT % BASE: respondents who are likely to revisit (street:294, outlet:208) Visitors aged 35+, those from lower social grades and Wales likely to return sooner

THE ENIVIRONMENTAL VISITOR CENTRE

Q24) EXHIBITIONS THE VISITOR CENTRE SHOULD INCLUDE % BASE: all respondents (300)

Q25) FACILITIES THE VISITOR CENTRE SHOULD INCLUDE – TOP 8 % BASE: all respondents (300)

Q25) FACILITIES THE VISITOR CENTRE SHOULD INCLUDE – % BASE: all respondents (300)

Q26) LIKELIHOOD OF VISITING THE CENTRE Interest very high overall, however younger respondents & ABC1s most likely to visit

Q27) HOW MUCH VISITORS PREPARED TO PAY % BASE: all respondents (300) Those from higher socio-economic grades prepared to pay more

Q28) IDEAS/SUGGESTIONS ABOUT PROPOSED VISITOR CENTRE % BASE: all respondents (300)

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Profile of visitors to the Dyfi Valley markedly: –Upmarket 73% ABC1 –Middle age range (56% yrs) Visitors mainly from England (esp. Midlands) Encouragingly, around three quarters staying away from home (for average of 5 nights) & most staying in or around the Dyfi Valley Most family groups (outlet) & couples (street)

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS (Continued) Very high level of repeat visiting & top reason for visit was previous visit Favourite activities cited: attractions, beach, walking & shops Turning to information sources, Internet preferred by most, after TIC, however not reflected in usage – limited internet sources?

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS (Continued) Overall perceptions/opinions extremely positive: –96/98% found visit enjoyable (78% very enjoyable) –95/98% likely to revisit (& most next year) –94% disagreeing the Dyfi Valley is boring –96% agreeing it’s a place families can enjoy Visitors especially like the scenery, peace and relaxation Some areas for improvement evident: –Attractions to be open longer (minority) –Nothing to do if it rains (one in five) –One in five disagreed there’s something for everyone –Higher criticism by younger visitors apparent (16-34 yrs)

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS (Continued) The Environmental Visitor Centre – nearly all likely to visit (96%), especially appealing to younger visitors & ABC1s Most willing to pay between £2 to £5