Screening for learning disabilities in prisons Glynis Murphy, Tizard Centre, Kent Univ

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STIs in Victoria who why prevention Rebecca Guy Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health Research, The Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research.
Advertisements

London Offender Health Needs Assessment
Rgu Research into information providing and using A selective overview Dorothy Williams
Assessment of autism in a survey of adults Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 2007.
Disabled Allied Health Professionals: meeting the challenge International Conference on Disability in HE University of Antwerp July 5 th /6 th 2011 Presenters:
Treatment for offenders with learning disabilities Glynis Murphy, Tizard Centre, Kent Univ Alison Giraud-Saunders,
Dumb & Dumber: Hearing Services for Deaf People Sue O’Rourke. Consultant Clinical Psychologist Mayflower Hospitals, Bury.
'Women with Mental Health Issues in the Criminal Justice System in Northern Ireland- A Misunderstood and Victimised Group'. Elizabeth Craig-PhD Student.
Here to Stay Research Conference Presentation will provide an understanding of the lives and experiences of BME with learning disability as an oppressed.
Offender health Setting the Scene Offender Health Research Conference Jenny Shaw.
A Health Needs Assessment for Adults with a Learning Disability in Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Presented at the Help and Advice for Learning Disability.
Improving sub national estimates of disability prevalence Alan Marshall Manchester University.
Sources of Stress: Work Around 500,000 UK workers believe work stress is making them ill Around 500,000 UK workers believe work stress is making them ill.
The deterrent effects of drug detection dogs on drug use in NSW, Australia Caitlin Hughes,¹ Don Weatherburn², Robert MacCoun 3 ¹ National Drug and Alcohol.
Chronic kidney disease Mr James Hollinshead Public Health Analyst East Midlands Public Health Observatory (EMPHO) UK Renal Registry 2011 Annual Audit Meeting.
©AMK 2015 Education, Vulnerable Offenders and the Criminal Justice System Working in Partnership: Addressing Mental Health and Learning Disabilities in.
Chronic disease and its impact on disability and the need for LTC Carol Jagger Experts' Seminar on Ageing and Long-Term Care Needs 20 May 2011.
Work time and productivity Data Slides 18/02/2015 © University of Kent Q-Step Centre 2015.
Removing Barriers. Achieving Change. Annual Youth Justice Convention Bournemouth November 2007 Angela Greatley Chief Executive Sainsbury Centre for.
Jenny Talbot Prison Reform Trust 7 October 2014
The challenges of health care for defendants with intellectual disability Susan Hayes, Professor of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, University of Sydney,
People with Learning Disabilities in the Criminal Justice System
Lord Bradley’s review of people with mental health problems or learning disabilities in the criminal justice system
Sloshed and sentenced: a prevalence study of alcohol use disorders amongst offenders in the North East of England Dorothy Newbury-Birch 1, Barbara Harrison.
Forensic Team part of Walsall Disability Services.
1 DEVELOPING FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES PAUL E MULLEN.
Labour Market Trends and the Impact of Migration Howard Reed Chief Economist Ippr 28 February 2008.
Epidemiology of sight loss in the UK
Alcohol Consumption and Diabetes Preventive Practices: Preliminary Findings from the U.S.-Mexico Border Patrice A.C. Vaeth, Dr.P.H. Raul Caetano, M.D.,
The prediction of well-being in early adolescents by four domains of social connectedness Paul E. Jose and Jan Pryor Roy McKenzie Centre for the Study.
Lord Bradley’s review of people with mental health problems or learning disabilities in the criminal justice system
‘Think Family’. The Hertfordshire Context Review of Integrated Practice - 2 years on  Reducing unnecessary escalation  Improving.
Implications of the 2015 Intergenerational Report Peter McDonald Crawford School of Public Policy The Australian National University and ARC Centre of.
UK Renal Registry 15th Annual Report Figure D.1. 95% confidence limits for incidence of 108 pmp for population size 80,000–800,000.
A Universal Testing Programme for Blood Borne Viruses in an Urban Emergency Department – a call for widespread ED testing in Ireland S O’Connell 1, D Lillis.
Improving Cancer Outcomes in Camden Dr Lucia Grun 19 March 2014.
SoFMH School of Forensic Mental Health PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY IN PRISON Dr Fergus Douds, Associate Medical.
Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Intellectual disability, criminal offending and victimisation in Victoria Margaret Garnsey Clayton Campus 22 nd November.
Glynis Murphy Prof of Clinical Psychology & Disability, Tizard Centre, Univ of Kent
Headway – the brain injury association The Justice Project
C2ME Main findings Jeanine Suurmond, AMC, dept of Public Health, Project leader C2ME 18 September 2015 ‘Culturally Competent In Medical Education’ Amsterdam.
 Aim:  Develop an understanding of the reasons why we punish criminals  Objectives: › Develop an understanding of different forms of punishment throughout.
Healthcare vs Non-Healthcare London, 5 August 2003 Opportunities in the European DAT Market © 2003 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved. This document.
ACC 491 Week 4 DQ 2 Week-4-DQ-2 What is the importance of defining the population when performing audit.
People with LD in the Criminal justice system
Dr Ágnes Kozma Hungary / Tizard Centre, University of Kent, UK
Adapted offending behaviour programmes
RISK FACTORS OF TYPE 2 DIABETES AMONG MBORORO POPULATION OF GUIWA-YANGAMO /EAST- CAMEROON BY JUDITH MAKA.
Suicide in Prisons: The data
Changing demographics and the impact on dementia
Getting it wrong – the example of children in residential care
Wellbeing as an outcome
Diversion: developing a gold standard?
Clive Tobutt University of Surrey, UK
How to Reset D-Link Router Administrator Password
Figure 3 Life expectancy at birth in all countries included
Subjects and Methods Introduction Results
Widening the Net: Assertive Outreach and Criminal Justice
Dr Coral Sirdifield, Research Fellow, University of Lincoln
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Abstracts from Around the World
1 Panel 2, Position 6 Jack D. Ripper.
UK Renal Registry 15th Annual Report
UK Renal Registry 16th Annual Report
Figure 9.1.
Gender differences in diabetes prevalence in 2009 in the general Portuguese population patients and in patients with CAP. Diabetes prevalence is higher.
Percentage of applicants and first-time enrollees by race and ethnicity, 2012–13Note: The number and percentage of applicants and first-time enrollees.
Incarceration and Afterward – Class 1
Screening test accuracy of the final risk score at a threshold of ≥2
Presentation transcript:

Screening for learning disabilities in prisons Glynis Murphy, Tizard Centre, Kent Univ

Offenders with LD: prevalence Interpret data with care! Samples vary, methods vary! Eugenics era: assumed to be very high rates but little good data (eg assessed only those referred with problems; used incorrect norms) In USA: early studies showed 10% of prisoners have ID; recent studies: 3% & less In Australia: often get figures around 10% or more; higher in Aboriginal populations; affected by ethnicity? + lack of diversion possibilities?

Offenders & ID: prevalence In UK: studies in 1990s - police station: 5-9% acc to Gudjonsson et al - probation: 6% acc to Mason & Murphy prison: <1% - Harnett, Holland & Murphy, ‘95 More recent UK studies suggested 7% of prisoners have learning disabilities – e.g. Mottram et al study in NW prisons – but methodology criticised Do exact numbers matter?

What prisons currently do In the No One Knows Programme, Jenny Talbot (Prison Reform Trust) asked prisons whether they screen people for learning disabilities or difficulties No routine screening going on at time (2008) Clear from rest of ‘No One Knows’ that prisoners with LD were very disadvantaged in terms of: accessing visitors, doctor appoint- ments, ordering meals, accessing work training, + accessing treatment programmes.

Bradley report Amongst other recommendations, asserted that prisons should screen for LD Clearly best to screen at entry to CJS – i.e. at police station – that is still (my) long term aim Meanwhile let us try screening in prison! Common objection: but what can we do if we find we have got prisoners with LD? Our answer: all sorts of things! - AND if you don’t know who has LD, how can you help them at all?

How can we screen? Common tools & requirements WAIS-IV - gold standard IQ test; takes 45mins-1hr; done by psychologists only WASI - short form IQ test; takes 20 mins; done by psychologists & a few others HASI – much like the WASI; validated in CJS; can train few others to do; over-estimates IQ LIPS – takes 15 mins; vocab & clock drawing; can train others to do it; validated in CJS LDSQ – 10 mins max; very easy to train others; validated in community

Dept of Health trial in 2010/11 None of tests ideal (adaptive behaviour issue) BUT: Used LDSQ to screen all new entrants to 3 prisons in a 3 mth trial Durham, Birmingham, Wormwood Scrubs Screening done by LD nurse in healthcare in Wormwood Scrubs; by DLO in Birmingham & by Education & Skills staff in Durham Done in first 48 hrs in W. Scrubs + Bham but later in Durham Overall positive ID for LD 7% - see next slide for exact numbers

Dept of Health trial PrisonNo. OfferedNo. refusedID as +ve for ID Birmingham1364 (85% of new prisoners) 195 (14%)59 (5%) Wormwood Scrubs 1099 (71%)58 (5%)89 (8.5%) Durham362 (57%)143 (39%)21 (9.5%)

What happened next? Up to each prison what they did when someone identified with LD Wormwood Scrubs: the LD nurse called up their local CLDT & invited them in to meet the person & do a full assessment Birmingham: 3 rd sector agency Care First worked in prison (doing activities like crafts) & followed people up when they left – those with LD referred to them Durham: ???

What else would we like to do? Train prison officers on what this means & what support the person may need Ensure support for person on literacy - eg to fill in forms for visitors, meals, doctor visits etc Ensure not bullied/harrassed/tricked Ensure wing officers aware (eg he may be struggling to understand, not being stroppy) Provide easy read info Provide access to work + treatment Ensure liaison with local services

What happened after the DH 3 mth trial? A hold up + Government change + austerity! Is it still the right thing to do? If yes, why arent we doing it? Is it just resources? (who pays for LDSQ forms? Who conducts the assessments? Who logs the data? Where? Who follows up?) Screening is a target for CLDTs & prisons......

Conclusions We know how to screen for LD We could negotiate reasonable price with test company We know how to liaise with prisons We have some ideas for what to do after people are identified We know its the right thing to do Lets do it!