12/10/20141 Project Nexus Workgroup Settlement Issues 15 th May 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Advertisements

Third Energy Package for Change of Supplier 2009/73/EC.
PNUNC AMR3 Topic Workgroup 12 th May, Transporter response to actions.  AMR004: Transporters (CW) to provide supporting justification as to why,
1 Project Nexus Analysis of impacts and next steps Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus UNC Workgroup 03 April 2012.
Project Nexus Next Steps Xoserve/Large GT View – 6 December 2011.
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic) Allocations Overview 4 th December 2012.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic) Meeting 3, 18 th July 2011.
Data Logger/ Daily Meter Reading Processes. New Daily Metered Site  DM Service Provider receives a request from Gas Shipper for installation of daily.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
Project Nexus Workgroup Unique Sites 4 th November 2014.
Mod 0445 – Amendment to the Arrangements for Daily Metered Supply Point Capacity Ofgem Direction to Provide Further Evidence National Grid Distribution.
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup Meeting 19 – Meter Reading.
PN UNC Workgroup Supply Point Register 25 th October 2011.
Project Nexus Workgroup AQ Backstop Date Options 7 th October 2014.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Project Nexus Workgroup Read Validation following Transfer of Ownership 13 th October
IGT Single Service Provision Requirements Update – 27 th March 2013.
Meter Read Validation 11 th August Background The meter read validation principles were developed under ‘The Settlement’ BRD and formed part of.
PN UNC Workgroup iGT Services 7 th February 2012.
PN UNC Workgroup Settlement topic 4 th October 2011.
Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.
Project Nexus Workgroup Extension of Modification 0434 to permit retrospective updates pre-dating Project Nexus Go Live Date 9 th September 2014.
PN UNC Workgroup Read Validation 4 th October 2011.
1 MOD Proposal 0224 Facilitating the use of AMR in the Daily Metered Elective Regime UK Link Implementation Summary & Overview of Solution Options 9 th.
1 Review Group 264 Rules & Options Analysis for BSSOQ Methodology Changes Post MOD th September 2009.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Apr 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  These slides describe the business rules for the treatment.
PN UNC 4 th September 2012 Reconciliation Issues (Action: NEX06/02)
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 24 th October Objectives of the Workgroups To determine detailed business requirements Consider/review comments made.
1 Smart Metering Foundation Stage February Agenda File Format Changes for Effective Switching Back Population Approach for Effective Switching.
Impacts of Mod 244 Steve Nunnington xoserve. Background  96.5% of transportation charges based on capacity.  These are dependent on historical throughput.
PN UNC Workgroup Settlement Issues 1 st November 2011.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
DM Elective Transfer Scenarios 29 January Principles  Incoming Shipper or Read Provider responsible for obtaining read at Start of GFD – i.e.
MOD Proposal 0224 Facilitating the use of AMR in the Daily Metered Elective Regime 28 May 2009 Code User Pays Services.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 10 th January Objectives of the Workgroups To determine business principles for future Invoicing processes –Consider/review.
Project Nexus UNC Workstream Consolidation of High-Level Principles Fiona Cottam 19 May 2010.
Supply Point Register 7th December 2011
Supply Point Register 21st November 2011
Supply Point Register 10th January 2012
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Project Nexus Workgroup (Settlement)
Incentives 26 September 2018.
DM Elective Transfer Scenarios 26 February 2009
Modification th July 2008.
Project Nexus Workgroup
Project Nexus Workgroup
Project Nexus Workgroup
PN UNC Workgroup iGT Services
Project Nexus Workgroup
CONFIDENTIAL - Review Group 272 © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc
PN UNC Workgroup Settlement Overview
Current situation The submission of AQ Appeals and AQ Amendments using two alternative dates and reads that provide a more realistic indication of the.
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic)
Deferral of Retrospective Updates Functionality
Nexus Workgroup Winter Consumption and the influence on Winter Annual Ratio (WAR) Bands 8th January 2014.
Project Nexus Workgroup
Project Nexus Workgroup
MOD Proposal 0224 Facilitating the use of AMR in the Daily Metered Elective Regime Distribution Workstream Update Following Completion of Analysis 23rd.
UNC Modification 0634 (Urgent) – Post Implementation Assessment
Invoicing Proposals 20th May 2013
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup Meeting 14 – Meter Reading
Nexus Workgroup Read Validation Scenarios
Project Nexus Workgroup
Meter Read Rejections ..
Project Nexus Workgroup
Project Nexus Workgroup
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
DSC CoMC Switching Programme Update September 2019
Presentation transcript:

12/10/20141 Project Nexus Workgroup Settlement Issues 15 th May 2012

2 Introduction Xoserve is developing internal requirements based on the BRDs developed at PN UNC. Second topic is ‘Settlement’ During the internal workshops issues / questions / clarifications are raised These need to be discussed and conclusion agreed by PN UNC

3 Settlement Issues – Submission of Estimated Reads Settlement BRD currently states Shippers can submit estimated reads for Products 1, 2 & 3 All estimates submitted must be calculated to a standard methodology Initial internal analysis suggests that system costs may be higher to validate the estimated read submitted rather than generate the estimated read Proposal –Xoserve generate the estimate read (to the agree standard methodology), at no charge, but incentives developed by PN UNC to encourage the submission of actual reads –Incentive could be after X number of estimates generated (number dependent on Product) a charge per read would be applied

4 Settlement Issues – Replacing Actual Reads BRD states an actual read can be replaced any number of times within GFD+5. Question raised internally on the reason for replacing actual reads –Only scenario would be for faulty meters so the actual would be replaced with an estimate??? Replacing an actual could potentially impact the Ratchets process –Following notification of a Ratchet on D+1 the read could be replaced with an estimate which could invalidate the ratchet Proposal for only estimates to be replaced Any requirement to replace an actual read would be via a ‘consumption adjustment’ –Amend the consumption derived rather than the read

5 Settlement Issues – DM Unbundling DM Unbundling services & reading arrangements were not fully addressed & defined during the development of the BRD Internal analysis has identified a few issues for DM Mandatory sites. Propose to amend the BRD to account for both options to ensure all aspects of DM processes (Products 1 & 2) are covered –Changes required around provision of the read by the DMSP and some changes regarding transfer from or to DM Mandatory –This can be changed at a later stage if a Mod is approved –Concern that some processes/impacts may be missed if the current assumption remains Proposal that DM Mandatory sites only are processed under Product 1 –Current read submission deadline remains as the energy is used for initial allocation Product 2 is used by Shippers for processing their nominated DM sites –Allows more time for read submission –Also, as the read is not used for initial allocation the read submission deadline can be extended to ‘Close Out’. If the read is received by am it will be used for the initial allocation run

6 Settlement Questions On change of Shipper will the metering equipment be changed or will the new Shipper adopt the equipment? –Is this different for Smart or AMR meters? For metering equipment that derive reads, at Shipper transfer is it likely that the Supplier will carry out a re-synch on or near the transfer date Issue around allocation of drift as Incoming Shipper would bear the risk if the re-synch is carried out after the transfer date No incentive on the Outgoing Shipper to carry out a re-synch

7 Shipper Transfers Settlement BRD requirements for the Shipper transfer process & transfer reading have been reviewed Couple of issues around the transfer read have been identified; –If transferring from Product 2 to 4 a read is required by GFD+5 to close out the period for the Outgoing Shipper –Outgoing Shipper can submit reads for their period of ownership upto GFD+5 for Products 1 & 2 and upto 25/40 days for Products 3 & 4. What if the reads submitted do not align with the transfer read?

8 Transfer Read Principles These principles are a clarification of those in the noted in the Settlement BRD; –Incoming Shippers responsibility to load the transfer read –Xoserve will generate an estimated read if not submitted within the transfer read window –Shipper can replace the estimated read within the transfer read window –SAR process to continue for challenges outside the window –‘Cyclic’ (normal) reads will not be accepted until the transfer read has loaded (applies to Products 3 & 4 only) –The prevailing Product type estimation methodology will be applied (e.g. Product 2 to 4: D-7 estimate)

9 Transfer Scenarios