PART 1: A Brief Comparison of Time- Latitude First Stokes Bias Structure in v505 and v620 PART 1: A Brief Comparison of Time- Latitude First Stokes Bias.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stratospheric Measurements: Microwave Sounders I. Current Methods – MSU4/AMSU9 Diurnal Adjustment Merging II. Problems and Limitations III. Other AMSU.
Advertisements

EGU 2013, 8-12 April 2013, Vienna Session OS4.9 SMOS and Aquarius Inter-Comparison Over Oceans [and Land] Gary S.E. Lagerloef, Francois Cabot, Rajat Bindlish,
Calibration Method of Microwave Tb for Retrieving Accurate SST Akira Shibata JAXA / EORC Advances of Satellite Oceanography at Vladivostok, Oct. 3-6, 2007.
1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Isotropic RFI detection Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Claire Henocq (ACRI-ST) Philippe Waldteufel (LATMOS)
BIAS TRENDS IN THE 1-SLOPE (REPROCESSING) AND CALIBRATED L1 BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES Joe Tenerelli SMOS Payload Calibration Meeting September 2012.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Commissioning Plan, 07/05/2009 Level 2 Ocean Salinity Processor Commissioning Plan 7 May 2009 ARGANS ACRI-ST ICM-CSIC.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity – Reprocessing Level 2 Ocean Salinity Reprocessing 17 September 2008.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity L1OP v620 border flag width 23 May 2014 ARGANS & L2OS ESL
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity L20S Tool Box Architecture & Release 27 June 2014 ARGANS & SMOS L2OS ESL.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Reprocessed constant calibration L1c OTT drift study 13 April 2011 ARGANS & L2OS ESL ascendingdescending.
1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Galactic noise model adjustment Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN) Xiaobin Yin (LOCEAN)
UPDATE ON BIAS TRENDS, DIRECT SUN CORRECTION, AND ROUGHNESS CORRECTION Joe Tenerelli May 10, 2011.
AN INITIAL LOOK AT THE IMPACT OF THE NEW ANTENNA LOSS MODEL Joe Tenerelli SMOS QUALITY WORKING GROUP #4 7-9 March 2011.
UPDATE ON SMOS LONG-TERM BIASES OVER THE OCEAN AND ROUGH SURFACE SCATTERING OF CELESTIAL SKY NOISE Joe Tenerelli SMOS L2OS Progress Meeting Arles, France,
REVIEW OF OBSERVED BIAS TRENDS OVER THE OCEAN AND POTENTIAL IMPACT OF PROCESSOR EVOLUTION Joe & Nicolas IFREMER/CLS ESL Quality Working Group #5 May 30-31,
PART 2: A QUICK COMPARISON OF V504 AND V620 GLOBAL MAPS Joe Tenerelli SMOS Calibration Meeting 18 26/05/2014.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity L1 -> L2OS tools 12 February 2014 ARGANS & SMOS L2OS ESL.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity Using TEC estimated from Stokes 3 24 October 2012 ACRI-st, LOCEAN & ARGANS SMOS+polarimetry.
1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 TEC estimation Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN)
SABER Instrument Performance and Measurement Requirements.
GLOBAL BIASES IN THE DWELL-LINE MEAN STOKES PARAMETERS FROM SMOS FOR NOVEMBER 2010 Joe Tenerelli 25 February 2011.
The Aquarius Salinity Retrieval Algorithm Frank J. Wentz and Thomas Meissner, Remote Sensing Systems Gary S. Lagerloef, Earth and Space Research David.
MIRAS performance based on OS data SMOS MIRAS IOP 6 th Review, ESAC – 17 June 2013 Prepared by: J. Font, SMOS Co-Lead Investigator, Ocean Salinity – ICM-CSIC.
ConcepTest • Section 2.1 • Question 1
IFREMER EMPIRICAL ROUGHNESS MODEL Joe Tenerelli, CLS, Brest, France, November 4, 2010.
ElectroScience Lab Studies of Radio Frequency Interference in SMOS Observations IGARSS 2011 Joel T. Johnson and Mustafa Aksoy Department of Electrical.
An Update on A Few Issues Relevant to Ocean Salinity Retrieval for SMOS Joe Tenerelli SMOS Quality Working Group 11 July ESA ESRIN.
Galactic noise model adjustment Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN) Xiaobin Yin (LOCEAN)
SMOS Science Workshop, Arles, th Sept, 2011 IMPROVING SMOS SALINITY RETRIEVAL: SYSTEMATIC ERROR DIAGNOSTIC J. Gourrion, R. Sabia, M. Portabella,
SMOS QWG-5, 30 May- 1 June 2011, ESRIN Ocean Salinity 1 1.Commissioning reprocessing analysis 2.New processor version: improvements and problems detected/solved.
Analysis of a Suspected Variable Star. What is a Variable Star? Variable stars are stars that change brightness. The changes in brightness of these stars.
Polarization Surveys with the DRAO 26-m Telescope at 1.4 GHz Maik Wolleben, T. Landecker, O. Davison Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory W. Reich,
1 Detection and Determination of Channel Frequency Shift in AMSU-A Observations Cheng-Zhi Zou and Wenhui Wang IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada, July 24-28,
UPDATE ON THE SUN GLINT Joe Tenerelli Ocean Data Lab SMOS Level 2 OS Progress Meeting 26 SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Barcelona, Spain April 2015.
A REVIEW OF BIAS PATTERNS IN THE MIRAS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES OVER THE OCEAN Joe Tenerelli SMOS Quality Working Group # Feb 2013 ESRIN.
SPCM-9, Esac, May 3 rd, 2012 MODEL-INDEPENDENT ESTIMATION OF SYSTEMATIC ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES J. Gourrion, S. Guimbard, R. Sabia,
Dependence of SMOS/MIRAS brightness temperatures on wind speed and foam model Xiaobin Yin, Jacqueline Boutin LOCEAN & ARGANS.
OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 OTT sensitivity study and Sun correction impact J. Gourrion and the SMOS-BEC team SMOS-BEC, ICM/CSIC.
EXTENDING THE LAND SEA CONTAMINATION CHARACTERIZATION TO THE EXTENDED ALIAS- FREE FIELD OF VIEW Joe Tenerelli (CLS) and Nicolas Reul (IFREMER) SMOS Quality.
SMOS QWG-6, ESRIN October 2011 OTT generation strategy and associated issues 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Characterization of scattered celestial signals in SMOS observations over the Ocean J. Gourrion 1, J.
USING SMOS POLARIMETRIC BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES TO CORRECT FOR ROUGH SURFACE EMISSION BEFORE SALINITY INVERSION.
SMOS-BEC – Barcelona (Spain) LO calibration frequency impact Part II C. Gabarró, J. Martínez, V. González, A. Turiel & BEC team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre.
SMOS-BEC – Barcelona (Spain) Assessment of impact of new ECMWF cycle 38r2 BEC team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, Barcelona.
QWG-10 ESRIN 4-6 February 2013 Quality control study for SMOS data / Flags analysis C. Gabarró, J. Martínez, E. Olmedo M. Portabella, J. Font and BEC team.
Validation of SCIAMACHY total ozone: ESA/DLR V5(W) and IUP WFDOAS V2(W) M. Weber, S. Dikty, J. P.Burrows, M. Coldewey-Egbers (1), V. E. Fioletov (2), S.
2.6 Scatter Diagrams. Scatter Diagrams A relation is a correspondence between two sets of data X is the independent variable Y is the dependent variable.
SMOS Quality Working Group Meeting #2 Frascati (Rome), September 13 th -14 th,2010 SMOS-BEC Team.
Analysis of Nonlinearity Correction for CrIS SDR April 25, 2012 Chunming Wang NGAS Comparisons Between V32 and V33 Engineering Packets.
TEC introduced high ratios of std(Tbmeas-Tbmodel)/ radio_accuracy X. Yin, J. Boutin LOCEAN.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity – PM#25 1/20 Level 2 Ocean Salinity May 2013 A3TEC.
SMOS Science Meeting September 2011 Arles, FR Simulating Aquarius by Resampling SMOS Gary Lagerloef, Yann Kerr & Eric Anterrieu and Initial Results.
Impact of sea surface roughness on SMOS measurements A new empirical model S. Guimbard & SMOS-BEC Team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta.
Slide 1 Initial results from the assessment of ATMS data at ECMWF Niels Bormann, Bill Bell, Anne Fouilloux, Ioannis Mallas, Nigel Atkinson, Stephen English.
UPDATE ON GALACTIC NOISE CORRECTION Joe Tenerelli SMOS Quality Working Group #9 ESA ESRIN 24 October 2012.
Dependence of SMOS/MIRAS brightness temperatures on wind speed: sea surface effect and latitudinal biases Xiaobin Yin, Jacqueline Boutin LOCEAN.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya CORRECTION OF SPATIAL ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES L. Wu, I. Corbella, F. Torres, N. Duffo, M. Martín-Neira.
21-23/04/2015PM27 ACRI-ST ARGANS LOCEAN TEC follow-up.
Tests on V500 Sun On versus Sun Off 1)Tbmeas. –Tbmodel in the FOV X. Yin, J. Boutin Inputs from R. Balague, P. Spurgeon, A. Chuprin, M. Martin-Neira and.
AIRS – MODIS TEB Global Comparisons Chris Moeller Dave Tobin Univ. Wisconsin May 13, 2008 MODIS Calibration Mtg.
OMI Nitrogen Dioxide Workshop Ellen Brinksma, Folkert Boersma.
Markus Nielbock (MPIA Heidelberg)
How accurate is the “Dad’s Army view” of the Home Guard?
Observing Climate Variability and Change
SMOS Soil Moisture Validation With U.S. In Situ Networks
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Student Satisfaction Spring 2006 (Short version)
-.&- ·Af& Q 0 "i'/
Midnight calibration errors on MTSAT-2
Presentation transcript:

PART 1: A Brief Comparison of Time- Latitude First Stokes Bias Structure in v505 and v620 PART 1: A Brief Comparison of Time- Latitude First Stokes Bias Structure in v505 and v620 Joe Tenerelli SMOS Calibration Meeting 18 26/05/2014

PURPOSE: Compare v504 and v620 alias-free average bias structure as a function of time and latitude, focusing on May 2011 (not eclipse period with relatively small orbital drift in v504) and Nov 2012-Jan 2013 (eclipse period).

Recall Descending Pass TP-7 in Eclipse Period Variations in Tp7 strongest during this time of year:

Corresponding v505 AF-FOV Bias in (Tx+Ty)/2 Variations in first Stokes parameter also strongest during this time of year in version 504 of reconstructed Tbs:

Corresponding v620 AF-FOV Bias in (Tx+Ty)/2 Drift noticeably reduced in v620:

Change from v505 to v620 Bias Drift difference between v620 and v504:

Recall Descending Pass TP-7 in Eclipse Period Bias change pattern seems to correspond well to the Tp-7 pattern in descending passes. So is the change in the bias linked to the removal of the one-slope model?

Descending Pass Bias vs TP-7 Correlation between Tp7 and bias in first Stokes is reduced in V620 rtelative to that in v504:

We next look at ascending pass bias

v505 AF-FOV Bias in (Tx+Ty)/2 Ascending passes

Corresponding v620 AF-FOV Bias in (Tx+Ty)/2 Ascending passes

Change from v505 to v620 Bias Ascending passes

CONCLUSION FOR ASCENDING PASSES: Latitudinal variation also seems reduced for ascending passes in the eclipse period.

We next look at descending-ascending pass bias

v505 AF-FOV Bias in (Tx+Ty)/2 Descending-Ascending passes

Corresponding v620 AF-FOV Bias in (Tx+Ty)/2 Descending-Ascending passes

Change from v505 to v620 Bias Descending-Ascending passes

We next look at May 2011 where the change is mostly an overall shift in the level of the brightness temperature with little latitude- time structure.

Corresponding v505 AF-FOV Bias in (Tx+Ty)/2 May 2011 descending passes

Corresponding v620 AF-FOV Bias in (Tx+Ty)/2 May 2011 descending passes

Change from v505 to v620 Bias May 2011 descending passes

We next look at ascending pass bias for May 2011

Corresponding v505 AF-FOV Bias in (Tx+Ty)/2 May 2011 ascending passes

Corresponding v620 AF-FOV Bias in (Tx+Ty)/2 May 2011 ascending passes

Change from v505 to v620 Bias May 2011 ascending passes

CONCLUSION FOR MAY 2011 ASC/DESC PASSES: Noticeable decrease in long-term drift in v620 relative to v504 for ascending passes. Little short term drift in either version in this period.

Fourth Stokes Bias

Fourth Stokes v505 Bias

Fourth Stokes v620 Bias

Fourth Stokes v620-v505 Bias

CONCLUSION FOR FOURTH STOKES: Reduced short term drift. Less obvious correlation with Faraday rotation (should be none).