Friday, July 15, 2011.  ART Progress  Fall Critical Thinking Institute  Deliverables  Assessment  Next Steps.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

SE Name SE Title Blackboard Training: Approaches and Opportunities.
Learner-Centered Education Course Redesign Initiative Builds upon work of prior LCE grants Will award grants of $40,000 - $50,000, with the option.
Developing New Instructional Roles in a Large Enrollment Online Course The National Center for Academic Transformation Course Redesign Alliance Conference.
How did we get Here and Where are We? Outcomes Assessment at Carteret Community College.
21 st Century Balanced Assessment: What Does It Mean to My School? WVDE 2008 Fall Regional School Counselors Workshop West Virginia Department of Education.
Principal Professional Development Mathematics KCAS June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Florida Department of Education Sally Sanders Science Curriculum Specialist.
QEP BASICS.
Fine Tuning Online Faculty Development Workshops October 17, 2012 ACM SIGUCCS FALL CONFERNCE Kathy Fletcher Manager of IT Training Office of Information.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Introduction to Acuity School District of Philadelphia Extended Day Program and Strategic Intervention Programs Assessment.
Latest developments in the MYP © International Baccalaureate Organization 2007 Page 2 Background to the presentation This PowerPoint presentation.
Ginny Price, MS, CVT, VTS (Behavior) St Petersburg College Veterinary Technology Program, AS.
Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science.
Student Growth Goals Sorting it out. Over- arching Goal 2.
What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
Module 3 Objectives Gain knowledge in the variables that comprise critical thinking Identify when clinical reasoning is being used Evaluate the effectiveness.
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
Presented by Barbara June Rodriguez Professor Trish Joyce Professor Joshua Kimber 14 th Annual Texas A&M Assessment Conference February 16-18, 2014.
Critical Thinking Critical Thinking is Unnatural Defining Critical Thinking Educating Critical Thinkers Critical Thinking is Unnatural Defining Critical.
(IN)FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT August Are You… ASSESSMENT SAVVY? Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning? Using it effectively.
Critical Thinking Rubrics David Hunter, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Chair Philosophy and Humanities Buffalo State College, SUNY November 4, 2005.
Definitions – John Dewey
NCATE Institutional Orientation Session on PROGRAM REVIEW Moving Away from Input- based Programs Toward Performance-based Programs Emerson J. Elliott,
Dr. Jia Li UOIT, Faculty of Education Jingfeng Han
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
Curriculum Design for Assuring Learning in Business Education Session 2.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
UNIT 6 CRITICAL THINKING At the end of this session:  YOU WILL UNDERSTAND THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF CRITICAL THINKING AND APPLY THOSE PRINCIPLES TO DEVELOP.
January 29, 2010ART Beach Retreat ART Beach Retreat 2010 Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking First Scoring Session Summary ART Beach Retreat.
Assessing Progress on the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Quality Enhancement Committee Meeting Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.
Presentation Five Using Descriptive, Analytical, and Reflective Writing to Analyze Practice.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012.
Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report College of Nursing.
Friday, August 28,  A pile of blackberries weighs 9 pounds but is 90% water. After sitting in the sun all day long, the berries are only 80% water.
Noel Levitz Priorities Survey for Online Learners (PSOL) Joan Costello —Chief Academic Officer, Inver Hills Community College Deborah Proctor —eCurriculum.
VELS The Arts. VELS (3 STRANDS) Physical, Personal and Social Learning Discipline-based Learning Interdisciplinary Learning.
Friday, April 24,  Deliverables  CAT  Critical Thinking Activity/RLO.
Learning Targets January 21, 2008 Londa Richter & Jo Hartmann TIE.
RECOGNIZING, ANALYZING, AND CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS
Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011.
Friday, June 11,  Fall Critical Thinking Institute  Summer Deliverables  Reusable Learning Objects.
ARC 114 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN I Spring Term ARC 114 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN I Spring Term INTERNATIONAL BURCH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT of.
The Lesson PlanningProcess The BLaST IU17 Liberty Fellowship September 20, 2011 Dr. Fran Macko
Welcome to CHS Open House Mara Schultz English 11 Room 201.
Friday, December 9,  Housekeeping  Return materials  PAARs  Completion of the Instructional Portfolio and Fall Deliverables  Recommendations.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
BLHC4032 CRITICAL AND CREATIVE THINKING SIX STEPS OF CRITICAL THINKING.
College Admissions Testing Iona Prep College Readiness Night November 18 th, 2015.
Test Question Writing Instructor Development ANSF Nurse Training Program.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Welcome to the STEM Task Force Funding provided by:
Critical Thinking or how to learn and know that you know what you know, if you know it Terry C. Norris.
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Craig Gabler Regional Science Coordinator ESD 113.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
Friday, August 27,  Intervention & Assessment Strategy  Fall Deliverables  QEC & Critical Thinking Subcommittee Meeting  Fall Critical Thinking.
Faculty Champion Meeting
Faculty Champion Meeting
Faculty Champion Meeting
Faculty Champion Meeting
Critical thinking as an educational ideal
Faculty Champion Meeting
Faculty Champion Meeting
Faculty Champion Meeting
Faculty Champion Meeting
Faculty Champion Meeting
Key Dates for GEARS Fall 2017 All Faculty Selected Faculty
A MOVE FROM CRITICAL THINKING TOWARDS CRITICAL PRACTICE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF THE SOCIO-CULTURAL FACTORS Author: Hesaam Kashi Deakin University.
Presentation transcript:

Friday, July 15, 2011

 ART Progress  Fall Critical Thinking Institute  Deliverables  Assessment  Next Steps

 Instructional Portfolio component  Intervention  Drop Boxes & Forms  ARC Scenario  Critical Thinking Activity/RLO  ART Action Items (May, June, July)  Midpoint Survey  Session Description for Fall Critical Thinking Institute  Fall ART Meeting Dates

Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (1980), by Goodwin Watson and Edward Maynard Glaser. Harcourt Assessment, Inc. ents.com/HAIWEB/Cultures/ en- us/Productdetail.htm?Pid= General-Content Multi-Aspect (more detailed analysis given by Fawkes6) Multiple-Choice “sections on induction, assumption identification, deduction, judging whether a conclusion follows beyond a reasonable doubt, and argument evaluation.” The California Critical Thinking Skills Test: College Level (1990), by Peter Facione nt.com/test-cctst.html General-Content Multi-Aspect (more detailed analysis given by Fawkes8) Multiple-Choice Multiple-choice assessing interpretation, argument analysis and evaluation, deduction, induction, basic statistical reasoning, and puzzle-solving. Additional Resources for Assessing Critical Thinking Interventions and Activities

The Cornell Critical Thinking Test, Level Z (2005), by Robert H. Ennis and Jason Millman. The Critical Thinking Company. s/055/index_c.html General-Content Multi-Aspect (more detailed analysis given by Fawkes13) Multiple-Choice “[S]ections on induction, credibility, prediction and experimental planning, fallacies (especially equivocation), deduction, definition, and assumption identification.” INTERNATIONAL CRITICAL THINKING BASIC CONCEPTS & UNDERSTANDING ONLINE TEST es/critical_thinkg_test1.cfm The test is a three- part, 100 item test It is based on the substantive approach to critical thinking developed by Paul and his colleagues at the Foundation for Critical Thinking during the last quarter century. It is the only critical thinking test that approaches critical thinking as a transdisciplinary system of interconnected concepts, principles, and understandings. It focuses on the five essential dimensions of critical thinking: 1. the analysis of thought. 2. the assessment of thought 3. the dispositions of thought 4. the skills and abilities of thought 5. the obstacles or barriers to critical thought.substantive approach to critical thinking The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test (1985), by Robert H. Ennis and Eric Weir. Critical Thinking Press and Software (formerly Midwest Publications), PO Box 448, Pacific Grove CA List1199.html Aimed at grades 7 through college. Also intended to be used as a teaching material. Incorporates getting the point, seeing the reasons and assumptions, stating one's point, offering good reasons, seeing other possibilities (including other possible explanations), and responding to and avoiding equivocation, irrelevance, circularity, reversal of an if-then (or other conditional) relationship, overgeneralization, credibility problems, and the use of emotive language to persuade. Additional resources for assessing Critical Thinking Interventions and Activities

 Instructional Portfolio components  Systematic Observation  Observations  Results Analysis  Peer Evaluation  Key Issues  Results Synthesis  Context of Knowledge Base

 Drop Boxes & Forms  ART Action Items (August, September, October, November, December)  Portfolio Report  Session Description for Spring Critical Thinking Institute  Final Survey

DateEventLocation Friday, September 2, 9:00-11:00 a.m. QEC Meeting & Critical Thinking Subcommittee Meeting EpiCenter – Friday, September 23, 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Fall Critical Thinking InstituteClearwater Campus Friday, October 21, 9:00- 11:00 a.m. Faculty Champion MeetingEpiCenter – Friday, November 18, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. ARC Scoring Workshop DO Consular Conference Room Friday, December 9, 9:00- 11:00 a.m. Faculty Champion MeetingEpiCenter – *Subject to Change (Revised 6/1/11)