Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Matters Building a Quality Online Course.
Advertisements

E-Learning and How it works Instructor: Barbara Salice November 13, 2011 Michele Gurzynski.
Developing Learner-led Knowledge Generating Online Communities
When Students Can’t Read…
Look forward Look backward Todays topic: Communicating The course Activity: Review your present Syllabus with a Checklist Activity: Checklist for final.
Troy University eTROY Colloquium April 17-18, 2012.
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
The Quality Matters Rubric ® ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
Institutional Policy & Quality Matters Standards: The impact of policy on course quality Deb Adair, QM Director Sloan-C Conference November 9-11, 2011.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Quality Matters! Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design Susan Bussmann and Sandy Johnson NMSU Quality Matters Institutional.
Twelve Step Program to Meeting Quality Matters Standard One Susan Bussmann, PhD Sandra Johnson, MS, MA New Mexico State University.
Module/Unit Learning Objectives Miley Grandjean and Sandy Johnson Instructional Innovation & Quality (IIQ)
Applying the QM Rubric August 2008
IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.
Quality Bucks Inter-Collegiate Quality Assurance in Online Learning.
Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Classroom Observation Training. Instructional Activities to be observed include but may not be limited to….. Classroom instruction Laboratory and clinical.
Introducing the Quality Matters Continuing Education Rubric
Quality Assurance Initiative. What is it anyway? The Quality Assurance (QA) Initiative is a faculty-centered, peer review process designed to assess the.
Quality Matters : Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning Teaching with New Technologies May 2007.
Online Course Quality and Peer Review Adapted from Maryland Online FIPSE Project “QUALITY MATTERS” Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning.
Quality Matters: Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning A Grant Initiative of MarylandOnline Sponsored by the U.S. Dept. Education Fund.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Quality Matters and Online Courses in Sakai Brian Dashew, Instructional Designer, Marist College Dr. Reba-Anna Lee, Assistant Director for Academic Technology.
HOW TO DESIGN A SIMPLE ONLINE COURSE April 28, 2009 ED 641 STEPHEN CHESKIEWICZ, MS.ED AND IMPROVE STUDENT SUCCESS.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University November 2013.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Finding the Good Fit: Faculty Members, Instruction, Evidence, and Technology Patricia A. McGee, PhD Associate Professor/2003 NLII.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
TEACHING AN ONLINE CLASS BY Karen J. Louis Was I prepared to teach online? How will I get my students to interact with me online? How will I get my students.
Universally Designed Syllabi Kirsten Behling, MA Suffolk University.
GSU Online Degree and Certificate Programs Preparation for North Central Association Accreditation Visit.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
1 The Use of Standards for Peer Review of Online Courses Barbara Battin Little, DNP, MPH, RN
JMBE An insider’s guide to publishing JMBE curriculum articles Jean A. Cardinale, Alfred University Curriculum Editor, Journal of Microbiology & Biology.
Peer to Peer Interactions Providing opportunities for online students to engage and participate with others in meaningful ways. Susie Bussmann, Ph.D. Sandy.
 The Inclusive Classroom: Assessment & Differentiation Design and Assessment for ALL students STMU: Sept 14, 2012 Guest Instructor: Cheryl Babin.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University Spring 2015.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Formative Peer Review at Ocean County College. Guiding Principle “Ideally, the peer review of teaching is a critically reflective and collaborative process.
MAKING THE SHIFT: FROM CLASSROOM TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN
Building Trust with Quality Assurance Strategies in TAACCCT Gerry Hanley (TAACCCT Repository Services) Executive Director, MERLOT Assistant Vice Chancellor,
Innovate. Engage. Empower THE ONECLAY WRITES SCORING EXPERIENCE WELCOME! FIND A SEAT TALK TO OTHERS AT YOUR TABLE AND DISCUSS SUCCESSES SO FAR THIS YEAR.
Quality Matters Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Introduction My class is a 7 th grade Science class which consist of 20 students total, 11 females-9 males, 4students are special needs and.
Mapping Your Online Course Susie Bussmann, Ph.D. & Sandy Johnson, M.A. & M.S.
ENHANCING QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING Nadeosa Conference Durban University of Technology 8-9 July 2015 Dr Ephraim Mhlanga.
Snaptutorial EDU 372 Course Experience Tradition/ snaptutorial.com
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Pilot’s Log: Getting Our Professional Development Course QM Recognized
Essential Attributes of Faculty Professional Development: The Excellence in Online Education Initiative Carol McQuiggan, D.Ed. Senior Instructional Designer,
The Academic Technology Center
A community of learners improving our world
From the Ground Up: RN to BSN Completion
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
E-Learning & Virtual Classroom
Professional Development
Online Course Showcase
The Buggy Before the Horse
Trying to get the Horse in Front of the Buggy
Quality Matters Overview
Presentation transcript:

Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design Susan Bussmann, PhD RETA/NMSU suceppib@nmsu.edu Sandy Johnson, MS MA srjohnso@nmsu.edu

Quality Matters Students Identify & recognize it? Faculty Quality does matter to… Students Faculty Administrators Institutions Accrediting agencies Legislators Tax Payers How do we… Identify & recognize it? Motivate & instill it? Assess & measure it? Insure it? Assure it?

The QM Rubric Processes are Continuous The Quality Matters process is designed to ensure that all reviewed courses will eventually meet expectations. The process is integral to a continuous quality improvement process

The QM Rubric Processes are Centered On research - the development of the rubric is based in national standards of best practice, the research literature, and instructional design principles. On student learning - the rubric and process are designed to promote student learning. On quality - the review sets a quality goal at the 85% level or better (courses do not have to be perfect but better than good enough).

The QM Rubric Processes are Collegial A Quality Matters review is part of a faculty-driven, peer review process. The review process is intended to be diagnostic and collegial, not evaluative and judgemental.

The QM Rubric and Processes are Collaborative The review is based on collaboratively identified evidence found in the course rather than the personal preference of an individual reviewer. The review is flexible and not prescriptive (many ways to meet each standard). The review team consists of three experienced online instructors as reviewers along with the course faculty developer.

Factors Effecting Course Quality QM Reviews Course Design Other components to online instruction include- Course delivery (i.e. teaching, faculty performance) Course content Course management system Institutional infrastructure Faculty training and readiness Student engagement and readiness

Quality is…. More than average; more than “good enough” An attempt to capture what’s expected in an effective online course at about an 85% level Based on research and widely accepted standards 85 %

The Rubric Eight General Standards: Course Overview and Introduction Learning Objectives Assessment and Measurement Resources and Materials Learner Interaction Course Technology Learner Support Accessibility Key components must align. Alignment: Critical course elements work together to ensure that students achieve the desired learning outcomes.

Rubric Scoring 40 85 Standards Points Relative Value 17 3 Essential 11 2 Very Important 12 1 Important TOTALS 40 85 Team of 3 reviewers initially score individually One score per standard based on team majority Pre-assigned point value Yes/No decision; All/None points Consensus is NOT required

To Meet Expectations… 72/85 = 85% A course must achieve: “Yes” on all 17 of the 3-point “essential” standards A minimum of 72 out of 85 points 72/85 = 85%

Let’s Practice You will need your annotated Quality matters review rubric to participate. Everyone ready?

In a course you are reviewing, you find no module or unit-level objectives. You do see (reprinted below) a course description and course-level goals on the syllabus. Course Description During this course we will be intensely involved in reading and discussing readings from the modern era (that is, from the 1600’s on), from around the world. We will consider the common themes that bind us together as human beings on this planet, as well as recognizing and acknowledging cultural differences. We will also consider what it means to be “modern,” and the relation of art to life and culture. There is one major research paper. Course Goals This course will contribute to the development of the following General Education Objectives: 1.        oral and written communication 2.       reading with comprehension 3.       critical thinking 4.       abstract reasoning 5.       appreciation of cultural diversity 6.       use of bibliographic sources 7.       life-long learning Let’s Practice Standard 2.4: Instructions to students on how to meet the learning objectives are adequate and stated clearly. Does this scenario meet Standard 2.4? YES or NO Indicate your decision in the chat box and explain your rationale for your decision.

On the homepage of a course you are reviewing is a button entitled "Notes on Course Topics." This links to a commercial website that contains a huge amount of material: outlines, PowerPoint, animations, exercises, self-test, charts and graphs, and text, all related in some way to the subject of the course. Assignment directions in the online course say to click on the link, peruse the commercial website, and find material related to the weekly topic.   Let’s Practice Standard 6.1: The tools and media support the learning objectives, and are appropriately chosen to deliver the content of the course. Does this scenario meet Standard 6.1: YES or NO Please explain how you would improve this scenario in accordance with Standard 6.1.  

The Early Childhood Education course you are reviewing has listed the following course level learning objective: Design your ideal classroom using features that meet the space, safety, and comfort needs of very young children. Students are to produce a model of their ideal classroom, take pictures of the model, post them on the course website, and also write and post an essay explaining how the model represents the ideal. Both the models and the essays will be evaluated according to a grading rubric distributed along with the class assignment. Let’s Practice Standard 3.1:  The types of assessments selected measure the stated learning objectives and are consistent with course activities and resources. Does this scenario meet Standard 3.1 ? YES or NO Please explain your rationale for your decision.  

Quality Matters! More information at: www.QualityMatters.org Info@QualityMatters.org