MARCH 29, 2012 EARLY RELEASE DAY 1 – 4 P.M. HOSTED BY: HAPPY VALLEY SCHOOL K-8 Collaborative Staff Development : The Curriculum Mapping Process 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

INTRODUCING ACADEMIC CONTENT An Introduction PLEASE OPEN ON YOUR COMPUTERS: ATL.CM.FD > #CMIM Handouts -- > Week2.Handouts -- > CS Handouts SIT.
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Instructional Coaching at Westminster
SSE Lesson Plan “Look For” List
1 1 S ession 3 How to Effectively Implement Learning Objectives.
Project-Based vs. Text-Based
Copyright © 2010 Verizon Foundation. All Rights Reserved. This document may be reproduced and distributed solely for uses that are both (a) educational.
Copyright © 2011 Verizon Foundation. All Rights Reserved. This document may be reproduced and distributed solely for uses that are both (a) educational.
The 21st Century Context for
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Principal Professional Development Mathematics KCAS June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
1 Progress Reports in Child Care. 2 Why Progress Reports? Support communication with parents Help with program planning Support transitions to new programs.
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
Directions As you view the photos from this teacher-built standards- based classroom, read the accompanying explanation regarding how each depicted artifact.
Trustee Gough Ward 3 Forum TDSB/Provincial Report Card
21 st Century Thinking Project. How would you rate your knowledge and use of active thinking routines in your teaching in February?
RESA Implementation Sessions Day 2 Process Welcome – Before we Begin… Connect to the Internet Give copies of your Professional Development Plans to Facilitator.
RESA Implementation Sessions Day 2 Process Welcome – Before we Begin… Connect to the Internet Visit the Wiki at
Session 2: Introduction to the Quality Criteria. Session Overview Your facilitator, ___________________. [Add details of facilitators background, including.
Observation: The Key to Responsive Planning
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Science ROCKS! Welcome to the Hamilton County District In-service: August 4, 2011.
Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices
High School Standards-Based Classroom.
Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.
Cuyahoga Falls City Schools District Leadership Team January 31, 2014.
Curriculum Maps Public Release: February 10, 2014
+ September 11, 2012 Iowa Core Implementation Network
1 Deeper Investigation of Iowa Core Standards: K-5 English/Language Arts Iowa Department of Education In Partnership with AEA School Improvement ©2011.
1 From Formative to Instructional Practice Kelly Oglesby, Chief Information Office Data Tools Team Elementary Language Arts and Social Studies Data Analyst.
The Principal’s Role in Leading College and Career Readiness September, 2013.
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training English K-6 Syllabus Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Speaking and Listening Instruction: Identifying and Using Effective Approaches to Facilitating Classroom Discussions December 9, 2014 Katanna Conley Michelle.
TIE REGIONAL SUMMITS 1 ST OF 5 SETTING DIRECTION AND LEADING THE WAY By: Dr. Pam Lange TIE Development Coordinator.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 2: Recording Evidence NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Student Growth Goals Sorting it out. Over- arching Goal 2.
Translating Standards Into Curriculum: The Lead Standards Approach.
Shelee King George Puget Sound Center for Teaching, Learning and Technology.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
Student centered learning The shift from teachers teaching to students learning: more than semantics.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Burden/Byrd Methods for Effective Teaching: Meeting the Needs of All Students, 6/e USING.
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
Topic 13 – Lesson Plan Review Facilitation Guideline Zone and Date
Meaningful Mathematics
Induction Professional Development September 27, 2012 Facilitated by Lisa Wolf, Julie Shaw, and Amber Martello POLISH YOUR STARS UTILIZING EFFECTIVE, EFFICIENT.
PAIUnet Defined STEM Trainer of Trainers David L. Reese, Ed. D. Sunny Minelli Weiland.
 Defined STEM and 21 st Century Teaching and Learning David L. Reese, Ed. D.
CESD Board and Admin Retreat March 20-22, FIND YOUR TEAM & TABLE:  Look at the icon on the left hand side of your nametag  your name is also on.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Fall 2011 Peer Observation Training. Agenda Process for Peer Observations What am I looking for during the Peer Observation and how do I rate it? How.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
 Sign In and find your assigned table  Enjoy breakfast items  You will NOT need a computer until much later  Be ready to share at 9 a.m. a check for.
Applying the Skills for Proficient Problem Solving Instructional Intervention Teams Level 3 Training April 7, 2011.
February 28.  Unit plans feedback (that I have completed)  Expectations for reflections  Pre-Internship Expectations  Questions you always wanted.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Indiana Room Math Leadership Teams December 8, 2014.
Summer Conference Wiki sion.wikispaces.com/ Fay Gore & Michelle McLaughlin
May 8, Let’s Do Some Math 6 cats catch 6 rats in 6 minutes. How many cats will it take to catch 100 rats in 50 minutes?
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
How can the examination of student/educator work be supported as a routine for continuous improvement?
21st Century Pilot for System Learning
Instructional Rounds Peninsula School District
Align Combine Design.
Presentation transcript:

MARCH 29, 2012 EARLY RELEASE DAY 1 – 4 P.M. HOSTED BY: HAPPY VALLEY SCHOOL K-8 Collaborative Staff Development : The Curriculum Mapping Process 1

Enjoy Your Lunch (1:00 – 1:30) After you’ve had time to relax and visit with one another, we will begin the Curriculum map review process. Map reviews begin with independent work. Please, do not share maps until directed by your group’s facilitators. 2

Why is the curriculum mapping process needed during implementation of the new SCOS? How can curriculum mapping be used to improve curriculum, instruction and assessment? Essential Questions: The Point of our Collaboration 3

Continue collaboration with our K-8 colleagues. Communicate best instructional and assessment practices using the Curriculum Mapping process. Identify how our instructional and assessment methods, individually and collectively (as K-8s), demonstrate rigor and relevance in our classrooms. Reflect on the importance of relationships in effective schools. Our Tasks for Today: 4

The On-going “Process” Complete individual maps. (Complete) 2. Review groups of maps. (For today) 3. Share reviews with colleagues. (For today) 4. Share with a large group. (For today) 5. Develop an action plan. (For today) 6. Implement action plan. (For the future) 5

2) Review Groups of Maps, independently Directions: Using the “Mapping Checklist” provided, independently review your colleagues’ maps. (Instructional Assistants should work with a classroom teacher for map review.) Review at least two maps. Refer to the “Directions for Backward Mapping” hand-out. Fill out the “Mapping Checklist” completely. Maps and checklists will be collected for review by administrators and future SD planning. 6

3) Share maps with colleagues Directions: In groups of 3 or 4, share the “Mapping Checklist.” Designate a recorder to keep “Small Group Discussion Notes” and a reporter to share out with the large group. Discuss:  Patterns/consistencies/connections  Strengths  Areas of need  “Ah-ha” moments  How is this process useful for instructional improvement? 7

4) Share with a large group Directions: Each group will share their observations about the information contained on the backward maps. Whole Group Reflection (open-ended): Use sticky notes to write your thoughts about the group observations. (There are no “right or wrong” thoughts. Simply allow yourself to process and comment on the information you have received. Reflections will be shared on your group’s pbworks page. 8

5) Develop an Action Plan Where to go next? Small Group Work: Use the mapping template to forward map a unit/lesson for: _____________________(subject). Share your completed forward maps by downloading it to the k.8 mapping space. Document your team plans on the “Action Plan” sheet. 9

To Consider As You Forward Map: What do the Standards require me to teach? What is the outcome I want for my students - (SWBAT: Students will be able to...)? How will I clearly communicate this goal to them? Why am I choosing this content? (Be honest.) Do my activities help me move to the role of facilitator and allow for students to practice the 4 Cs of 21 st Century skills ( Critical thinking, Creativity, Collaboration, and Communication )? Do my activities align with my assessments? What information do my assessments communicate? 10

The Cognitive Rigor Matrix A Tool for Aligning Activities & Assessment Applies Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) to Bloom’s Cognitive Processes Domain DOK is used with SMARTER-balanced Assessments ( ) and with NC’s , assessments. 11

12 Cognitive Rigor Matrix DOK + Bloom’s

“Are your lessons RIGOROUS?” 13 Rigor requires more complex thinking processes, not necessarily more “fun.” Using the Cognitive Rigor Matrix for lesson design may be helpful in avoiding the following conversation...

14

1) Artifacts from Activities *Backward Maps/Checklists; *Small Group Discussion sheet; *Poster w/Sticky Notes; *Action Plan Sheet Group Facilitators should collect these materials, and bring them to Kim Case’s room. 2) “Essential Question” Evaluations 3) “Forward Maps” downloaded to your group’s K.8 Mapping page. End of the Day Products 15

Time to Collaborate Spend the remainder of your time today developing your forward map. Remember to post your completed map to the K.8 Mapping page. 16