Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Manifestation Determination and Functional Behavioral Assessment April 30, 2010 Luzerne IU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educational Consultant
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
California Statewide System of School Readiness Networks Inclusion of Children with Disabilities Prepared by Chris Drouin, Special Education Division Anne.
West Virginia Department of Education
Inappropriate Behaviors Resulting In Disciplinary Action Revised 7/9/2012 Policy 4373, IDEA, Policy 2419 and SPL Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Michelle L. Doyle For Catapult Learning 1.  What is IDEA?  Who is eligible?  How do they get identified?  How do they get services? ◦ Who pays? ◦
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Special Education Student Discipline
1. The information you are about to hear derives from the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) and Policy 2419: Regulations.
Manifestation Determination Review
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
Parent Educational Advocacy Training Center
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Discipline Under the IDEA Tulsa Public Schools Special Education and Student Services Presenter: Cheryl Henry August, 2011.
1 Discipline of Students with IEPs Making Sense out of a Complex Topic.
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
Discipline Flowchart.
Special Education: Discipline Basics Lee Robbins Equip for Equality.
1 Quick Summary Student with a disability may be removed for no more than 10 consecutive school days for a disciplinary violation (unless exception applies).
Discipline of Students with Disabilities under IDEA 2004 October 2007.
Disciplining Students with Disabilities. Glossary of Terms Alternative Instruction Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP) Disciplinary Change In Placement Expedited.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
Discipline Requirements Presented By The New Jersey Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs December 2006.
Disciplining Students with Disabilities Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
SPECIAL EDUCATION: Practical Tips About IEPs and Expulsion Hearings
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
1 Behavior, Discipline and Students with Disabilities IDEA 2004 Provisions.
DISCIPLINE OF STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Presented by: Donald Griffin Education Specialist Division of Performance and Accountability Bureau of Indian.
SPECIAL EDUCATION LAW BUILDINGBLOCKS&BASICS Sallie Lynagh Disability Rights Network of PA.
DISCIPLINE & DUE PROCESS 2007 Changes to NYS’ Special Education Laws and Regulations.
Discipline Procedures When the IEP Team, including the parents, agrees to a change in placement for disciplinary reasons, there is no requirement to implement.
Laura Matson, Ph.D. Director, Special Services Puget Sound Educational Service District Navigating the School Culture September 25, 2014.
Behavior, Discipline and Students with Disabilities
Presented by: Elvin W. Houston.  A bus suspension counts as a day of removal if the IEP calls for transportation, the student is suspended from the bus.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Update on Requirements for Paraprofessionals and the PA Credential of Competency A Webinar for Administrators,
1 Interaction Between IDEA and School Expulsion for Misconduct.
Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports General Overview of PBIS Intensive Tier Processes Module “Overview” Revised July 2010.
Functional Behavior Assessment. 2 FBA is a process for gathering information to understand the function (purpose) of behavior in order to write an effective.
Special Education and Discipline April 8, What Counts as a Suspension? Partial days = full days of removal. If restrictions/conditions are imposed,
1 Making Appropriate Manifestation Determinations Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act – 2004 Parkway School District and Special School.
Discipline Part 201. The same disciplinary procedures that apply to all students apply to students with disabilities. However, there are additional requirements.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Ed Palmisano 06/2005 Evaluation Procedures An Introduction for New School Psychologists and Members of the M- Team.
Key Issues in the Discipline of Special Education Students Presented by Kisha Davis October 1, 2008 Bowie State University SPED 912: Critical Issues in.
Placement ARC Chairperson Training 1 Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Other Related Processes and Concepts Module – Revised July, 2010.
DISCIPLINE OF STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES DISCIPLINE OF STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES By Jason H. Ballum Reed Smith LLP 901 E. Byrd Street Suite 1700 Richmond,
Required Services, Procedures, and Data Presented by Scott Hall 2009 Special Education Fall Conference Suspension & Expulsion.
Fall A SHORT HISTORY OF SPECIAL EDUCATION Special Education as we know it started with Public Law (Education of All Handicapped Children Act.
The New IDEA in Special Education
Manifestation Determinations Review of Suspension Meetings And Review of Placement Meetings.
Significant Discrepancy in Suspension and Expulsion Rates in West Virginia: Barriers to Implementation of Discipline Policy and Procedures November 15,
Functional Behavioral Assessment Mini-Module. Outcomes Define changes to Chapter 14 regarding Functional Assessment and Positive Behavior Support Define.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
 A FBA is a structured system used to analyze behavior.  It’s a collaborative problem solving process used to understand why a student engages in problem.
Required Services and Procedures for Students with Disabilities Presented by Scott Hall and Ty Manieri 2010 Oregon Special Education Fall Conference Eugene,
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Discipline.
Discipline of Students with Disabilities under IDEA 2004 October 2007 Dr. Mary Anne Linden Title Slide.
Procedural Safeguards
Special Education Discipline
Special Education Legal Boot Camp
Manifestation Determination
Navigating the confusing world of school discipline
Discipline for Children with Disabilities under IDEA 2004
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Disciplining Students with Disabilities
Faculty Meeting Resource
Disciplining Students With Disabilities
Extended School Year (ESY)
Presentation transcript:

Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Manifestation Determination and Functional Behavioral Assessment April 30, 2010 Luzerne IU

PaTTAN’s Mission The Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network is an initiative of the Pennsylvania Department of Education working in partnership with families and local education agencies to support programs and services to improve student learning and achievement. 2

PDE’s Commitment to Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) Our goal for each child is to ensure Individualized Education Program (IEP) teams begin with the general education setting with the use of Supplementary Aids and Services before considering a more restrictive environment. 3

MANIFESTATION DETERMINATION 4

Not a Change of Placement <10 consecutive school days <15 cumulative school days (PA) Manifestation determination not required.

Change of Placement >10 consecutive school days Pattern of removals –> 10 consecutive school days OR –Series of removals constitute pattern > 10 school days in school year AND Behavior substantially similar to previous incidents AND Such factors as length of each removal, total amount of time removed, proximity of removals to one another –> 15 cumulative school days (PA) LEA determines if pattern on case-by-case basis –Determination subject to review Manifestation determination required.

Who Conducts? LEA Parent “Relevant” members of IEP team (determined by parent and LEA

When Conduct? Within 10 school days of any decision to change placement –Decision first, then manifestation determination within 10 school days

How Conduct? Review all relevant information: IEP, teacher observations, relevant information provided by parents Two key determinations re conduct in question – If caused by, or had direct and substantial relationship to, child’s disability OR – If direct result of LEA’s failure to implement IEP Examination of both school’s and child’s behavior

More School-Friendly Language? If caused by, or had direct and substantial relationship to, child’s disability –Did the disability cause student to misbehave? –Is there a direct and substantial relationship? If direct result of LEA’s failure to implement IEP –Did the school’s failure to implement the IEP directly cause the student ‘s misconduct?

If Behavior is a Manifestation Conduct FBA Implement behavioral intervention plan (PBSP)/Review PBSP and modify it as necessary to address the behavior Return student to previous placement, unless – Special circumstances – Parents and LEA agree to change of placement as part of BIP IEP team makes decisions about FBA, PBSP, placement

If Behavior Not a Manifestation Impose same penalty as applicable to student without disability –Same manner/duration Continue to provide appropriate services –In interim alternative educational setting (IAES)? IEP team determines services and setting

Special Circumstances: Drugs, Weapons, Serious Bodily Injury Unilateral decision of LEA for removal regardless of whether manifestation or not For up to 45 school days Manifestation determination must be conducted – If manifestation, FBA and BIP required and removal limited to 45 school days – If not manifestation, same consequences as student without disability

SERIOUS Bodily Injury Substantial risk of death Extreme physical pain Protracted and obvious disfigurement Protracted loss/impairment of function of bodily member, organ, mental faculty

Challenges to MD Disagreement: complaint, mediation, due process hearing, stay-put Stay-Put: changed in IDEA 2004 for disciplinary cases –Child shall remain in IAES pending the decision of the hearing officer or until the expiration of the removal period, unless parent and LEA agree otherwise –Expedited hearing shall occur within 20 school days of date requested and decision within 10 school days after hearing

Practical Considerations for MD Process Clarify procedures under school discipline process and those required by IDEA Identify a school administrator to consider change in placement due to pattern of removals Send notices immediately: Invitation to IEP meeting, regular education discipline meeting, Procedural Safeguards Notice

Practical Considerations for MD Process Hold the regular education proceedings first Prepare packet of information for each member of MD team Document the information reviewed Make the determination –Be prepared for nonconsensus

18

FUNCTIONAL BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT (FBA) 19

20 Assumptions underlying FBA Behavior is learned and serves a specific purpose –To get –To avoid Behavior is related to the context within which it occurs What is an FBA?

“If we consider problem behaviors as occurring in people, it is logical to try to change the people. If we consider problem behaviors as occurring in contexts, it becomes logical to change the context. Behavior change occurs by changing environments, not trying to change people.” O’Neill, Horner, Albin, Sprague, Storey, & Newton (1997) 21 Think about this…

Completing an FBA allows us to analyze patterns –Under what circumstances or antecedent events is the target behavior most/least likely? Who is present? What is the activity? When (time of day)? Where does it occur? –What consequences or results predictably follow the target behavior? What is gained or access? What is avoided or postponed? –What broader issues are important influences on behavior? 22 What is an FBA?

Results 1.Development of specific, clear description of the behavior of concern 2.Identification of environmental factors (antecedents and consequences) corresponding with the behavior 3.Development of summary statements identifying the perceived function(s) of the behavior of concern 23

24 Horner, R. & Sugai, G. (2007). Function based support: Selected topics. Retrieved from web 5/13/08 FBA LEVELS A-B-C Data Structured, Direct Observation 3. Complex Checklist Functional Assessment Interview Brief Observation/Scatter Plot 2. Simple Archival Review Problem Solving Meeting 1.Informal What are the levels of assessment?

Levels of FBA Informal FBA Conducted in school by staff that regularly interacts with the student Conducted as part of normal daily problem solving Simple FBA Conducted by specialist in school setting Typically involves interviews, checklists, and brief observation Complex FBA Conducted by behaviorally trained member of school, district, Intermediate Unit Typically involves interviews and direct observation 25

All three levels of FBA maintain the same goals: –Define the target behavior. –Identify setting events –Identify the events/antecedent triggers –Identify the consequences –Analyze patterns to develop a summary statement of function of the behavior. What is an FBA? 26

Only 2 Basic Functions of Behavior Pos Reinf Neg Reinf Existing aversive condition identified What is an FBA? 27

28 FBA Summary Statement: 1. When this occurs… (describe circumstances/antecedents/setting events) 2. the student does… (describe target behavior) 3. to get/to avoid… (describe consequences) What is an FBA?

Triggering Antecedents (Events that occur preceding the problem behavior) Maintaining Consequences (Typical response to the problem behavior) Problem Behavior/ Targeted Behavior The FBA summary statement is a TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS What is an FBA? 29

30 IEP teams determine that the student’s behavior impedes his/her learning or that of others Start Conduct Functional Assessment YES NO High Confidence in Hypothesis Conduct Full Functional Assessment Develop Positive Behavior Support Plan Satisfactory Improvement YES Monitor & Modify PBSP Regularly Horner, R. & Sugai, G. (2007). Function based support: Selected topics. Retrieved from web 5/13/08

31 FBA and Consent Is written consent required? Yes. Individualized evaluation procedure To assist in determining nature + extent of special education and related services needed, including need for PBSP Initial Evaluation Reevaluation Volume 3 Chapter 14 Q&A Jan. 30, 2009

32 FBA and Consent When is written consent NOT required? Reviewing existing data Administering a test or other evaluation that is administered to all children, unless parent consent is required for all children Review of behavior interventions in school as a whole

FBA and Reevaluation Is conducting FBA a reevaluation? A reevaluation must be conducted if the LEA determines that the educational or related services needs, including improved academic achievement and functional performance, of the child warrant a reevaluation. ( (a)) –Purpose is to determine child’s needs, including whether additions/modifications to specially designed instruction and related services needed to enable child to meet IEP goals and to participate in general ed curriculum. (Volume 8 Chapter14 Q&A)

34

35 Resources Walsh, J. Manifestation determinations: Avoiding needless conflict and common mistakes. (2007). Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.

Contact Information Diane Funsten (610) ext Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Edward G. Rendell, Governor Pennsylvania Department of Education Gerald L. Zahorchak, D.Ed., Secretary Diane Castelbuono, Deputy Secretary Office of Elementary and Secondary Education John J. Tommasini, Director Bureau of Special Education Patricia Hozella, Assistant Director Bureau of Special Education 36