CH 14 Citizenship and Equal Justice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 14, Section 3 THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED
Advertisements

Welcome! In your team folders... “ELEMENTS OF DUE PROCESS”
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Rights of the Accused th – Amendment Presumption of innocence Presumption of innocence Manzanar –one of our big failings Reasonable doubt Reasonable.
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Miranda vs. Arizona 1966.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
1. Amendment 14 Defines citizenship – makes you a citizen of USA first, then of your state. – Before this state citizenship was supreme – States could.
1. Amendment 14 Defines citizenship – first a citizen of USA, then of the state makes states follow due process of the law guarantees equal protection.
The Mock Trial Version! We the Students Mock Trial Jeopardy Bill of Rights People in Court Court Proceedings Criminal, Civil, & Juvenile Law Federal,
Winning, until proven guilty …. Searches and Seizures The Fourth Amendment protects from unreasonable searches and seizures Searches must be conducted.
Objective 29l-Analyze the rights of the accused Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois.
U.S. Constitutional Amendments 1-10
{ Criminal Trial Procedure What happens when the police arrest a criminal suspect?
Arrests and Miranda. 2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
III. Rights of the Accused. A. Exclusionary Rule Exclusionary Rule – Supreme Court ruled any evidence collected illegally cannot be used in federal court.
The Bill of Rights.
Defendant’s Rights and the Right to Privacy AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.
Chapter 1 The Pursuit of Justice Unit #1 Notes Packet.
Law & Justice Chapter 12 Criminal Investigations.
Rights of the Accused Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Right Against Self Incrimination Right Against Self Incrimination Right to Counsel Right to Counsel.
The U.S. Bill of Rights. 1st Amendment The 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of religion, speech, the press, assembly, and petition. This means that we.
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Ashley Nine March 25, 2010 Period 7.  Poor living immigrant from Mexico living in Arizona.  He was charged with rape and kidnapping.  He was arrested.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.
Arrests and Miranda.  Right to a grand jury  Protection against double jeopardy  Protection against self-incrimination  Right to due process  Custody.
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
Due Process of the Law Requires the state and the federal government in matters of life, liberty, or property of individuals to be reasonable, fair, and.
Other Bill of Rights Protections Ch. 4, Les. 2. Rights of the Accused  The First Amendment protects five basic freedoms  Equally important is the right.
Chapter 4.2 Other Guarantees in the Bill of Rights.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 3.
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
Essential Question How does the Constitution protect the rights of the accused?
BELLWORK What are the three types of crime? (Page 430)
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATION Chapter 12.
Unit V Packet – get it together! 1.The Federal Court System 2.The Structure of the Federal Court System 3.Supreme Court Justice Research 4.Cases of the.
Miranda Warnings. Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Objective Students.
Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Chapter 20.
DUE PROCESS. Procedural Due Process v. Substantive Due Process Procedural follows a set procedure, the same for all the accused Such as counsel, unreasonable.
Chapter 6 Due Process and Other Protected Rights Section 1 The Rights of Criminal Defendants.
LECTURE 4: THE CONSTITUTION AND DUE PROCESS. The Constitution and Due Process The US Constitution set out how US laws are passed and enforced. – The legislative.
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Miranda v. Arizona.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual rights
Tori Roupe and Haley Leavines
Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs
Rights of Criminal Suspects
1. Amendment 14 Defines citizenship – makes you a citizen of USA first, then of your state. Before this state citizenship was supreme States could deny.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Landmark Supreme Court cases
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES:
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
DUE PROCESS.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) The Warren Court.
The Rights of American Citizens
Critical Thinking Question
Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.
Rights of the Accused Part 1
DUE PROCESS.
Presentation transcript:

CH 14 Citizenship and Equal Justice

Rights of the Accused A crime is an act against a law of the state. The challenge for Americans is to balance the rights of the people versus that of the accused. (The greater good) The BOR and the 14th Amendment were designed to protect the rights of both.

The 4th Amendment The police must state under oath that they have probable cause in order to get a search warrant. The search warrant is then very specific about place and things. They may search a private home without a warrant only in life threatening emergencies. No warrant is needed if the police see someone breaking the law. (they have the right to arrest and seize for drugs in a minor traffic stop)

Drug tests are considered a search but do not require a warrant if it is to protect public safety Illegally obtained evidence may not be used in court. (This is now being challenged and even relaxed if the officers can prove they acted in good faith) The 4th amendment is also relaxed in high schools. All that is needed is reasonable grounds and a student may be searched at any time. The rules differ if the search is conducted by a police officer vs. a school official.

The 6th Amendment Guarantees a defendant the right to counsel or an attorney. This mainly applies to federal courts. People can be tried in state courts without a lawyer.

The 5th Amendment (Self Incrimination) The government bears the burden of proof. Defendants are not obliged to help the govt. prove they committed a crime or testify at their own trial. It protects against forcibly attained confessions or information. This amendment was later enforced more strongly when the Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona and established the Miranda rights for questioning subjects.

Miranda v Arizona In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona for stealing $8 from bank worker and charged with armed robbery. He already had a record for armed robbery, and a juvenile record including attempted rape, assault, and burglary. While in police custody he signed a written confession to the robbery, and to kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old woman 11 days before the robbery. After the conviction, his lawyers appealed, on the grounds that Miranda did not know he was protected from self-incrimination. The case, Miranda v. Arizona, made it all the way to the Supreme Court, where the conviction was overthrown. In a landmark ruling issued in 1966, the court established that the accused have the right to remain silent and that prosecutors may not use statements made by defendants while in police custody unless the police have advised them of their rights, commonly called the Miranda Rights. The case was later re-tried, Miranda was convicted on the basis of other evidence, and served 11 years. He was paroled in 1972, and died in 1976 at the age of 34, after being stabbed in a bar fight. A suspect was arrested but chose to excercise his right to remain silent, and was released.

5th Amendment Continued (Double Jeopardy) Also deals with double jeopardy. It does not protect against someone being prosecuted criminally and then being tried civilly. A criminal act can be tried in both state and federal courts. A single act can involve multiple crimes and a suspect can be tried for each component of the event.

8th Amendment Forbids cruel and unusual punishment The main controversy is whether or not the death penalty is cruel or unusual. What do you think? Alabama's Electric Chair 1927 - 1965 153 Executions

1 Schlosser Yates 5 11 7 10 Millions

Equal Protection of the Law “All men are created equal” as stated in the DOI really means that all are entitled to equal rights and treatment before the law. This is shown in the 14th amendment which grants equal protection under the law and really extends the 5th amendment due process clause. The point is to keep the government from making distinctions among people based on classification.

14th Amendment Passed after the Civil War and is intended to grant rights to former slaves. However many states passed Jim crow laws which allowed legal segregation. Jim Crow laws were upheld by the Supreme Court in Plessy v. Ferguson which put into place the principle of “separate but equal”

Brown vs Bd of Education Plessy vs. Ferguson stood until the 1950’s when it was overturned by Brown v. Bd of Education. This led to the Civil Rights Movement and the cooperation of many blacks and whites in an effort to bring about “equal” justice for all.