Supreme Court Case Presentation By Nicholas Childers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Due Process and Search and Seizure- 4 th and 14 th Amendments.
Advertisements

1985.  3/7/80, 2 Freshmen at Piscataway High School is found in the girl’s bathroom smoking cigarettes.  They were brought to the AP’s office  One.
 Record in Agenda: 1) Notebook check next class– all notes & class activities should have been completed and glued into your notebook. Check the Absent.
New Jersey V.S T.L.O. Argued March 28, 1984 Reargued Oct 2, 1984 Decided Jan 15, 1985.
Landmark Cases: Search and Seizure
Section 10.2 The Exclusionary Rule Section 10.2 The Exclusionary Rule.
Gitlow vs. New York Background Information  Gitlow v. New York was a Supreme Court decision which ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment had extended.
Fourth Amendment: Searches at School Note: Some photos and text in the PowerPoint are adapted from a lesson plan developed by Lindsey Kakert. The lesson.
Law enforcement officers conduct searches every day in an effort to find evidence that can be seized and used in court to prosecute people who have violated.
New Jersey v. T.L.O (1985) David Kumar. Table of Contents Background Progression Through Courts Constitutional Issues Supreme Court Ruling.
+ Protecting Individual Liberties Section 1 Chapter 14.
Objective 29l-Analyze the rights of the accused Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois.
4 th & 5 th Amendment Rights BR: Are your privacy rights at risk today?
Student Rights: What rights do students have once inside the schoolhouse door? Tinker v. Des Moines and New Jersey v. T.L.O.
Mapp v Ohio By: Gavin Koonts 10/27/13 Block 2. Mapp v Ohio  Dollree Mapp v State of Ohio  Argued: March 29, 1961  Decided: June 19, 1961.
Street Law Fourth Amendment Rights
MAPP V. OHIO Rachel Simmons. Background & Freedom at Issue  The 4 th and 14 th Amendments  With reasonable suspicion of a bomb at the house, the police.
The Rights of Individuals Analyze court cases that demonstrate how the U.S. constitution and the bill of rights protect the rights of individuals.
Analyzing a Court Decision An overview of Student Searches presented by Bart Fennemore.
469 U.S. 325 January 15, 1985 Circumstances of the Case On March 7, 1980 a teacher at Piscataway High School found T.L.O with a friend smoking cigarettes.
NJ vs. T.L.O. Peter Kotsovolos and Matt Spiegel. Parties & Roles  Two fourteen year-old high school freshman were caught smoking in the school bathroom.
By Marta Telatin and Andrew Koennig 4 TH AMENDMENT.
Criminal Procedure Week 2. U.S. CONSTITUTION PURPOSE WHICH GOVERNMENT IT REGULATES Bill of Rights.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
Psychology of Homicide Unit II
Criminal Procedure Chapter 6. Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning Objectives Define arrest, and explain the authority of a firefighter to make an.
Chapter 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation © 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the historical evolution.
New Jersey v. T.L.O By Luke Wills and Caroline Weschler.
Grady L. Hunt Locklear, Jacobs, Hunt & Brooks (910) The information contained in this presentation is intended for general.
Rights of Criminal Defendants Are the due process rights and the procedural guarantees provided by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments.
The Bill of Rights The First Fundamental Changes of the Constitution.
Procedural Criminal Law What are the constitutional rights of the accused?
By: Adrienne Hardwig Kelsi Teague Kelina Seyferth Ashlee Schaefer Daltun Hasty.
New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) Lori Wolfe and Ann Peterson.
New Jersey vs TLO By Sarah Shelleh.
What does it all mean?! The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. This means that law enforcement.
Do They Have the Right??? You SHALL Decide……. Case #1 The United States is involved in a controversial war. To show their opposition to the war, two students.
Fourth Amendment Rights “The young man knows the rules, but the old* man knows the exceptions.” Oliver Wendell Holmes *Please note that some of us prefer.
New Jersey v. TLO Unit 4 Lesson 10.
Rights of Criminal Defendants
The 4 th amendment. The 4 th amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported.
New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.
Strip search th Amendment “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches.
CALL TO ORDER  Have you or someone you’ve known ever been searched by the police, legally or illegally?  What do you know about the rules that police.
Essential Question How does the Constitution protect the rights of the accused?
The Fourth Amendment COURT CASES. What does the Fourth Amendment say? The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
Chapter 12: Criminal Justice Process ~ The Investigation Objective: Student should be able to correlate how the constitution relates to an investigation.
Criminal Investigation: Laws of Arrest, Search and Seizure Chapter 12 Law and Government.
Eliseo Lugo III.  In Weeks v. United States, 1914, the Court ruled that evidence obtained by police illegally is not admissible in federal court—a practice.
U.S Supreme Court Cases Francesca Reis Isabel Pittman Pierce Robinson Frias Shihady.
Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.
New Jersey v TLO Trevor B. & Akilia R.. Facts about the case : In 1980, a teacher at Piscataway in NJ discovered two girl smoking in a restroom This was.
Facts of the Case  Two students were found smoking cigarettes in a school bathroom.  One of the students (TLO) denied smoking, so her bag was searched.
Criminal Law Jeopardy Dr. Garcia.
Limiting the Right of Search
The 4th Amendment Notes 5-3.
What Do You Think? The principal is walking down the hall at the end of lunch, hurrying students to class. As he passes the bathroom, he smells marijuana.
Introduction to the Federal Court System
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) 367 U.S. 643.
Do They Have The Right?.
The 4th Amendment Notes 5-3.
Introduction to Federal Court System
4th Amendment Jorge Gonzalez.
Film Clip: Crash Course - Legal System Basics: #18
Search & Seizure The act of taking possession of this property.
Safford United School District #1 v. Redding
Appeals Courts Losing party may be able to appeal the decision to an appeals (appellate) court Losing party will ask the court to review the decision.
Search & Seizure in Schools:
Alexzandria Rosser 469 U.S. 325 (1985)
New Jersey v. T.L.O. 469 US 325 (1985) By Sage Miller.
Presentation transcript:

Supreme Court Case Presentation By Nicholas Childers

Search and Seizure Looking through personal property to find evidence of a crime or tort.

Wolf v. Colorado Julius Wolf (the “petitioner”) was convicted by a State court of conspiring to commit abortions based upon evidence allegedly obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment’s search and seizure clause.

Wolf v. Colorado Decision Majority Opinion Any evidence found in violation of the 4 th Amendment was not usable in the court. Exclusionary Rule- any evidence found by violating your constitutional right is excluded and any evidence it leads to is also excluded -the fruit of the poisonous tree

Wolf v. Colorado “the Weeks exclusionary rule is a federal court construct that is not found implicitly in the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution nor is a law promulgated by Congress.”

New Jersey v. TLO The Vice-principal of the school searched a student and found evidence that she was dealing Marijuana. VP caught two students smoking and searched one of them and found cigarette paper, Marijuana, a pipe, many one dollar bills, and a list of people who owed her money.

New Jersey v. TLO Decision Majority Opinion 4 th Amendment right was not violated School officials do not need a warrant to search students within their authority.

New Jersey v. TLO “The majority observed “[i]t is now beyond dispute that “the Federal Constitution, by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures by state officers… but does not need a warrant to search a student under their authority”

Citation Page -procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to- saltzburg/searches-and-seizures-of-persons- and-things/wolf-v-colorado-3/ -procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to- saltzburg/searches-and-seizures-of-persons- and-things/wolf-v-colorado-3/ -procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to- weinreb/the-fourth-amendment-arrest-and- search-and-seizure/new-jersey-v-tlo/