I. Confirm Implementation of the CIP II. Assess the Effectiveness of the Strategies, Action Steps, Benchmarks III. Provide Feedback to CIP Team and Faculty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
<<Date>>
Advertisements

Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
CQU Portal Task Experience IV Putting it all together.
Certificate IV in Training and Assessment (TAA) Welcome to the INPUT DAY for.
Quality and Outcomes Framework Assessor Training Group-oriented skills in chairmanship, time management and team-working (during the review visit) Module.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Quality Assuring the Scottish Baccalaureate Inter-disciplinary Project Session
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Promotion and Tenure Workshop 1. Evaluation Procedure There is only one evaluation procedure leading to recommendations regarding promotion, tenure and.
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 3: Effective Feedback NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Instructional Learning Cycle
CIP Part IV: Culture Strategies to Address School Safety/Classroom Management/Discipline/RTI Framework/Building Supportive Learning Environments.
Module 1: CIP Basics Contents of Module: Purposes of the CIP
CIP Overview 1. Purposes of the CIP What Does CIP Success Look Like? Identifying the Team Roles of LEA, Principal, and CIP Team CIP Timeline 2.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
…what Georgia schools should know, do, and understand.
Conducting a Comprehensive Needs Assessment. Objectives Identify the components of a comprehensive needs assessment Classify the types of data collected.
Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Coaching With Indistar Office of School Improvement.
Service Learning Academic aTtainment Evaluation Conducted for the CalServe Initiative By Sasha Neumann.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
Vision to Action © American Student Achievement Institute 2004 Document 1.13.
New PBIS Coaches Meeting September 2,  Gain knowledge about coaching  Acquire tips for effective coaching  Learn strategies to enhance coaching.
Site Visit. 2 Process Intent Observation (IO) Strength to Comment Intent Observation: “Double plus on the process used for strategic planning.” Comment:
PBIS Coaches Network pbis.sccoe.org
ADEPT Framework
1 Our Approach to Lesson Study María E. Torres Summer, 2004.
Parental Involvement Requirements A Focused Look at Compliance Spring 2009.
P arent I nvolvement A nalysis? The Parent Involvement Analysis is designed and developed by Academic Development Institute What is.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Learning Focused Observations BEST Leadership Roundtable February 1 st, 2012.
Arizona Early Intervention Program -Assessment Part II-
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
TAA1 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA1 Process TAA 1 Action.
How to Prepare for an Ohio TAV/TRV September 21, 2006 D.D. Davis, Mill Creek, Youngstown.
TAA2 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION QUALITY EXTERNAL MONITORING IN THE SCHOOL YEAR 2007 – 2008 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Material produced.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Setting the context Multiplying leaders to build movements everywhere requires that development be designed around the needs of the individual as.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
District Mentoring Plan
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Teacher Evaluation Process
Deliverables to Celebration
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Steps in the TDES Evaluation Process
The roles and the process
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Periodic Accounting Review Periodic Revenue Reconciliation
Presentation transcript:

I. Confirm Implementation of the CIP II. Assess the Effectiveness of the Strategies, Action Steps, Benchmarks III. Provide Feedback to CIP Team and Faculty IV. Provide Feedback to the LEA V. Guide the School/LEA in Determining Next Steps of Support Purpose of the Mid Year Review

First Hour of the Review Welcome/Summary – The Principal should bring the Mid Year Review Team up to date on summary of past reviews and share benchmark data that supports that the plan has been successful improving student success. (20 Minutes) Assignments – Team members will be assigned their role for the day and then given the forms that they need in order to record observations and comments. Each team will meet individually to go over forms for understanding. (20 Minutes) Coming to Consensus – The SIS will lead a short discussion on what “key terms” included in the plan should “look like” during the observation time. (20 Minutes)

Second Hour+ of the Review Five MYR Components – The five components can run simultaneously. CIP Walkthrough Teams: 1 – 4 teams of 2 – 3 members each depending on size of school CIP Evidence Box Check Team: 1 team of 2 people CIP Teacher Face to Face Interview Teams: 2 -4 teams of 1-2 members each CIP Student Face to Face Interview Teams: 2 – 4 teams of 1–2 members each CIP Student Interviews By Survey: 1-2 members depending on size of school (survey 10%-20% of total student population) Both of these components in blue can be completed on another day. If so, they should be conducted by an “outside” team of people. A representative of the team should attend the report out on the day of the review – bring the group the questions and share findings

Third Hour of the Review Reflection/Summary/ Next Steps All three teams (walk-through, Evidence Box, and Student Interview) teams will meet together after they complete their task to combine totals. The appointed typist will project the report form up on the screen for all to see. As the report out begins, one member from each team will report totals. Each team member should contribute comments to support the data that they report. These comments should highlight successes and identify opportunities for improvement. If time permits, the team can make suggestions for possible next steps.

After the Review Principal Summary – The Principal will report the findings to his/her CIP team and faculty in a timely manner. Any necessary amendments will be made to the plan. The Principal will also create a summary report to be sent to the SIS/LEA. Superintendent’s Meeting –The Principal’s report will be used as the basis for the discussion at the Superintendents meeting in February. The Principal should lead the discussion of findings. Both the LEA and Principal should leave the meeting with Short Term and Long Term Next Steps of support.

School:Date of Review:Time: Walkthrough Teams: The Midyear Review walkthrough “look – for’s” are determined entirely by the plan. As many teachers as possible should be seen during this time. If this is a school that has a Peer Mentor, then they should determine what teachers are seen. Team 1Team 2Team 3Team 4 Face to Face Teacher Interview Teams: It is recommended that groups of teachers be scheduled at 15 minute intervals. Team 1 - TeacherTeam 2 - TeacherTeam 3 - TeacherTeam 4 - Teacher Face to Face Student Interview Teams: Student groups must be representative of the school demographics. It is recommended that groups of students be scheduled at 15 minute intervals. Team 1 - StudentTeam 2 - StudentTeam 3 - StudentTeam 4 - Student Survey Interviews: To give substance to the data collected, at least 10% of the total student population needs to be interviewed or surveyed. Example: 450 students…at least 45 students need to be interviewed or surveyed. Team 1 Evidence Box Team: All SI schools are required to provide documentation/evidence that supports implementation of the plan by all teachers Team 1 Mid Year Review Planning Tool

Student and Teacher Interviews Questions: Notes/Group 1: Notes/Group 2: Notes/Group 3 Notes/Group 4 Overall Celebrations: Overall Concerns:

Roles of SIS and/or EL Contact and Principal SIS and/or EL Contact Conduct the Mid Year Review Pre Plan in December at the school Support the Principal in the preparation of the Mid Year Review Work with the RSIC to prepare the student and teacher interview questions and forms – plus the student survey Work with the RSIC on the “Key Term” portion of the Review Verify that all walkthrough, evidence and student/teacher interview forms are complete and bring copies for all participants to the MYR Day of review, lead the whole team in understanding “Key Terms”/Oversee the organization of the day/Type if necessary After review, assist Principal in preparing for February Roundtable Meeting Principal Prepare the introduction Schedule the walkthroughs and the student/ teacher interviews Participate on a team the day of the review Lead the reflection time at the end and begin summarizing information for the LEA summary report Share the results of the review with the CIP team and Faculty including celebrations, challenges, changes/amendments, and get input on next steps Begin preparing the presentation for the February Superintendents/Roundtable meeting with assistance from the SIS and/or EL Contact