Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska Deep Dive Break-Out.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.
Advertisements

Alabama College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
Educator Effectiveness System November 5, Agenda – Town Hall Meeting Community Builder/Video (OPTIONAL) Today, we will be presenting an overview.
o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
Performance management guidance
The Principal’s Role in Leading College and Career Readiness September, 2013.
ANALYZING STUDENT PERCEPTION DATA TO REFLECT UPON INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
NIET Teacher Evaluation Process
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….
Oklahoma’s Teacher and Leader Evaluation System and Great Expectations: Putting the Pieces Together Alicia Currin-Moore Executive Director, TLE Oklahoma.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Teacher Practice in  In 2012, the New Jersey Legislature unanimously passed the TEACHNJ Act, which mandates implementation of a new teacher.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
Round Table Discussion- Evaluating Arts Teachers William Kohut, Principal- Denver School of the Arts Dr. Mark Hudson- Director of Arts- Denver Public Schools.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
RAPPS – Rural Alaska Principal Preparation and Support Program Selecting and Training Evaluators May 28 – 30, 2014 Learning Groups 1, 2, and 3 Hilton Hotel.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
Next Generation Professionals Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Interim Joint Committee on Education July 12, 2010.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Recognizing Effective Teaching Thomas J. Kane Professor of Education and Economics Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Colorado’s Student Perception Survey. Agenda Why use a Student Perception Survey? What the Research Says Survey Overview Survey Administration Use of.
Evaluating Teacher Performance Daniel Muijs, University of Southampton.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Alicia Currin-Moore Executive Director, TLE Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Presentation by Dr. Doug Bower. Always in motion is the future -Master Yoda.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Toolkit #3: Effectively Teaching and Leading Implementation of the Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including the Common Core.
Final Reports from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project Tom Kane Harvard University Steve Cantrell, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
STAR3 Project for WS/FCS. STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide.
Bonnie S. Billingsley, Professor Virginia Tech College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences School of Education, Department of Teaching & Learning
What makes Great Teaching Sutton Trust Report Oct 2014.
The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
KVEC Presents PGES Observation Calibration Are You On Target?
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
GAPSS ANALYSIS REPORT Lindley Sixth Grade Academy A T T H E B A R N E S C E N T E R ANALYSIS REVIEW “In the Pursuit of Excellence”
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
RAPPS – Rural Alaska Principal Preparation and Support Program Ensuring Fidelity In the Evaluation System May 28 – 30, 2014 Learning Groups 1, 2, and 3.
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
 Mark D. Reckase.  Student achievement is a result of the interaction of the student and the educational environment including each teacher.  Teachers.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
The School Turnaround Group
The Call for Action: Coaching and Supporting Mathematics Instruction
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska Deep Dive Break-Out Session Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Measures of Effective Teaching Study - Findings and Recommendations Session Leader: Al Bertani, RAPPS Senior Design Consultant

Learning about Teaching – Initial Findings from the MET Project Published by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 2010 A new approach to development and evaluation that teachers endorse and that helps all teachers improve. Goals of the Gates Foundation MET Study

Learning about Teaching – Initial Findings from the MET Project Published by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Whenever feasible, a teacher’s evaluation should include his/her students’ achievement gains. 2.Any additional components of the evaluation (eg. classroom observations, student feedback) should be demonstrably relate to student achievement gains. 3.The measures should include feedback on specific aspects of a teachers’ practice and support teacher growth and development. Premises of the Gates Foundation MET Study

Gates MET Study SEE YOUTUBE LINK BELOW FOR VIDEO

Learning about Teaching – Initial Findings from the MET Project Published by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 2010 If we want to change the curve of improvement, we must…  Identify great teachers  Find out what makes them so effective  Transfer those skills to others Strategies of the Gates Foundation MET Study

Learning about Teaching – Initial Findings from the MET Project Published by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 2010 Measure 1Student achievement gains on different assessments. Measure 2Classroom observations and teacher reflections. Measure 3Teacher pedagogical content knowledge. Measure 4Student perceptions of the classroom instructional environment. Measure 5Teacher perceptions of working conditions and instructional support at their school. Data Collected-Gates Foundation MET Study

Learning about Teaching – Initial Findings from the MET Project Published by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation In every grade and subject studied, a teacher’s past successes in raising student achievement on state tests is one of the strongest predictors of his/her ability to do it again. 2.Teachers with the highest value-added scores on state tests also tend to help students develop a deeper conceptual understanding as well. 3.The average student knows effective teaching when he/she experiences it. 4.Valid feedback need not be limited to test scores alone. Gates MET Study Findings – Phase 1

MET Working with Teachers to Develop Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching June 2010 TODAYFUTURE SCENARIO High Level Principal Evaluations Only Rigorous Classroom Observations Input ObservationsStudent Feedback SeniorityPedagogical Content Knowledge Degrees EarnedSchool Working Conditions Moving From and To…

MET Project Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching January 2013 Question 1 Can measures of effective teaching identify teachers who better help students learn? Question 2 How much weight should be placed on each measure of effective teaching? Question 3 How can teachers be assured trustworthy results from classroom observations? Research Study Questions – Phase 2

MET Project Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching January Effective teaching can be measured. Teachers previously identified as more effective caused students to learn more. Groups of teachers identified as less effective caused students to learn less. Major Research Findings 2.Balanced weights indicate multiple aspects of effective teaching. Teaching is too complex for any single measure of performance to capture it accurately. Trade off’s to using different models. 3.Adding a second observer increases reliability significantly more than having the same observer score an additional lesson. Adding outside observers can provide an on-going check against in- school bias.

MET Project Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching January 2013 Meaningful Feedback Procedures = Trust Measures Add Value Balance Weighting Potential of Video Framing What We Know Now…

MET Project Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching January 2013 Lesson 1Student perception surveys and classroom observations can provide meaningful feedback to teachers. Lesson 2Implementing specific procedures in evaluation systems can increase trust in the data and the results. Lesson 3Each measure adds something of value. Lesson 4A balanced approach is most sensible when assigning weights to form a composite measure. Lesson 5There is great potential in using video for teacher feedback and for the training and assessment of observers. What We Know Now

How Teacher Development Could Revolutionize Our Schools? By Bill Gates published in the Washington Post February 28, 2011 “We know that of all the variables under a school’s control, the single most decisive factor in student achievement is excellent teaching. It is astonishing what great teachers can do for their students. Yet compared with the countries that outperform us in education, we do very little to measure, develop, and reward excellent teaching. We have been expecting teachers to be effective without giving them feedback and training.” Influence of the Gates Foundation

How Teacher Development Could Revolutionize Our Schools? By Bill Gates published in the Washington Post February 28, 2011 Proxies for improving student achievement…  Automatic salary increases based on seniority ($50 billion per year)  Bump in pay for advanced degrees ($15 billion per year)  Reducing class size (U.S. has twice as many teachers per student than they did in Influence of the Gates Foundation

Learning about Teaching – Initial Findings from the MET Project Published by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) - Pianta and Hamre 2.Framework for Teaching – Danielson 3.Mathematical Quality of Instruction (MQI) – Hill & Ball 4.Protocol for Language Arts Teaching Observations (PLATO) – Grossman 5.Quality Science Teaching (QST) - Pecheone Evaluation Instruments Used in the MET Study

ATLANTANot EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary COLLEGE READY PROMISELevel 1Level IILevel IIILevel IV DENVERIneffectiveApproachingEffectiveDistinguished HILLSBOROUGHRequires Action DevelopingAccomplishedExemplary MEMPHISLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 PITTSBURGHUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished PRINCE GEORGE’S UnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished TULSAIneffectiveNeeds Improvement EffectiveHighly Effective Superior Gates Partnership Sites – Levels of Performance

Gates MET Project Teaching Video SEE YOUTUBE LINK BELOW FOR VIDEO