Balanced Leadership: District- Level Leadership and Student Achievement Leadership Team April 3, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohios Educator Standards. Ohios Standards for the Teaching Profession.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Leader as Change Agent Nancy Stanford-Blair Cardinal Stritch University © 2005 NSB.
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
School Leadership that Works:
The Nuts and Bolts of Aligning Service-Learning with Content Standards Presented by Lisa Guilfoile Education Commission of the States Lori Gonzalez and.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
School Leadership that Works
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
1 The Nebraska Leadership Initiative Overview of Rationale and Research A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
School Leadership Teams Roles & Responsibilities Coaching for District & School Leadership Teams.
How to ensure successful change and still maintain your sanity! Robert Miller, Victorian Coordinator.
RAPID CITY AREA SCHOOLS MARCH 7, 2011 Collaborative Goal Setting Task Force Meeting.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Professional Learning Communities OKGEAR UP Public Schools April 2, 2015.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
1 What School Boards Can Learn From School District Leadership That Works WSSDA – November 2007 Rick Maloney, University Place SD & Director Area 3.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
Superintendent Goals Update. District Level Leadership Research McRel Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver,
A School Leader: 21Responsibilities
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Context setting, assessment scenarios, and communications.
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Instructional Leadership Pennsylvania Reading First Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida State University and The Florida.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
How We Approach Leadership in a High-Performing Schools Dr. Akram M. Zayour Dubai International School AlQuoz Branch 9/19/20151.
New Virginia Superintendent Evaluation Why the Change?
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Scott Lowrey, Ed.D. (OISE/University of Toronto) CCEAM/CASEA 2014.
The Method to My Madness Rapid City Area Schools Administrative Retreat August 9, 2010.
McREL’s Balanced Leadership
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
RAPID DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT Academy of Pacesetting States July 20, 2009 Brett Lane Technical Advisor to the Center on Innovation & Improvement.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
McREL Leadership Initiative North Rockland Administrator’s Summer ALF Retreat June 30, 2010 Overlook Lodge.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Standard 1- Leadership & Vision Sara Saffell Amy Blackwell Marilyn McDonald 1. Leadership and Vision-Educational leaders inspire a shared vision for comprehensive.
Module Four: Resources for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
OCM BOCES Day 2 Principal Evaluator Training 1. Back to the beginning: 2 Nine Components.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Educational Service Unit 7 Wednesday, September 24, 2008 Dr. Dan Ernst and Dr. Bill Kenagy Administrator Evaluation: Superintendent Principal.
Magnitude of Change.
Developing Structures for Teacher- Lead Learning Communities Jill Cabrera, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University.
Balanced Leadership ©McREL 2006 Do not copy without permission Balanced Leadership Matters: Superintendents and Student Achievement Leveraging leadership.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
Michael Lubelfeld Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools Deerfield Public Schools, District 109 – Lake County ISAL II Cohort Member
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
School Board Presentation September 24, 2012
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Roles, Goals & Performance Expectations
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Presentation transcript:

Balanced Leadership: District- Level Leadership and Student Achievement Leadership Team April 3, 2008

District Level Leadership Research McRel  Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver, Colorado dedicated to improving education for all students through applied research, product development, and service (Robert Marzano)  From a meta-analysis that began with over 4500 studies that was narrowed down to 27, there were 3 major findings about district leadership

Major Findings  There is a relationship between district- level leadership and student achievement; district-level leadership matters  There are six district leadership responsibilities with a statistically and positive significant effect on student achievement  Leaders perceived as strong do not always have a positive impact on achievement

Six District Leadership Responsibilities  Collaborative goal setting process  Non-negotiable goals for achievement and instruction  Board alignment with and support of district goals  Use of resources to support the goals for achievement and instruction  Monitoring goals for achievement and instruction  Define autonomy: Superintendent relationship with schools

Collaborative goal setting process  Developing a shared understanding among principals and district office staff as to the nature and function of the goal setting process  Involving board members and school and district office administrators in the goal setting process  Developing goals that reflect changes necessary to enhance student achievement rather than goals intended to maintain the status quo Effect size (r) = 0.24 (From McREL presentation 1/31/08)

Non negotiable goals  Establishing clear priorities among the district’s instructional goals and objectives with district achievement and instructional practices at the top of the list  Adopting five-year non negotiable goals for achievement and instruction  Adopting varied and diverse instructional methodologies that allow for a wide range of learning styles that exist in a diverse student population Effect size (r) = 0.33 (From McREL presentation 1/31/08)

Board alignment and support  Establishing alignment of the board president regarding district achievement and instructional goals as well as the type and nature of conflict in the district  Along with the board president, remaining situationally aware, agreeing on the political climate of the school district  Providing professional development for board members Effect size (r) = 0.29 (From McREL presentation 1/31/08)

Defined autonomy: Relationship with schools  Developing a shared vision and understanding of defined autonomy  Providing leadership for principals regarding how to implement district goals  Ensuring that all students have the opportunity to learn  Directing personnel operations to assure a stable yet improving and well-balanced work environment Effect size (r) = 0.28 (From McREL presentation 1/31/08)

Additional finding  The available data indicate the effect of superintendent tenure on student achievement is (r) 0.19, which appears after two years and is evident at least through year ten. (From McREL presentation 1/31/08)

The differential impact of leadership  Leaders perceived as strong do not always have a positive impact on student achievement (Key areas are focus of leadership and the magnitude of the change)

Magnitude  The magnitude of change is determined by the implications it has for the people expected to implement it or those who will be impacted by it  The same change can be perceived differently by different stakeholders (From McREL presentation 1/31/08)

First or second order? Do stakeholders perceive the change as… An extension of the past?A break from the past? Consistent with prevailingInconsistent with organizational norms?prevailing organizational norms? Congruent with personal values?Incongruent with personal values? Easily learned using existingRequiring new knowledge Knowledge & skills?and skills? First Order ImplicationsSecond Order Implications (From McREL presentation 1/31/08)

Balancing leadership for change What an organization needs from its leader depends on the magnitude of change for the organization. DirectSupport AnswerQuestion Step upStep back (From McREL presentation 1/31/08)

Quote The art of progress is to preserve order amid change and preserve change amid order. Alfred North-Whitehead