International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Advertisements

You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
1
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Sequential Logic Design
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
We need a common denominator to add these fractions.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Create an Application Title 1Y - Youth Chapter 5.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
The 5S numbers game..
Photo Slideshow Instructions (delete before presenting or this page will show when slideshow loops) 1.Set PowerPoint to work in Outline. View/Normal click.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
Turing Machines.
Table 12.1: Cash Flows to a Cash and Carry Trading Strategy.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
ABC Technology Project
Exarte Bezoek aan de Mediacampus Bachelor in de grafische en digitale media April 2014.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Bell Work for Quarter I … listed in reverse order.
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
Charging at 120 and 240 Volts 120-Volt Portable Vehicle Charge Cord 240-Volt Home Charge Unit.
Adding Up In Chunks.
FAFSA on the Web Preview Presentation December 2013.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
Before Between After.
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
Federal Aviation Administration Radiant Panel Updates 2014 June Materials Meeting Switzerland Materials Working Group Michael Burns, FAA Tech Center June,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Test Results for Proposed Cargo.
NexGen Burner Comparative Testing
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Development of a New Flammability.
Federal Aviation Administration Evacuation Slide Test Method: Round Robin 3 Results 0 Evacuation Slide Test Method: Comparison Test Results Federal Aviation.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Essential Cell Biology
Converting a Fraction to %
Clock will move after 1 minute
PSSA Preparation.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Essential Cell Biology
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
A Data Warehouse Mining Tool Stephen Turner Chris Frala
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
RESTRAINT OF LEATHER SEAT CUSHIONS DURING APPENDIX F SEAT CUSHION (FIRE BLOCK) TESTING COLOGNE UPDATE.
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Wiring 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Bremen, Germany.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Seat Test Round Robin Materials Working Group Patricia Cahill June 26, 2007 Interim.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Discussion of Full-Scale Testing of Leather.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Test Cell Airflow Study For Cargo.
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Presentation transcript:

International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Restraining Leather Cushions for the Seat Oil Burner Test International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Tim Salter, FAA Technical Center June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland

Why are restraints necessary for testing of leather seat cushions? Typical fabric covered seat cushions burn away but do not deform when tested (top) Leather cushions will tend to shrink and pull away from the burner flame (bottom) If the cushion pulls away from the flame during testing, does this decrease weight loss and burn lengths? Are the results still valid?

From the Handbook 7.3.5 Specimen Mounting Frame The mounting frame for the test specimen will be fabricated of 1 by 1 by 1/8-inch (25 × 25 × 3-mm) steel angle, as shown in figure 7-1. A wire can be added to the mounting frame for the seat back cushion to secure the specimen into place. More than one wire may be used to restrain leather seat components as long as the wires do not impede or redirect the flame. The mounting stand will be used for mounting the test specimen seat bottom and seat back, as shown in figure 7-2. Reference paragraph 7.3.5 of Chapter 7 Supplement.

Leather Cushion Restraints Current definition of leather cushion restraint method is vague and open to interpretation Different methods of restraint among test labs can lead to disparities in test results and be the difference between a specimen that passes or a specimen that fails Testing and research has been done in the past, but no final decisions were made regarding a standardized leather cushion restraint method Past data has shown that there is not necessarily a correct or incorrect method of restraining leather cushions, so long as restraints do not impede the flame A standardized restraint method used by all labs should increase test result repeatability

Selecting a Restraint Method Things to consider when deciding on a restraint method: Configuration The arrangement of the restraints Quantity The number of individual restraints Materials Steel rod, safety wire, hook and loop, etc. Goal Devise a method of restraint to maximize repeatability, but not overcomplicate restraint method in order minimize sample preparation time

Standardized Restraint Configuration After testing numerous configurations, it was determined that the most effective and simple method of restraint uses only three pieces of 0.032” steel wire wrapped around the cushions and frame Wire placement: 1.5” ± 0.5” from top of vertical cushion 1.5” ± 0.5” from bottom of vertical cushion Center of horizontal cushion

Restraint Materials Initial testing involved the use of safety wire wrapped around the cushion and frame Alternatively, pre-bent 1/8 inch stainless steel rod was selected as an option due to its ease of use The rod can quickly be “clipped” onto the cushion and frame, and reused for many tests Safety wire is more tedious to attach, and must be disposed of for each test run Using the clip-on SS rod can save time and money if it can demonstrate to be an effective method of restraint

Bend 1/8” stainless steel rod, and “clip” onto seat cushions as shown. 1.5” ± ½” 10” ± ½” 2” 3” 18” 4” Bend 1/8” stainless steel rod, and “clip” onto seat cushions as shown.

Interlab Study A “mini round robin” was performed to test the effectiveness of the new configuration, as well as compare the performance of SS rod compared to 0.032” steel wire The FAA Tech Center and Accufleet conductedthe round robin The test specimens used were fire hardened foam cushions covered in four different materials 3 different styles of leather 1 synthetic type leather 3 specimens of each type were tested for both the SS rod and safety wire restraint configurations 3 specimens x 4 leather types x 2 configurations = 24 tests per lab

Round Robin Results Dark Blue Synthetic Leather Tan Leather Light Blue Leather Brown Leather 1/8" SS Rod 5.68% 6.80% 9.53% 7.79% Saftey Wire 7.39% 8.42% 11.07% 9.01% Weight Loss % Difference 1.71% 1.61% 1.54% 1.22% Dark Blue Synthetic Leather Tan Leather Light Blue Leather Brown Leather 1/8" SS Rod 6.50% 7.14% 6.28% 6.37% Saftey Wire 5.81% 6.68% 5.40% 6.15% Weight Loss % Difference 0.21% 0.46% 0.68% 0.88%

Additional Notes The 1/8” is strong, reusable, and moves with the seat cushion as it shrinks from exposure to the flame The safety wire can be used only once, sometimes snaps during a test, and the seat cushion back can sometimes shrink out from under the restraint

Questions?