Education for the C21st An interdisciplinary approach A Presentation for the Franklin University Teaching and Learning Conference June 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Creativity and Innovation 2. Communication and Collaboration
Advertisements

HART RESEARCH P e t e r D A S O T E C I
Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Ability-Based Education at Alverno College. Proposed Outcomes for Session 1. To introduce you to Alvernos approach to designing integrative general education.
D ONALD H AFNER Vice Provost, Undergraduate Academic Affairs J ANET C OSTA B ATES Associate Director, Career Center.
Translating Education into Careers Donald Hafner Vice Provost, Undergraduate Academic Affairs Janet Costa Bates Associate Director, Career Center.
Research teaching Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching University of Washington August 2006 ACI Committee.
Project Management Network for Excellence in Learning & Teaching PMnetwork for Excellence in Learning & Teaching Sixth Workshop University of Westminster.
Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science.
Note: Lists provided by the Conference Board of Canada
Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
An Overview of Teaching Meghan Kurtz EDU 415/515.
University Mission Learning-centered environment Integration of teaching research, service, and co-curricular experiences Prepare students to be responsible.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Creative Mobile Multitasking Collaborative Producers.
The Role of General Education in Developing Leadership for a Sustainable Future March 23, 2007 George Watson Sr. Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences.
NMT Gen Ed Learning Objectives An ability to communicate well An ability to reason well An ability to evaluate and apply information Development of analytical.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Research Methods in MIS Dr. Deepak Khazanchi. Objectives for the Course Identify Problem Areas Conduct Interview Do Library Research Develop Theoretical.
Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Teaching Malcolm Potts, Qatar University, February Benefits and Preparation.
Jingzi Huang, Ph.D School of Teacher Education, CEBS UNC 2013 Fall GTA Conference Presentation.
© 2005 Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy 1 Digital Information Fluency Skills In Search of a Definition.
Workplace C ompetencies Developing workplace competencies on the job.
Ideas to Action Critical Thinking to Foster Student Learning and Community Engagement Patricia R. Payette, Ph.D. January 9, 2008.
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION & INSTRUCTION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY LEARNER JUNE 15-17, 2009 HOPE BROWN, HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE, ST. EDMOND, FORT DODGE VALERIE JERGENS,
DEVELOPING UNDERGRADUATE CAPACITIES: The continuum of school to university Kenny McIntosh Lecturer in Language Education and Employability (University.
Management Committee TUNING methodology and tools for curricula design: II part - Questionnaires Fausta Ludovici.
LEFIS W2 Posgraduate Workshop 1 LEFIS, WG 2 Postgraduate studies Meeting, Rotterdam.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
Writing Learning Outcomes David Steer & Stephane Booth Co-Chairs Learning Outcomes Committee.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Integration & Inquiry Transitioning to the Common Core & Next Generation of Science Standards CaMSP Learning Network Sacramento, California February 27.
By Karen Diaz TechKNOW Associates.
Common features for the subject area report Business and Management LEFIS Continuing education Malta, 8th April 2006.
Cooperative Work Experience Education PowerPoint Presentation #2 Chapter 1 – Job Savvy: How to be a Success at Work.
Ch. 3 StudyCast SarahBeth Walker. NETS-T Standard 1  Teachers use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to facilitate.
K-12 Technology Literacy Curriculum and Assessment.
Objective 1.03 Understand ethics and skills needed for employment in accounting 1 Accounting I.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
A group of essential abilities that involve the development of a knowledge base, expertise level and mind set that is increasingly necessary for success.
 400 hiring executives of major corporations were asked this simple but significant question…their collective answer? o …. Not really  Found students.
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
“…the ability to think and act flexibly with what one knows.” David Perkins in Teaching for Understanding, Wiske et al (1998)
Common features for the subject area report Law and Policy LEFIS Continuing education Malta, 8th April 2006.
Integrating General Studies
Howard Gardner “In the 21 st century, the most valued mind will be the synthesizing mind: the mind that can survey a wide range of sources, decide what.
A tool for participants of projects funded by the Youth in Action Program,used to describe what they have done and to show what they have learnt. 8 key.
From concepts to particles, and back again - combining disciplinary education with interdisciplinarity at the Amsterdam ‘Natural and Social Sciences bachelor’
Getting the Most Out of Learning Opportunities
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
WEBS2002 Interdisciplinary Project Focus: Exploring Interdisciplinarity Su White
Laboratory Science and Quantitative Core Requirements.
21st Century Skills in the Classroom
Griffith Sciences CAP/PLUS Model for Embedding Employability
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
1.03 Workplace Skills Accounting I
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
The Concept of INTERDISCIPLINARY TEACHING
Chapter 1: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Real World
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
CORE VALUES and 21st century Learning Skills
Life Skills Development: UNICEF Jordan Life Skills framework
Gavin Brown Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Education 20th January 2017
About Interdisciplinary Studies & Disciplines
Accounting I Objective 1.03 Understanding Skills Needed
Foundation of Discipline-Specific Knowledge and Understanding
WORLD-READINESS STANDARDS FOR LEARNING LANGUAGES
A Learner is one who is engaged, resilient and seeks to understand through:
Accounting I Objective 1.03 Understanding Skills Needed
IP&B Student Service and Instructional Support Retreat
Presentation transcript:

Education for the C21st An interdisciplinary approach A Presentation for the Franklin University Teaching and Learning Conference June 2014

Goals Define Interdisciplinary Studies (IDST) Introduce the IDST research methodology Discuss the traits and characteristics developed by interdisciplinarians Identify the appeal of IDST graduates to employers Describe the IDST program at Franklin University Explain why IDST matters in C21st

Source: Picture Source: Wikimedia CommonsWikimedia Commons

Interdisciplinary Studies is a process of answering a question, solving a problem, or addressing a topic that is too broad or complex to be dealt with adequately by a single discipline [… it ] draws on disciplinary perspectives and integrates their insights to produce a more comprehensive understanding or cognitive advancement (Repko, 2008, p.12)

Repko’s Interdisciplinary Research Process A. Drawing on disciplinary insights 1. Define the problem or state the research question 2. Justify using an interdisciplinary approach 3. Identify relevant disciplines 4. Conduct the literature search 5. Develop adequacy in each relevant discipline 6. Analyze the problem and evaluate each insight or theory B. Integrating disciplinary insights 7. Identify conflicts between insights or theories and their sources 8. Create common ground between concepts and theories 9. Construct a more comprehensive understanding 10. Reflect on, test, and communicate the understanding Source: Repko (2008, p. 142)

Step 1 Define Problem or State Research Question

Step 2 Justify Using an Interdisciplinary Approach 1. Is the problem sufficiently complex and open to further investigation? Or is the answer already known, readily ‘googled’ for an answer that is generally agreed to be correct? 2. Does the problem spill into multiple (or at least two) disciplinary domains in order to sufficiently address the problem? Or does it fall clearly into one disciplinary domain that is adequate and best suited to address the problem comprehensively?

Step 3 Identify Relevant Disciplines

Discipline

Step 4 Conduct Literature Search

Step 5 Develop Adequacy in each Relevant Discipline

Step 6 Analyze Problem and Evaluate each Insight or Theory

Analyze Problem and Evaluate each Insight or Theory

Where are we? A. Drawing on disciplinary insights 1. Define the problem or state the research question 2. Justify using an interdisciplinary approach 3. Identify relevant disciplines 4. Conduct the literature search 5. Develop adequacy in each relevant discipline 6. Analyze the problem and evaluate each insight or theory B. Integrating disciplinary insights 7. Identify conflicts between insights or theories and their sources 8. Create common ground between concepts and theories 9. Construct a more comprehensive understanding 10. Reflect on, test, and communicate the understanding

Integrating Disciplinary Insights

Source:

Integrating Disciplinary Insights

Where are we? A. Drawing on disciplinary insights 1. Define the problem or state the research question 2. Justify using an interdisciplinary approach 3. Identify relevant disciplines 4. Conduct the literature search 5. Develop adequacy in each relevant discipline 6. Analyze the problem and evaluate each insight or theory B. Integrating disciplinary insights 7. Identify conflicts between insights or theories and their sources 8. Create common ground between concepts and theories 9. Construct a more comprehensive understanding 10. Reflect on, test, and communicate the understanding

Step 7 Identify Conflicts between Insights or Theories and their Sources

Identify Conflicts between Insights or Theories and their Sources

Step 8 Create Common Ground between Concepts and Theories

Create Common Ground between Concepts and Theories

Step 9 Construct a more Comprehensive Understanding

Construct a more Comprehensive Understanding

Step 10: Reflect on, Test, and Communicate the Understanding ldkfjsdfsdfsdfjsldfjsldfjsldfjsdlfjsl dfjsdfjsldfjsldkfjsldfjsldfjsldfjsldfj sldjflsdjflsdjflsdjflskdjflskdjflskdjfl ksjfskjflsdkfjsdkljfsdkljflsdkjflsdjfl sjdflksjdlfjsdlfjsldfsldkfjslkfjsldkjf ssdfkjsldfjsldkfjsdkfjsldkfjsdlkfjs

Goals Define Interdisciplinary Studies (IDST) Introduce the IDST research methodology Discuss the traits and characteristics developed by interdisciplinarians Identify the appeal of IDST graduates to employers Describe the IDST program at Franklin University Explain why IDST matters in C21st

Chapter 3: The IDS “Cognitive Toolkit” What is the IDS ‘Cognitive Toolkit’?  Intellectual Capacities (interdisciplinary perspective taking, critical thinking, intellectual dexterity, integration)  Values (empathy,ethical consciousness, humility, appreciation of diversity, tolerance of ambiguity, civic engagement)  Traits and Skills (Traits: entrepreneurship, love of learning, self-reflection, and Skills: communicative competence, abstract thinking, creative thinking, metacognition)

Relevance to Employers January 28, 2014 Communications Skills (Verbal, Written, Listening) Analytical/Research Skills (non-laboratory) Computer/Technical Skills Flexibility and Adaptability Multitasking or Managing Multiple Priorities Interpersonal Skills Leadership/Management Skills Multicultural Sensitivity/Awareness Planning/Organizing Problem-Solving, Reasoning, and Creativity Teamwork

Relevance to Employers – ID capacities January 28, 2014 Communications Skills (Verbal, Written, Listening) Analytical/Research Skills (non-laboratory) Computer/Technical Skills Flexibility and Adaptability Multitasking or Managing Multiple Priorities Interpersonal Skills Leadership/Management Skills Multicultural Sensitivity/Awareness Planning/Organizing Problem-Solving, Reasoning, and Creativity Teamwork Intellectual Capacities interdisciplinary perspective taking critical thinking intellectual dexterity integration Values empathy ethical consciousness humility appreciation of diversity tolerance of ambiguity civic engagement Traits and Skills entrepreneurship love of learning self-reflection communicative competence abstract thinking, creative thinking, and metacognition

Relevance to Employers January 28, 2014 Communications Skills (Verbal, Written, Listening) Analytical/Research Skills (non-laboratory) Computer/Technical Skills Flexibility and Adaptability Multitasking or Managing Multiple Priorities Interpersonal Skills Leadership/Management Skills Multicultural Sensitivity/Awareness Planning/Organizing Problem-Solving, Reasoning, and Creativity Teamwork communicative competence interdisciplinary perspective taking critical thinking intellectual dexterity Integration tolerance of ambiguity love of learning empathy ethical consciousness humility appreciation of diversity civic engagement entrepreneurship self-reflection abstract thinking, creative thinking, and metacognition

Relevance to Employers January 28, 2014 Communications Skills (Verbal, Written, Listening) Analytical/Research Skills (non-laboratory) Computer/Technical Skills Flexibility and Adaptability Multitasking or Managing Multiple Priorities Interpersonal Skills Leadership/Management Skills Multicultural Sensitivity/Awareness Planning/Organizing Problem-Solving, Reasoning, and Creativity Teamwork communicative competence interdisciplinary perspective taking critical thinking intellectual dexterity Integration tolerance of ambiguity love of learning empathy ethical consciousness humility appreciation of diversity civic engagement entrepreneurship self-reflection abstract thinking, creative thinking, and metacognition

IDST Program at Franklin University

IDST in the Real World Why IDST matters Six “drivers” of the field’s continued advance  1. The complexity of nature, society, & ourselves  2. The complexity of the globalized workplace  3. The needs for systems thinking and contextual thinking  4. The changing nature of university research  5. The public world and its pressing needs  6. A knowledge society needs both disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity

Questions