Fast Forward Ramp Meter Design for Metro Atlanta Taylor H. Stukes, PE Gresham, Smith and Partners 2325 Lakeview Parkway, Suite 400, Alpharetta, Georgia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4-1 Application Workshop. 4-2 Module Objectives Apply the concepts learned to a freeway lane closure Case 1. Without a back up Case 2. With a back up.
Advertisements

Signing Plan Design - At Grade Intersections TEM Chapter Application Guidelines - Regulatory Signs.
Preparing a Curb Ramp Project December 15, Tiers of Project Types Non-Signalized Curb Ramp Reconstruction - Typically utilizing standard plans.
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Eric Graves, P.E. City Traffic Engineer Alpharetta, Georgia
VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT DEPLOYMENT EVALUATION I-270/I-255 Traffic and Safety Conference May 12, 2010 Missouri University of Science and Technology and HDR.
Chapter 12 Freeway Driving.
GDOT’s Metro Atlanta Ramp Meters
© OPDS 2009 WELCOME TO OCEAN PARK DRIVING SCHOOL My Name is Kim Filby and I will be your Driving School Instructor First things first, do we all know our.
Capilano Road Improvement Project WELCOME TO THE OPEN HOUSE.
June 18, 2013 WINDSOR PARKWAY – ROSWELL ROAD INTERSECTION RELOCATION FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS.
INTERSTATE DRIVING Information Processing: Complex Risk Environments
Freeway Signing Plan Design April 29, 2008
1 Austin Transportation Department Ali Mozdbar, P.E., PTOE Division Manager, Traffic Signals Traffic Signal Features for Pedestrians & Bicyclists.
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
MODULE 6 Objectives: Students will learn about using risk reducing strategies to manage multiple-lane roads at speeds up to 65 mph in complex risk environments.
2 Lane 2 way Rural hwys CTC-340. HMWK CH 16 # 1, 3, 6 use HCS+ software.
Highway Capacity Software Based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Special Report 209 Transportation Research Board (TRB), National Research Council.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments.
Peter Koonce TRB Annual Meeting January 9, 2005 Best Practices for Signal Operations Best Practices for Signal Operations – Lessons Learned from the Portland.
Signs, signals, and pavements markings
Advanced Lane Management Assist (ALMA) for Partially and Fully Automated Vehicles Robert L. Gordon, P.E. 1.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Driving on Expressways
Expressway Driving. Characteristics of Expressway Driving Roadway Speed Interchanges No cross traffic Median Tollbooths Entrance/exit ramps Limited access.
Interstate 435 and Front Street Interchange Improvements This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
Traffic Engineering Division Traffic Operations Traffic Administration Construction and maintenance of traffic control devices. Engineering design Signal.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Expressway Driving Some of the East / West interstate expressways.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Planes, Trains, Automobiles and More Ardrey Kell High School February 23, 2012.
9-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise C – Session #9.
Unit 2: Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
Interacting With Other Users. Most collisions occur when two or more objects try to occupy the same space at the same time. Drivers must identify movement.
Robert L. Bertini Sirisha M. Kothuri Kristin A. Tufte Portland State University Soyoung Ahn Arizona State University 9th International IEEE Conference.
Company LOGO Ramp Meters. Company LOGO What are Ramp Meters? Part of NaviGAtor, Georgia DOT’s Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Also includes electronic.
Ch 11 Driving on Expressways Characteristics of Expressway Driving.
Chapter 13: Weaving, Merging, and Diverging Movements on Freeways and Multilane Highways Chapter objectives: By the end of these chapters the student will.
Georgia’s Intelligent Transportation System
Strategic Highway Research Program 2 Project L07 Identification and Evaluation of the Cost- Effectiveness of Highway Design Features to Reduce Nonrecurrent.
Right-of-Way Who Goes First?.
Unit 4 Chapters 7, 9, 10 and 11.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Roadway Markings NV Driver Education Curriculum Unit 2: Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings Presentation 3 of 3.
Expressway Driving Entering, lane changing, and exiting.
Virginia Department of Education
Information Processing: Complex Risk Environments Topic 1 -- Characteristics of Expressways Topic 2 (through Lesson 1)-- Entering, Changing Lanes, and.
Intersections.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Expressway Driving Legacy High School Drivers Education.
(is it necessary?) By: Tim Torrini per. two Ramp meters are the “stop and go signals located at the entrance ramps of freeways to regulate the amount.
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Data Collection Plan / Experimental Design May.
DRIVING THE FREEWAYS ALABAMA DRIVER MANUAL CHAPTER 8.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
CEE 495/771 – Fall 2008 Topic 9 Ramp Metering Ramp Metering.
Traffic Signals NV Driver Education Curriculum Unit 2: Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings Presentation 2 of 3.
District VI, Florida Department of Transportation SE 2 nd Avenue and SE 4 th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way March 25 th, 2014 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory.
TMCs – The Next Generation ITS Tennessee Annual Meeting / October 8, 2009 Dr. Robert Edelstein, PE, PTOE.
When Being Passed Monitor passing vehicle’s position Move to lane position 3 to increase space cushion Do not increase speed—decelerate if necessary Once.
After the NACTO Guide Now I’m going to discuss the options available within the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide.
Adaptive Signals & ALDOT
Problem 5: Interstate 87 Interchange
HERO UNIT Training Module
Presentation transcript:

Fast Forward Ramp Meter Design for Metro Atlanta Taylor H. Stukes, PE Gresham, Smith and Partners 2325 Lakeview Parkway, Suite 400, Alpharetta, Georgia

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting1 Ramp Meter Operational Concepts Ramp meters preserve freeway capacity by limiting the amount of traffic entering the mainline flow – typically at ramps with recurring congestion Fixed or variable metering rates Time-Of-Day schedule (TOD) or based on freeway volumes/speed Break up platoons on entrance ramps, easing congestion Metered flow should make merges easier and safer

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting2 Fast Forward Ramp Meter Operational Concept Modified SWARM algorithm: controls entrance ramp meters based on mainline congestion upstream of ramp SWARM is “System Wide Adaptive Ramp Metering,” and will control a group of ramps based on where congestion is occurring Mainline volume and speed values are used to decide when freeway becomes congested GDOT is measuring outside 4 lanes with video detection, between 50 and 500 feet upstream of merge point

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting3 Four Generations of Atlanta Ramp Meters Olympic Era: 4 sites (1996) GDOT Testing: 4 sites (2005) State Road 400: 8 sites (2006) Fast Forward: 160 sites (2007) This map is 70 miles in diameter!

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting4 Olympic Era Ramp Meter I-75 Northbound only, for Olympic venues north of the City 8-inch lens on lower signal; inductive loops on ramp Connected to NaviGAtor; TOD operations with no freeway detection

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting5 GDOT Testing Ramp Meter I-75/I-85 Downtown Connector, Southbound only Test effectiveness of ramp meters Video detection, multi-lane ramps, connected to NaviGAtor Time-Of-Day schedule with “early-on” if freeway volumes are high

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting6 State Road 400 Ramp Meters Not yet operational; installed during bus-on-shoulder project Pedestal-mount signals on left side (both sides for multilane ramps) Loop detectors on ramp Not connected to NaviGAtor Operates on Time-Of-Day only with no freeway detection

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting7 Fast Forward Ramp Meters - Primary Design Criteria STOP BAR LOCATION – Provide minimum AASHTO acceleration length for posted speed – Provide maximum vehicle storage – Provide physical separation from mainline to prevent cheating TWO-LANE RAMP or SINGLE-LANE RAMP? – Travel lanes: 12 feet wide – Inside shoulder: 4 feet wide – Outside shoulder: 10 feet wide – or obtain FHWA design exception No meters on freeway-to-freeway ramps or on ramps entering C-D roads

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting8 Signals and Wig-Wag Signs FHWA mandated two displays per lane – Upper & lower on pedestal – Four heads on two-lane mast arm Wig-Wag signs, one per lane, warn drivers “PREPARE TO STOP” with flashers Pedestals and sign posts are breakaway Poles and cabinets are outside Clear Zone or behind guardrail

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting9 Video Detection and Video Monitoring Mainline video detection accomplished through off-the-shelf IVDS units (Intersection Video Detection System) directly into Ramp Meter controller Required CCTV coverage: stop bar and discharge area Desired CCTV coverage: entire ramp Existing CCTV cameras are checked for suitability by actually positioning them, using the zoom, and capturing the best image

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting10 Detection for the Ramp Meter “Passage” loops just downstream of stop bar (6x6) “Presence” loops just upstream of stop bar (6x40 quadrupoles) “Queue” loops located with wig-wag near crossing street (6x6) Queue loops detect occupancy, and will maximize metering rate or turn signals off

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting11 Fiber Connection with NaviGAtor Network Demand for fiber exceeded availability in downtown area and along northern side of Perimeter Highway Substantial GDOT investment of staff to test and identify available fibers Some projects installed new trunk fiber GDOT will be using “pre-terminated” fiber connectors

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting12 CORSIM and Other Traffic Analysis Vehicles In versus Vehicles Out estimated queue lengths for each hour of the 4-hour peak period Detailed CORSIM analysis of ramp, but not adjacent signals or arterial CORSIM estimates how long until queue loops are occupied

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting13 Suggestions for Next Time … In our case, the Governor challenged GDOT to get it done, and they got it done! Evaluate ramp capacity and queue storage prior to design phase of project, and widen / lengthen ramps to accommodate longer queues Establish design criteria to ensure consistent design (easier to build and easier to maintain) Involve all departments of DOT during planning phase (roadway, traffic, construction, maintenance) Begin verifying existing fiber infrastructure during planning phase

ITE Tennessee / ITS Georgia Annual Meeting14 On Schedule? Questions? Taylor H. Stukes, PE Gresham, Smith and Partners 2325 Lakeview Parkway, Suite 400 Alpharetta, GA