Open Ocean Iron Fertilization Experiments From IronEx-I Through SOFEX: What We Know and What We Still Need to Understand Johnson, K S Chase, Z Elrod, V.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

1 The Changing Fortunes of the EUs Energy Market Antony Froggatt.
“God Is Not…” “God is not a man” Numbers 23:19 God’s dependable nature
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
Assessing the efficiency of iron fertilization on atmospheric CO2 using an intermediate complexity ecosystem model of the global ocean Olivier Aumont 1.
The Ecology of Iron Enhanced Ocean Productivity Michael R. Landry Integrative Oceanography Division Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California,
Carbon Sequestration by Ocean Fertilization Overview
HKCEE Chemistry Volumetric Analysis &
1 Covalent bonds l Nonmetals hold onto their valence electrons. l They cant give away electrons to bond. l Still want noble gas configuration. l Get it.
We need a common denominator to add these fractions.
/4/2010 Box and Whisker Plots Objective: Learn how to read and draw box and whisker plots Starter: Order these numbers.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Energy Flow Through an Ecosystem
Reducing Fractions. Factor A number that is multiplied by another number to find a product. Factors of 24 are (1,2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24).
Frigid Fridays On each Friday last January, the temperature was a record low temperature for the date. On Friday, January 30, the mercury dropped to 5°F,
0 - 0.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
1 How does relief affect temperature? 2 Hurricanes are associated with which type of pressure?
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
Negative Numbers What do you understand by this?.
Prospects for ocean sequestration of carbon dioxide Andrew Watson School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400.
ABC Technology Project
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
VOORBLAD.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Chapter 8 Test Prep Game.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
North Patch South Patch SAMPLE COLLECTION & ANALYSIS We deployed the Multiple Unit Large Volume in-situ Filtration System (MULVFS) during the.
Fe-Stimulated Changes in Phytoplankton Biomarker Distributions and Carbon Isotopic Compositions During SOFeX R. Bidigare, S. Christensen, S. Brown, K.
Layer dominated by big cells (>20 um) with low Fv/Fm = 0.28 Layer dominated by small cells (< 5 um) with high Fv/Fm Layer dominated by big cells (>20 um)
1 Expectations of Equity Risk Premia, Volatility, and Asymmetry: From a Corporate Finance Perspective John R. Graham Duke University, Durham, NC USA
Week 1.
Number bonds to 10,
Changes in  15 N of nitrate and particulate nitrogen during a mesoscale iron fertilization experiment in the Southern Ocean David Timothy, Mark Altabet,
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
PSSA Preparation.
THE CHEMICAL CONCEPT INVENTORY
EXAMPLE 3 Use synthetic division
Biological pump Low latitude versus high latitudes.
Changes in POC Concentration and  13 C during Mesoscale Iron Fertilization in the Southern Ocean 1 Mark A. Altabet, David Timothy, Matt McIlvin, and Peng.
Some (other) possible climate and biogeochemical effects of iron fertilization Andy Watson School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich.
Nutrient dynamics in the deep blue sea – David M. Karl
Temporal scales of coastal variability and land-ocean processes J. Salisbury, J. Campbell, D. Vandemark, A. Mahadevan, B. Jonsson, H. Xue, C. Hunt.
Lecture 19 HNLC and Fe fertilization experiments
Iron and Biogeochemical Cycles
Why dump iron in the oceans? Lessons learned from ocean iron fertilization experiments Ken O. Buesseler Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
USCG Polar Star overview & Particle export during SOFeX Ken O. Buesseler.
The biological response to in situ Southern Ocean iron fertilization. Richard T. Barber and SOFeX Team SOFeX: Southern Ocean Iron Experiments, An Overview.
Simulating the Southern Ocean Iron Experiment (SOFeX) using a marine ecosystem model Abstract The Southern Ocean Iron Experiment (SOFeX) was conducted.
Iron studies during JGOFS Philip Boyd
Iron and Biogeochemical Cycles
Presentation transcript:

Open Ocean Iron Fertilization Experiments From IronEx-I Through SOFEX: What We Know and What We Still Need to Understand Johnson, K S Chase, Z Elrod, V Fitzwater, S Plant, J Coale, K Hunter, C Gordon, R M Buesseler, K

Eight open ocean, iron fertilization experiments have now been conducted.

Open ocean iron enrichment experiments that have been conducted to date. All show a strong ecosystem response to iron addition: IronEx I: Equatorial Pacific, fold increase in chlorophyll. Patch subducted 4 days into the experiment. IronEx II: Equatorial Pacific, fold increase in chlorophyll, 90 µatm draw down in CO 2, 5µM drawdown in NO 3. SOIREE: Pacific sector of Southern Ocean, South of Polar Front. 6-fold increase in integrated chlorophyll, 25 µatm draw down in CO 2, 2 µM draw down in NO 3. EisenEx: Atlantic sector of Southern Ocean, Dispersion into an eddy, 4x increase in chlorophyll. SEEDS: Western subarctic Pacific Ocean, fold increase in chl, 13 µM draw down in NO 3. SOFeX North: Pacific sector of Southern Ocean, North of Polar Front. >10x increase in chlorophyll, >40 µatm draw down in CO 2. SOFeX South: Pacific sector of Southern Ocean, South of Polar Front. >10x increase in chlorophyll, >40 µatm draw down in CO 2. SERIES:Eastern subarctic Pacific Ocean, ~10 µM NO 3 draw down.

We have developed a good (but not perfect) understanding of the role of iron in stimulating a shift- up in the ecosystem.

In previous experiments, only IronEx II shows an appreciable carbon export signal. This experiment was not designed to study export (e.g. only Th obs.) and we do not have a good understanding of bloom termination. Is SOFEX the solution?

SOFEX South shows a modest increase in carbon flux. Iron fertilized export is not higher than fluxes measured during AESOPS (10 to 16 mmol/m 2 /d). Only ~ 3%/d of carbon is exported (=14 mmol C/m 2 /d /(14 mmol POC/m 3 * 30 m mixed layer))

SOFEX North Patch as seen by MODIS on Feb. 5. The 15 km x 15 km patch created on Jan. 12 to 14 had grown to be 4 km x 230 km and still blooming.

SOFEX North Patch survey by Revelle on Feb. 8/9

North Patch iron drops ~20x (4/0.2) in 22 days following last addition. Loss rate is ~15%/day. SF 6 drops ~70x (100/1.4) in same time frame. Loss rate is ~21%/day. Gas exchange ~11%/d in South Patch. Horizontal diffusion ~21%-11% = 10%/d. Iron loss rates (15%/d) are ~10%/d by diffusion and ~5%/d by bio. uptake and scavenging.

SF6 loss in South Patch is dominated by gas exchange (11%/d mean). Mixing losses of SF6 and, presumably, iron are quite small (3 to 7%/day).

What happens in the South Patch? We add iron as Fe(II), which our analytical method doesn’t measure. In warm water, Fe(II) is rapidly (minutes) oxidized to Fe(III), which we do measure. Oxidation rate is slow in So. Patch (days).

After 1st Fe addition nM total After 2nd Fe addition nM total After 4th Fe addition nM total Low temperatures (-0.6°C) in South Patch reduced Fe(II) oxidation rate and iron losses were likely even lower than in N. Patch. What is impact on biota?

In contrast, Fe loss during IronEX II was very rapid, due to extreme rates of horizontal mixing: SF 6 lost at 48%/d! Is that why IronEx II had export?

Conclusions: Major loss of iron in SOFEX North Patch was mixing & not uptake or scavenging. Phytoplankton were probably never iron limited in the North Patch. Would large amounts of export have occurred? Iron oxidation rate in SOFEX South Patch was very slow (days). Iron was likely lost at a much slower rate than in North Patch. Were phytoplankton iron limited in the South Patch? Concentrations were probably not extremely low over the 28 day observing period. Observing export might require an experiment longer than 28 days or warmer water.

Thanks to REVELLE, MELVILLE & POLAR STAR scientists & special thanks to NSF & MBARI for support