1  Janet Hensley  Pam Lange  Barb Rowenhorst Meade School District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Números.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
EuroCondens SGB E.
Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program Gateway and End of Course 2007.
Math Changes Curriculum -Pacing Guides - Vocabulary -Benchmarks Norwalk Public Schools Craig Creller Leeann Glick Sandra Fisher.
Construction Careers Center Charter High School CCC Career Coaching Participants.
CALENDAR.
Working Together: Understanding SBA Data Les Morse, Director Assessment & Accountability Alaska Department of Education & Early Development No Child Left.
SBA to GLE: The Road Les Morse, Director Assessment & Accountability Alaska Department of Education & Early Development No Child Left Behind Winter Conference.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
Ninth Grade Distribution All Students = 301 (100%) (less level 1 & 2 students) (less level 3 students in full transition) (less students in full.
Enhancing our guiding philosophy of continuous improvement
2007 ITBS/ ITED Results Cedar Rapids Community Schools.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
Data Retreat® is a registered service mark of Cooperative Educational Service Agency 7, Green Bay, WI Todays Leadership for Tomorrows Results.
SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY Title I For additional information contact the school at
Growth Shown on ALL Smart Goals Academic Success = Motivation Pride Improved Attendance Rate Collaboration “Every Student, Every Opportunity, Every Time”May.
The 5S numbers game..
Warm-Up On the front of an index card, write your first and last name, the names of your campus and your address. First Name Last Name Campus
APS Teacher Evaluation
The SCPS Professional Growth System
School Report Card A Focus on Academic Performance West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation June 21, 2011.
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
The basics for simulations
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2013 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
ASSESSMENT UPDATE Rhonda Sims, Director Division of Support and Research Office Of Assessment And Accountability
Faster IS Better: Accelerating to Success Kay Teague And Michael Warren.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Data Teams.
High School School Performance Framework (SPF)
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
School Improvement Advisory Committee October 15, 2008 Welcome!
MT. PLEASANT A CLOSER LOOK AT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Focused on Quality; Committed to Excellence Presentation to the Maryland State Board of Education May 22, 2012 Deep Creek Magnet Middle School Dundalk.
AYP: Making Adequate Yearly Progress in Washington State Spring 2012.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
11 P 2 : Proficiency & Progress 2011 Using Data to Think & Do Things Differently Dr. Ron Costello Superintendent of Catholic Schools Archdiocese of Indianapolis.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Celebrating Successes Working on Challenges K-2 Literacy Growth.
Integrated II Workshop August 28, Purpose of Integrated II To assist our weaker science students master the high school science benchmarks To help.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
AP Statistics Mr. Deem (858) ext 4267
Welcome to Mrs. Jessee’s room for “Back To School” Night! Welcome to Mrs. Jessee’s room for “Back To School” Night!
OPSB & RSD LEAP/GEE Scores in Context Cowen Institute for Public Education Initiatives Tulane University May 2008.
FINAL WRAP-UP Phil 109 All about final grades. THE FINAL EXAM + the quiz : A : A 92-90: A : B : B 82-80: B : C 72-70: C-
PHIL 111 Spring 2011 FINAL WRAP-UP All about grades.
Creating District C.I.P. And Building S.I.P. Making Sure The Canaries Don’t Die While You Are Data Mining.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
Highlights From the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A
Conducting a Comprehensive Needs Assessment. Objectives Identify the components of a comprehensive needs assessment Classify the types of data collected.
Arkansas ESEA Flexibility Flexibility Amended in October, 2012 Louis Ferren, School Performance Public School Accountability.
North Santiam School District State Report Cards
SMART GOALS APS TEACHER EVALUATION. AGENDA Purpose Balancing Realism and Rigor Progress Based Goals Three Types of Goals Avoiding Averages Goal.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
A Data Warehouse Mining Tool Stephen Turner Chris Frala
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
1  Barb Rowenhorst  TIE Rapid City. Outcomes  Analyze eMetrics results and gain a deeper understanding of grade-level and individual student data.
1  Barb Rowenhorst  Janet Hensley Rapid City. Take care of your own needs. Limit side conversations in large group Chimes – return to large group Respect.
1  Jennifer Nehl Kemmerer. Outcomes To discuss district report card status. To examine PAWS data reports. To analyze reading and math standards at individual.
Mock Data Retreat Pam Lange TIE/ESA 7. 2 Agenda  Based on school’s need  May be ½ day/ full day/ two days  Work with district to determine needs –
Presentation transcript:

1  Janet Hensley  Pam Lange  Barb Rowenhorst Meade School District

 USF Credit ◦ 2 credits for PASS Team Members ◦ 1 credit for other participants  Who will be responsible for sign-up in building on In-service days?

 Data Driven Dialogue ◦ Non-negotiable ◦ Negotiable ◦ Technology  Formative Assessment ◦ Seven Strategies

To discuss district/building report card status. To analyze reading and math standards at individual grade and student levels. To integrate multiple data sources. To determine uses of summative and formative assessments.

Data Matrix

Prioritize & Set Goals Study & Plan Successful Strategies Observe Patterns & Hypothesize Student Data Program & Structures Data Family & Community Data Professional Practices Data

Pre-Assessment Discovering Summative/Final Assessment Making Sure Formative Assessment Checking Up

 Formative Assessment: Formal and informal processes teachers and students use to gather evidence for the purpose of improving learning.  Summative Assessment: Assessments that provide evidence of student achievement for the purpose of making a judgment about student competence or program effectiveness.

It isn’t the method that determines whether the assessment is summative or formative… …it is how the results are used.

 Discuss the assessments listed for your grade level/building level  Determine if the results are currently used for pre/formative/summative  Add any assessments that are missing  Turn in a copy of the matrix per building

Work Time

 Complete Observations/Hypothesis worksheet  Big aha’s

14 DakotaSTEP Basic Information Basic Information

15  Reading: 3-8 and 11 ◦ New standards tested 2009  Math: 3-8 and 11  Science: 5, 8 and 11 Not reported on AYP Report Card

Annual Measurable Objectives up to 2014 K School YearReadingMathReadingMath %45%50%60% %54%66%67% %65%66%54% %65%72%54% %72% 63% %72%62%63% %79%71%72% %86%80%81% %93%90% %

Observations (Facts Only) Hypothesis (Why might this be a pattern?) Next Steps: What needs further investigation? Recorder: Person with most buttons.

19

 Find the report for your specific building.  Analyze report.  Areas of celebration?  Areas of surprise?  Math, reading, attendance, graduation

Work Time

Observations (Facts Only) Hypothesis (Why might this be a pattern?) Math – Blue Reading – Pink Next Steps: What needs further investigation? As a team, what two big areas need to be posted on the data wall? Big aha’s Questions/Concerns/Celebrations

DakotaSTEP Individual Standards Grade Level/Building Level Discussions

25 School What score is good enough?

 The Dakota STEP blueprints can be found at…  /docs/2009/STEP%20Spring%202009%20Test %20Blueprints.pdf  It will help teachers better understand what will be on the 2010 Dakota STEP Assessment.

Observations (Facts Only) Hypothesis (Why might this be a pattern?) Next Steps: What needs further investigation? Recorder: Birthday closest to today.

Work Time

Observations (Facts Only) Hypothesis (Why might this be a pattern?) Reading – Pink Next Steps: What needs further investigation? As a team, what two big areas need to be posted on the data wall? Big aha’s Questions/Concerns/Celebrations

35 School

 Usually, 7 questions per standard (R) or indicator (M - combines standards) or below and above

 The Dakota STEP blueprints can be found at…  /docs/2009/STEP%20Spring%202009%20Test %20Blueprints.pdf  It will help teachers better understand what will be on the 2010 Dakota STEP Assessment.

Observations (Facts Only) Hypothesis (Why might this be a pattern?) Next Steps: What needs further investigation? Recorder: Youngest person at the table.

Work Time

Observations (Facts Only) Hypothesis (Why might this be a pattern?) Math – Blue Next Steps: What needs further investigation? As a team, what two big areas need to be posted on the data wall? Big aha’s Questions/Concerns/Celebrations

45

7.R.2.1 Students can interpret text using comprehension strategies. Learning targets to meet this standard: I can study or determine the relationship of the parts to the whole (interpret) by connecting, questioning, visualizing, determining importance, inferring, synthesizing, and monitoring for meaning (comprehension strategies). Examples: Determining the author’s purpose, cause and effect, compare and contrast, conclusions, facts or opinions, generalizations, graphics, hypotheses, inferences, supporting details, prior knowledge, or purpose for reading

Individual Student Standards Report Grade Level Discussion

 Select a content area your table would like to work with.  Find the excel document.  Select one of the lowest standards for that content area.  Sort that standard.  How many students scored below your “good enough” score?  How many of these are proficient students?  Do you need to adjust your “good enough” score?

 How are you going to address this so everyone has this information? (non-negotiable)  What will your teachers do with it?  How will this drive instruction?

Work Time

Observations (Facts Only) Hypothesis (Why might this be a pattern?) Math – Blue Reading - Pink Next Steps: What needs further investigation? As a team, what two big areas need to be posted on the data wall? Big aha’s Questions/Concerns/Celebrations

K-12 Content Discussions

 Sort observations into categories that make the most sense to your team ◦ K-12 Reading or math  As a content area team, determine the next steps. ◦ Post on chart paper

Plan Time

 Ethan Dschaak  David Carroll  Chris Koletsky  Mitch Adams

62 Create an Account ONLY