Contact: Mag. Claudia Flandorfer, Section Environmental Meteorology, Tel. 0043 1 360 26 / 2405, Mag. Marcus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Case studies of pollen spread within a Central European Forest canopy
Advertisements

ALARO-0 at ZAMG Experiences, verification, identified problems, ….
European Reanalysis and Observations for Monitoring MACC Conference, Utrecht, May 2011 GEOLAND2 MyOcean MACC SAFER G-Mosaic ??? Global Monitoring.
ESF- MedCLIVAR Workshop Climate Change Modeling for the Mediterranean region, ICTP, Trieste, Italy, Oct 2008 Regional air quality decadal simulations.
PREV AIR : An operational system for air quality monitoring and forecasting presented by Laurence Rouïl.
Integrated modelling and monitoring for use in forecasting Jørgen Brandt and Finn Palmgren National Environmental Research Institute Department of Atmospheric.
1 Limitations of current air quality data in Europe? Frank de Leeuw Real time pollution data exchange and forecast in Europe Copenhagen, 7-8 April 2005.
Severe Weather Forecasts
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik Atmospheric stability in urban areas detected by ultrasonic anemometers Martin Piringer, August Kaiser.
PREV AIR : An operational system for large scale air quality monitoring and forecasting
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik BASIC INVESTIGATION OF SYMMETRIC INSTABILITY DURING CONVECTIVE INITITATION IN THE ALPINE REGION Thomas Krennert,
Air Implementation Pilot Task 3. Assessing modelling activities Núria Castell and Bruce Denby NILU FAIRMODE Forum for air quality modelling in Europe.
Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Assessment of air pollution by cadmium CZECH REPUBLIC EMEP Heavy metal case study Milan Váňa, Pavel Machálek + MSC-E.
Project for support of the participation of West Balkan countries in the work of the EEA Wim Mol European Topic Centre on Air pollution and Climate change.
HR 09 IB EN 02 – German Proposal, Zagreb, 10 June 2011 Page 1 April 12, Strengthening the Ministry of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia.
The MINNI Project Italian Agency for New Technologies Energy and the Environment Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution Convention TFIAM Meeting, Amiens,
The Regional Chemical Transport Model over Northeast Asia Area Operated by Japan Meteorological Agency A. Kamada*, M. Ikegami, H. Naoe, M. Kajino, M. Deushi,
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik ZAMG - Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics Barbora Stuhl Josef.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Fighting the Great Challenges in Large-scale Environmental Modelling I. Dimov n Great challenges in environmental modelling n Impact of climatic changes.
Inputs from the PROMOTE/MACC projects Laurence Rouïl (INERIS)
EUROPEAN UNION INITIATIVES AND REQUIREMENTS : AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY MECHANISM Sonja Vidič Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia.
AIR POLLUTION. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMICAL TRANSPORT MODELS Why models? incomplete information (knowledge) spatial inference = prediction temporal inference.
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for large scale air quality monitoring and forecasting over Europe
1 Modelling Activities at LAC (PSI) in Switzerland Ş. Andreani-Aksoyo ğ lu, J. Keller, I. Barmpadimos, D. Oderbolz, A.S.H. Prévôt Laboratory of Atmospheric.
Andrea Fraser – October 2011 Andrea Fraser, Geoff Dollard, Paul Willis, Trevor Davies, Justin Lingard UK Air Quality Forecasting of Particulate Matter.
Data assimilation of trace gases in a regional chemical transport model: the impact on model forecasts E. Emili 1, O. Pannekoucke 1,2, E. Jaumouillé 2,
TNO experience M. Schaap, R. Timmermans, H. Denier van der Gon, H. Eskes, D. Swart, P. Builtjes On the estimation of emissions from earth observation data.
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for air quality monitoring and forecasting Laurence ROUÏL.
Integration of CMAQ into the Western Macedonia environmental management system A. Sfetsos 1,2, J. Bartzis 2 1 Environmental Research Laboratory, NCSR Demokritos.
Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.
Near Real Time analyzed maps of air quality in Europe Cécile Honoré, Laurence Rouïl.
Improving Cloud Simulation in Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Through Assimilation of GOES Satellite Observations Andrew White Advisor: Dr. Arastoo.
Development of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch 2012 CMAS Conference October 16,
Bas Mijling Ronald van der A AMFIC Final Meeting ● Beijing ● 23 October 2009 Results of WP 5 : Air Quality Forecasting.
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
AIR QUALITY MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Dusanka Stanojevic Directorate for.
Evaluation and Application of Air Quality Model System in Shanghai Qian Wang 1, Qingyan Fu 1, Yufei Zou 1, Yanmin Huang 1, Huxiong Cui 1, Junming Zhao.
Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of.
Source-Specific Forecasting of Air Quality Impacts with Dynamic Emissions Updating & Source Impact Reanalysis Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu.
| Folie 1 Assessment of Representativeness of Air Quality Monitoring Stations Geneva, Wolfgang Spangl.
Gloream workshop, Paris 2006 Setting of an experimental forecast system for air quality at ECMWF in the framework of the GEMS project : implementation.
A real-time forecast system for air pollution concentrations - Contribution to subproject GLOREAM - GLO-6 Hermann J. Jakobs, Elmar Friese, Michael Memmesheimer,
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.
The Impact of Short-term Climate Variations on Predicted Surface Ozone Concentrations in the Eastern US 2020 and beyond Shao-Hang Chu and W.M. Cox US Environmental.
Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov CMAQ O 3 Prediction.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Western Air Quality Issues and Photochemical Modeling - An Industrial Perspective Doug Blewitt, CCM AQRM Dana Wood, PE BP.
Introduction The indicator species are widely used to assess the sensitivity of ozone to the reduction of emissions of its two main precursors: nitrogen.
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
Georgia Institute of Technology Evaluation of the 2006 Air Quality Forecasting Operation in Georgia Talat Odman, Yongtao Hu, Ted Russell School of Civil.
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
HYDROCARE Kick-Off Meeting 13/14 February, 2006, Potsdam, Germany HYDROCARE Actions 2.1Compilation of Meteorological Observations, 2.2Analysis of Variability.
1 European air indicator reporting Process and experience © iStockphoto.com/cmisje.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
1 Černikovský, Krejčí, Volná (ETC/ACM): Air pollution by ozone in Europe during the summer 2012 & comparison with previous years 17th EIONET Workshop on.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
Impact of various emission inventories on modelling results; impact on the use of the GMES products Laurence Rouïl
Jacek W. Kaminski1 Joanna Struzewska2 Pawel Durka3,4
Urszula Parra Maza, Peter Suppan
The CAMS Policy products
Gabriele Curci Model study of the impact of updated European biogenic emission inventory from NatAir on air quality using Chimere.
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
M. Schaap + TNO and RIVM teams
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

Contact: Mag. Claudia Flandorfer, Section Environmental Meteorology, Tel / 2405, Mag. Marcus Hirtl, Section Environmental Meteorology, Tel / 2406, 1. Introduction The Air-Quality model for Austria (AQA) is operated at ZAMG in cooperation with the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU) in Vienna by order of the regional governments since The modeling system is currently a combination of the meteorological model ALARO and the photochemical dispersion model CAMx. Two modeling domains are used with the highest resolution (5 km) in the Alpine region. Various extensions with external data sources have been conducted in the past to improve the daily forecasts of the model. Since 2013 O 3 - and PM 10 - observations from the Austrian measurement network have been assimilated daily using optimum interpolation. Dynamic chemical boundary conditions are obtained from Air-Quality forecasts provided by ECMWF in the frame of MACC-II. Additionally the latest available high resolved emission inventories for Austria are combined with TNO and EMEP data. The biogenic emissions are provided by the SMOKE model. ZAMG provides daily forecasts of O 3, PM 10 and NO 2 to the regional governments of Austria. The evaluation of these forecasts is done for the summer 2013 with the main focus on the forecasts of ozone. The measurements of the Air-Quality stations are compared with the punctual forecasts at the sites of the station and with the area forecasts for every province of Austria. 2. ALARO-CAMx Model configuration  Meteorological Model: ALARO, 61 vertical levels  Photochemical Dispersion Model: CAMx ( 16 vertical levels, SAPRC99-Mechanism (Carter, 2000) with 73 trace gases and 211 chemical reactions  2 Model domains: 13,8 km and 4,6 km (Fig. 1)  2 Model runs: 00 UTC and 06 UTC. Data assimilation of the Austrian Measurement stations is only used in the 2 nd run. The modeling system is described in several reports and pubilcations (Baumann-Stanzer et al, 2005a, Baumann-Stanzer et al., 2005b, Krüger et al. 2006a, Krüger et al., 2006b, Hirtl et al, 2011). Development and evaluation of the operational Air-Quality forecast model for Austria ALARO-CAMx Claudia Flandorfer a, Marcus Hirtl a, Bernd C. Krüger b a Section Environmental Meteorology, ZAMG – Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Vienna, Austria b Institute of Meteorology, BOKU – University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria Emissions  Anthropogenic emissions: The new emission data is a combination of Austrian inventories, TNO and EMEP inventory (Fig. 3). Before 2013 the emissions were based on the UNECE/EMEP database (webdab.emep.int), which has a resolution of 50 km. For Austria, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary the emissions has been downscaled to a resolution of 5 km (Fig. 2).  Biogenic emissions of hydrocarbon and nitrogen oxid are calculated by SMOKE (Sparse Matrix Kernel Emissions Modeling System, Houyoux and Vokovic, 1999) based on the actual meteorological data. Chemical boundary conditions The dynamic boundary conditions from ECMWF, developed in the MACC- Project (Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate, atmosphere.eu) are used since Before 2013 the concentrations calculated in the framework of the EU-project CECILIA (Central and Eastern Europe Climate Change Impact and Vulnerability Assessment, are used. Data Assimilation Since 2013 the measurements of PM 10 and O 3 of all Austrian Air-Quality stations are used to optimize the initial conditions for the Air-Quality model. The optimum interpolation technique (Daley, 1991) is used for data assimilation. 3. Evaluation Results for O 3 In summer of 2013, two heat waves occurred. The first short-time heat wave was in June During this period one exceedance of the alert threshold value for ozone occurred. The second heat wave took place from the end of July to the mid of August. Due to very high temperatures (new temperature record for Austria measured in Bad Deutsch-Altenburg with 40.5°C) and long dryness episodes the information threshold value has been exceeded several times in the eastern regions of Austria. The alert threshold value has been exceeded one time in this period. The exceedance of the alert threshold has been measured at the station “Schwechat Sportplatz”, which is located in the southeast of Vienna (3 rd August 2013, 13:00 UTC). The model was able to forecast this high O 3 concentration in time and nearly in the same intensity as the measurement, only the location of the maximum is slightly in the northwest of the station. The model shows a high hit rate in predicting events or non-events (95,6 %). Only 4,4 % of all daily maximum forecasts for O 3 predict an event when no event occurs respectively vice versa (Table 1). Fig. 1: Model domains Fig. 2: Emissions used before 2013 Fig. 3: Emissions used since 2013 Fig. 6: O 3 forecast without data assimilation Fig. 7: O 3 forecast with data assimilation measurement stations (dots) References  Baumann-Stanzer, K., M. Hirtl und B. C. Krüger, 2005a: Pilotstudie zur Prognose von Sommersmog auf Basis operationeller regionaler Wettervorhersage in Österreich. Endbericht, Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik und Institut für Meteorologie der Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Mai  Baumann-Stanzer, K., M. Hirtl und B. C. Krüger, 2005b: Testbetrieb des Modellsystems zur Prognose von Sommersmog auf Basis operationeller regionaler Wettervorhersage. Zwischenbericht, Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik und Institut für Meteorologie der Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Nov  Carter, W.P.L., 2000: Implementation of the SAPRC-99 Chemical Mechanism into the Model-3 Framework, Report to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, cert.ucr.edu/~carter/absts.htm#s99mod3  Daley, R., 1991: Atmospheric Data Analysis. Cambridge Atmospheric and Space Science Series, Cambridge University Press. ISBN , 457 pages.  Houyoux MR and Vukovich JM, 1999: Updates to the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emission (SMOKE) modeling system and integration with Models-3, presented at the Emission Inventory: Regional Strategies for the Future, October 26-28, Raleigh, NC, Air and Waste Management Association.  Krüger, B. C., K. Baumann-Stanzer, und M. Hirtl, 2006a: Änderungen des Modellsystems zur Prognose von Sommersmog für Nordost- Österreich im Winter 2005/ Zwischenbericht -, Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik und Institut für Meteorologie der Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, April  Krüger, B. C., K. Baumann-Stanzer, und M. Hirtl, 2006b: Testbetrieb 2006 des Modellsystems zur Prognose von Sommersmog auf Basis operationeller regionaler Wettervorhersage. Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik und Institut für Meteorologie der Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Dezember European Geoscience Union, General Assembly 2014, Vienna, 27 th April – 2 nd May 2014 Fig. 4: Example for MACC boundary conditions for O 3 Fig. 5: Improvement of O 3 daily max forecasts due to MACC boundary conditions Fig. 8: O 3 daily max during the second heat wave in Austria (06 UTC run with data assimilation) Table 1: Hit rate for O 3 daily max Fig. 9: O 3 model forecast (06 UTC run)