Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments Markus Haag Developing People Internationally Konstanz, Germany - 28 Sep 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Author: Brenda Stephenson The University of Tennessee Date submitted to deafed.net – Date submitted to deafed.net – March 6, 2006 March 6, 2006 To contact.
Advertisements

ICT for Development The importance of place: language, culture and identity ICT4D Lecture 16 Tim Unwin.
Learning at Our primary role has been to help schools, teachers and lifelong learners engage with NLS collections through online resources, workshops and.
Cognitive-metacognitive and content-technical aspects of constructivist Internet-based learning environments: a LISREL analysis 指導教授:張菽萱 報告人:沈永祺.
In a Post-Literate Society
LANGUAGE LEARNING AND THE INTERNET.  The communicative possibilities of the internet have been seized by those who deal in the teaching of languages.
D2.1. PEDAGOGICAL FRAMEWORK Matjaž Debevc UM FERI.
 will be able to write a learning outcome from the student perspective  will understand the difference between writing about an activity and learning.
Teaching Language in Context First edition 1986 Third edition 2001
Integration of Workplace Learning in Vocational Teacher Education Courses for supervisors and vocational teachers.
KM most-cited articles (R#8) Article 7- 9 MIS 580: Knowledge Management Arab Salem November 8, 2005.
Week 7: Cultures in Computer- Supported Collaborative Design Dr. Xiangyu WANG September 8 th 2008.
While it may be difficult to identify the variety of learning styles in your class, some measures can be taken to facilitate and encourage all types of.
Instructional Design for Culturally Diverse Online Learners Devshikha Bose Department of Educational Leadership and Instructional Design Idaho State University.
Maximizing the benefits of English- medium instruction through cross- curricular planning at junior secondary levels Theoretical background and overview.
Intel Teach Elements Collaboration in the Digital Classroom Charity I. Mulig First Webinar Session October 18, :00 – 9:30 pm.
Robert Reid Torri Ortiz Lienemann.  Session I: ◦ Introductions of group members, facilitators, and text ◦ Review format for the book study ◦ Choose partners/small.
Dr E. Lugo Morales1 6/28/2012. Develop academic vocabulary Read to acquire new information Understand information presented orally Participate in classroom.
Theories Guiding E-Learning
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT MANAGING. Terminologies  Education: the system which aims to develop people’s intellectual capability, conceptual and social understanding.
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum ENGLISH May, 2012.
Knowledge Development in Virtual Work Markus Haag Developing People Internationally Konstanz, Germany - 28 Sep 2007.
Culturally Nuanced Learning: Variations in Learning Style and Communication Nolan Zane, Ph.D. University of California, Davis Department of Psychology.
Culture and Cognition LisaAllisonAronya HarperMenjivar Waller.
Curriculum Design. A Learner Centered Approach May, 2007 By. Rhys Andrews.
Culture and Cognition LisaAllisonAronya HarperMenjivar Waller.
 “Relevant aspects of an interactional or communicative situation”  “Utilizes students’ funds of knowledge and skills as a foundation for new knowledge”
“ Sociology of Education and Didactics- theory of Education ” Thelma de Jager (Educational Studies )
Four Basic Principles to Follow: Test what was taught. Test what was taught. Test in a way that reflects way in which it was taught. Test in a way that.
3-5 March | DBSA | Midrand The National Environmental Skills Summit.
Jenni Parker, Dani Boase-Jelinek Jan Herrington School of Education Murdoch University Western Australia.
1 The SECI model in the Knowledge Management Nasipaniy Vitaliy, Chief specialist of International Relations Department.
What is CLIL? How does CLIL benefit learners?
Assuring quality for the teaching of intercultural communication in Europe: perspectives and challenges Sharon Millar and Célio Conceição.
Relationship orientated cultures
WHAT DOES E-LEARNING MEAN ? THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN ORDER TO : PLAN DISTRIBUTE CHOOSE MANAGE CONSOLIDATE A LEARNING PROCESS.
DEOMI Diversity Competencies
The planning of virtual seminars Project MiLCA Katrin Vogt.
Advanced Language Learners Levels V, VI, VII (2) Using age-appropriate activities, students master novice tasks, expand their ability to perform intermediate.
Managing Across Cultures Cultural differences making a difference –6 Basic cultural variations People’s Nature Relationship to nature Relationship to other.
Section 1 FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS Interplay Interplay, Eleventh Edition, Adler/Rosenfeld/Proctor Copyright © 2010 by Oxford University Press, Inc.
How people learn knowledge in organizations Through which knowledge sharing and creation culture being instilled in learners. In this regard, knowledge.
Culture and Communication
Programming the New Syllabuses (incorporating the Australian Curriculum)
Randall’s ESL Cyber Listening Lab Randall S. Davis
Literacy, the social practices approach and community based learning
ASSESSING THE WHOLE CHILD Creating Powerful Portfolios and Student Led Conferences.
Facilitate Group Learning
Developing networked learner support in UK higher education Perspectives from the NetLinkS project Phil Levy, UK-Nordic Conference 1997.
IB ARTS La Paz Community School. IB learner profile Inquirers: They develop their natural curiosity. They acquire the skills necessary to conduct inquiry.
1CCT200 Week #10: RT Rhon Teruelle Class #9 – November 12, 2012 CCT200: Intercultural Communication Intercultural Communication in the Workplace Cross.
Drama Cultivating Creativity and Individuality. Personal Curriculum Goals Drama curriculum that is forward looking so that student’s earlier learning.
Constructivist Pedagogy in Distance/Online Education Anthony R. Romano, Ph.D.
EMPLOYABILITY SKILLS WORKSHOP PRESENTER: MARIE BAIRD.
Culture learning/ Teaching culture. Culture learning “Culture learning is the process of acquiring the culture-specific and culture-general knowledge,
International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme IB MYP.
Middle Years Programme The unique benefits of the MYP.
Chapter 13 International Human Relations. 2 Learning Objectives 1)Discuss the four major reasons why businesses become multinational companies. 2)Identify.
COURSE AND SYLLABUS DESIGN
Pedagogical aspects in assuring quality in virtual education environments University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Competencies and consequences … choices to make April
Foundation Degree in Business Victoria Hadfield
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Getting the balance of the blend right
How learners and teachers connect online
Developing Leadership Diversity
Improving Instructional Effectiveness
Presentation transcript:

Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments Markus Haag Developing People Internationally Konstanz, Germany - 28 Sep 2007

28 Sep 2007Markus Haag - Developing People Internationally Konstanz Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments Outline 1. Culture and e-learning 2. SECI model 3. Cross-cultural differences of the SECI modes 4. SECI model: impact of culture in e-learning 5. PhD research A Cross-Cultural Perspective

28 Sep 2007Markus Haag - Developing People Internationally Konstanz Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments 1. Culture and e-learning (E-)learning is situated and contextualised, relevant only in a mutually shared and negotiated context (Lave and Wenger, 1991) context is defined by culture context also shaped by individual learning styles and different educational systems Internet: both a culture of its own and created by culture? Hofstede (1986) names the following cross-cultural differences in learning: -- differences in social positions of teachers and students -- differences in the relevance of the curriculum/content -- differences in profiles of cognitive abilities, and -- differences in expected patterns of teacher/student and student/student interaction A Cross-Cultural Perspective

28 Sep 2007Markus Haag - Developing People Internationally Konstanz Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments 2. SECI model -1- SECI: -- four modes of knowledge conversion (socialisation, externalisation, combination, internalisation) -- continuous interaction between explicit and tacit knowledge A Cross-Cultural Perspective socialisationexternalisation internalisationcombination tacit to tacit tacit to explici t explicit to explicit explici t to tacit

28 Sep 2007Markus Haag - Developing People Internationally Konstanz Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments 2. SECI model -2- Integrating the concept of culture into KD in e-learning systems: -- Cultural value dimensions -- Offline learning and its context -- Online learning and its context -- Learning styles (cultural and individual) -- Interpersonal communication across cultures -- E-learning system usability Highly interdependent, becoming more salient or less salient depending on context and situation A Cross-Cultural Perspective

28 Sep 2007Markus Haag - Developing People Internationally Konstanz Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments 3. Cross-cultural differences of the SECI modes – General Culture determines behaviour Problem: different levels of culture national, regional, gender, generation, class, organisational, etc. Ba: a platform for advancing individual [italics by the presenter] and/or collective knowledge (Nonaka and Konno, 1998, p. 40) shared space for knowledge creation cultural context for learning, analogous to the notion of situated learning (Lave and Wenger, 1991) Plurality of ba; ba can be connected to another ba (Nonaka, Toyama and Konno, 2000) difficult to group e-learning processes into one specific ba A Cross-Cultural Perspective

28 Sep 2007Markus Haag - Developing People Internationally Konstanz Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments 3. Cross-cultural differences – Socialisation and originating ba Hypothesis S.1: E-learners from countries high on collectivism prefer to communicate when invited by their in-group to do so, whereas e-learners from countries high on individualism assert their individual opinion openly S.2: E-learners from countries high on collectivism are less likely than e- learners from countries high on individualism to express feelings, emotions and attitudes in online communication S.3: E-learners from a high power-distance culture are less likely than e- learners from a low power-distance culture to challenge the views of e-tutors S.4: E-learners from countries high on individualism focus more on the task in hand whereas e-learners from countries high on collectivism strive to maintain harmonious interpersonal relationships, also at the expense of achieving a task, if necessary A Cross-Cultural Perspective

28 Sep 2007Markus Haag - Developing People Internationally Konstanz Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments 3. Cross-cultural differences – Externalisation and interacting ba Hypothesis E.1: E-learners from countries high on individualism prefer to work through the learning materials on their own, whereas e-learners from countries high on collectivism prefer to work in groups E.2: E-learners from countries high on collectivism are less likely than e- learners from countries high on individualism to criticise peers openly in chats or asynchronous discussion forums E.3: E-learners from a high-context culture feel more uncomfortable than e- learners from a low-context culture when they interact with peers via online channels due to lack of contextual cues A Cross-Cultural Perspective

28 Sep 2007Markus Haag - Developing People Internationally Konstanz Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments 3. Cross-cultural differences – Combination and cyber ba Hypothesis C.1: E-learners from countries high on individualism prefer educational content (texts, videos, quizzes, other exercises, etc.) that tells them the why and how, whereas e-learners from countries high on collectivism prefer to learn the what C.2: E-learners from a high uncertainty avoidance culture prefer structured learning experiences (e.g. a linearly-structured online course), whereas e- learners from a weak uncertainty avoidance culture prefer self-guided and open learning experiences C.3: E-learners from a high power distance culture are more likely to prefer tasks set and discussions moderated by an e-tutor rather than ones peers than e-learners from a low power distance culture A Cross-Cultural Perspective

28 Sep 2007Markus Haag - Developing People Internationally Konstanz Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments 3. Cross-cultural differences – Internalisation and exercising ba Hypothesis I.1: different use of their newly acquired knowledge, expertise and skills, because of different cognitive background and situational context A Cross-Cultural Perspective

28 Sep 2007Markus Haag - Developing People Internationally Konstanz Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments 4. SECI model: impact of culture in e-learning A Cross-Cultural Perspective 0ffline learning and context Learning styles Cultural value dimensions Online learning and context Usability Socialisation (originating ba) Tacit to tacit Hypotheses: S.1, S.2, S.3, S.4 Externalisation (interacting ba) Tacit to explicit Hypotheses: E.1, E.2, E.3 Combination (cyber ba) Explicit to explicit Hypotheses: C.1, C.2, C.3 Internalisation (exercising ba) Explicit to tacit Hypothesis: I.1 Interpersonal communication across cultures

28 Sep 2007Markus Haag - Developing People Internationally Konstanz Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments 5. PhD research focus on knowledge development processes and learning outcomes from the point of view of the learners focus groups, one-to-one interviews, surveys work-in-progress: shift from Hofstede to Schwartz applying and modifying the SECI model for individual knowledge development (as opposed to organisational knowledge creation) Comments / suggestions regarding methodology etc.? A Cross-Cultural Perspective

28 Sep 2007Markus Haag - Developing People Internationally Konstanz Knowledge Development in E-Learning Environments Thank you very much. Contact: A Cross-Cultural Perspective