A TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE NAS FINAL REPORT ON CCB PLACEMENT AT COAL MINES KIMERY C VORIES OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
Advertisements

Deborah Dale, Hydrogeologist OSM-MCR Alton, Illinois
Surface Mining Control Reclamation Act Michael Dashefsky Period: 4 Bodas.
Surface mining control and reclamation act of 1977 Draft Year: 1977 Amendment Years: The Abandoned Mine Reclamation Act of 1990 amended this act. This.
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
Coal Ash Use and Disposal Debra Pflughoeft-Hassett, Associate Gypsum Parameters 20 Fenton Avenue Grand Forks, North Dakota
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT. 1.HAZARDOUS WASTE DEFINITION EPA Definition – General Definition – substance which may be hazardous to humans or.
Coal Combustion Residuals Proposed Regulation Air and Waste Management Association Southern Section August 6, 2010.
SMCRA Surface Mining Reclamation and Control Act of 1977 imposed uniform standards of what was required for reclamation Title II of Act Sets up Office.
S-1925 Subsection t Stakeholder Meeting November 9, :30-2:30pm NJDEP Public Hearing Room 1 st Floor, 401 East State Street Trenton, NJ.
Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule Public Meeting Charlotte Mooney Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
DOE 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010 Loren W. Setlow, CPG Office of Radiation and.
Soil Management Discussion April 24, 2014 MassDEP Waste Site Cleanup Program.
Coal Ash Ponds The Romeo and Juliet Story of Coal Fired Power Plants Society sees them as toxic together, but currently, one cannot exist without the other.
Managing coal combustion residues Information from: Managing Coal Combustion Residues in Mines Committee on Mine Placement of Coal Combustion Wastes,
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 By: Leeron Azoulai The Surface Mining Control and reclamation Act was drafted in 1977 and amended in.
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Kingston Fossil Plant Knoxville.
Environmental Legislation and Agencies Review. Sets a time table for phasing out ozone- depleting substances.
MINING RECLAMATION Jordan Long
SURFACE MINING CONTROL AND RECLAMATION ACT OF 1977 Rosemary Newsome.
SURFACE MINING CONTROL AND RECLAMATION ACT OF 1977 MEERA KOTA-PERIOD 3.
Bob Evans, Director Lexington Field Office Office of Surface Mining Reclamation & Enforcement.
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement MissionEnsure that coal mines are operated in a manner that protects citizens and the environment.
OSM CCB Placement in Coal Mines - Proposed Rulemaking John R. Craynon, P.E. Chief, Division of Regulatory Support Office of Surface Mining Reclamation.
Using the Directives Process to Track EMS Requirements Department of Energy EMS Training Workshop Columbus, OH March 7-8, 2005 Daniel L. McCollum, Quality.
Adem.alabama.gov Coal Combustion Waste Regulation Stephen A. Cobb Governmental Hazardous Waste Branch Land Division.
EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.
CCR Final Rule Utility Perspective on Key Compliance Items
Overview of the Land Recycling Program (Voluntary Cleanup Program)
History Tidbits. Over the years, both the federal and state governments have attempted to tackle Pennsylvania’s AML problem. For example, Pennsylvania.
Lead Based Paint 101 September 2005 Liz Wilde X
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM Land Division Update Chip Crockett Chief, Industrial Hazardous Waste Branch Air & Waste Management Association Southern Section Pine.
EPA’s Proposed CCB Regulations & Morgantown STAR Project 1 Shawn A. Seaman September 27, 2010
Integrated Used Nuclear Fuel Management Regulatory Information Conference U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission March 11, 2009 Steven P. Kraft Senior Director.
MINING Review notes from fossil fuels - coal. MINING Diamond mine, Siberia Largest hole Diamond mine, South Africa Largest hand-dug hole.
Surveys, Proposed Mining Regulations and other things… Presented to ARIPPA on April 24, 2007 by Dave Goss, Executive Director American Coal Ash Association.
SPCC & CCP Issues Jim Roewer APPA E&O Conference April 12, 2006.
Mining. It’s a mineral if it… Is naturally occurring Is an inorganic compound Has specific physical and chemical properties (melting point, density, hardness)
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
Mining & Mineral Resources
1 Draft Final Safe Fill Regulations Major Changes/Revisions Presented to the CSSAB November 8, 2002.
Division of Water Quality Coal Ash Storage, Use, & Disposal: Update Ted L. Bush, Chief Aquifer Protection Section Division of Water Quality “To protect.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and 1989 (RCRA) Alex Chenault Period 4.
David K. Paylor Virginia State Board of Health March 17, 2016.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Why is Coal Ash of Concern and how to assess potential impacts?
Presentation for Office of Surface Mines on Potential Use of the Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework to enhance source terms for use of CCRs in.
The Wilderness Act Permanently protects some lands from development.
All About Waste Dallas, TX ♦ May 18, 2016 Carrie Yonley, P.E.
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE (MSW) Aka: Garbage. Municipal Solid Waste  Aka “trash” or “garbage”  Consists of common household waste, as well as office and.
Department of Environmental Quality Review of 15A NCAC 13A.0101 Hazardous Waste Rules May 12, 2016.
Evan Kane, DWR Ken Pickle, DEMLR Jon RisGAARD, DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
2015 Definition of Solid Waste Rule
Update on EPA Regulatory and Guidance Activities
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Surface Mining Control And Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA)
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (Simon K)
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act
Department of Environmental Quality
Environmental Geotechnics
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA)
Welcome To Our Presentation 1. Topic Name Transfer Stations and Transport, Ultimate Disposal Methods 2.
Branch Organization Chuck Mueller, Branch Chief
2018/2019 Activities. 2018/2019 Activities Revised Regulations - HSRA Reflect changes in scientific understanding since 1994 Provide Consistency in.
May 15, 2018 David Paylor, Director
Presentation transcript:

A TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE NAS FINAL REPORT ON CCB PLACEMENT AT COAL MINES KIMERY C VORIES OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING

PERSPECTIVE ON THE SCIENTIFIC APPROACH OSM 11 YEARS OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFER BASED ON MAXIMIZING CCB EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE NAS 1 YEAR OF INVESTIGATION BASED ON MAXIMIZING LACK OF BIAS BY EXCLUDING CCB EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE

IMPORTANT NAS FINDINGS THAT ARE TECHNICALLY WELL SUPPORTED BY LITERATURE CCB PLACEMENT AT ACTIVE COAL MINES IN SUPPORT OF RECLAMATION COULD BE AN APPROPRIATE OPTION FOR USE/DISPOSAL THE SCOPE OF SMCRA IS BROAD ENOUGH TO COVER CCB PLACEMENT IN SUPPORT OF RECLAMATION

IMPORTANT NAS FINDINGS THAT ARE TECHNICALLY WELL SUPPORTED BY LITERATURE SMCRA SHOULD BE AMENDED TO SPELL OUT SPECIFICALLY WHERE AND HOW THE EXISTING RULES APPLY TO CCB PLACEMENT ON ACTIVE COAL MINES OSM NEEDS TO SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS CCB PLACEMENT AT FEDERALLY FUNDED AML PROJECTS TO ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND ENVIRONMENT

IMPORTANT NAS FINDINGS THAT ARE TECHNICALLY WELL SUPPORTED BY LITERATURE OSM AND EPA NEED TO WORK TOGETHER ON FEDERAL RULEMAKING RELATED TO CCB PLACEMENT AT SMCRA MINES AND FEDERALLY FUNDED AML PROJECTS

IMPORTANT NAS RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS Investigate environmental behavior of CCBs placed at coal mines for protracted time scales over: a range of climates, hydrogeologic settings, CCR types, and mining and reclamation techniques.

IMPORTANT NAS RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS Investigate fate and transport of contaminants from CCBs placed at coal mines and the potential for exposure by humans and biological communities for protracted time scales.

IMPORTANT NAS RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS Investigate the improvement and field validation of leaching tests to better predict the mobilization of constituents from CCBs in the mine settings for comparison with post reclamation water monitoring results.

NAS REPORT LIMITATIONS DOES NOT ADDRESS DATA APPLICABILITY RELATED TO THE WIDE RANGE OF REGULATORY PROGRAMS SMCRA TITLE V ACTIVE COAL MINES SMCRA TITLE IV AML PROJECTS COAL MINE PITS REGULATED UNDER RCRA SOLID WASTE PLACEMENT REGULATED UNDER STATE MINING PROGRAM UTILITY DISPOSAL IN IMPOUNDMENTS AND LANDFILLS UNREGULATED DISPOSAL AREAS NOT RELATED TO COAL MINING

ACTIVE COAL MINE APPLICATIONS UNDER TITLE V SMCRA

ALKALINE SEAL TO PREVENT ACID MINE DRAINAGE

CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL AS COMPACT DURABLE BASE

Mine Road Building (Before Ash)

Mine Road Building (During)

Mine Road Building (After Ash)

NON-TOXIC FILL TO REDUCE RECLAMATION COST

Mine Fill with Ash

ABANDONED MINE LAND APPLICATIONS EITHER SMCRA FUNDED OR STATE FUNDED

ALKALINE FILL FOR ACID AML PIT

SOIL SUBSTITUTE FOR AML RECLAMATION

ASH GROUTING FOR AMD ABATEMENT OR SUBSIDENCE CONTROL

STATE FUNDED AML PROJECTS

Waste Coal Converted to Power

AML Reclamation with FBC Ash

AML Ash and Harbor Dredge Fill (Before)

AML Ash & Harbor Dredge Fill (After Reclamation)

STATE RCRA PROGRAMS NORTH DAKOTA RELEASES FINAL PITS FROM SMCRA MINES UNDER AN INDUSTRIAL LAND USE WHERE IT IS RELEASED AS A SOLID WASTE LANDFILL REGULATED BY THE STATE SOLID WASTE PROGRAM FOR DISPOSAL OF CCBs.

NAS REPORT LIMITATIONS RELIANCE ON NON REPRESENTATIVE EPA DAMAGE CASE DATA WITH NO DEMONSTRATION OF APPLICABILITY TO SMCRA REGULATED MINES NO ADEQUATE ANALYSIS OF VOLUMES OF EXISTING STATE WATER QUALITY MONITORING DATA SHOWING NO DAMAGE ON SMCRA MINES

NAS REPORT LIMITATIONS NO ADEQUATE ANALYSIS OF VOLUMES OF SCIENTIFIC STUDIES SHOWING NO DEGRATION OF WATER QUALITY ON SMCRA MINES

NAS REPORT LIMITATIONS LACK OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF DECADES OF SCIENTIFIC STUDIES RELATED TO COAL MINING BY: U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Combustion By-Products Recycling Consortium DOE researchers at the National Energy Technology Laboratory Energy and Environment Research Center at the University of North Dakota Center of Applied Energy Research at University of Kentucky University of Ohio Southern Illinois University at Carbondale Penn State University West Virginia University and CCB scientists and mining experts who wrote134 articles published in 6 technical interactive forum proceedings by the Office of Surface Mining over the period 1996 to 2005

CURRENT FEDERAL RULEMAKING INITIATIVES LATE 2006 EPA WILL PUBLISH A NOTICE OF DATA AVAILABILITY CONCERNING RULEMAKING FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS AND LANDFILLS. A VOLUNTARY ACTION PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE UTILITIES WILL BE INCLUDED.

CURRENT FEDERAL RULEMAKING INITIATIVES LATE 2006 OSM WILL PUBLISH A NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING TO WRITE CCB SPECIFIC RULES FOR SMCRA REQUESTING PUBLIC COMMENT.

CURRENT FEDERAL RULEMAKING INITIATIVES SPRING 2007 OSM WILL PUBLISH A PROPOSED RULE FOR SMCRA TITLE IV AND V UNDER EXISTING AUTHORITY SPRING 2008 OSM WILL PUBLISH A FINAL RULE FOR SMCRA TITLE IV AND V UNDER EXISTING AUTHORITY