Public Participation in Community Decision-Making

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slides have references to related pages in the Guide
Advertisements

NCRSC Leadership Workshop June 14, 2008
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
William H. Bowen School of Law. service – learning program of two schools UALR Bowen School of Law University of Arkansas Clinton School of Public Service.
Twelve Cs for Team Building
Growing Leadership Capacity in the face of continuous and complex #rethinkingleadership.
Leading by Convening: The Power of Authentic Engagement
INITIAL ON BOARDING COACHING
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
A Brief Overview of the Process. Why CTAP? During the development of the Salem to Manchester project, the public raised issues relative to growth. The.
Public Engagement in a Multi-Stakeholder World Don Lenihan June 2008.
2012 Indiana 4-H Congress Doug Keenan, 4-H Youth Development Extension Educator.
Partnerships, Partnerships, Partnerships… How can they work for you? Presented by: Carolyn Evancio and Melanie Vance Strengthening Healthy School Communities.
What is Teamwork & Team Building Team work : Concept of people working together as a team. Team Player : A team player is someone who is able to get.
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
School-Community Relations. Learning Outcomes (School-Community Relations) Students are able to: Students are able to: Explain the meaning of meaningful.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Healthy Cities / Healthy Communities.
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Oral Health in Maryland Florida Oral Health Conference The Nuts and Bolts of Coalitions August 23, 2012 Penny Anderson, M.S.W. Executive Director.
Co-op Development Training Program Starting September, 2011 Information Session July 8, 2011.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Guidance in Structuring a Communities of Practice.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
California HIV/AIDS Community Engagement Design Summit March 18 & 19, 2009 Los Angeles.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
A Guide for Navigators 1National Disability Institute.
Develop your Leadership skills
CHCCD412A Cluster 1.  s/pdf_file/0006/54888/CHAPS_Community- Services-Pathway-Flyer_v 4.pdf
Multidisplinary Approach.. What are your expectations Write on board.
Collaborating to Sustain a Healthy Community January 28, 2015.
Local Government Programming In-service October 22 & 23, 2014 Deliberative Governance: Civil Discourse and Public Engagement Presented by Bill Rizzo Professor.
African American Outreach: NAMI Tennessee Presented by: Clarence Jordan Operations Officer NAMI National Convention June 28, 2006.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
Headwaters Communities in Action Building A Better Quality of Life Together.
Inspire Personal Skills Interpersonal & Organisational Awareness Developing People Deliver Creative Thinking & Problem Solving Decision Making, Prioritising,
School Health Councils Samantha Heard Executive Board Member, MASH Physical Education Chair, AFHK State Health Systems Director, ACS.
Best Practices in Partnering Julia King Tamang
Community Board Orientation 6- Community Board Orientation 6-1.
Collaborative Leadership National PTA Diversity Committee.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
Defending Childhood Protect Heal Thrive January 25-27, 2011 Sandra Spencer Executive Director National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health.
Redevelopment of the Georgia-Pacific Mill Site, Fort Bragg, CA. Options and Alternatives for Public Participation in the Planning Process Neil Peacock.
Presented by: Steve Litke, Fraser Basin Council Winnipeg, Manitoba June 18, 2012 Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Governance – Lessons from BC.
Module V: Writing Your Sustainability Plan Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 © 2011.
Healthy Cities / Healthy Communities
Bear Creek OR 1976 Bear Creek OR Burro Creek AZ 1981 Burro Creek AZ 2000.
Ready to Raise PowerPoint Resource The Work of Early Years Community Developers Please feel free to adapt these PowerPoint slides to your needs. Credit.
COMMUNITY RESOURCE MAPPING Train the Trainer MAST - NH December 15, 2006 Facilitated by: Kelli Crane.
FINAL PRESENTATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR AND ANALYSIS Prepared for : Dr. S. Kumar Group : Dollar 2 A. R. S. BANDARA - PGIA / 06 / 6317 B. A. G. K.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
A Relational Model of Leadership. Process Oriented InclusiveEmpowering Purposeful Ethical.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
What is Facilitation? Facilitation is the process of taking a group through learning or change in a way that encourages all members of the group to participate.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Understanding Cultural Planning Considering a Cultural Plan for Erie and Niagara Counties Impact and Issues Presented to the Greater Buffalo Cultural Alliance.
© BLR ® —Business & Legal Resources 1408 Teambuilding for All Employees.
Board Chair Responsibilities As a partner to the chief executive officer (CEO) and other board members, the Board Chair will provide leadership to Kindah.
SIX PLUS ONE COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTATION MODEL OF PARENT ENGAGEMENT = 7.
Developing and Organizing Leadership Committees Jim Rhodes, Ag/4-H Youth Development Major County.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
WHO WE ARE Spark Ventures exists to form partnerships with high-impact organizations around the world that help vulnerable children achieve their potential.
- sport policies and programs
Development THE NEW NAME IN TOWN.
Implementing Country Guidelines for Coordination & Information-Sharing
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
Positions Positions are...
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
Healthy Cities / Healthy Communities
Presentation transcript:

Public Participation in Community Decision-Making CTAP Conference September 29, 2007 Jim Gruber, Antioch New England Institute Michele Gagne, UNH Cooperative Extension Charlie French, UNH Cooperative Extension Dan Reidy, UNH Cooperative Extension

Why Engage the Public? To identify and assist in addressing community needs To educate and empower citizens so they can more fully understand the complexities of issues you must address To educate decision-makers To broaden the asset base To make implementation more likely by building ownership of the citizens on the agreed upon approach To build accountability and effective feedback We have several projects ongoing with WIU and SIU, and C-FAR crosses university boundaries.

Different Approaches of Community Engagement for Different Purposes Is the purpose… Community Building? Public Information? Deliberation? Decision Making?

Structure the Public Participation Process Determine the purpose of the Process Determine the Role of the Public Identify and Involve Key Stakeholders Determine how to engage the public Develop a process Build Accountability (how will info be used) We have several projects ongoing with WIU and SIU, and C-FAR crosses university boundaries.

Public Participation Approaches Strategic Planning Community Visioning (Vision to Action) Interest-Based Problem Solving Citizen Advisory Committees

Strategic Planning Advantages Challenges Strategic planning enables a group to come to a shared vision of its desired future and to create a detailed, participant-owned plan of action. Advantages Brings community together around issues Results-oriented process Addresses both short and long-term issues Components of plan adoptable by other plans Challenges Requires skilled facilitator Participants may get frustrated with the process There is not always consensus re objectives and strategies Results may be long term

Vision “Dream” of where the community/group wants to be far in the future Example: Our town is committed to improving the quality of life for our residents by building a community in which all people have access to economic opportunity, the ability to pursue that opportunity, and a voice in the decisions that affect their lives.

Mission The “what” and “why” Example: To build a healthy community through a comprehensive initiative to promote jobs, education, and housing

Objectives The how much of “what” will be accomplished by “when” Example: Quality Affordable Housing is housing that is free of significant structural defects, meets the basic living needs of residents, and is reasonably safe and secure. To be “affordable,” the cost to live in quality housing should be within the financial reach of residents (30 percent of income) at various income levels. Quality affordable housing must be profitable for the builder, developer, landlord, etc., or it will not be built and/or maintained.

Strategies and Actions The “how” and specifics of who will do what and when Examples: The City of ---- should enforce existing health and building codes encouraging rental property owners to recognize problems and take action. Form a committee to determine problem areas in town and report this back to town committees by March 2008 Selectmen will make a determination after hearing report about expanding code enforcement officer hours to full-time by town meeting 2008

Advantages Challenges Community Visioning…the first step of a vision-to-action process This approach can be used to either “map” the current condition (called a mind map) or to create a shared, collective vision of the future. Advantages Builds a broad ownership of where the community wishes to go Sets broad priorities of the created vision Inclusive…100s can participate in one hour Challenges Must have a broad cross-section of the community “in the room” Must have a plan to translate the vision into tangible objectives and actions This is only the 1st step

Step One: The Vision Map Twenty Years form now….if there is sustained growth…How do you want your community to look, to feel, to have as a home?

The Vision Map Develop a shared vision of where you want to be in 20 years based upon: the characteristics of your community that you value and wish to sustain changes you wish to encourage and changes that you wish to discourage prioritize key elements of the vision

Step Two Review previous successful (and unsuccessful) approaches, actions, and events that were effective (or not effective) with planning, managing, and directing growth. Assess resources currently lacking that are needed to plan for growth.

Step 3 Translate the Vision Map into prioritized objectives Identify existing barriers that are in the way of achieving these objectives (economic, political, social, organizations, knowledge, etc.) Develop preferred strategies/ approaches that are most likely to address these barriers

Step 4 Identify the specific types of resources/ strategies that are needed to fill the gap between the current resources of local government and what are needed to achieve the shared vision (prioritized objectives) Revise community’s master plan, capital budget, and other actions needed to proceed towards prioritized objectives

Ground Rules Rules: All ideas are valid The person with the idea says where it goes Give an example to clarify Everyone has one contribution before a second contribution to the vision Opposing ideas are OK

Interest Based Problem Solving Interest-Based Problem Solving is an issue-resolution process that addresses individual and group differences in a problem-solving environment. Advantages Focuses on common interests – win-win Fosters creativity Solutions weighed with objective criteria Builds leadership Challenges Not all issues can be resolved Process can be frustrating and take a long time Some parties intentionally work to corrupt process

When you hear the word “conflict” what images come to mind?

Positive aspects of public conflict: Mutual gains solutions Addresses problems and promotes action Builds long-term relationships Stimulates creativity Strengthens democracy Leadership emerges

Positions Are… Emotions – how someone feels about an issue A pre-determined solution

Problems with positions: Predetermined way to resolve problems. Does not deal with interest of parties in dispute Limits creative options.

Interests are… Needs, beliefs, values behind the positions. Why something is important.

Why focus on interests? Gets to heart of issue. Moves people beyond polarized positions. Sets stage for mutual understanding. Leads to group cooperation. Sets stage for issue re-framing. Sets stage for generating creative options.

Examples of interests & positions: Community pride Value historic school Educational quality Cost-efficiency Educational quality Stretch resources Interests Want school consolidation Oppose school consolidation Positions

Citizen Advisory Committee Citizen advisory committees foster positive relations with the community by engaging citizens in the development of policies and programs to ensure that they are enriched by diverse perspectives. Advantages Diverse representation Based on local assets Directly engages citizens in policy-making Challenges Committees often don’t have jurisdictional power Requires much time/effort Can suffer low return rates We have several projects ongoing with WIU and SIU, and C-FAR crosses university boundaries.

How are they helpful? Help anticipate public reaction to proposed decisions Provide communication to constituencies Organize a forum for building consensus The advisory committee becomes more educated and their feedback is more informed

When are they used? Master Plans Representative of various groups in community with a chair to coordinate meetings and report back to town boards Can work to develop public involvement opportunities for Plan update

Even More Approaches to Engage Community Members Search Conferences Collaborative Decision Making Study Circles Deliberative Dialogue Public Information Outreach Citizen Surveys Youth Involvement Programs Public Listening District Council Community Celebrations Volunteerism (See handout for a description)

Further Resources re Public Participation Tools: Asset Mapping: http://ctb.ku.edu/tools/en/sub_section_main_1043.htm Concerns Survey: http://ctb.ku.edu/tools/en/sub_section_main_1018.htm Needs Survey: http://ctb.ku.edu/tools/en/sub_section_main_1042.htm Focus Groups: http://ctb.ku.edu/tools/en/sub_section_main_1045.htm Interviews: http://ctb.ku.edu/tools/en/sub_section_main_1047.htm Public Forums: http://ctb.ku.edu/tools/en/sub_section_main_1021.htm

Break Out Activity

Strategies for Enhancing Public Participation An Example: Involving the public in a community master plan and capital budget planning and implementation process

Specific Goals All approaches should support overall community building and… Informs the Public (provides public information) Solicits input from the public (that includes public deliberation processes) Engages the public in “the work” (including the decision making process)

Three Break-out Groups Group A) Informs the Public (MG facilitates) Group B) Soliciting Input from the Public (JG facilitates) Group C) Engaging the Public “In the Work” (CF facilitates)

Impact vs Feasibility Each group brainstorms potential, specific approaches of engaging the public including: both what your can do and how you can do it. Each approach is written on a sticky note. Each sticky note is placed on an “Impact vs Feasibility Grid” (Low, Medium, or High” feasibility and Low, Medium, and High Impact”